Regional On-Board Bus Survey Proposal Presentation to the TPB Technical Committee Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director October 5, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Regional Bus Rapid Transit Efforts Board Transportation Committee October 20, 2009.
Advertisements

Proposed RISC 2014 Deliverables, Activities, and Calendar For Discussion Andy Rodriquez, Director of RRAC January 14, 2014.
TPB Human Service Transportation Coordination Program 1 Key Elements of the Update to the Coordinated Human Service Transportation Plan Human Service Transportation.
Review and Revision of Draft Round 7.0 Growth Forecasts Paul DesJardin Department of Human Services, Planning and Public Safety and Robert Griffiths Department.
TPB Human Service Transportation Coordination Program 1 Key Elements of the Update to the Coordinated Human Service Transportation Plan Human Service Transportation.
An Approach for Base Transit Trip Matrix Development: Sound Transit EMME/2 Model Experience Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., Seattle October,
Street Smart Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Campaign: Goals, Evaluation, and Funding Briefing to the TPB Tech Committee, Friday, March 4th, 2005 Item #6.
Think. Learn. Succeed. Getting College Students on Board George Mason University Office of Parking & Transportation VTA 2008 Annual Conference May 20,
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Update on Transportation Activities in Fairfax County Transportation Roundtable Dulles Area Transportation.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 January 2015 Service Change Route 929 – Centreville Rd Buses will serve Park Center Drive and.
2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Changes in Daily Travel Patterns 1994 to 2007/2008 Robert E. Griffiths Technical.
Rapid Transit System Steering Committee Meeting December 4, 2012.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Innovative Approach to Transit On-board Data Collection.
1 Regional Priority Bus Projects List Steve Yaffe, Arlington County December 17, 2008 TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee Presented to the Transportation Planning.
1 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Customer Satisfaction Measurement FY 2006 Q3 Comparison April 28, 2006.
Presented by: Michael Ferrell, Chairman MWCOG Human Services and Public Safety Policy Committee APRIL 17, 2015 Photo Credit: Bob Jagendorf 2015 Homeless.
PLANNING RSTWG Review of Planning Concept of Operations & Requirements Tasks.
1 Draft Regional Priority Projects List Steve Yaffe, Arlington County November 20, 2008 TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee Presented to the TPB Access For All.
Montgomery County Maryland I-270 Integrated Corridor Management Project Tom Jacobs, University of Maryland Center for Advanced Transportation Technology.
WMATA BRT Marketing and Branding Presentation Rapid Transit Steering Committee April 30, 2013 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
1 Briefing on the Round 8.0 Cooperative Forecasts Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director Department of Transportation Planning TPB Technical Committee.
Fall 2008 Spring 2009 Review TPB Technical Committee 10/2/2009, Item #6 TPB Technical Committee 10/2/2009, Item #6 1.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Project Update TAC - July 21, 2015 Nick Perfili, FCDOT Department of Transportation.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director TPB Technical Committee September.
AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS OF THE 2013 CONSTRAINED LONG RANGE PLAN & FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DRAFT June 13, 2013 Transportation.
Commuting to Work in the Metropolitan Washington Region Some Preliminary Results from the 2000 Census Robert E. Griffiths Cooperative Forecasting and Data.
I-95 Transit & TDM Plan I-95 Transit and TDM Plan I-95 Corridor Stakeholder and Service Provider Meeting #2 June 13, 2011.
On-Board Transit Survey Presentation to TCC Dec. 13, 2002 Heather Alhadeff, AICP
1 Enhanced Mobility Projects 2014 Solicitation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Joint AFA/HSTC Meeting April 16, 2015 Lynn Winchell-Mendy,
TPB Geographically-Focused Household Travel Surveys Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director TPB Technical Committee Meeting September.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
2008 Regional Bus Survey Preliminary Results Presentation to the Access for All Advisory Committee Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director April.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Additional Findings by Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
Item 14 Re view of Budget and Outline for the FY2015 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) 1 Gerald Miller Acting Co-Director Department of Transportation.
1 TPB Access for All Committee’s Recommendations on Transit Services for People with Disabilities John Hudson TPB Access for All Advisory Committee Presentation.
1 FY05 Budget Proposal March 4, Presentation Overview FY04 ridership and improvements FY05 background FY05 anticipated outcomes FY05 budget highlights.
Metropolitan Washington Region 2002 Vanpool Survey TPB Technical Committee Meeting April 4, 2002 Technical Committee Item # 8.
PRTC Challenges, Opportunities, and Experience with a Regional Fare Collection System.
Street Smart Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Campaign: Spring 2007 Campaign, Proposed Actions for FY 2008 Briefing to the Transportation Planning Board Technical.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Spring 2010 Campaign Briefing George Branyan Pedestrian Program Manager District of Columbia Department of Transportation Transportation Planning Board.
1 Transit Capacity Constraint Presented to: TPB Technical Committee April 1, 2005 Lora Byala Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Business.
1 Briefing on the Preliminary Round 7.2 Cooperative Forecasts TPB Technical Committee Timothy Canan, AICP 7 November 2008 Item 11.
Street Smart Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Campaign: Spring 2009 Activities, and Funding Outlook for FY 2010 Briefing to the Transportation Planning Board.
1 Presentation to TAC May 20, 2009 Priority Corridor Network (PCN) Evaluation Project Introduction.
Commuter Connections FY 2007 Work Program National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee March 3, 2006.
Street Smart Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Campaign: Spring 2007 Campaign, Proposed Actions for FY 2008 Item #12: Briefing to the Transportation Planning.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Findings on Weekday Travel Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
COG/TPB Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) Update Project Robert E. Griffiths Presentation to the TPB Scenario Study Task Force April 16, 2008.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
The 2006 Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan: Plan Performance Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning October 18, 2006 Item #7.
Street Smart Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Campaign Briefing to the TPB Technical Committee April 7, 2006 Item 7 Michael Farrell COG/TPB Staff Item 7,
1 Review of Draft FY2009 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Ronald F. Kirby Director, Department of Transportation Planning National Capital Region Transportation.
1 Briefing on the TPB Transportation Planning Process Certification Summary Report Sandra Jackson Federal Highway Administration Transportation Planning.
County Board Work Session with County Manager Transit Planning Update March 6, 2015.
Transportation Fee FY2016 January 16, Services Provided by Transportation Stinger Buses - Three routes with 10 buses operating weekdays and two.
ROUND 9.0 COOPERATIVE FORECASTS OF FUTURE GROWTH Paul DesJardin COG Director of Community Planning and Services COG Board of Directors March 9, 2016 Agenda.
1 Draft Round 7.2 Cooperative Forecasts of Population, Households, and Employment Transportation Planning Board Timothy Canan, AICP April 15, 2009 Item.
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
2007 Household Travel Survey
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
Technical Committee Item # 9
Implementing the Transportation/Land Use Connection Program
April 23, 2018.
HRT Workshop: Transit Strategic Plan and Aug-Dec working items
Presentation transcript:

Regional On-Board Bus Survey Proposal Presentation to the TPB Technical Committee Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director October 5, 2007

2 Background WMATA has budgeted $750,000 for a Metrobus Passenger Survey in 2008 WMATA has budgeted $750,000 for a Metrobus Passenger Survey in 2008 TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee requested that additional funding be identified for a supplemental local bus on-board survey that would complement WMATA’s effort TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee requested that additional funding be identified for a supplemental local bus on-board survey that would complement WMATA’s effort Supplemental Survey would survey riders on local and county agency buses, including systems outside the WMATA Compact area Supplemental Survey would survey riders on local and county agency buses, including systems outside the WMATA Compact area WMATA has budgeted $750,000 for a Metrobus Passenger Survey in 2008 WMATA has budgeted $750,000 for a Metrobus Passenger Survey in 2008 TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee requested that additional funding be identified for a supplemental local bus on-board survey that would complement WMATA’s effort TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee requested that additional funding be identified for a supplemental local bus on-board survey that would complement WMATA’s effort Supplemental Survey would survey riders on local and county agency buses, including systems outside the WMATA Compact area Supplemental Survey would survey riders on local and county agency buses, including systems outside the WMATA Compact area

3 Spring 2008 Metrobus Survey Purpose of WMATA’s On-Board Survey Purpose of WMATA’s On-Board Survey Subsidy allocation for WMATA’s Regional Bus Routes Subsidy allocation for WMATA’s Regional Bus Routes Collection of origin-destination trip patterns for bus route planning and travel demand model validation Collection of origin-destination trip patterns for bus route planning and travel demand model validation Profile of current bus riders Profile of current bus riders Purpose of WMATA’s On-Board Survey Purpose of WMATA’s On-Board Survey Subsidy allocation for WMATA’s Regional Bus Routes Subsidy allocation for WMATA’s Regional Bus Routes Collection of origin-destination trip patterns for bus route planning and travel demand model validation Collection of origin-destination trip patterns for bus route planning and travel demand model validation Profile of current bus riders Profile of current bus riders

