Carbon Capture and Storage Climate Change and Sustainable Development: New Delhi, April 7-8, 2006 Pernille Holtedahl, PhD, Norad NORWAY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joe Chaisson April 21, Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Power Plants and Geologic Carbon Sequestration Joe Chaisson.
Advertisements

CO 2 Capture and Storage (CCS). Contents The Need for CO 2 Capture and Storage 4 Reliance on Fossil Fuels 5 Largest CO 2 Emitters 7 Addressing the Challenge.
OPTIONS FOR ADDRESSING THE CO 2 PROBLEM How can we avoid doubling of CO 2 ? “Stabilization wedges”: Pacala and Sokolow (2004) DOE CDIAC.
Carbon Capture and Storage Climate Change and Sustainable Development: New Delhi, April 7-8, 2006 Pernille Holtedahl, PhD, Norad NORWAY.
Technical options for placement of CO 2 in the maritime area  by Paul Freund
© IEA/UNIDO 2011 Challenges and Opportunities of CO 2 Capture & Storage in the Iron and Steel Industry Steel Institute VDEh Auditorium Dusseldorf, Germany.
B9 Coal Deploying Fuel Cells to Generate Cheap, Clean Electricity from Fossil Fuels.
Top-level Research Initiative - a major Nordic venture for climate, energy and the environment.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Carbon Dioxide Mitigation: The Technology Challenge Richard A. Bradley and Cedric Philibert.
Carbon Management for Sustainable Development: An Examination of Potential Technological Transition Paths of the Saudi Arabian System of Innovation to.
CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.
Tackling the Climate Problem with Existing Technologies
Carbon Sequestration Anjani Kumar CPSP218L Dudash
Carbon, Capture And Storage. Capture and Storage  Not quite this simple:
Carbon, Capture And Storage. Capture and Storage  Not quite this simple:
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Building the CO 2 Value Chain – Is it Possible? Olav Kårstad Special Advisor CO 2 British – Norwegian Workshop on.
Robert C. Trautz Principal Technical Leader CREA Energy Innovation Summit Denver, Colorado October 27, 2014 Commercial CO 2 Storage: Around the Corner.
West Coast Sequestration Partnership Kick-off Meeting 9/29-30.
EOR: Promesa Incumplida o un Gran Futuro?
Alexander Voice 24 November  Motivation for the development of CCS technology  Climate change  Energy profile and outlook  Public perception.
The Future of Coal: Carbon Capture and Storage Dmitri Malinin Fall 2006 CBE 555 Dmitri Malinin Fall 2006 CBE 555.
An Introduction to the Role of Carbon Capture and Storage in Ukraine Keith Whiriskey.
Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE 1 Dr. Robert K. Dixon Head, Energy Technology Policy Division International Energy Agency.
Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies Stephen W. Pacala and Robert Socolow Science Vol. 305.
PROSPECTS FOR CO 2 CAPTURE AND STORAGE Energy Technology Scenarios Technologies and Costs of CO 2 Sequestration Jacek Podkanski, Dolf Gielen International.
1 CO 2 from capture to storage Gérard FRIES Executive Vice-President Institut Français du Pétrole.
Can CCS Help Protect the Climate?. Key Points Climate Protection requires a budget limit on cumulative GHG emissions. Efficiency, Renewable Electric,
Economic assessment of the whole CCS technology cycle Ksenia Sidorova, PhD student Department of Organization and Management, National Mineral Resources.
Technology options under consideration for reducing GHG emissions SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ROUNDTABLE SERIES: Next Steps Post-Kyoto: U.S. Options January 13,
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation & CO 2 Storage Prof. Jenn-Tai Liang Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Kansas.
EU ETS & European Energy Market Dr Bill Kyte OBE Advisor, Sustainable Development, E.ON AG Chairman, UK Emissions Trading Group Ltd Chairman, Eurelectric.
Stabilization Wedges Tackling the Climate Problem with Existing Technologies This presentation is based on the “ Stabilization Wedges ” concept first presented.
Technologies of Climate Change Mitigation Climate Parliament Forum, May 26, 2011 Prof. Dr. Thomas Bruckner Institute for Infrastructure and Resources Management.
