The National Predictive Modeling Summit 2.01 Basics and Administrative Track: Legal Review of Obtaining Data Testing and Using New Models in Production.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 IS&C Expo October 16 & 17, 2002 John Wagner Governor’s Office of Technology.
Advertisements

© 2014 ACA International. All Rights Reserved. Obtaining Optimum Compliance Performance Foundational Training on ACA’s Professional Practices Management.
COMPLYING WITH HIPAA PRIVACY RULES Presented by: Larry Grudzien, Attorney at Law.
Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act of 1996 HIPAA for Researchers: IRB Related Issues HSC USC IRB.
Implementation of Privacy Board Reviews at PCMC Mary Thomason, Intermountain Healthcare Privacy Board Chair.
Business Associate Contracts: Time Is Running Out... Rebecca L. Williams, RN, JD Partner Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Seattle, WA
An Introduction to Captive Insurance F. Hale Stewart, JD, LLM, CTEP, CWM, CAM Author of the book U.S. Captive Insurance Law Captiveinsuranceinfo.com
Chapter 10 Schedule Your Schedule. Copyright 2004 by Pearson Education, Inc. Identifying And Scheduling Tasks The schedule from the Software Development.
FIELD MARKETINGFIELD MARKETING AVOIDING AGENT LITIGATION Session 35: February 28, 2006 Session Producer: Stephen Serfass, Associate Drinker, Biddle & Reath,
Hong Kong Privacy Code on Human Resource Management
Chapter 7 Control and AIS Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 7-1.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 10 – Maximizing the Use of Evaluation Results.
Version 6.0 Approved by HIPAA Implementation Team April 14, HIPAA Learning Module The following is an educational Powerpoint presentation on the.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 5b – Collecting Data from Agency Records.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 17 Administrativ e Law.
Data Privacy: Third Parties, Vendors, & Nonprofits Baron Rodriguez (PTAC), Michael Hawes (DoED), & Mike Tassey (PTAC)
Learning Objectives LO1 Outline six general audit techniques for gathering evidence. LO2 Identify the procedures and sources of information auditors can.
WORKING WITH THIRD- PARTY VENDORS AND STRATEGIC PARTNERS Pharmaceutical Regulatory and Compliance Congress October Washington, D.C. David Davidovic,
HIPAA Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996.
Insurance Fundamentals for Policymakers. Four assignments: Insurance Principles Insurance Coverages: Property and Casualty Insurance Coverages: Life and.
Information Asset Classification
Route to Buyout – Preparation is Key MetLife Assurance Limited – A specialist in pension risk management.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Legal Research & Writing LAW-215 Writing A Legal Memorandum.
Management & Development of Complex Projects Course Code - 706
Confidentiality and Security Issues in ART & MTCT Clinical Monitoring Systems Meade Morgan and Xen Santas Informatics Team Surveillance and Infrastructure.
HIPAA – How Will the Regulations Impact Research?.
Impact of Financial Crisis on D&O 15 September 2009.
LEGAL ISSUES IN MEDICAL HOME DEVELOPMENT Presented by: Gerry Hinkley Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Ch 8 Privacy Law and HIPAA.
FleetBoston Financial HIPAA Privacy Compliance Agnes Bundy Scanlan Managing Director and Chief Privacy Officer FleetBoston Financial.
2.2 Acquisition Methodology. “Acquisition methodology” – the processes employed and the means used to solicit, request, or invite offers that will normally.
Higher Education PKI Summit Meeting August 8, 2001 The ABA PAG Rodney J. Petersen, J.D. Director, Policy and Planning Office of Information Technology.
Information Asset Classification Community of Practicerev. 10/24/2007 Information Asset Classification What it means to employees.
Copyright ©2014 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved 1 Chapter 02 Compliance, Privacy, Fraud, and Abuse in Insurance Billing Insurance.
FACTA Medical Chicago Regional Training Conference Indianapolis, Indiana June 14, 2006 David Lafleur, Policy Analyst-Compliance Federal Deposit Insurance.
1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 7-1 Chapter 7: Audit Planning and Documentation.
Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except.
May l Washington, DC l Omni Shoreham Web Hosting Potentials and Pitfalls David Snead Attorney W. David Snead, P.C.
TOP 10 DHS IT SECURITY & PRIVACY BEST PRACTICES #10 Contact The Office of Systems & Technology for appropriate ways to proceed if you need access to.
The Use of Actuaries as Part of a Supervisory Model Michael Hafeman – Consultant World Bank May 2004.
PwC Issues in HIPAA Research Compliance William R. Braithwaite, MD, PhD “Dr. HIPAA” HIPAA Summit 6 Washington, DC 27 March 2003.
Published by Flat World Knowledge, Inc. © 2014 by Flat World Knowledge, Inc. All rights reserved. Your use of this work is subject to the License Agreement.
Observing Informed Consent Presented by: David Rickaby, PhD Research Compliance Officer Milwaukee VAMC.
Copyright © 2012, Big I Advantage®, Inc., and Swiss Re Corporate Solutions. All rights reserved. (Ed. 08/12 -1) E&O RISK MANAGEMENT: MEETING THE CHALLENGE.
Data protection—training materials [Name and details of speaker]
Sharing Information Legally Lindsay Ould London Borough of Lewisham.
Screening for Patients’ Health Insurance and Confidentiality Needs
Contracts A contract is an agreement between two or more parties which creates an obligation to do or not to do a particular thing. The document containing.
Privacy principles Individual written policies
E&O Risk Management: Meeting the Challenge of Change
IS4680 Security Auditing for Compliance
General Data Protection Regulations: what you really need to know
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Chapter 3: IRS and FTC Data Security Rules
Reasons why Chiropractic Claims get Delayed or Denied
Ethical questions on the use of big data in official statistics
General Data Protection Regulation
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Cybersecurity compliance for attorneys
Health Care: Privacy in a Digital Age
Chapter 8 Developing an Effective Ethics Program
Welcome!.
Business Associate Contracts: Time Is Running Out . . .
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Issues in HIPAA Research Compliance
Privacy & Security ABC Family Practice.
HIPAA Privacy and Security Update - 5 Years After Implementation
Protecting Student Data
Lesson 3.2 Product Planning
Presentation transcript:

The National Predictive Modeling Summit 2.01 Basics and Administrative Track: Legal Review of Obtaining Data Testing and Using New Models in Production 2.01 Basics and Administrative Track: Legal Review of Obtaining Data Testing and Using New Models in Production Thursday, December 13, 2007 Washington, DC Presented by: Patrick J. Hatfield Bruce W. Foudree L OCKE L ORD B ISSELL & L IDDELL LLP

The National Predictive Modeling Summit 2 OBJECTIVES OF SESSION Share lessons learned Help you avoid surprises at end of planning phase - “Hey, maybe we should run this by Legal before launching?” Explain a few general legal constraints in: gathering data defending new underwriting rules Q&A at end, but please ask as we go

L OCKE L ORD B ISSELL & L IDDELL LLP The National Predictive Modeling Summit 3 Typical Scenario Company owns data gathered from its clients: from applications for coverage, additional data from third parties, and claims related data Company wants to explore new predictive models which: involves obtaining new data from third parties mining data from company’s clients will be validated by applying new model with new data to existing clients, to then compare predictions with reality Once model validated, company wants to model in production

L OCKE L ORD B ISSELL & L IDDELL LLP The National Predictive Modeling Summit 4 3 Broad Categories of Laws Problems in any category may be fatal Category 1 - rules governing data gathering and analysis Category 2 - rules governing what models are good enough to use in production Category 3 - rules governing fairness and requiring actuarial basis or justification

L OCKE L ORD B ISSELL & L IDDELL LLP The National Predictive Modeling Summit 5 Data Gathering Phase Various laws govern (GLBA, HIPAA, FCRA, other state privacy / information handling statutes) data gathered for one purpose (eligibility for coverage initially) which is then sought to be used for a different reason Data gathered for one purpose but which is to be re-disclosed for a different reason, such as re-disclosure to a third party to develop the model Obtaining new information for existing clients, such as requesting a new Rx report for an existing insured

L OCKE L ORD B ISSELL & L IDDELL LLP The National Predictive Modeling Summit 6 Data Gathering Phase Various contracts govern (service agreements with data providers such as Consumer Reporting Agencies, which includes MIB) use of data for other than “permissible purposes” as defined in the contracts re-disclosure to third parties obtaining new information

L OCKE L ORD B ISSELL & L IDDELL LLP The National Predictive Modeling Summit 7 Data Gathering Phase Other “undertakings” by the company may govern the activities described above as well: privacy policies / statements published generally or provided specifically to clients, including websites assurances in applications, consents and authorizations obtained in the new business phase

L OCKE L ORD B ISSELL & L IDDELL LLP The National Predictive Modeling Summit 8 Data Gathering Phase Associating data possessed by a company to the particular governing law, contract or “undertaking” may be difficult Risks of not understanding all the terms governing particular data are high Practically, it may be too risky, expensive and time consuming to appropriately complete the analysis of which data is governed by which terms

L OCKE L ORD B ISSELL & L IDDELL LLP The National Predictive Modeling Summit 9 De-Identification Process The risk of not properly evaluating all of the terms and conditions associated with each data element can be mitigated by using an effective de-identification process De-ID process uses some type of coding method that prevents any unauthorized person from associating any sensitive / protected data to a particular person De-ID process can be used to share aggregated data with third parties without violating privacy rules There is some legal guidance on the critical elements of an effective De-ID process

L OCKE L ORD B ISSELL & L IDDELL LLP The National Predictive Modeling Summit 10 Data Gathering - Lessons Identify types of data to be gathered, internally or externally For each category of data, assess the applicability of the following: privacy laws contracts with sources of the data other undertakings If not confident in the results of the above, prepare De-ID process that satisfies privacy laws, contracts and other undertakings Test the De-ID process for data gathered internally and externally and for how new data will be gathered for the study Adjust data gathering process and details of De-ID process Not understanding how the De-ID process must work in practice until late in the process can be extremely expensive - get to this point as early as possible

L OCKE L ORD B ISSELL & L IDDELL LLP The National Predictive Modeling Summit 11 Putting New Model Into Production Assuming new model is validated using sound testing / statistical techniques and the company is ready to put the model into production, next challenge is to make sure data supporting the predictability of the model is sufficient There are laws governing what “sufficient” means There are laws governing what data may not be used, in some instances, regardless of how tight the correlations may be

L OCKE L ORD B ISSELL & L IDDELL LLP The National Predictive Modeling Summit 12 Production and Implementation Phase State laws prohibiting limited geographic implementation redlining State laws requiring fairness and prohibiting unfair discrimination insurance trade practices State laws imposing standards in rating, such as actuarial soundness Additional examples of state laws potentially applicable to the use of predictive modeling in the business of insurance

L OCKE L ORD B ISSELL & L IDDELL LLP The National Predictive Modeling Summit 13 Lessons Understand the legal landscape at the beginning of the process because doing so may change the methodology early in the process Don’t assume third parties will be permitted to provide the data sought Consider who owns or has rights to use the methodologies for gathering the data, examining the data, the model developed and any related know-how

L OCKE L ORD B ISSELL & L IDDELL LLP The National Predictive Modeling Summit 14 Questions? Answers! Patrick J. Hatfield Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Office: Bruce W. Foudree Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Office: