On using process-based statistical models of air pollutants to meet regulatory and research needs Amy Nail, Ph.D. Honestat, LLC Statistics & Analytics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
Advertisements

A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ETA - CMAQ AIR QUALITY FORECAST MODEL FOR THE SUMMER OF 2004 CMAS Workshop Chapel Hill, NC 20 October, 2004.
COMPARATIVE MODEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CMAQ-VISTAS, CMAQ-MADRID, AND CMAQ-MADRID-APT FOR A NITROGEN DEPOSITION ASSESSMENT OF THE ESCAMBIA BAY, FLORIDA.
1 AirWare : AirWare : C OMPREHENSIVE A IR QUALITY M ODEL WITH E X TENSIONS VERSION 4.30, PBM DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352.
Available Analytical Approaches for Estimating Fire Impacts on Ozone Formation Hilary Hafner Stephen Reid Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma,
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development October 30, 2013 Prakash V. Bhave, Mary K. McCabe, Valerie C. Garcia Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
A statistical method for calculating the impact of climate change on future air quality over the Northeast United States. Collaborators: Cynthia Lin, Katharine.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
Statistics, data, and deterministic models NRCSE.
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
1 icfi.com | 1 HIGH-RESOLUTION AIR QUALITY MODELING OF NEW YORK CITY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN FUELS FOR BOILERS AND POWER GENERATION 13 th Annual.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling Division, Applied Modeling Research Branch October 8, 2008.
Tanya L. Otte and Robert C. Gilliam NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with U.S. EPA National Exposure Research.
©2005,2006 Carolina Environmental Program Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions SMOKE Modeling System Zac Adelman and Andy Holland Carolina Environmental.
TSS Data Preparation Update WRAP TSS Project Team Meeting Ft. Collins, CO March 28-31, 2006.
National/Regional Air Quality Modeling Assessment Over China and Taiwan Using Models-3/CMAQ Modeling System Joshua S. Fu 1, Carey Jang 2, David Streets.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
1 Recent Advances in the Modeling of Airborne Substances George Pouliot Shan He Tom Pierce.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Dataset Development within the Surface Processes Group David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent.
Soontae Kim and Daewon W. Byun Comparison of Emission Estimates from SMOKE and EPS2 Used for Studying Houston-Galveston Air Quality Institute for Multidimensional.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division Uncertainty Analysis of Ozone Formation and Emission Control Responses using High-order Sensitivities Di Tian,
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
Use of Photochemical Grid Modeling to Quantify Ozone Impacts from Fires in Support of Exceptional Event Demonstrations STI-5704 Kenneth Craig, Daniel Alrick,
Ambient Air Monitoring Networks 2010 CMAS Conference Chapel Hill, NC October 13, 2010 Rich Scheffe, Sharon Phillips, Wyatt Appel, Lew Weinstock, Tim Hanley,
On the Model’s Ability to Capture Key Measures Relevant to Air Quality Policies through Analysis of Multi-Year O 3 Observations and CMAQ Simulations Daiwen.
VISTAS Emissions Inventory Overview Nov 4, VISTAS is evaluating visibility and sources of fine particulate mass in the Southeastern US View NE from.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 2 T. W. Tesche Dennis.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Impacts of MOVES2014 On-Road Mobile Emissions on Air Quality Simulations of the Western U.S. Z. Adelman, M. Omary, D. Yang UNC – Institute for the Environment.
CMAQ APPLICATION TO OZONE POLLUTION IN THE PEARL RIVER DELTA OF CHINA Wei Zhou 1,2,Yuanghang Zhang 1,Xuesong Wang 1,Daniel Cohan 2 1.College of Environmental.
Deguillaume L., Beekmann M., Menut L., Derognat C.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Evaluation of Emission Control Strategies for Regional Scale Air Quality: Performance of Direct and Surrogate Techniques Presented at the 6 th Annual CMAS.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19” from left.
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
C. Hogrefe 1,2, W. Hao 2, E.E. Zalewsky 2, J.-Y. Ku 2, B. Lynn 3, C. Rosenzweig 4, M. Schultz 5, S. Rast 6, M. Newchurch 7, L. Wang 7, P.L. Kinney 8, and.
Analysis of Ozone Modeling for May – July 2006 in PNW using AIRPACT3 (CMAQ) and CAMx. Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. EPA Region 10 Nov CMAQ O 3 Prediction.
GOING FROM 12-KM TO 250-M RESOLUTION Josephine Bates 1, Audrey Flak 2, Howard Chang 2, Heather Holmes 3, David Lavoue 1, Mitchel Klein 2, Matthew Strickland.
Evaluation of Models-3 CMAQ I. Results from the 2003 Release II. Plans for the 2004 Release Model Evaluation Team Members Prakash Bhave, Robin Dennis,
Exposure Assessment for Health Effect Studies: Insights from Air Pollution Epidemiology Lianne Sheppard University of Washington Special thanks to Sun-Young.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
Evaluation of CMAQ Driven by Downscaled Historical Meteorological Fields Karl Seltzer 1, Chris Nolte 2, Tanya Spero 2, Wyat Appel 2, Jia Xing 2 14th Annual.
WRAP Stationary Sources Joint Forum Meeting August 16, 2006 The CMAQ Visibility Model Applied To Rural Ozone In The Intermountain West Patrick Barickman.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Response of fine particles to the reduction of precursor emissions in Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China Juan Li 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yang Gao 1, Yun-Fat Lam.
Comparisons of the Response of Simulated Ozone Concentrations to Changes in Emissions Using the Carbon Bond IV and SAPRC99 Chemical Mechanisms Bruce Jackson,
Accuracy of multi-parameter response surfaces generated from sensitivity coefficients Daniel Cohan and Antara Digar CMAS Conference 2009 October 19, 2009.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
Predicting PM2.5 Concentrations that Result from Compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) James T. Kelly, Adam Reff, and Brett Gantt.
FUTURE PREDICTION OF SURFACE OZONE OVER EAST ASIA UP TO 2020
C. Nolte, T. Spero, P. Dolwick, B. Henderson, R. Pinder
J. Burke1, K. Wesson2, W. Appel1, A. Vette1, R. Williams1
Uncertainties influencing dynamic evaluation of ozone trends
The Value of Nudging in the Meteorology Model for Retrospective CMAQ Simulations Tanya L. Otte NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, RTP, NC (In partnership with.
Update on 2016 AQ Modeling by EPA
UNCERTAINTIES IN ATMOSPHERIC MODELLING
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

