Introduction More delays for Flavio. Visa appointment in Mexico for Jan 9 th 2008. Likely start date: Second half of Jan. MIRS 3 rd Release delivered on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Configuration management
Advertisements

Configuration management
Creating Elluminate Live! Recordings Best Practices.
Page 1GlobColour CDR Meeting – July 10-11, 2006, ESRIN All rights reserved © 2006, ACRI-ST Resulting Technical Specification.
Status of Operational Implementation of MIRS V2.0 at OSDPD Limin Zhao, Aiwu Li and Jiang Zhao April 18, 2008.
Software Delivery. Software Delivery Management  Managing Requirements and Changes  Managing Resources  Managing Configuration  Managing Defects 
Software to Manage EEP Vegetation Plot Data A design proposal Michael Lee January 31, 2011.
Illinois Institute of Technology
Applied Software Project Management Andrew Stellman & Jennifer Greene Applied Software Project Management Applied Software.
Low level CASE: Source Code Management. Source Code Management  Also known as Configuration Management  Source Code Managers are tools that: –Archive.
1 CMPT 275 Software Engineering Revision Control.
Software Testing Test Design and Implementation. Agenda Test Design Test Implementation Test Design Sources Automated Testing 2.
Application Process USAJOBS – Application Manager USA STAFFING ® —OPM’S AUTOMATED HIRING TOOL FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES.
How to Get The Most Out of Outlook 2003 Michele Schwartzman Division of Customer Support Summer 2006.
Slide 1 of 9 Presenting 24x7 Scheduler The art of computer automation Press PageDown key or click to advance.
TNKids Duplicate Social Security Number. The following graphics are designed to help you to navigate through this Computer Based Training. The navigational.
Chapter Seven Advanced Shell Programming. 2 Lesson A Developing a Fully Featured Program.
ITIS 1210 Introduction to Web-Based Information Systems Chapter 48 How Internet Sites Can Invade Your Privacy.
Pragmatic Projects Prepared by Doug Glidden. Pragmatic Projects Pragmatic Teams Ubiquitous Automation Ruthless Testing It’s All Writing Great Expectations.
September 23-24, 2014Dawn Conway, AMSR-E / AMSR2 TLSCF Lead Software Engineer AMSR-E / AMSR2 Team Lead Science Computing Facility TLSCF at UAH Dr. Roy.
Software Engineering Modern Approaches
Let’s Make An Form! Bonney Armstrong GD 444 Westwood College February 9, 2005.
Project Source Code Structure and Build Process ● Remember consistency matters as source code structure, build process, and release processes are all intertwined.
Automating Tasks with Visual Basic. Introduction  When can’t find a readymade macro action that does the job you want, you can use Visual Basic code.
Rsv-control Marco Mambelli – Site Coordination meeting October 1, 2009.
By Anthony W. Hill & Course Technology1 Common End User Problems.
Nightly Releases and Testing Alexander Undrus Atlas SW week, May
1 Software Development Configuration management. \ 2 Software Configuration  Items that comprise all information produced as part of the software development.
LiveCycle Data Services Introduction Part 2. Part 2? This is the second in our series on LiveCycle Data Services. If you missed our first presentation,
Step By Step Windows Server 2003 Installation Guide Step By Step Windows Server 2003 Installation Guide.
Version control Using Git Version control, using Git1.
Status of MIRS Updates Kevin Garrett and Sid-Ahmed Boukabara MIRS Meeting February 15, 2008.
