US IOOS Independent Cost Estimate: Summary Information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Advertisements

Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
Summary of $475 million Bond Issue and Capital Financing Options Practiced By the State System of Higher Education in Oklahoma Practiced By the State System.
Presentation to IOOS FAC Josie Quintrell April 2014.
U.S. IOOS ® Briefing for RDML Glang Suzanne Skelley, CAPT Scott Kuester, & Jen Rhoades US IOOS Program Office 1.
FY 2013 Request: Total R&D by Agency Budget Authority in Billions of Dollars.
Department of Transportation Support Services Branch ODOT Procurement Office Intergovernmental Agreements 455 Airport Rd. SE, Bldg K Salem, OR
Washington, DC 1 AMS Public-Private Partnership Forum AMS Public-Private Partnership Forum April 22, 2008 Dr. Chet Koblinsky Director, NOAA Climate Program.
NC Health Information Technology (HIT) Collaborative NC Health Information Technology (HIT) Collaborative Moving North Carolina Forward September 3, 2009.
1 IOOS Status of Planning & Implementation Background –Milestones Implementation Plan, Part I –Governance of the IOOS Implementation Plan, Part II –The.
NFRA and Pending Legislation Ann Jochens GCOOS Regional Coordinator GCOOS Committees Meetings New Orleans, LA 27 November 2007.
GCOOS Annual Meeting Sept 2007 Josie Quintrell, Executive Director.
Andrew Clark Industry Liaison Ocean.US
Ocean Research Priorities Plan Near-Term Priority Abrupt Climate Change and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) Anticipated Outcomes.
Structure and Responsibility
American Legion Post 71 October 18, 2011 Presented by Dave Loomis Dave Loomis Copywriting
Developing an IOOS Data Management Plan that Satisfies NOAA’s Requirements and IOOS Certification Requirements John Ten Hoeve 9/11/13.
HSRP Spring Meeting May 4, 2011 David M. Kennedy.
District Planning Council Program Overview. District Planning Concept Local Elected Officials Emergency Managers Emergency Responders Local Business Community.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.
INTERAGENCY ARCTIC RESEARCH POLICY COMMITTEE Brendan P. Kelly Assistant Director for Polar Sciences Office of Science and Technology Policy
Certification Requirements RAs are supportive of certification Want to make process as simple as possible – for both IOOS office, and for RAs (“Less is.
Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Debra Hernandez, SECOORA Walter Johnson, BOEMRE Ru Morrison, NERACOOS Charly Alexander, IOOS Office.
Audit objectives, Planning The Audit
The Climate Prediction Project Global Climate Information for Regional Adaptation and Decision-Making in the 21 st Century.
An update from the National Committee on Levee Safety Presented to the TWCA by Karin M. Jacoby, PE, Esq. June 17, of 14An Involved Public and Reliable.
The Financial Accounting Foundation The Financial Accounting Foundation Advancing Financial Reporting.
Emergency Planning Steps 5 steps in emergency planning Step 1: Establish a team Step 2: Analyze capabilities and hazards Step 3: Conduct vulnerability.
Gradually, the government's highest levels are becoming acquainted with the limits of observation in the Gulf, Jane Lubchenco, the administrator of the.
BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R. Match and Maintenance of Effort.
Summary Outcomes 3 rd PIDF Summit 1-4 th September 2015 Grand Pacific Hotel Suva, Fiji Islands.
Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act 2002 (PPEA) Joe Damico.
Josie Quintrell, NFRA Executive Director October, 2010 MACOORA Board Meeting.
Creating a national plan for the regional contribution to National ICOOS.
Socio-Economic Studies What? Why? How? April, 2014 Brett Howe NGS Geodetic Services Division Chief.
Zdenka Willis Briefing to GCOOS March 4, 2010 US IOOS Update.
Summary of NAST Major Accomplishments Dollars in Millions National Coalition White Paper NAST Congressional Testimony $54.5M RAND $2M Wind Tunnel Study.
Ocean.US and Coastal Ocean Applications and Science Team (COAST) Larry Atkinson September 2004 Corvallis.
-101 MACOORA Annual Meeting October 22-23, 2008 Dartmouth, Massachusetts Presenters: Scott Glenn & Josh Kohut.
NASA Applied Sciences Program Update John A. Haynes Program Manager, Weather National Aeronautics and Space Administration Applied Sciences Program Earth.
FGDC Coordination Group Meeting 11 May 2010 Roger L. Parsons, IWG-OCM Co-chair (NOAA) Ocean and Coastal Mapping Integration Act Congressional Reports Update.
Advertising your data: Agency requirements for submitting metadata Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich Version 1.0 September 2012 Section: Local Data Management Copyright.
The Integrated Coastal and Oceans Observation System Act of 2009: Implementation 2009 IOOS Regional Coordination Workshop Thursday, August 27.
The Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) is envisioned as a coordinated national and international network of observations, data management and analyses.
State Perspectives on Coastal and Ocean Management A Review of A Review of Coastal States Organization’s Recommendations to the US Commission on Ocean.
Why We Are Here Eric Lindstrom, Co-chair Interagency Ocean Observation Committee Great Lakes Industry Workshop June 21, 2011.
LANCE UWG Applied Science Perspectives Dr. David Green NASA HQ.
Hydrographic Services Improvement Act of 1998 with Amendments from 2002 OVERVIEW.
Match and Maintenance of Effort BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R.
Interagency Ocean Observation Committee The Integrated Coastal & Ocean Observing System Act of 2009  Interagency Ocean Observing Committee  Lead Federal.
The Rutgers IMCS Ocean Modeling Group Established in 1990, the Ocean Modeling Group at Rutgers has as one of it foremost goals the development and interdisciplinary.
U.S. IOOS ® Update – SECOORA Annual Meeting Jack Harlan & Rob Ragsdale US IOOS Program Office.
FPAW Surface Observations Panel August 8, 2012 Dr. Curtis H. Marshall NWS/Office of Science and Technology The National Mesonet Program.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, associated professor.
Office of Research and Development Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo.
1. 2 NOAA’s Mission To describe and predict changes in the Earth’s environment. To conserve and manage the Nation’s coastal and marine resources to ensure.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOS - August, 2008 GEOSS Interoperability Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
New Mexico’s Nonpoint Source Management Program and Plan Revision.
1 NOAA STRATEGY FOR REVIEW OF THE REPORTS OF THE U.S. COMMISSION ON OCEAN POLICY and the PEW OCEANS COMMISSION Lee Dantzler, Deputy Chair NOAA Ocean Council.
2009 IOOS Regional Coordination Workshop Thursday, August 27
Structure and Responsibility
Associate Director for Research, Education and Marine Operations
Funding Opportunity Announcement Number: HRSA
2017 Health care Preparedness and Response Draft Capabilities
Unidata Policy Committee Meeting
Regional healthcare coalition match documentation
U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS®)
Presentation transcript:

