Turbulent Dynamo Stanislav Boldyrev (Wisconsin-Madison) Fausto Cattaneo (Chicago) Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spectrum of MHD turbulence
Advertisements

Dynamo Effects in Laboratory Plasmas S.C. Prager University of Wisconsin October, 2003.
Turbulent transport of magnetic fields Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical.
Galactic Dynamos and ISM Turbulence. Steve Cowley,UCLA/ Imperial College Alex Schekochihin, Imperial Jim McWilliams, UCLA Greg Hammett, Princeton Greg.
Madison 2006 Dynamo Fausto Cattaneo ANL - University of Chicago Stewart Prager University of Wisconsin.
Intermittency of MHD Turbulence A. Lazarian UW-Madison: Astronomy and Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas Special.
CMSO 2005 Mean field dynamos: analytical and numerical results Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic-Self Organization and Department.
The solar dynamo(s) Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas Chicago 2003.
Chicago, October 2003 David Hughes Department of Applied Mathematics University of Leeds Nonlinear Effects in Mean Field Dynamo Theory.
Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ION HEATING: Planning the next.
Outline Dynamo: theoretical General considerations and plans Progress report Dynamo action associated with astrophysical jets Progress report Dynamo: experiment.
Canopy Spectra and Dissipation John Finnigan CSIRO Atmospheric Research Canberra, Australia.
Proto-Planetary Disk and Planetary Formation
Topic: Turbulence Lecture by: C.P. Dullemond
Particle acceleration in a turbulent electric field produced by 3D reconnection Marco Onofri University of Thessaloniki.
INI 2004 Astrophysical dynamos Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization Computations Institute Department of Mathematics.
Lecture 9 - Kolmogorov’s Theory Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics
LES of Turbulent Flows: Lecture 10 (ME EN )
Numerical simulations of the magnetorotational instability (MRI) S.Fromang CEA Saclay, France J.Papaloizou (DAMTP, Cambridge, UK) G.Lesur (DAMTP, Cambridge,
Magnetization of Galactic Disks and Beyond Collaborators: Dmitry Shapovalov (Johns Hopkins) Alex Lazarian (U. Wisconsin) Jungyeon Cho (Chungnam) Kracow.
Dresden, May 2010 Introduction to turbulence theory Gregory Falkovich
New Mechanism of Generation of Large-Scale Magnetic Field in Turbulence with Large-Scale Velocity Shear I. ROGACHEVSKII, N. KLEEORIN, E. LIVERTS Ben-Gurion.
Inertial particles in self- similar random flows Jérémie Bec CNRS, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Nice Massimo Cencini Rafaela Hillerbrand.
Influence of turbulence on the dynamo threshold B. Dubrulle, GIT/SPEC N. Leprovost, R. Dolganov, P. Blaineau J-P. Laval and F. Daviaud.
Numerical simulations of the MRI: the effects of dissipation coefficients S.Fromang CEA Saclay, France J.Papaloizou (DAMTP, Cambridge, UK) G.Lesur (DAMTP,
GRB Prompt Emission: Turbulence, Magnetic Field & Jitter Radiation Jirong Mao.
Turbulence in Astrophysics (Theory)
23-28 September 2003 Basic Processes in Turbulent Plasmas Forecasting asymptotic states of a Galerkin approximation of 2D MHD equations Forecasting asymptotic.
Physics 777 Plasma Physics and Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) Instructor: Gregory Fleishman Lecture 8. Weak Turbulence and Magnetic Reconnection 21 October.
1 Forced – decaying Helical – nonhelical. 2 Points of the talk Resistive effects during inverse transfer B-field does not care about irrotational part.
Statistics of Lorenz force in kinematic stage of magnetic dynamo at large Prandtle number S.S.Vergeles Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics in collaboration.
Transport Equations for Turbulent Quantities
Plasma Dynamos UCLA January 5th 2009 Steve Cowley, UKAEA Culham and Imperial Thanks to Alex Schekochihin, Russell Kulsrud, Greg Hammett and Mark Rosin.
Processes in Protoplanetary Disks
Center for Multi-scale Plasma Dynamics. Bill Dorland, Maryland.
1 Hantao Ji Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Experimentalist Laboratory astrophysics –Reconnection, angular momentum transport, dynamo effect… –Center.