Exploring an Open Source Automation Framework Implementation.
25 June 2009 Dawn Conway, AMSR-E TLSCF Lead Software Engineer AMSR-E Team Leader Science Computing Facility.
Slide 12.1 Chapter 12 Implementation. Slide 12.2 Learning outcomes Produce a plan to minimize the risks involved with the launch phase of an e-business.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 POES Microwave Products Presented.
HDF-EOS at NOAA/NESDIS NOAA / NESDIS / ORA orbit-net.nesdis.noaa.gov/arad2/MSPPS Huan Meng, Doug Moore, Limin Zhao, Ralph Ferraro NOAA / NESDIS.
A Technical Validation Module for the offline Auger-Lecce, 17 September 2009  Design  The SValidStore Module  Example  Scripting  Status.
T Project Review Sotanorsu I3 Iteration
Feb. 8, 2008 UHCO Graduate Course in MATLAB Core Programming Module Best Practices Core Grant Programming Module Best Practices (Coding Conventions) General.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.1.
29 th Operational-MIRS Meeting June 12 th 2009 K. Garrett, F. Iturbide-Sanchez, C. Grassotti, and W. Chen.
Finalizing the AMSR-E Rainfall Algorithm GPROF2010 AMSR-E Science Team Meeting Oxnard, CA 4-5 September, 2013 Dave Randel Colorado State University.
G.Govi CERN/IT-DB 1 September 26, 2003 POOL Integration, Testing and Release Procedure Integration  Packages structure  External dependencies  Configuration.
MIIDAPS Application to GSI for QC and Dynamic Emissivity in Passive Microwave Data Assimilation.
16-17 September 2015 Dawn Conway, AMSR-E / AMSR2 TLSCF Lead Software Engineer AMSR-E / AMSR2 Team Lead Science Computing Facility TLSCF at UAH Dr. Roy.
T Project Review Muuntaja I1 Iteration
Advanced Task Engine Doing Cool Stuff with Cool stuff!
1 CSC160 Chapter 1: Introduction to JavaScript Chapter 2: Placing JavaScript in an HTML File.
14 th Operational-MIRS Meeting May 2 nd Agenda MIRS Status [Sid] Operational Status [OSDPD] Validation & Fine Tuning [Kevin] Quality Control [Flavio]
MIRS Science and other Updates S.-A. Boukabara and K. Garrett.
Software Test Plan Why do you need a test plan? –Provides a road map –Provides a feasibility check of: Resources/Cost Schedule Goal What is a test plan?
Emissivity-Based Products: Current Status and Plans MIRS Monthly Meeting 3 October 2008 C. Grassotti.
Nextgen Bank Reconciliation Resource Bank Reconciliation Menu Financial Management Bank Reconciliation –Import Bank Statements –Reconcile Bank Accounts.
Text2PTO: Modernizing Patent Application Filing A Proposal for Submitting Text Applications to the USPTO.
Instructional Design Center Editing Files Using Google Docs.
21 st Operational-MIRS Meeting October 3 rd 2008.
1 CAA 20 th Cross Calibration Meeting, MPS, Gottingen 16th Oct 2014 CAA Cross Cal Meeting Oct 2014 Pipeline Automation Chris Perry.
SWE 434 SOFTWARE TESTING AND VALIDATION LAB2 – INTRODUCTION TO JUNIT 1 SWE 434 Lab.
Project Work Order Generator
Data Virtualization Tutorial: Introduction to SQL Script
USAJOBS – Application Manager
Online Software Status
Maintaining software solutions
Design and Programming
Course: Module: Lesson # & Name Instructional Material 1 of 32 Lesson Delivery Mode: Lesson Duration: Document Name: 1. Professional Diploma in ERP Systems.
Test Case Test case Describes an input Description and an expected output Description. Test case ID Section 1: Before execution Section 2: After execution.
Software Verification, Validation, and Acceptance Testing
CSE 1020:Software Development
Presentation transcript:

Introduction More delays for Flavio. Visa appointment in Mexico for Jan 9 th Likely start date: Second half of Jan. MIRS 3 rd Release delivered on December 15 th as scheduled The following slides present the main features of this release and the latest developments since pre-release

What to expect in this 3 rd release New algorithms implemented for the surface properties (SWE, SIC, Snow Cover) based on emissivity New parameters delivered for testing purposes (Snow effective grain size, Multi-Year, First-Year Sea ice concentrations, Surface Type) Improved Science (Footprint matching, Bias correction, Preclassification, First-Guess from Regression, NEDT computation) Higher convergence rates over all surfaces System/Format changes to account for OSDPD feedback System/Format changes to accommodate new products

Science Updates Non-Convergence Non-convergence was handled by a number of things: -Use of first guess -Implementation of range checking -measures for emissivity

Science Updates Footprint Matching Automatic synchronization Manual synchronization Synchronization (or geolocation) issues between AMSU and MHS We reverted back to manual synchronization Drawback: we might see again missing scanlines

Science Updates New Algorithms for Surface Properties Based on MIRS emissivities Use physical model Comparison to MSPPS and to IMS See Cezar’s presentation

Science Updates(5/8) New Products (not officially delivered) Case of Sea Ice Concentration First-Year SIC Multi-Year SIC Total Sea Ice

Science Updates(6/8) New Products (not officially delivered) Case of Snow Snow Water Equivalent Snow Effective Grain Size Snow Cover (by product)

DescriptionCommentsStatus 1 Non zero exit code should be issued for any abnormal exit. [Interpretation: All BASH scripts exits should have error codes returned.] Most of exits had returned codes. A few did not have any. This was fixed. OK 2 Error code check need be added for script functions at each step [Interpretation: Test the status returned after each step (script)] Script functions have been tested but internally. Added tests in scripts to check status of execution in each step. OK 3 Op_msg should only be used for fatal errors This was the case for all F90 codes. Pb was with script functions. All script functions do now use op_msg only for fatal errors and echo for the rest. OK 4 Other error messages for monitoring or diagnostics purpose should be re-directed to another log file (non- zero but not 99). [Same as item3] Needs clarification (assumed to be same as item 3) OK Handling Feedback from OSDPD (1/3)

DescriptionCommentsStatus 5 Set-up “lock” to allow only one orbital processing per satellite to avoid duplicated jobs or competition for resources. This is implemented in OSDPD using wrapper. The same wrapper could be used for newer versions of MIRS. OK 6 A non-zero return code should be issued when no footprint match data found or the number of the retrieved Profiles is zero When no valid FM profiles found, process returns code to script. OK 7 QC check for radiance using scanline quality flag provided in 1b Needs clarification. Not sure we understand the meaning of this remark. Assumed related to the zero-valid scanlines issue. Problem fixed at the RDR2TDR level. OK Note: Let us know if meant something else. 8 Can scanline information be saved? – lack of this information would put drawback on data provided and limits/impacts for users to use exist visualization tools Scanline # added from footprint matching to EDR and DEP files. Note that there might be gaps if scanline is missing or mis- synchronization found. OK Handling Feedback from OSDPD (2/3)

DescriptionCommentsStatus 9 Directory structures, file name conversion should be Simple, unique and consistent crossing sensors and satellites. The MIRS package controls all directory structure through setup file (PCF), making it possible to use any directory structure wished by user. We have streamlined many directories (see next item). If needed, directory structure could be further changed through PCF (Paths and Configuration File). OK 10 Unique Sat_ID and sensor_ID are recommended to be added in the name conversion for sensor or satellite dependent subroutine, static files, scripts, load modules and makefile Convention used previously (satId_sensorId) for sensor- specific scripts, executables, Inputs and Control Files. Now extended to all Static (Cov, CRTM, Nedt, Antennas, etc), Semi-Static data (Regression, Bias) and src/ files as well when sensor specific items are needed. OK Note: For makefiles, we use standard procedure in software industry (tree-type generic makefiles for all applications. No sensor names in makefiles) 11 Using color code or turn the track tool on to allow the changes be clearly tracked for each version. -OK 12 Make sure are the content of docs are consistent with the codes and data delivered. -OK 13 A set of Word Docs with the changes identified should be delivered to OSDPD if the.pdf files are preferred in the DAP for public. -OK Handling Feedback from OSDPD (3/3)

Work Accomplished Since pre- release (Dec 15 th 2007) Further validation of the surface properties (SWE, SIC) [See Cezar’s presentation] Documentation Updates Finalization of the update to the first guess Finalization of the validation of the sounding Finalization of the new features of the system monitoring tool (scientific monitoring comprised of comparisons to GDAS and MSPPS)

MIRS Web site Central piece of the (1) MIRS quality monitoring but also of (2) the scientific validation of all products and (3) scientific improvement See Web site demo –Number of iterations added –SWE, SIC (and derived products) added –More sounding layers added for monitoring –Sounding validation wrt GDAS