OWASP Global Projects Committee Brad Causey Leo Cavallari Pravir Chandra Jason Li Matt Tesauro **Paulo Coimbra** **Dinis Cruz**

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Request Management Mirror-. A random three day sample of Incidents revealed that about 86% of the registered Incidents were legitimate Requests Many other.
Advertisements

Policy Advisory Group (PAG) & Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Leader Primer Presented by: Devin A. Jopp, Ed.D. President & CEO.
Lean Program at CTS and Incident Management Notification Project.
Project Progress Report Members:Philip H. Peng Advisor: Dr. Stephen H. Lane CIS 401, Fall 2011, University of Pennsylvania Designing Rhythm Games for Touchscreen.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Second Legislated Review of Community Treatment Orders Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care November 9, 2012.
MIKE2.0 Methodology Presentation to Wiki Wednesday community, London 6 June 2007
Software Engineering II - Topic: Software Process Metrics and Project Metrics Instructor: Dr. Jerry Gao San Jose State University
Swami NatarajanJune 17, 2015 RIT Software Engineering Reliability Engineering.
Architectural Challenges in Developing a Web-Based Public Health Reporting System Workshop on Evaluating Software Architectural Solutions May.
Build It and They Will Come Designing Effective Writing Assignments Writing Across the Curriculum Workshop Center for Educational Practice.
Nina Muscillo and Andrew Hargreaves November 2014 Supporting Medication Reconciliation.
How to Write Goals and Objectives
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CDI Webinar Series 2013 Mobile Framework Lorna Schmid, AEI Tim Kern, Fort Collins Science Center.
This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. The OWASP Foundation OWASP AppSec DC October 2005.
Center for Enterprise Dissemination Services
#PhUSE Standard Scripts Project Proposal for Qualification of Standard Scripts.
Business Flow Modeller (BFM) Simplify and standardize your business processes across the project lifecycle.
Chapter : Software Process
Process: A Generic View
LIFE 3 LIFE 3 : Predicting Long Term Preservation Costs Brian Hole LIFE 3 Project Manager The British Library KeepIt training course 05/02/10.
Software Engineering Chapter 15 Construction Leads to Initial Operational Capability Fall 2001.
RUP Fundamentals - Instructor Notes
© Blackboard, Inc. All rights reserved. Back to the Feature: An Agile, User-centric Software Development Lifecycle Cindy Barry Senior Product Manager Martha.
ADOPTING OPEN SOURCE INTEGRATED LIBRARY SYSTEMS Best Practices Presented by Vandana Singh, PhD Assistant Professor, School of Information Sciences University.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Global Strategic Plan Overview. 5 Pillar Framework The Movement has validated our 5 Pillar approach, so we must invest in a balanced portfolio that leads.
Chapter 2 Process: A Generic View
A Friendly Atmosphere for the Volunteer How to Promote “Volunteer-friendliness”
Copyright 2007 © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
Understanding the Big Picture for Your Change Strategy LaToya Gilbert and Wendy Beck – May 20, 2014.
Curriculum Management
Study for Migration from CVS to SubVersion (SVN) Gunter Folger CERN/PH/SFT.
New Ideas for IA Readings review - How to manage the process Content Management Process Management - New ideas in design Information Objects Content Genres.
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 6, 2014.
Sonali Bhasin. Abstract  Software organizations that are transitioning from traditional method to Agile development methods.  Study various challenges.
Communicating Impact Elizabeth Coke Haller School Health Team Leader Program Development and Services Branch Division of Adolescent and School Health.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CDI Webinar Series 2013 Data Management at the National Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation This work is available under the Creative Commons SA 2.5 license The OWASP Foundation OWASP AppSec India Aug 2008.
Cmpe 589 Spring 2006 Lecture 2. Software Engineering Definition –A strategy for producing high quality software.
Local Evaluation Overview and Preliminary Findings Diane Schilder, EdD.
PoDAG XXI: SEEDS SEED: NSIDC Potential Interactions NSIDC DAAC should prepare an evaluation of their desired future roles in "core activities" and in mission.
The principles of an object oriented software development process Week 04 1.
Metadata By N.Gopinath AP/CSE Metadata and it’s role in the lifecycle. The collection, maintenance, and deployment of metadata Metadata and tool integration.
Developing a Project Management Standard for Your Organization Francine DiMicele, PMP June 08, 2015 NC Piedmont Triad Chapter.
Rational Unified Process (RUP)
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation.
Software Project Management
Publicity: Toward a Consolidated Approach: Internal Publicity, Media and Outreach, Writing About Asha.
Welcome!. Retreat Goals Remember who we are and what we’ve done Look at what we can accomplish in Review a proposed organizational configuration.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Shibboleth 1.2 Technical Overview “So you thought 1.1 was complicated…” Scott Cantor The Ohio State University and Internet2 Scott Cantor.
Copyright 2007 © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
RDA-WDS Publishing Data IG Data Bibliometrics Working Group.
Diana Matot: Director of Admissions Operations, Champlain College Strategic Enrollment Management.
Dynamic/Deferred Document Sharing (D3S) Profile for 2010 presented to the IT Infrastructure Technical Committee Karen Witting February 1, 2010.
Software Development Framework
Modernization Maturity Model and Roadmap
Define phase Interview the client to understand goals, audience, content, design, and delivery requirements. Organize and outline interview information.
Conceptual Model of Integrated Planning
Object Oriented Analysis and Design
MTM Measurement Initiative
Validation and Quality Assessment of Data
Status, Next Steps and Call to Action
Health Ingenuity Exchange - HingX
OWASP Global Projects Committee
OWASP Global Projects Committee
Data + Research Elements What Publishers Can Do (and Are Doing) to Facilitate Data Integration and Attribution David Parsons – Lawrence, KS, 13th February.
Presentation transcript:

OWASP Global Projects Committee Brad Causey Leo Cavallari Pravir Chandra Jason Li Matt Tesauro **Paulo Coimbra** **Dinis Cruz**

Presentation Overview The original plan post-Portugal One year later Assessment Criteria v2 Survey & orphaned projects Wiki templates and project meta-data Next Steps Goals for 2010 Structured discussions Questions/Comments/Flames

The original plan post-Portugal Define and apply quality/health metrics to projects o Incorporate results for categorization Create and capture project meta-data Provide repository for all OWASP projects o Migrate projects to new repository Create project "kit" for new projects o Template for project pages Revamp the view of OWASP projects o Rework "Projects" page and tables Improve transitions from SoC to full projects Formulate high-level workflows for documentation projects

One Year Later Assessment Criteria v2 Project surveys Identified orphaned projects Finding Leaders for orphaned projects Supported new projects Centralized Data about projects – Wiki Templates Revised SoC plans

Assessment Criteria v2 Why does OWASP have the ACv2? o Evaluation of future SoC projects o Collect a common set of info on projects Why collect all this info on projects? o Currently situation = grab bag of projects o GPC would like to promote projects  External audiences  Project to project integration  Recruit volunteers

Assessment Criteria v2 My project is a release, my release is a project? Eh? o ACv2 makes a distinction between a project and the releases the project creates o Releases are measured against Alpha, Beta, Stable  Project leads decide when they want a release reviewed - point releases vs trunk o Projects are measured against levels of health o Project health is still very early in development  GPC has a lot of work to do here

Reviewers Wanted!!!! We have a lot of projects Project make a lot of releases We ALWAYS can use reviewers o Just contact the GPC o Spread the word  Easy way to get involved  First step for new contributors!

Survey & Orphaned Projects Conducted project survey o First global look across all projects o Collected loads of usable meta-data Will conduct the survey yearly Identified projects that were un-owned (orphans) Always looking for new project leaders for orphans

Wiki Templates & Project Meta-data Used wiki templates to standardize data cataloging for OWASP projects Enables dynamic re-use of data without duplication Allows us to dynamically generate summary pages for each project o Consistent look and feel Enables future dashboarding efforts o Like the current project information tab

Next Steps Need project leader buy-in/feedback on Assessment Criteria v2 Need reviewers for projects and releases NOT an Assessment Criteria v3 (at least not for a year!)

Goals for Apply Assessment Criteria v2 to all projects 2.Unified dashboard for OWASP projects 3.Launch and manage Season of Code 2010

Discussion: Assessment Criteria v2 Do you understand it? Does it make sense what changed? Do you understand how it affects you?

Discussion: Wiki Templates & Project Pages Thoughts and feedback? Objections to changing project pages? How would this impact your project?

Discussion: Season of Code No SoC 2009 o We realized there were some challenges that we didn't expect o Push submitted proposals until next cycle New season of code plan o Changes on focus of proposals o Changes to payment structure

Questions/Comments/Flames What do you think about what we've done? o Future plans? What more can the GPC do to help you?