4 TPB’s Interest in a Supplemental On-Board Bus Survey With data from the 2008 Metrobus Survey, supplemental survey would provide complete picture of bus transit usage in the region With data from the 2008 Metrobus Survey, supplemental survey would provide complete picture of bus transit usage in the region Would provide information on “bus only” transit ridership in the suburbs, not easily obtained by other means Would provide information on “bus only” transit ridership in the suburbs, not easily obtained by other means Would complement the TPB Household Travel Survey currently underway and Spring 2007 Metrorail Passenger Survey Would complement the TPB Household Travel Survey currently underway and Spring 2007 Metrorail Passenger Survey An “unique” opportunity in terms of survey timing An “unique” opportunity in terms of survey timing With data from the 2008 Metrobus Survey, supplemental survey would provide complete picture of bus transit usage in the region With data from the 2008 Metrobus Survey, supplemental survey would provide complete picture of bus transit usage in the region Would provide information on “bus only” transit ridership in the suburbs, not easily obtained by other means Would provide information on “bus only” transit ridership in the suburbs, not easily obtained by other means Would complement the TPB Household Travel Survey currently underway and Spring 2007 Metrorail Passenger Survey Would complement the TPB Household Travel Survey currently underway and Spring 2007 Metrorail Passenger Survey An “unique” opportunity in terms of survey timing An “unique” opportunity in terms of survey timing

5 Bus Survey Issues Survey data collected on WMATA Regional Bus Route needs to be accurate and of very high quality for subsidy allocation purposes Survey data collected on WMATA Regional Bus Route needs to be accurate and of very high quality for subsidy allocation purposes Planners and modelers would like to have very detailed information about bus riders and their trip patterns Planners and modelers would like to have very detailed information about bus riders and their trip patterns Long, complicated survey forms asking “sensitive” questions, like household income, can diminish survey response and data quality Long, complicated survey forms asking “sensitive” questions, like household income, can diminish survey response and data quality Survey data collected on WMATA Regional Bus Route needs to be accurate and of very high quality for subsidy allocation purposes Survey data collected on WMATA Regional Bus Route needs to be accurate and of very high quality for subsidy allocation purposes Planners and modelers would like to have very detailed information about bus riders and their trip patterns Planners and modelers would like to have very detailed information about bus riders and their trip patterns Long, complicated survey forms asking “sensitive” questions, like household income, can diminish survey response and data quality Long, complicated survey forms asking “sensitive” questions, like household income, can diminish survey response and data quality

6 TPB Staff Recommendations Amend the FY 2008 UPWP to add 2008 Metrobus Survey and Supplemental On-Board Bus Survey Amend the FY 2008 UPWP to add 2008 Metrobus Survey and Supplemental On-Board Bus Survey WMATA would transfer $750,000 in funding from their FY 2008 budget to TPB’s 2008 UPWP Budget WMATA would transfer $750,000 in funding from their FY 2008 budget to TPB’s 2008 UPWP Budget Reprogram $375,000 in FY 2008 UPWP funds currently budgeted for the Household Travel Survey and WMATA Technical Assistance for Supplemental On-Board Survey Reprogram $375,000 in FY 2008 UPWP funds currently budgeted for the Household Travel Survey and WMATA Technical Assistance for Supplemental On-Board Survey Conduct WMATA’s 2008 Metrobus Survey and the Supplemental On-Board Survey as a single contract procurement managed by TPB staff Conduct WMATA’s 2008 Metrobus Survey and the Supplemental On-Board Survey as a single contract procurement managed by TPB staff Evaluate impact of questionnaire length and content on survey response and data quality in a survey pre-test Evaluate impact of questionnaire length and content on survey response and data quality in a survey pre-test Amend the FY 2008 UPWP to add 2008 Metrobus Survey and Supplemental On-Board Bus Survey Amend the FY 2008 UPWP to add 2008 Metrobus Survey and Supplemental On-Board Bus Survey WMATA would transfer $750,000 in funding from their FY 2008 budget to TPB’s 2008 UPWP Budget WMATA would transfer $750,000 in funding from their FY 2008 budget to TPB’s 2008 UPWP Budget Reprogram $375,000 in FY 2008 UPWP funds currently budgeted for the Household Travel Survey and WMATA Technical Assistance for Supplemental On-Board Survey Reprogram $375,000 in FY 2008 UPWP funds currently budgeted for the Household Travel Survey and WMATA Technical Assistance for Supplemental On-Board Survey Conduct WMATA’s 2008 Metrobus Survey and the Supplemental On-Board Survey as a single contract procurement managed by TPB staff Conduct WMATA’s 2008 Metrobus Survey and the Supplemental On-Board Survey as a single contract procurement managed by TPB staff Evaluate impact of questionnaire length and content on survey response and data quality in a survey pre-test Evaluate impact of questionnaire length and content on survey response and data quality in a survey pre-test

