ACCURACY IN ASSESSMENT; EVIDENCING AND TRACKING PROGRESS IN TEACHER EDUCATION BEA NOBLE-ROGERS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Self Evaluation – writing a good SEF
Advertisements

Dr Sue Horner Head of Standards and Assessment Policy Qualifications and Curriculum Authority UCET, November 2008 A new conversation about assessment.
Supporting managers: assessment and the learner journey
Overview Securing School Improvement. Welcome and introduction AIM Understanding the Ofsted Inspection Framework To give some insight into how some of.
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Standards and assessment: session 3.
Performance management guidance
Working with the Teachers’ Standards in the context of ITE. Some key issues for ITE Partnerships to explore.
NEW STATUTORY REGULATIONS FOR TEACHER APPRAISAL AND CAPABILITY 2012 Mary Higgins, Advisor.
Introduction to: Assessing Pupil Progress (APP)
BEA NOBLE-ROGERS 0FSTED: LESSONS LEARNED APTE 2013 TEACHER EDUCATION SOLUTIONS.
Consistency of Assessment
Performance management guidance
External Mentor and Link Tutor Conference Tuesday 27th January 2015
Lessons from Ofsted ITE Inspection overview 2009/10 WMCETT Forum Professional Dialogue seminar 1 st November 2010 Jill Hardman.
Assessing Pupils’ Progress (APP) in English Workshop: Introducing APP February
Monitoring and Tracking Progress and Achievement in the context of 5
Welcome to the Secondary PGCE New Mentor meeting.
The Ofsted ITE Inspection Framework 2014 A summary.
OFSTED READINESS: RULES OF ENGAGEMENT 2014 BEA NOBLE-ROGERS TEACHER EDUCATION SOLUTIONS.
A Governor Update The New Ofsted Inspection Framework DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER 1.
Building Our Curriculum
PGCE Full-time SE3 Briefing March Aims Be aware of the expectations of SE3 Understand what is expected of you during the block experience Understand.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
12 th January  More genuine consultation  Review our provision  Share best practice  Establish local area networks.
Ofsted lessons Clerks’ Update Jan Ofsted Sept 2012 The key judgements: Inspectors must judge the quality of education provided in the school – its.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 Updates continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director & Caroline Lansdown.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 …continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director Caroline Lansdown – Senior.
Another New Framework Major Changes: No more satisfactory 2 strikes and you are out All criteria changed Very short notice No pre-inspection brief.
History PGCE Subject Development Panel Jan Feedback from Chief External Examiner 2013/14 KEY STRENGTHS: 1.Highly efficient and effective communication.
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Foundation Subjects MFL: optional module 9.
Year 1 School Based Training Briefing 2. Have you: developed an understanding of how children learn? developed an understanding of the range and diversity.
School Inspection What is changing? Substantial changes to the way that Ofsted inspects:  A new Common Inspection Framework  Short inspections for all.
Derbyshire County Council Children and Younger Adults Department ‘P’ Scales Moderation / Levelling.
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
From good to outstanding: Teaching & Learning in the new framework Dave Lewis Nov 2010.
Update on Ofsted inspections in schools January 2012.
Sheila Nolan Director of School Improvement
Accuracy in assessment Evidence bundles: tracking Trainee achievement through pupil progress overtime.
The New Ofsted Framework Pupil Achievement Quality of Leadership and Management Quality of Teaching Behaviour and Safety.
Ofsted Common Inspection Framework Mapping to Career Ready September 2015.
Tracking and Target Setting. Ensuring impact on pupil learning  Identify strand from an area of learning in literacy and mathematics  Identify focus.
PGCE Early Years & Primary Pre-Placement Meeting November / December 2015.
PGP1 Autumn 2015 School Based Mentor training Laura Manison Shore Primary Partnership Manager Linda Bennett SBM at Parson St and School Based Training.
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
Ofsted September 2015 The New Common Inspection Framework.
The 2012 Ofsted inspection framework SCHOOLS North East 14 th October 2011.
Mentor Training Brunel University Primary Partnership Friday 25 th January pm – 4.00pm Barbara Hosier & Alison Silby.
THE TRAINING AND ASSESSMENT TOOLKIT: A GUIDE TO ACCURACY UEL MENTOR TRAINING 3 JULY 2015.
Science Mentors Meeting Jan 29 th Postgraduate Course Feedback Introduction and Welcome.
Creating a school development plan Jamie Hassan 11 th Feb 2016.
Link Tutor Update 17 th March Inspection of Leeds Beckett ITE We anticipate being inspected this year as an ITE provider The Ofsted window opens.
Assessor Training 11 TH FEBRUARY Key Messages from Ofsted  Strengths  The partnership has a clear vision for improving the quality of practice.
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Parents Meeting to discuss Ofsted Report
Making Secure Judgements
New Assessment Routines: Update for Parents
Subject specialist mentoring on the DET
Making Judgements The following slides indicates some of the ‘tools of the trade’ for making judgments about trainee progress. It is intended that a trainee.
APTE ITT inspections: The insights
GOVERNING BODY SELF-EVALUATION TOOLKIT
Accuracy in assessment: tracking trainee progress through impact on pupil progress over time We encourage colleagues to tailor this presentation to the.
B.A. 4 Placement Overview (Placement 1) 4th October 2016
Primary pgce mentor training
Working in Partnership with UEA
Professional Tutor Conference 2017
school self-evaluation and improvement toolkit
OTLA Report Writing Training
Presentation transcript:

ACCURACY IN ASSESSMENT; EVIDENCING AND TRACKING PROGRESS IN TEACHER EDUCATION BEA NOBLE-ROGERS

 Accuracy in Assessment Toolkit  Tracking Trainee’s Progress: ‘evidence bundles’  The Educate Project

WHY THE ACCURACY IN ASSESSMENT TOOLKIT?  Address significant shifts in emphasis of teacher education inspection: two years / three inspection frameworks  Make explicit to all main features of assessment process and protocol = consistency and accuracy  Key elements of assessment at a glance, in one place  Provide explicit grading criteria and expectations for progress  Can be used to ensure all trainees and partners understand and can explain how accuracy in assessment is achieved and their role in that  Support teacher ed. providers in presenting a robust case to, especially inexperienced, inspectors  Flexible to local need: It can be adapted to fit individual partnerships or used essentially as is  Adaptable framework for future change  Safety in numbers and avoid ‘wheel recreation’

THE KEY SHIFTS IN EMPHASIS The quality of trainees’ teaching judged by  impact on pupil progress and learning over time  the context and content of their teaching, through sequences of lessons; it should not be judged by performance in individual lessons, and using the full range of evidence available eg marking  performance against the Teachers’ Standards in full, the bulleted subheadings used to: track progress against the Standards determine areas for additional development identify strengths demonstrate any Grade 3 trainees ‘requiring improvement’ are exceeding the minimum level of practice Very explicit in inspections!!!!

THE KEY SHIFTS IN EMPHASIS  Strengthened expectations for Part Two of the Standards: fundamental British values, extremism, all bullying, professional conduct  Precise, developmental target setting  Individual training plans and intervention  Robust evidence of the accuracy of judgements  All grades, targets, report comments, level of pupil progress must be fully aligned  Inspection Handbooks modify and extend the (future proofed / immutable) Teachers’ Standards: assessment / unseen children / behaviour /FBV  Raised expectations

THE HEART OF THE SYSTEM

THE PRINCIPLES  a vision for the development of outstanding teachers which places the pupil at the heart of teacher education  a framework for assessing the quality of trainees’ teaching starting with impact on pupils’ progress which informs ongoing achievement and final attainment  the essential resources to support trainees and their tutors/mentors in recording and evidencing progress and setting appropriate long and short term targets  assessments reflect the quality of trainees’ teaching overall and the interrelatedness of the Standards enabling pupil progress  an unambiguous shared language for discussing the progress of, and expectations for, trainees