On using process-based statistical models of air pollutants to meet regulatory and research needs Amy Nail, Ph.D. Honestat, LLC Statistics & Analytics CMAS Conference Chapel Hill, NC October 28,

Objective Use two process-based statistical models (PBSMs) of 8-hour ozone to show that PBSMs of air pollutants 1. Can meet regulatory and research needs 2. Have a high return on investment 2

Return on investment: time and expertise Jan 2001: started internship at EPA Jan 2005: started first PBSM of ozone as dissertation research Aug 2007: first PBSMO, dissertation, Nail 2007 Aug 2007 – 2008: My own simple modifications to model 2009: Help from George Pouliot and Joe Pinto 3

What is a process-based model? 1.Input variables have a cause-effect relationship with output, or are surrogates for variables that do 2.Mathematical representations are verifiably consistent with atmospheric chemistry results from chamber experiments and field studies 3.Model can be broken into interpretable components 4

Original goal NOx emissions VOC emissions Meteorology PBSM 8-hour ozone Daily 2001 (whole year) Lat, lon resolution Northeast US 5

Needs met by original goal 1.Retrospective space-time prediction for exposure quantification 2.Decomposition 3.Assessment of past and future emission controls 4.Exceptional event analyses 5.Mutual evaluation/validation with other models 6.Learning about process 7.Quantification of uncertainty (automatic with a statistical model) 6