7 On-Board Bus Survey Planning Assumptions (Metrobus) TPB staff with assistance from WMATA will develop the sampling plan for the survey TPB staff with assistance from WMATA will develop the sampling plan for the survey WMATA regional and non-regional weekday bus routes will be surveyed by contractor hired by TPB staff WMATA regional and non-regional weekday bus routes will be surveyed by contractor hired by TPB staff Survey will be designed to provide WMATA staff with the high quality data needed for subsidy allocation Survey will be designed to provide WMATA staff with the high quality data needed for subsidy allocation An income question will be included on the long version questionnaire in the survey pre-test An income question will be included on the long version questionnaire in the survey pre-test WMATA staff will approve the survey design and final questionnaire used on regional and non-regional Metrobus routes WMATA staff will approve the survey design and final questionnaire used on regional and non-regional Metrobus routes TPB staff with assistance from WMATA will develop the sampling plan for the survey TPB staff with assistance from WMATA will develop the sampling plan for the survey WMATA regional and non-regional weekday bus routes will be surveyed by contractor hired by TPB staff WMATA regional and non-regional weekday bus routes will be surveyed by contractor hired by TPB staff Survey will be designed to provide WMATA staff with the high quality data needed for subsidy allocation Survey will be designed to provide WMATA staff with the high quality data needed for subsidy allocation An income question will be included on the long version questionnaire in the survey pre-test An income question will be included on the long version questionnaire in the survey pre-test WMATA staff will approve the survey design and final questionnaire used on regional and non-regional Metrobus routes WMATA staff will approve the survey design and final questionnaire used on regional and non-regional Metrobus routes

8 On-Board Bus Survey Planning Assumptions (Local Bus Systems) Weekday bus routes on the following systems will be surveyed Weekday bus routes on the following systems will be surveyed Prince George’s County (The Bus) Prince George’s County (The Bus) Montgomery County (Ride On) Montgomery County (Ride On) Frederick County (TransIT) Frederick County (TransIT) The City of Alexandria (Dash) The City of Alexandria (Dash) Arlington County (Art) Arlington County (Art) The City of Fairfax (Cue) The City of Fairfax (Cue) Fairfax County (Connector) Fairfax County (Connector) Prince William County (PRTC: OmniRide, OmniLink) Prince William County (PRTC: OmniRide, OmniLink) Loudoun County (LC Transit) Loudoun County (LC Transit) Survey data collected in WMATA and supplemental local bus on-board surveys will be shared with MTA and data collected in MTA commuter surveys will be incorporated into TPB’s regional transit database Survey data collected in WMATA and supplemental local bus on-board surveys will be shared with MTA and data collected in MTA commuter surveys will be incorporated into TPB’s regional transit database Weekday bus routes on the following systems will be surveyed Weekday bus routes on the following systems will be surveyed Prince George’s County (The Bus) Prince George’s County (The Bus) Montgomery County (Ride On) Montgomery County (Ride On) Frederick County (TransIT) Frederick County (TransIT) The City of Alexandria (Dash) The City of Alexandria (Dash) Arlington County (Art) Arlington County (Art) The City of Fairfax (Cue) The City of Fairfax (Cue) Fairfax County (Connector) Fairfax County (Connector) Prince William County (PRTC: OmniRide, OmniLink) Prince William County (PRTC: OmniRide, OmniLink) Loudoun County (LC Transit) Loudoun County (LC Transit) Survey data collected in WMATA and supplemental local bus on-board surveys will be shared with MTA and data collected in MTA commuter surveys will be incorporated into TPB’s regional transit database Survey data collected in WMATA and supplemental local bus on-board surveys will be shared with MTA and data collected in MTA commuter surveys will be incorporated into TPB’s regional transit database

9 On-Board Bus Survey Planning Assumptions (Local Bus Systems) (cont) TPB staff with assistance from local agency staff will develop the sampling plan and questionnaire for each local bus system Survey questionnaire will include same core questions that are on 2008 WMATA Metrobus survey staff will approve the survey design and final questionnaire used on their bus system Local agency staff will approve the survey design and final questionnaire used on their bus system Survey contractor hired by TPB staff or contractors already under contract to local transit will conduct on- board survey TPB staff with assistance from local agency staff will develop the sampling plan and questionnaire for each local bus system Survey questionnaire will include same core questions that are on 2008 WMATA Metrobus survey staff will approve the survey design and final questionnaire used on their bus system Local agency staff will approve the survey design and final questionnaire used on their bus system Survey contractor hired by TPB staff or contractors already under contract to local transit will conduct on- board survey

10 Proposed Schedule Review of UPWP Amendment by TPB Technical Committee – Nov 2 rd TPB Action on UPWP Amendment – Nov 14 th Issue RFP – Nov 15 th Select Contractor – Dec 19 th Start Contract – January, 2008 Survey Pre-Test Early March, 2008 Conduct Survey – April & May, 2008 Data Delivery – June, 2008 Review of UPWP Amendment by TPB Technical Committee – Nov 2 rd TPB Action on UPWP Amendment – Nov 14 th Issue RFP – Nov 15 th Select Contractor – Dec 19 th Start Contract – January, 2008 Survey Pre-Test Early March, 2008 Conduct Survey – April & May, 2008 Data Delivery – June, 2008