CONTENTS Assessing trainees: important considerations Grading rationale Annual assessment process at a glance: an example Expected outcomes and progress though training Accuracy in grading: the alignment of grades, progress, comments and targets Guidance for the weekly meetings: reviewing progress and assessment Cause for concern procedure Target setting and achieving targets Teachers’ Standards, Part One: Teaching grade descriptors - guidance notes Teachers’ Standards, Part One: Teaching grade descriptors Teachers’ Standards, Part Two: Personal and professional conduct

IMPACT ACROSS A TEACHER ED. PARTNERSHIP  At a glance processes and procedures from observation to assessment understood and used by all  Mentors, trainees and link tutors understanding and using the language of progress  Collaboration over training : trainees taking responsibility for their progress and their pupils’ progress  Trainees able to pin point their own needs, working with their mentors – individualized training  Secure evidence of progress towards exceeding the Standards overall, individual standards and pupils’ progress

TRACKING TRAINEE PROGRESS - YOU NEED TO:  Accurately track data of individual’s, sub groups’, full cohort’s progress  Explicitly use this to inform on going self evaluation and improvement planning and intervention for cohort overall and groups of trainees  Clearly rationalise approach for trainees and mentors, clear purpose and fit for purpose

TRACKING PROGRESS AND EVIDENCE OF PROGRESS  Currently often cumbersome - masses of evidence collection against each Standard Clarity of purpose, expectations and intended impact on outcomes and progress unclear  Step change from evidence collection to reflecting on and analysing quality of teaching and learning From their ‘performance’ to their pupils’ progress from ‘getting’ Teachers’ Standards to recognising how Teachers’ Standards work together from whole class progress to progress and learning of groups of learners overtime

TRACKING TRAINEE PROGRESS Observations: evidence of pupil progress and learning overtime, trainee strengths areas for development impacting on pupil progress Weekly meetings: evidence pupil progress and learning overtime, progress v targets, map new and revised targets and key strengths against TSs’ Interim reviews: evidence of impact on groups of learners; review targets and progress against TSs’ overall Summative reviews: evidence bundle; groups of learners; progress against the TSs’; strengths and targets for next stage

EVIDENCE BUNDLES Evidence bundles are used to demonstrate:  progress made by pupils overall and by groups of pupils  quality of trainee’s teaching overall  how trainees’ skills against each Standard has enabled them to impact on pupil progress  how strong their teaching is in each of the Standards  areas for targets for further development

EVIDENCE BUNDLES PROCESS  Trainee with mentor identifies strong sequence of lessons re pupil progress overtime (or sequences)  Pull together a ‘bundle’ of evidence relating to this: assessments, photographs, marking, plans, observations, evaluations, weekly review forms etc.  Bundle analysed and annotated to identify evidence of impact on the progress of different groups evidence progress against each of the TSs’  Trainee writes analytic evidence-based commentary of their progress since their previous review; including impact of training

THE EDUCATE PROJECT: ONLINE RESOURCE FOR T. ED Currently  No online bespoke systems in UK for moving from trainee assessment to improvement planning  Existing systems cumbersome and not fit for purpose  Too much time consuming manual data population  Too often handed to ‘data’ experts with tutors losing ownership  Limited scope for trainees to reflect

WE ARE BUILDING  Simple, fully automated and intuitive system  Trainees, mentors and assessors  Generic model with bespoke solutions  Guidance, frameworks, proformas for: assessment, self evaluation and improvement planning  Automatically track progress from report forms  Alert user to atypical issues  Crunch numbers and generate charts  Populate self evaluation proforma with relevant data  And ……..?

AT A GLANCE AssessmentTracking Data processing Self evaluation Improvement planning