1 FUTURE EU ENERGY MIX - WILL COAL PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE? International Conference in Gliwice 29 May 2006 Matthias Dürr RWE AG.
Carbon Capture and Storage - can it make coal clean? Dr. Shannon Page Department of Environmental Management Lincoln University.
Stabilization Wedges A Concept and Game
Billions of Tons Carbon Emitted per Year Historical emissions Historical Emissions.
1 Carbon Capture and Storage Martin Blunt Department of Earth Science and Engineering Imperial College London.
Olje- og energidepartementet Present Norwegian activities Focus on CCS both as global climate mitigation measure and for EOR-purposes. Valuable.
CCS and Climate. Do We Need CCS? Climate protection is impossible with current emission trends. Global coal investments will lock in high cumulative carbon.
Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geological Storage: Contributing to Climate Change Solutions Luke Warren, IPIECA.
Future Power Generation in Georgia Georgia Climate Change Summit May 6, 2008 Danny Herrin, Manager Climate and Environmental Strategies Southern Company.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Heleen de Coninck (IPCC WG III on Mitigation) DEFRA/IRADe.
R K Jain. CO 2 emission responsible for global warming Development process to go unhalted. Ways and means to be found for controlling and abating CO 2.
ARKANSAS ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION GHG EMMISSIONS TRADING CONFERENCE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MARCH 2006 Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Your name Your institute Date, place.
CO 2 Capture and Geological Storage Demonstration at In Salah, Algeria Iain Wright (CO2 Project Manager, BP Group Technology) UNCTAD Africa Oil & Gas Conference.
Delhi CCS R&D prorities CO 2 geological storage: Road Map, EOR, aquifers, mineral Stuart Haszeldine School of GeoSciences.
Biochar Is biochar a viable method?. The Carbon Cycle Four Reservoirs of Carbon: 1.Sedimentary Rock 2.Ocean 3.Land Surface 4.Atmosphere Each of these.
T HE RELEVANCE OF CCS AS A CLIMATE POLICY INSTRUMENT IN VIETNAM Presented by: Nhan T. Nguyen * (co-authors: Minh Ha-Duong and Didier Bonijoly) * Centre.
Norwegian Carbon Capture and Storage Projects Helge Lund, President & CEO Capital Markets Update 8 June 2005 Tor Fjæran, Senior Vice President Corporate.
Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.
LM-01L Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage Larry R. Myer Earth Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Physics of Sustainable Energy March.
2002 European Commission - Directorate-General for Research CO2 Strategy.ppt 1 An EU Research Strategy for the Mitigation of CO 2 Emissions An EU Research.
Deploying Carbon Reduction Technologies In Time Daniel A. Lashof February 2007.
European Climate Change Programme (ECCP II) Stakeholder Meeting 24 October 2005 Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) ● Current Situation ● Possible role of.
Carbon Sequestration A Strategic Element in Clean Coal Technology Presentation to: Mid-America Regulatory Conference (MARC) Columbus, Ohio, June 20, 2006.
Geological Sequestration of C Carbon Sequestration in Sedimentary Basins Module VII: Weyburn, Sask. Maurice Dusseault Department of Earth Sciences University.
Forest management, forest products & the climate.
Carbon Capture and Storage Potentials and Barriers to Deployment.
© OECD/IEA Do we have the technology to secure energy supply and CO 2 neutrality? Insights from Energy Technology Perspectives 2010 Copenhagen,
1 PNNL-SA The Role of Technology in a Low- carbon Society Selected Key Findings from the Global Energy Technology Strategy Program Jae Edmonds February.
Status on Norwegian CCS activites Dr. Per Christer Lund, Counsellor Science and Technology, Innovation Norway.
Ministry of Petroleum and Energywww.mpe.dep.no An Ambitious Policy for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in Norway 8th International Conference on Greenhouse.
The Dimensions of the Prize: Leverage Technology to Achieve Sustainable Emissions Cal Cooper ConocoPhillips.
Climate Change Policies: The Road to Copenhagen Dr Robert K. Dixon.
Challenges in Global CCS Projects
Marco Mazzotti – ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Presentation transcript:

Carbon Capture and Storage Climate Change and Sustainable Development: New Delhi, April 7-8, 2006 Pernille Holtedahl, PhD, Norad NORWAY

Outline CCS – what is it? A history Projects Storage CCS in a portfolio Challenges International Agenda The Future

CCS – What is it? CCS is a process consisting of the separation of CO 2 from industrial and energy-related sources transport to a storage location long-term isolation from the atmosphere (IPCC, 2005)

IPCC, 2005

CCS – what is it? Suitable for large point sources: –CO 2 -emitting industries –natural gas production –large fossil fuel/biomass plants Electricity sector most promising candidate (IPCC, 2005)

A history of CCS: EOR as a starting point Inspired by experience with enhanced oil recovery (EOR) Large-scale injection of CO 2 for purposes of EOR started in 1972 in the US (Permian Basin) – thus initially a commercial justification Many new projects started in the 1970s as oil prices increased Today, more than 70 ongoing CO 2 EOR projects and almost 40 Mtonnes CO 2 injected each year (OSPAR, 2005) Benefit of EOR: additional income stream (USD 30-50/tonne CO 2, with oil prices USD (!), Torvanger et al.)

CCS: Current projects - Weyburn Weyburn – Canada EOR Transport of 95 million cubic feet per day of 95 % pure CO 2 from a North Dakota coal gasification facility through a 320 kilometer pipeline t CO 2 /day Total planned storage: 20,000,000 t CO 2 Copyright © EnCana Corporation. All rights reserved

CCS: Current projects – In Salah In Salah – Algeria CO 2 content in gas extracted is too high for commercial use Separation of CO 2 from natural gas in amine contactor towers Storage in gas field t CO 2 /day Total planned storage: 17,000,000 t CO 2

CCS: Current projects - Sleipner Sleipner – Norway Gas extracted contains 9 % CO 2 and must be reduced to 2.5 % to satisfy commercial standard Motivation for injection/storage: Norwegian CO 2 tax, Storage in saline formation (200 m thick, at m depth) 3000 t CO 2 /day (1 Mt annually) Total storage planned : 20,000,000 t CO 2 Courtesy of Statoil ASA

Sleipner

Storage potential Utsira formation covers km 2 Storage capacity in aquifer estimated at 42 billion tonnes CO 2 Estimated storage capacity in oil and gas reservoirs and aquifers in Western Europe: 833 bn. tonnes CO 2 (Torvanger et al. 2005) Could theoretically store all of EU’s emissions for 67 years (ibid).

CCS: the broader picture CCS is but one answer to the problem of climate change A portfolio approach is the way to go. IPCC estimates inclusion of CCS in portfolio to lower overall cost of CO 2 stabilization by 30 % Pacala & Socolow (2004)’s Wedges Model: –Def: A simple quantification of carbon mitigation as the need for seven wedges –A wedge is a strategy to reduce carbon emissions that grows in 50 years from zero to 1.0 GtC/year.

Billion of Tons of Carbon Emitted per Year Currently projected path Flat path Historical emissions 1.9  GtC/y 7 GtC/y Seven “wedges” Wedges O

The Wedges Model The Carbon Capture Wedge (1 wedge) could consist of CCS at –800 GW coal power plants OR – Mt CO 2 /year

CCS Challenges Leakages –Uncertainty about magnitude... –... but likely to be very small (0.1% - 1% in different studies) –intergenerational issue, but fraction retained in appropriate locations likely to exceed 99 % for over 1000 years (IPCC, 2005) Monitoring Infrastructure needs: Large and long-term investments required for transportation and separation Lack of rules in Climate Convention and Kyoto Protocol context

CCS Challenges Costs: –Capture: varies depending on CO 2 concentration (USD 10-60/tonne CO 2 ) –compression and transport: varies depending on mode of transport and volume (USD 5- 28/tonne CO 2 ) –injection and storage: varies depending on type of resevoir (USD 1-16/tonne CO 2 ) –Economies of scale apply, and R&D will bring costs down over time –EOR income helps: ~USD 30-50/tonne CO 2 (Torvanger et al., 2005)

Opportunities for near-term adoption IPCC, 2005

CCS: future projects Gas processing plant at Kårstø (Norway) New technology could reduce the costs of CO 2 capture substantially The ambition is to halve the costs of carbon capture, which means USD 30/t CO 2 Replication possibilities exist

CCS: future projects Tjeldbergodden: Shell and Statoil have signed an agreement would be the world's largest project using CO 2 for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) offshore. project consists of a gas-fired power plant and methanol production facility, providing CO 2 to two offshore oil and gas fields.

CCS and the International Agenda Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published its report on CCS in Sept 2005 Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF), Carbon Sequestration Initiative, various research efforts (EU, US) IPCC guidelines currently in use do not specifically include CCS, but revision likely to change this Not specifically mentioned in Kyoto Protocol CDM

CCS and the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) SBSTA meeting in May to discuss guidelines for application of CDM to CCS projects – based on COP/MOP1 decision Various issues to be settled: who is responsible for monitoring (and potential leakages): Annex 1 or Non-Annex 1 country? Norway’s position: –CCS is a viable option under CDM... –...but leakage and liability issues need to be settled –careful selection of sites is key –monitoring is key –Forthcoming 2006 IPCC guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories should be used as a basis

The Future ”...models indicate that CCS systems are unlikely to be deployed on a large scale in the absence of an explicit policy that substantially limits greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere” (IPCC, 2005)

The Future Price on CO 2 will have to exceed USD 25-30/t CO 2 (or equivalent limit on emissions). Most current scenarios predict range of USD 3- 16/t CO 2 Conclusion: A more comprehensive/ambitious climate regime needed or projects likely to be limited to EOR