This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by the University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under.
Magneto-hydrodynamic turbulence: from the ISM to discs
The turbulent cascade in the solar wind Luca Sorriso-Valvo LICRYL – IPCF/CNR, Rende, Italy R. Marino, V. Carbone, R. Bruno, P. Veltri,
Structure functions and cancellation exponent in MHD: DNS and Lagrangian averaged modeling Pablo D. Mininni 1,* Jonathan Pietarila Graham 1, Annick Pouquet.
Magnetic dynamo over different astrophysical scales Axel Brandenburg & Fabio Del Sordo (Nordita) with contributions from many others seed field primordial.
0 Local and nonlocal conditional strain rates along gradient trajectories from various scalar fields in turbulence Lipo Wang Institut für Technische Verbrennung.
Critical issues to get right about stellar dynamos Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen) Shukurov et al. (2006, A&A 448, L33) Schekochihin et al. (2005,
Effect of Magnetic Helicity on Non-Helical Turbulent Dynamos N. KLEEORIN and I. ROGACHEVSKII Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, ISRAEL.
Helicity as a Constraint on the Solar Dynamo Alexei A. Pevtsov If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.
Large scale magnetic fields and Dynamo theory Roman Shcherbakov, Turbulence Discussion Group 14 Apr 2008.
Daniela Tordella, POLITECNICO DI TORINO. DNS and LES In the past years, DNS and LES become viable tools to treat transitioning and turbulent flows.
Dynamo theory and magneto-rotational instability Axel Brandenburg (Nordita) seed field primordial (decay) diagnostic interest (CMB) AGN outflows MRI driven.
3 March 2005ICTP Trieste David Hughes Department of Applied Mathematics University of Leeds Some Aspects of Mean Field Dynamo Theory.
Direct simulation of planetary and stellar dynamos II. Future challenges (maintenance of differential rotation) Gary A Glatzmaier University of California,
Catastrophic  -quenching alleviated by helicity flux and shear Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen) Christer Sandin (Uppsala) Collaborators: Eric G.
What Do We Know About MHD Turbulence?
Turbulent Dynamos: How I learned to ignore kinematic dynamo theory MFUV 2015 With Amir Jafari and Ben Jackel.
Physics of turbulence at small scales Turbulence is a property of the flow not the fluid. 1. Can only be described statistically. 2. Dissipates energy.
The Magneto-Rotational Instability and turbulent angular momentum transport Fausto Cattaneo Paul Fischer Aleksandr Obabko.
Numerical simulations of astrophysical dynamos Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm) Dynamos: numerical issues Alpha dynamos do exist: linear and nonlinear.
Harish Dixit and Rama Govindarajan With Anubhab Roy and Ganesh Subramanian Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore September.
ITP 2008 MRI Driven turbulence and dynamo action Fausto Cattaneo University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory.
Turbulence in Magnetised Plasma of Galaxies and Clusters
ANGULAR MOMENTUM TRANSPORT BY MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC TURBULENCE Gordon Ogilvie University of Cambridge TACHOCLINE DYNAMICS
Prandtl number dependence of magnetic-to-kinetic dissipation 1.What gets in, will get out 2.Even for vanishing viscosity 3.What if magnetic fields 4. contribute?
Spectrum and small-scale structures in MHD turbulence Joanne Mason, CMSO/University of Chicago Stanislav Boldyrev, CMSO/University of Madison at Wisconsin.
INI 2004 Small-scale dynamos Fausto Cattaneo Department of Mathematics University of Chicago.
Overview of dynamos in stars and galaxies
Dynamo action & MHD turbulence (in the ISM, hopefully…)
The Effects of Magnetic Prandtl Number On MHD Turbulence
Coronal Loop Oscillations observed by TRACE
Non linear evolution of 3D magnetic reconnection in slab geometry
Energy spectra of small scale dynamos with large Reynolds numbers
Catastrophic a-quenching alleviated by helicity flux and shear
Presentation transcript:

Turbulent Dynamo Stanislav Boldyrev (Wisconsin-Madison) Fausto Cattaneo (Chicago) Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas

Questions 1. Can turbulence amplify a weak magnetic field? 2.What are the scales and growth rates of magnetic fields? Kinematic Theory

MHD Equations   v + (v¢r)v = -rp + (r£B)£B +  v + f   B = r£(v£B) +  B P m = /  - magnetic Prandtl number R m =VL/  - magnetic Reynolds number V1V1 V2V2 B B Kinematic dynamo Re=VL/ - Reynolds number

Kinematic Turbulent Dynamo: Phenomenology   B = r£(v£B) +  B V(x, t) is given. Consider turbulent velocity field V(x,t) with the spectrum: K EKEK K0K0 K K -5/3  V / 1/3  » /  V / -2/3 smaller eddies rotate faster Magnetic field is most efficiently amplified by the smallest eddies in which it is frozen. The size of such eddies is defined by resistivity. » 1/K B

Kinematic Turbulent Dynamo: Phenomenology K EKEK K0K0 K K -5/3 KK KK E M (K) Role of resistivity  Small Prandtl number,Large Prandtl number, Dynamo growth rate: “smooth” velocity  V / “rough” velocity  V /   1/3  » 1/    » 1/  P M ´ /  ¿ 1 P M À 1

Phenomenology: Large Prandtl Number Dynamo Large Prandtl number P M = /  À 1 Interstellar and intergalactic media K EKEK K0K0 K K -5/3 KK E M (K) Magnetic lines are folded Schekochihin et al (2004)  B Cattaneo (1996)

Phenomenology: Small Prandtl Number Dynamo Small Prandtl number P M = /  ¿ 1 Stars, planets, accretion disks, liquid metal experiments KK0K0 K KK EKEK K -5/3 E M (K)  V » 1/3  / (R M ) -3/4  » /  V / 2/3  » 1/   / (R M ) 1/2 Dynamo growth rate: [S.B. & F. Cattaneo (2004)] Numerics: Haugen et al (2004)  RMRM

Kinematic Turbulent Dynamo: Theory   B = r£(v£B) +  B V(x, t) is a given turbulent field Two Major Questions: 1. What is the dynamo threshold, i.e., the critical magnetic Reynolds number R M, crit ? 2. What is the spatial structure of the growing magnetic field (characteristic scale, spectrum)? These questions cannot be answered from dimensional estimates!

Kinematic Turbulent Dynamo: Theory Dynamo is a net effect of magnetic line stretching and resistive reconnection. R M > R M, crit : stretching wins, dynamo R M < R M, crit : reconnection wins, no dynamo R M =R M, crit : stretching balances reconnection: B  When R M exceeds R M, crit only slightly, it takes many turnover times to amplify the field

Kinematic Turbulent Dynamo: Kazantsev Model No Dynamo Dynamo incompressibility homogeneity and isotropy

Kazantsev Model: Large Prandtl Number Large Prandtl number: P M = /  À 1 Kazantsev model predicts: 1. Dynamo is possible; 2. E M (K)/ K 3/2 Schekochihin et al (2004) Numerics agree with both results: If we know  (r, t), we know growth rate and spectrum of magnetic filed KEKEK K0K0 K K -5/3 KK E M (K)

Kazantsev Model: Small Prandtl Number P M = /  ¿ 1 KK0K0 K KK EKEK K -5/3 E M (K) Is turbulent dynamo possible? Batchelor (1950): “analogy of magnetic field and vorticity.” No Kraichnan & Nagarajan (1967): “analogy with vorticity does not work.” ? Vainshtein & Kichatinov (1986): Yes Direct numerical simulations: (2004): No  (2007): Yes resolution

Small Prandtl Number: Dynamo Is Possible K EKEK K0K0 K K -5/3 KK E M (K) KK0K0 K KK EKEK K -5/3 E M (K) Keep R M constant. Add small-scale eddies (increase Re). P M = /  À 1 P M = /  ¿ 1 Kazantsev model: dynamo action is always possible, but for rough velocity ( P M ¿1) the critical magnetic Reynolds number ( R M =LV/  ) is very large.

Kazantsev Model: Small Prandtl Number Theory S. B. & F. Cattaneo (2004) Simulations P. Mininni et al (2004) A. Iskakov et al (2007) R M, crit L/  May be crucial for laboratory dynamo, P M ¿ 1 Re P M À 1 P M ¿ 1 smooth velocity Kolmogorov (rough) velocity

Kinematic Dynamo with Helicity K EKEK K0K0 K K -5/3 KK It is natural to expect that turbulence can amplify magnetic field at K ¸ K 0 Can turbulence amplify magnetic field at K ¿ K 0 ? Yes, if velocity field has nonzero helicity “large-scale dynamo”

Dynamo with Helicity: Kazantsev Model energyhelicity magnetic energymagnetic helicity given need to find Equations for M(r, t) and F(r, t) were derived by Vainshtein and Kichatinov (1986) h=s v¢ (r £ v)d 3 x  0

Dynamo with Helicity: Kazantsev Model Two equations for magnetic energy and magnetic helicity can be written in the quantum-mechanical “spinor” form: h=s v¢ (r £ v)d 3 x  0 r r h=s v¢ (r £ v)d 3 x  0 S. B., F. Cattaneo & R. Rosner (2004)

Kazantsev model and  -model r  - model Kazantsev model, NO scale separation The  - model approaches the exact solution only at r  1 assumes scale separation

Conclusions 1.Main aspects of kinematic turbulent dynamo is relatively well understood both phenomenologically and analytically. 2. Dynamo always exists, but 3. Separation of small- and large-scale may be not a correct procedure. PMPM R M, crit 1