US IOOS Independent Cost Estimate: Summary Information

Provide summary level information about the US IOOS Independent Cost Estimate, completed in Purpose 2

Required by the ICOOS Act of 2009 (P.L ) Section of the Act requires: “Within 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Interagency Ocean Observation Committee, through the Administrator and the Director of the National Science Foundation, shall obtain an independent cost estimate for operations and maintenance of existing Federal assets of the System, and planned or anticipated acquisition, operation, and maintenance of new Federal assets for the System, including operation facilities, observation equipment, modeling and software, data management and communication, and other essential components. The independent cost estimate shall be transmitted unabridged and without revision by the Administrator to Congress.” Why an IOOS Independent Cost Estimate? 3

The IOOC engaged the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Earth Science and Technology Directorate to conduct the ICE based on their: –experience with cost modeling and estimations of this magnitude –insulation from U.S. IOOS, making the ICE independent. JPL conducted the ICE over the course of 8 months. Relied upon information furnished by IOOC and expert experience of JPL’s cost estimation team and other documents. How was the IOOS ICE Accomplished? 4

Estimates total cost of a fully functional U.S. IOOS based on: –10 year development period followed by –5 year operations and sustainment period. –Does not include the acquisition cost of assets already in use –Does not include unfunded Federal requirements Presents costs in three distinct groups: –Federal – Agencies that are executing appropriated national ocean observing programs –Non Federal* – Regional entities focused on meeting regional and local constituent needs, using Federal and non-Federal funding –Central Functions – IOOS unique functions required to develop, operate, maintain, coordinate and manage the System to deliver ocean, coastal and Great Lakes info in an easily accessible form. Structure of ICE 5 * The Act requires an ICE of Federal costs. Non-Federal entities were added since they contribute “essential components” of the system.

The ICE revealed that the largest portion of IOOS cost estimate (83.4%) is already funded in federal programs. Scope includes all Federal programs that are integrated or planned to be integrated into IOOS –Current investment in ocean observation programs in 17 federal agencies average $3 billion per year. Federal programs –ensure maritime safety and maritime shipping efficiency, –identify dangers to coastal communities, –support beach safety, search and rescue, public health, national security and many other national interests. The federal investment quantified in the ICE is required to meet national needs independent of IOOS. Federal Costs in the ICE 6

Second largest portion of ICE (14.8%) is the regional component. –This is identified as “non-Federal” because execution of the work is by Regional Information Coordination Entities (RICEs). RICEs integrate data from Federal systems within their region –Cost of operating & maintaining these systems is part of Federal estimate. Non-Fed estimate was derived from regional build-out plans –Plans were developed by 11 Regional Associations, proxies for RICEs. Current RICE activities primarily funded by Federal agencies, although RAs also receive support from non-Federal sources. –ICE estimates the costs of RICE-managed ocean observing systems as $534 million per year. –Current funding, awarded by Federal Cooperative Agreements, is approximately $22 million per year. Non-Federal Costs in the ICE 7

The smallest portion of ICE (1.8%) is the federally funded Central Function. Central Function costs address required Federal activities necessary develop, operate, maintain, coordinate and manage the System. The ICE determined that an investment of $65 million per year would enable conversion of the existing average $3 billion per year of national investment into a readily accessible and usable national system. Central Function Costs in the ICE 8

Cost Estimate by Category 9 Federal share represents the existing investment. Non-Federal share is largely unfunded. Non-Federal entities execute federal funding and some other funding Detailed regional build out plans are basis of estimate. Central Functions include cost to develop and sustain a national system. Federal 83.4% $45.2 B Non- federal 14.8% $8.0 B Central Functions 1.8% $1.0 B 15 years

Federal Contribution by Agency 10 98% of Federal contribution is from NOAA, ONR, NASA and NSF. Only existing Federal investments were included.