Revised goal VOC emissions NOx observations Meteorology PBSM 8-hour ozone Daily 2001 (whole year) Lat, lon resolution Northeast US 7

Changes to needs met Exposure quantification  Can’t do yet (No universal coverage for NOx) Emission control assessment  VOCs only Process learning  Better for VOCs (Observed NOx more accurate than modeled NOx.) 8

The data NOx and Ozone observations SLAMS/NAMS/PAMS & CastNET

10

O3 = Created + Transported + Error O3 f 2 ( NOx, temp, sinusoid, reactive VOC field ) f 1 ( ws, wd, O3 yesterday) f 3 ( VOC emissions, temp, sinusoid ) + Error VOC Random parts Normally distributed Mean zero Variance & spatial correlation parameters depend on temp and ws PB SMO VOC 11

Run time PB SMO VOC 9 hours on average 12

PB SMO: 36 & 12 O3 = Created + Transported + Error f 2 ( NOx, temp, sinusoid, VOC emissions ) f 1 ( ws, wd, O3 yesterday ) Random parts Normally distributed Mean zero Variance & spatial correlation parameters depend on temp and ws 13

Run time PB SMO 6 – 19 minutes 14

Model PB SMO VOC metcov PB SMO Chemmech 36 & 12 SourceNEI, BEISSMOKE, CB-IV SpaceCounty36 & 12 km Time Bio Monthly Anthro Annual Hourly Species Onroad Non-road Storage & Transport Biogenic Other area Ald2 Ole CO Non-react Eth Par Form Tol Isop Xyl VOC emission progression 15

How is transported process-based? Transported ozone (here, today) = Yesterday’s ozone 24 hours upwind Is a weighted average of yesterday’s ozone in the whole region. Weights – depend on wind speed and direction – are appropriately distributed over redundant information 16

How is created ozone process-based? 17

Three atmospheric regimes Low VOC/NOx ratios Changes in VOCs have no effect Ozone increases when NOx increases Created ozone can be negative Mid-level VOC/NOx ratios Ozone increases when NOx increases for fixed VOCs Ozone increases when VOCs increase at fixed NOx Ozone increases when both VOCs and NOx increase High VOC/NOx ratios Ozone increases when NOx increases Ozone does not change when VOCs increase. 18

SMOG chamber contour plot NRC (1991), p

Contour plot at 95 th percentile temperature 20

Two predictors for two purposes Process prediction Created + transported Process plus interpolated error For exposure quantification, we can interpolate the error field to get better predictions. 21

PB SMO VOC: metcov 22

PB SMO VOC (metcov) R2R2 RMSESlopeIntercept Val above Process + interpolated error Process CMAQ

Decomposition of ozone (ppb) DateJan 2Jun 17Mar 26Sept 11Aug 10June 19Aug 2 Created Transported Deviation from obs Obs Oz %-ile

How is background process-based? Functional forms have these properties If Nox = 0 and VOC emiss = 0, then created = 0 If created = 0 and transport = 0, then Ozone = intercept = background Revised metcov model Background estimate: 39ppb

Metcov vs. chemmech 36 R2R2 RMSESlopeIntercept Val above PPIE Metcov Chmech Process Metcov Chmech CMAQ

Metcov vs. chemmech 36, 12 R2R2 RMSESlopeIntercept Val above PPIE Metcov Chmech 36 Chmech Process Metcov Chmech 36 Chmech CMAQ

PB SMO: chemmech 12 28

From 2011 CMAQ Peer review They [ the CMAQ team] have led the way by demonstrating, in retrospective studies, that simple models constrained by observations are preferable to more complex models that contain many uncertain and unknown parameter values. 29

While these are data driven adjustments, they are based upon a thorough understanding of the physics of the lower atmosphere. Context: Lauding improvements to the quality of science in meteorological models 30

Thank you! 31