SWAT Modeling and Monitoring of Priority Watersheds- Phase III

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
Advertisements

Water Quality Assessment of Osage Creek & West Fork, White and Kings Rivers 2008 & ½ 2009 Marc Nelson PhD, PE Nelson Engineering.
Effects of Conservation Tillage Systems on Dissolved Phosphorus Dr. David Baker Heidelberg University Tiffin, Ohio November 15, 2012 Davenport, IA.
Streamflow and Water-Quality Monitoring in Support of Watershed Model Development, Potomac River Basin A Cooperative Project between the U.S. Geological.
UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
SWAT Model Study for Illinois River Drainage Area (IRDA) in Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service Presented by: Dharmendra Saraswat Co-Authors: M. Daniels,
Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Adam Freihoefer Wisconsin Department of Natural.
LTHIA – Upgrades and Training Bernard A. Engel Tong Zhai Larry Theller Agricultural and Biological Department Purdue University In conjunction.
Comprehensive Watershed Modeling for 12- digit HUC Priority Watersheds – Phase II P RESENTED BY : N ARESH P AI PI: Dharmendra Saraswat Collaborator: Mike.
Continuous Hydrologic Simulation of Johnson Creek Basin and Assuming Watershed Stationarity Rick Shimota, P.E. Hans Hadley, P.E., P.G. The Oregon Water.
Influence of Catchment Characteristics on Stream Nitrogen Transport to the Hood Canal Osborne, S.N.; Brett, M.T.; Richey, J.E.; Steinberg, P.D.; Newton,
Surface Water Simulation Group. Comprehensive watershed scale model developed and supported by the USDA-ARS capable of simulating surface and groundwater.
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution and Water Quality as a function of Land Management Practices on Four Kansas Farms William W. Spotts Dr. Donald Huggins.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
Water Quality Trends across 319 Monitoring Sites Brian E. Haggard Director, Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC.
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
Watershed Modeling and GIS Applications Jeff Arnold ARS- Temple, Texas.
8-Digit HUC Watershed Prioritization in Arkansas - Risk Assessment Matrix Approach 2014 Update Threatened and Endangered (T&E) Species Dharmendra Saraswat,
NASA IDS project meeting: Precipitation and LULC change datasets Hongjie Xie The University of Texas at San Antonio March 19, 2009 at Texas A&M, Corpus.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Modeling experience of non- point pollution: CREAMS (R. Tumas) EPIC (A. Povilaitis and R.Tumas SWRRBWQ (A. Dumbrauskas and R. Tumas) AGNPS (Sileika and.
1 Evaluating and Estimating the Effect of Land use Changed on Water Quality at Selorejo Reservoir, Indonesia Mohammad Sholichin Faridah Othman Shatira.
112.3 Jessica L. Feeser, M. Elise Lauterbur & Jennifer L. Soong Research Project for Systems Ecology (ENVS 316), Fall ’06 Oberlin College, Oberlin OH BackgroundFindings.
Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.
Cache River Monitoring Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
Best Management Practices- A Decision Making Framework Presented by: Dharmendra Saraswat Co-Authors: Naresh Pai and Mike Daniels ANRC.
Subwatershed Prioritization in Arkansas - A Modeling Approach Presented by: Dharmendra Saraswat Co-Authors: N. Pai, M. Daniels, and M. Leh ANRC Task Force.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part II – SWMM Water Quality Calibration Maryland Department of the Environment.
Larkin Creek Phase II Project Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part II – Water Quality Maryland Department of the Environment.
S TREBAND C LOUD : A TOOL FOR CONSERVATION PLANNERS Picture of White River near Flippin, AR, by James Powers Project No ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
SWAT Modeling for Subwatershed Prioritization Presented by: Dharmendra Saraswat Co-Authors: N. Pai, M. Daniels, and M. Leh 2010 Non Point Source Project.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in L’Anguille River Watershed and Deep Bayou Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
SWAT Modeling of Priority Watershed- Phase II 2013 NPS Conference – September 19, 2013 Dharmendra Saraswat Assoc. Prof,/Ext. Engineer- Geospatial
Brian Haggard Director Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC through Beaver Water District.
Willow Lake Cobb Gauge site Sample site Mesonet site For more information: We gratefully acknowledge.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
Annual Membership Meeting Water Quality Report 2010
Modeling Source-water Contributions to Streamflow
Phil R. Busteed, Research Engineer Daniel E. Storm, Professor
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Cache River Monitoring
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
2010 Updates Dharmendra Saraswat & Tom Riley
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Water Quality Monitoring Update – Summary August 15, 2017.
Larkin Creek Phase II Project
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
URBAN NON-POINT SOURCE NUTRIENT IMPACTS
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring Project S
Monitoring Water Quality in Impaired Watersheds
Middle Cache River Monitoring
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
Presentation transcript:

SWAT Modeling and Monitoring of Priority Watersheds- Phase III Project No.13-600 SWAT Modeling and Monitoring of Priority Watersheds- Phase III Dharmendra Saraswat, Ph.D. Assoc. Prof,/Ext. Engineer- Geospatial 501-681-5987 (mobile) dsaraswat@uaex.edu Mike Daniels, Ph.D. Professor and Statewide Water Quality Specialist Brian Haggard, Ph.D. Professor and Director, AWRC Tom Riley Director, Public Policy Center ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

Prioritize 12-digit HUCs using SWAT model output Objective Project Objective Prioritize 12-digit HUCs using SWAT model output ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

