GERB-2 V999 Unfiltering Nicolas Clerbaux & RMIB GERB Team. GIST 24, Imperial College, London 15 december 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantifying sub-grid cloud structure and representing it GCMs
Advertisements

Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
EUMETSAT 2006 Helsinki Exploitation of GERB/SEVIRI data for evaluation of the Met Office global forecast model Richard Allan, Tony Slingo Environmental.
GERB/CERES Meeting 2006 Exeter Evaluation of clouds and radiation in the Met Office global forecast model using GERB/SEVIRI data Richard Allan, Tony Slingo.
GOME-2 polarisation data and products L.G. Tilstra (1,2), I. Aben (1), P. Stammes (2) (1) SRON; (2) KNMI GSAG #42, EUMETSAT,
GERB SW fluxes: an update (Clear ocean SW radiances and fluxes in the reprocessed V999 June 04 data) Cédric Bertrand GIST th December, Imperial.
Xiaolei Niu and R. T. Pinker Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Radiative Flux Estimates from.
On the Development of GOES-R Longwave Earth Radiation Budget Products Hai-Tien Lee (1) & Istvan Laszlo (2) (1) CICS/ESSIC-NOAA, University of Maryland.
CERES-GERB meeting, Boulder, 3/2004 Validation of GERB unfiltered radiances S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Methodology to compare GERB- CERES filtered radiances.
ICSTM, London 14 th - 16 th Dec GIST-24 Meeting Remote Sensing Research Unit Climatology from Satellites Group Low Spatial Resolution Broad-band.
Diurnal asymmetry in the GERB(-like) fluxes: an update Cédric Bertrand Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium.
Quantifying aerosol direct radiative effect with MISR observations Yang Chen, Qinbin Li, Ralph Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology,
CERES-GERB Joint Science Teams The Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) experiment GERB Status Imperial College London J E Harries (GERB.
Plans for interim data release J E Russell (Imperial)
Surface Atmospheric Radiation Budget (SARB) working group update Seiji Kato 1, Fred Rose 2, David Rutan 2, Alexander Radkevich 2, Tom Caldwell 2, David.
GERB2-GERB 1 transition: discussion item J E Russell Imperial College, London
Version 1.0, 30 June 2004 APPLICATIONS OF METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION (MSG) RGB IMAGES: PART 1 OVERVIEW MSG SEVIRI CHANNELS Author:Jochen Kerkmann (EUMETSAT)
Meteorolojik Uzaktan Algılamaya Giriş Erdem Erdi Uzaktan Algılama Şube Müdürlüğü 7-8 Mayıs 2012, İzmir.
Direct LW radiative effect of Saharan dust aerosols Vincent Gimbert, H.E. Brindley, J.E. Harries Imperial College London GIST 24, 16 Dec 2005, Imperial.
Introduction Invisible clouds in this study mean super-thin clouds which cannot be detected by MODIS but are classified as clouds by CALIPSO. These sub-visual.
AGU 2002 Fall Meeting NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Validation of GOES-8 Derived Cloud Properties Over the Southeastern Pacific J.
Presentation of the monthly mean CM-SAF products Didier Caprion RMIB.
Data Release Requirements, decisions and plans. What we need New machine Implement (and test) all proposed changes from current Provide data quality summary,
CERES on Terra & Aqua validation and participation in SCALES Z. Peter Szewczyk G. Louis Smith The GIST 19, RAL 08/27-29, 2003.
Overview of the “Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB)” Experience. Nicolas Clerbaux Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMIB) In collaboration.
On the application of CERES SW ADMs Cédric Bertrand.
RGP geolocation analysis. The geolocation problem We don’t have all the necessary information: –Optical model needs tuning Can prob. do this now but not.
Direct LW radiative forcing of Saharan dust aerosols Vincent Gimbert, H.E. Brindley, J.E. Harries Imperial College London GIST 25, 24 Oct 2006, UK Met.
MSG, GERB calibration and data status May ‘07 J E Russell Imperial College, London
Estimating the radiative impacts of aerosol using GERB and SEVIRI H. Brindley Imperial College.
Dust Longwave Forcing from GERB and SEVIRI Vincent Gimbert, H.E. Brindley, J.E. Harries Imperial College London GIST 26, 03 May 2007, RAL, Abingdon Thanks.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Cloud Forcing Studies using CERES and GERB(-like) data Joanna Futyan, Jacqui Russell and John Harries GIST 22 RMIB, Brussels,
Intercomparison of SEVIRI data from MSG1 and MSG2 and implications for the GERB data processing Nicolas Clerbaux & RMIB GERB Team. GIST 26, RAL 3 and 4.
Radiative Atmospheric Divergence using ARM Mobile Facility, GERB data and AMMA stations –led by Tony Slingo, ESSC, Reading University, UK Links the ARM.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Estimating the radiative effect of mineral dust over ocean The radiance to flux problem Dust retrieval quality Applying.
GIST 21 st, Boulder The Surface Radiation Budget within the Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring (CM-SAF) Rainer Hollmann.
RMIB involvement in the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) and Climate Monitoring SAF projects Nicolas Clerbaux Remote sensing from Space Division.
2004/04/02GIST 21, Boulder M. Viollier et al.1 Time sampling bias: combination of CERES with Meteosat narrow-bands and beginning a comparison with GERB.
METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION FROM FIRST TO SECOND GENERATION METEOSAT
2004/11/10GIST 22, Brussels, LMD, M. Viollier1 POLDER, CERES, GERB flux comparisons and information on AMMA and MeghaTropiques Michel Viollier Laboratoire.
CM-SAF Board Meeting, Helsinki, September 2006 CM-SAF TOA radiation status report D. Caprion Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
CM-SAF Board Meeting, Offenbach, April 2006 CM-SAF TOA radiation status report D. Caprion Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Inter-comparisons of monthly mean (and monthly time-step mean) GERB clear sky fluxes Joanna Futyan, Richard Allan and Jacqui.
Generation of TOA Radiative Fluxes from the GERB Instrument Data. Part II: First Results Nicolas Clerbaux and GERB team Royal Meteorological Institute.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Deriving clear-sky fluxes for GERB Jo Futyan Gist 21, CERES-GERB meeting 02/04/04 Boulder, Colorado.
GIST, Boulder, 31/03/2004 RMIB GERB Processing: overview and status S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
Using GERB and CERES data to evaluate NWP and Climate models over the Africa/Atlantic region Richard Allan, Tony Slingo, Ali Bharmal Environmental Systems.
AIRS Land Surface Temperature and Emissivity Validation Bob Knuteson Hank Revercomb, Dave Tobin, Ken Vinson, Chia Lee University of Wisconsin-Madison Space.
Consistent Earth System Data Records for Climate Research: Focus on Shortwave and Longwave Radiative Fluxes Rachel T. Pinker, Yingtao Ma and Eric Nussbaumer.
GIST, Abingdon, 5/2007 GERB 1/GERB 2 and GERB/CERES comparisons S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences CERES Instantaneous Clear-sky and Monthly Averaged Radiance and Flux Product Overview David Young NASA.
Cloud Detection: Optical Depth Thresholds and FOV Considerations Steven A. Ackerman, Richard A. Frey, Edwin Eloranta, and Robert Holz Cloud Detection Issues.
Japan Meteorological Agency, June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Non-Meteorological Application for Himawari-8 Presented.
Characterizing Diurnal Calibration Variations using Double-Differences Fangfang Yu.
Richard Allan and Tony Slingo (ESSC, University of Reading)
Validation status overivew
Validation status overivew
Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration with D. Doelling (NASA)
TOA Radiative Flux Estimation From CERES Angular Distribution Models
DCC method implementation in FY3/MERSI and FY2
On the use of Ray-Matching to transfer calibration
Eumetsat conference 2004, Praha
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
Validating CERES calibration and ADMs Using Data from East Antarctica
Inter-calibration of the SEVIRI solar bands against MODIS Aqua, using Deep Convective Clouds as transfer targets Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration.
Dorothee Coppens.
Richard Allan, Tony Slingo ESSC, Reading University
Development of inter-comparison method for 3.7µm channel of SLSTR-IASI
Earth Radiation Budget: Insights from GERB and future perspectives
Presentation transcript:

GERB-2 V999 Unfiltering Nicolas Clerbaux & RMIB GERB Team. GIST 24, Imperial College, London 15 december 2005

Outline Shortwave –V999 spectral response –V999 unfiltering New : Empirical SEVIRI NB-2-BB New : Clear ocean unfiltering –Validations/main results Clear desert unfiltering problem Clear ocean NB-to-BB problem –Solution for release Longwave –V999 spectral response –V999 Unfiltering –Unfiltered radiance comparison with CERES

Comparison V002/V999 SW spectral response curves V999 (green) seems flatter but unfiltering more difficult

V999 SW Unfiltering Same unfiltering method as before: New empirical BB estimation with parameters dependent on surface type (CERES ST used: ocean, dark vegetation, …): -> Unfiltering parameters are dependent on surface type Unfiltering parameterization based on a new data base of spectral radiance curves (SBDART 2.4) Implementation of a dedicated clear ocean unfiltering (to try to solve the asymmetry problem).

Database of 3 months (March, April and July 2004) of coangular SEVIRI NB and CERES BB radiances (FM2 and FM3), (more than 4 millions observations), Derive regressions in terms of reflectance, for V999: Further improvement presented during the EUMETSAT conference at Dubrovnik (more info in the proceedings) New: Empirical SEVIRI NB-2-BB sun glint angle

New: Dedicated clear ocean unfiltering As different as possible from the previous version to see if the asymmetry still there Direct estimation of the unfiltering factor as a function of  0.6:  =a+b/  0.6 +c/   0.6 with a,b,c dependent on (    ). Best fit on the ocean scenes (clear or cloudy) in the database.

SW Unfiltering Validations Analysis of –Dave Doelling –Richard Allan –Cedric Bertrand –Steven Dewitte Main results: –Clear desert overestimation, –“Diurnal cycle” of error for the SEVIRI BB estimate (GERB-like), specially over the clear ocean, –This error is only partly corrected by GERB in the high resolution products (ARCH, SHI), –Dedicated clear ocean unfiltering not needed (direct unfiltering seems sufficient) –Diurnal cycle of unfiltering error for dark scene?

Clear desert problem V999 clear desert overestimation wrt to the other scene types (about 2%?) Reason: the desert unfiltering was parameterized using the “Soils” ASTER library category and not the “Rocks” Preliminary simulations using “Rocks” explain about 1.5% of the overestimation Solution: add new simulations in the data base and re- parameterize the unfiltering for the desert surfaces

See presentation of Cedric Bertrand. Possible solutions: –Do not use NB-2-BB but well the CERES TRMM ADM radiance, –Add to the NB-2-BB a correction c(SZA,VZA,RAA) dependent on the full angular geometry (parameterization using RTM), –Improve the NB-2-BB (more proxi) Validations –Comparison diurnal cycle with model –Data base of coangular CERES and SEVIRI clear ocean observations: L_ceres = a L_nb2bb Clear Ocean NB-2-BB Problem MethodSlope(a)RMS error (%) Radiance from ADM % V999 NB2BB % V999 NB2BB + Corr % Dubrovnik NB2BB % Dubrovnik NB2BB + Corr % See RMIB TN: “Clear ocean correction for SEVIRI NB-to-BB Conversion”

Select/implement on method to improve clear ocean BB estimation SBDART simulations with ASTER rock category + check the clear desert improvement Additional unfiltering validations needed for dark scenes (dark vegetation- tropical forest). If needed, use direct unfiltering instead of the ratio of the BB estimations To do before release - SW

Comparison V002/V999 LW spectral response curves V999 more sensitive to cold scene Bug in the V002 solar LW contamination Spectral response extended up to 500µm

LW Unfiltering Same as before except that the unfiltering factor is now estimated over [2.5:500]µm instead of [2.5:100]µm for V002

Validation with CERES FM3 & FM2 V999 ARCH data for June, July & December Analysis of the averaged coangular LW radiance: –at regional scale (10*10 ARCH pixel boxes) –in radiance bin (5Wm -2 sr -1 ) See RMIB TN: “Cross validation of GERB LW radiance with CERES”

FM3 daytime June/July 2004 [Wm -2 sr -1 ] ratio : /

FM3 nighttime June/July 2004 [Wm -2 sr -1 ] ratio : /

FM3 June/July 2004

FM2 daytime June/July 2004 [Wm -2 sr -1 ] ratio : /

FM2 night time June/July 2004 [Wm -2 sr -1 ] ratio : /

FM2 June/July 2004

Discussion- LW about 2% scene type dependency A bit higher for V999 than for V002 Should be confirmed with ARG data Over daytime hot desert ratio GERB/FM2 not consistent with GERB/FM3. Reason? Thank you !