KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION Ontologies Communication – Network Management Technologies Rashid Mijumbi Barcelona, April 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Berliner XML Tage. Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Oktober 2004 SWEB2004 – Intl Workshop on Semantic Web Technologies in Electronic Business Intelligent.
Advertisements

A Semantic Web Approach to Digital Rights Management Roberto García González.
Ontologies: Dynamic Networks of Formally Represented Meaning Dieter Fensel: Ontologies: Dynamic Networks of Formally Represented Meaning, 2001 SW Portal.
Semantic Web Thanks to folks at LAIT lab Sources include :
CS570 Artificial Intelligence Semantic Web & Ontology 2
So What Does it All Mean? Geospatial Semantics and Ontologies Dr Kristin Stock.
The Web of data with meaning... By Michael Griffiths.
NetML Network Markup Language Ivan Santarelli Alexandra Bellogini
PR-OWL: A Framework for Probabilistic Ontologies by Paulo C. G. COSTA, Kathryn B. LASKEY George Mason University presented by Thomas Packer 1PR-OWL.
CS652 Spring 2004 Summary. Course Objectives  Learn how to extract, structure, and integrate Web information  Learn what the Semantic Web is  Learn.
Dynamic Ontologies on the Web Jeff Heflin, James Hendler.
ModelicaXML A Modelica XML representation with Applications Adrian Pop, Peter Fritzson Programming Environments Laboratory Linköping University.
Ontologies IS 277 Spring Outline n Ontologies n Types of ontologies n Examples n Ontology engineering n Ontology standards n Machine-readable ontologies.
A Review of Ontology Mapping, Merging, and Integration Presenter: Yihong Ding.
From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language
1 Technologies and Modelling Frameworks XML ontology RDF taxonomy OWL thesaurus Semantic Web.
Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point? Oscar Corcho Mariano Fernandez-Lopez Asuncion Gomez-Perez Presenter:
Evaluating Ontology-Mapping Tools: Requirements and Experience Natalya F. Noy Mark A. Musen Stanford Medical Informatics Stanford University.
Semantic Web Technologies Lecture # 2 Faculty of Computer Science, IBA.
Knowledge Mediation in the WWW based on Labelled DAGs with Attached Constraints Jutta Eusterbrock WebTechnology GmbH.
FRE 2672 Urban Ontologies : the Towntology prototype towards case studies Chantal BERDIER (EDU), Catherine ROUSSEY (LIRIS)
Knowledge Interchange Format Michael Gruninger National Institute of Standards and Technology
Clément Troprès - Damien Coppéré1 Semantic Web Based on: -The semantic web -Ontologies Come of Age.
Author: Lornet LD team Reuse freely – Just quote Desired Properties of a MOT Graphic Representation Formalism Simplicity and User Friendliness (win spec,
The Semantic Web William M Baker
PART IV: REPRESENTING, EXPLAINING, AND PROCESSING ALIGNMENTS & PART V: CONCLUSIONS Ontology Matching Jerome Euzenat and Pavel Shvaiko.
A C-BML Standard Development Framework for Phase 2 and Beyond Kevin Gupton Applied Research Laboratories University of Texas at Austin
Ontology Summit2007 Survey Response Analysis -- Issues Ken Baclawski Northeastern University.
Ontology Summit2007 Survey Response Analysis Ken Baclawski Northeastern University.
Jan 9, 2004 Symposium on Best Practice LSA, Boston, MA 1 Comparability of language data and analysis Using an ontology for linguistics Scott Farrar, U.
Ontologies Come of Age Deborah L. McGuinness Stanford University “The Semantic Web: Why, What, and How, MIT Press, 2001” Presented by Jungyeon, Yang.
Semantic Web Constraint Language complement and the editor development in Protégé Piao Guangyuan.
updated ’08CmpE 583 Fall 2008Introduction- 1 CmpE 583- Web Semantics: Theory and Practice Atilla ELÇİ Computer Engineering Department Eastern.
Proposed NWI KIF/CG --> Common Logic Standard A working group was recently formed from the KIF working group. John Sowa is the only CG representative so.
Semantics: A Many-Splendored Thing Amicalola Lodge 3-5 April 2002 Mike Uschold Mathematics and Computing Technology Boeing Phantom Works.
Ontology-Based Computing Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University and Jarg.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
Oreste Signore- Quality/1 Amman, December 2006 Standards for quality of cultural websites Ministerial NEtwoRk for Valorising Activities in digitisation.
The future of the Web: Semantic Web 9/30/2004 Xiangming Mu.
Issues in Ontology-based Information integration By Zhan Cui, Dean Jones and Paul O’Brien.
THE SEMANTIC WEB By Conrad Williams. Contents  What is the Semantic Web?  Technologies  XML  RDF  OWL  Implementations  Social Networking  Scholarly.
The Semantic Web and Ontology. The Semantic Web WWW: –syntactic transmission of information –only processible by human – no semantic conservation of the.
ece 627 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
UNEP Terminology Workshop - Geneva, April 15, Environmental Terminology & Thesaurus Workshop UN Environment Programme Regional Office of Europe.
17 April 2005Sharif University of Tech Page 1 Ontologies Come of Age Amir Hossein Assiaee
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
Chapter 7 K NOWLEDGE R EPRESENTATION, O NTOLOGICAL E NGINEERING, AND T OPIC M APS L EO O BRST AND H OWARD L IU.
Stefan Decker Stanford University Mike Dean BBN Technologies.
© The ATHENA Consortium. Susan Thomas SAP AG, Research Department How do you do semantics? Semantic Web Drawings by Sebastian Cremers Unit 3:
Slide 1 2/22/2016 Policy-Based Management With SNMP SNMPCONF Working Group - Interim Meeting May 2000 Jon Saperia.
Lecture 8-2CS250: Intro to AI/Lisp What do you mean, “What do I mean?” Lecture 8-2 November 18 th, 1999 CS250.
OWL Web Ontology Language Summary IHan HSIAO (Sharon)
Policy Modeling in a PBM Architecture 6WIND / Euronetlab
An Introduction and UML Profile for the Web Ontology Language (OWL) October 23, 2002 Elisa F. KendallMark E. Dutra CEO & FounderChief Architect
Sharing personal knowledge over the Semantic Web ● We call personal knowledge the knowledge that is developed and shared by the users while they solve.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. SOA-RM Overview and relation with SEE Adrian Mocan
Of 24 lecture 11: ontology – mediation, merging & aligning.
Semantic Web. P2 Introduction Information management facilities not keeping pace with the capacity of our information storage. –Information Overload –haphazardly.
Mechanisms for Requirements Driven Component Selection and Design Automation 최경석.
The Semantic Web By: Maulik Parikh.
Integrating SysML with OWL (or other logic based formalisms)
DOMAIN ONTOLOGY DESIGN
SysML v2 Formalism: Requirements & Benefits
Knowledge Management Systems
Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO)
Web Ontology Language for Service (OWL-S)
Semantic Web - Ontologies
Ontology-Based Approaches to Data Integration
Semantic Markup for Semantic Web Tools:
CIS Monthly Seminar – Software Engineering and Knowledge Management IS Enterprise Modeling Ontologies Presenter : Dr. S. Vasanthapriyan Senior Lecturer.
Presentation transcript:

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION Ontologies Communication – Network Management Technologies Rashid Mijumbi Barcelona, April 2011

Data and Information Models Definition  A model is a representation of the entities in a managed environment.  Provides a common terminology for representing management information, relationships, constraints, rules, and operations to specify data syntax for a chosen domain of discourse DM 1 DM 3 IM 1 DM 2 Conceptual/Abstract model for designers and operators – High Level Representation Concrete model (for implementors) – Low Level Representation – More Details

Data Models (1) The “Necessary Evil” IPsec VPN MPLS VPNMPLS – TEMPLS – QoS Specific Device Model Specific Device #1 Specific Device #2 Specific Device #3 Specific Device #4 Translation Layer N Different Technologies Atleast N*M translations needed M Devices  Heterogeneity in systems makes different Data Models a necessity

Data Models (2) Problems Data harmonisation problem in Data Models Billing Application Customer Name: rashid.mijumbi Fault Management Application Customer Name: mrashid Security Application Customer Name: rmijumbi

Information Models (1) Abstraction, Data Harmonised (no Conflicts) Information Model Standards – Based Data Model Vendor – Based Data Model 1 : N 1 : M Enterprise wide managed objects define data Platform, language and protocol dictate vendor-independent possibilities Vendor implementations dictate working implementation

Information Models (2) Router Configuration Example CISCO Juniper Router(config)# router bgp autonomous-system Router(config-router)# neighbor { ip-address | peer-group-name} remote-as number Router(config-router)# neighbor ip-address activate routing-instances { routing-instance-name { protocols { bgp { group group-name; { peer-as as-number; neighbor ip-address; } } } } } -Different Languages -Different Semantics -Different programming models DEFINING BGP PEERS

Ontologies (1)

Ontologies (2)  Ontology refers to the shared understanding of some domain of interest which may be used as a unifying framework – Uschold and Gruininger (1996)  An ontology is an explicit specification of a conceptualisation. – Gruber 1993  Ontologies offer a formal mechanism for defining an understanding of data  Ontological Commitments  Ontology Requirements: Clarity, Coherence, Extensibility, Minimal encoding bias, Minimal ontological commitment

Ontology Languages  An ontology language is made up of three components  syntax,  semantics (model theory),  proof theory.  The syntax of an ontology language is itself divided into three areas  Logic lexicon, non-logic lexicon and Grammar.  By Syntax  CycL and KIF are examples of languages that support expressions in first-order logic.  By Structure  These languages use a markup scheme to encode knowledge, most commonly XML.  Ontology Inference Layer (OIL), OWL.

Ontology Tools  Ontology development tools  Ontology development tools can be further distinguished as: those that are independent of an ontology language, and those that are tightly dependent on one.  Protégé, Ontolingua.  Ontology merging tools  PROMPT, Chimaera.

Semantic Web (1) User lives in Barcelona and wants to buy a car locally. He can afford up to £500. He wants a red car. Hospitalet €400 maroon Old banger Ford Escort UsedCars Website User  A new form of web content that is meaningful to computers - Berners-Lee 2001 This is because computers cannot process the semantics that are associated with web content

Semantic Web (2) Ontologies: Define relationships: relationship between, say, a postcode, a town, a suburb, etc Mapping Service User Wordnet Ford New Cars BCN Cars UsedCars Website