Lower Ouachita Smackover Watershed Watershed Profile Lower Ouachita Smackover Watershed Area: 1797 sq. mi. Land-use: Forest (94%) Pasture (3%) Urban (2%) Water (1%) Elevation: 202 ft. (mean) Slope: 37% area under 3-8% slope Soil: 83% area under group C/D Precipitation: 52 inch (mean) ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

Watershed Profile Cache River Watershed Area: 1956 sq. mi. Land-use: Water (2%) Pasture (3%) Urban (3%) Barren (3%) Forest (25%) Crops (64%) Elevation: 351 ft. (mean) Slope: 48% area under 0-1 % slope Soil: 36% area under group C/D Precipitation: 35 inches (mean) ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

Overall Project Approach Precipitation PBIAS NSE R2 RSR Temperature Calibration/ Validation SWAT Check Nutrient init. SWAT Prioritization (Flow-weighted concentration) Soils Land-use/ management practices Point Sources Topography ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

SWAT Model Setup: Spatial Data Boundary (12-digit HUC) Elevation (DEM-5 m) Soil Map (SSURGO) Landuse (92, 99, 01, 04, 06) Streams (NHD) Weather (NEXRAD, Gages) ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

SWAT Model Setup: Tabular Data Management Data Crop rotation Timing & frequency of tillage Planting date Harvesting date Timing and rate of fertilizer application Irrigation Pesticides SWAT 2012 Cropping practices for each county Point source discharge (ADEQ) ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

Quality Control SWAT Check Input Data Errors Initial Model Development Problems Improper Parameter Adjust During Calibration Process not Properly Represented Known SWAT Model application Errors ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

Water Quality Monitoring in the Lower Ouachita-Smackover Watershed ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

objective (1) Better understand how water quality changes across headwater sub-water sheds draining different land use mixes (2) Estimate nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and sediment loads at select sites where active USGS stage and discharge monitoring stations exist. ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

Overall goal The knowledge attained from this project will help validate the SWAT modeling output, and improve the level of confidence that we have in the sub-watershed prioritizations based on the SWAT output. ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

procedure USE AWRC PROTOCOL Collect over 250 water samples from 21 sites in Lower Ouachita-Smackover Watershed starting November 2013 through October 2014. The routine, monthly sampling will be used to understand how physicochemical properties change in relation to the mix of catchment land use. Collect storm samples from 2 USGS sites. -Moro Creek, Fordyce, AR -Smackover Creek, Smackover, AR ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

Sampling sites Sites Moro Creek Caynes Creek Ouachita River Haynes Creek Holmes Creek Smackover Creek Camp Creek Sloan Creek Gum Creek South Bayou North Bayou Two Bayou Hussey Creek Locust Bayou Champagnolle Creek Bryant Creek ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

Storm sampling What we’re doing Usage of Alpha Meter Online USGS discharge data at Moro Creek and Smackover Creek used to determine when to grab storm samples. 1) one of the rising limb 2) one near peak 3) one on the falling limb ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

Storm sampling Grab 2 Grab 3 Grab 1 ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

**Distance covered (miles) Storm sampling-efforts Month Moro Creek Smackover Creek # of samples a month **Distance covered (miles) Nov. 2013 3 1 4 1,593 Dec. 2013 2 5 1,717 Jan. 2014 8 2,347 Feb. 2014 7 11 2,540 Mar. 2014 15 2,800 Apr. 2014 16 14 30 5,052 May. 2014 6 3,809 Jun. 2014 12 27 5,015 Jul. 2014 10 3,941 Aug. 2014 3,975 Sept. 2014   Total 71 75 146 32,789 **Distance includes trips to Fayetteville, AR for sample analysis. ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

What are we doing in the lab TASKS Water Samples from the 21 Sites and Storm Sampling Process water samples, filtering a portion and saving raw water. Testing for the following: Conductivity Nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), Total nitrogen (TN) Soluble reactive phosphorus (SPR) Total phosphorus (TP) Total suspended solids (TSS) Turbidity (NTU) Include appropriate lab quality assurance & control, like spikes, duplicates, and blanks Water samples were delivered to the lab within 48 hours. ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

Preliminary results Moro Creek Storm Sampling Precipitation (inches) -Nov. 2013=4.82 -Dec. 2013=7.45 -Jan. 2014= 1.69 -Feb. 2014=3.95 -Mar.2014=4.37 -Apr. 2014=6.02 -May.2014=5.28 -Jun. 2014= 2.98 -Jul.2014 =3.21 -Aug.2014=5.83 Total=45.6 in Nutrient -NO3 rises increases as discharges rises. -PO4 remains constant. Sediment -TSS and Turbidity increases as discharges increases. - There is more TSS than Turbidity with heavy precipitation. On average, it takes 48-72 hours from rising limb to falling limb to be collected. Average peaks were 4-8 hours. ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

Preliminary results Smackover Creek Storm Sampling Precipitation (inches) -Nov. 2013=5.01 -Dec. 2013=6.56 -Jan. 2014= 1.16 -Feb. 2014=3.42 -Mar.2014=3.99 -Apr. 2014=5.64 -May.2014=7.63 -Jun. 2014= 3.06 -Jul.2014 =2.86 -Aug.2014=2.36 Total=41.7 in Nutrient -NO3 rises as discharges rises, but tends to decrease the longer discharge flow. -PO4 increases as discharges rises. Sediment -TSS and Turbidity increases as discharges increases and they typically remain in sync with one another. On average, it takes 72 hours from rising limb to falling limb to be collected. Average peaks were 10 hours. ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014

Acknowledgements Henry Green- Program Technician Gurdeep Singh, Eeshan Kumar, and Mouli Koppolu- GRA ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program Review Meeting, September 18, 2014