Spatial and Spectral Properties of the Dummy-Head During Measurements in the Head-Shadow Area based on HRTF Evaluation Wersényi György SZÉCHENYI ISTVÁN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Frequency response adaptation in binaural hearing David Griesinger Cambridge MA USA
Advertisements

Frequency response adaptation in binaural hearing
Evaluation of Dummy-Head HRTFs in the Horizontal Plane based on the Peak-Valley Structure in One-degree Spatial Resolution Wersényi György SZÉCHENYI ISTVÁN.
1 3D sound reproduction with “OPSODIS” and its commercial applications Takashi Takeuchi, PhD Chief Technical Officer OPSODIS Limited Institute of Sound.
Binaural Hearing Or now hear this! Upcoming Talk: Isabelle Peretz Musical & Non-musical Brains Nov. 12 noon + Lunch Rm 2068B South Building.
Spatial Perception of Audio J. D. (jj) Johnston Neural Audio Corporation.
Learning the cues associated with non-individualised HRTFs John Worley and Jonas Braasch Binaural and Spatial Hearing Group.
Listening Tests and Evaluation of Simulated Sound Fields Using VibeStudio Designer Wersényi György Hesham Fouad SZÉCHENYI ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY, Hungary VRSonic,
CS 551/651: Structure of Spoken Language Lecture 11: Overview of Sound Perception, Part II John-Paul Hosom Fall 2010.
3-D Sound and Spatial Audio MUS_TECH 348. Wightman & Kistler (1989) Headphone simulation of free-field listening I. Stimulus synthesis II. Psychophysical.
Localizing Sounds. When we perceive a sound, we often simultaneously perceive the location of that sound. Even new born infants orient their eyes toward.
AUDITORY LOCALIZATION Lynn E. Cook, AuD Occupational Audiologist NNMC, Bethesda, MD.
Improvement of Audibility for Multi Speakers with the Head Related Transfer Function Takanori Nishino †, Kazuhiro Uchida, Naoya Inoue, Kazuya Takeda and.
What Virtual Audio Synthesis Could Do for Visually Disabled Humans in the New Era? György Wersényi Széchenyi István University Department of Telecommunications.
Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants Bernhard U. Seeber and Hugo Fastl (2007) Maria Andrey Berezina HST.723 April 8 th, 2009.
ICA Madrid 9/7/ Simulating distance cues in virtual reverberant environments Norbert Kopčo 1, Scott Santarelli, Virginia Best, and Barbara Shinn-Cunningham.
3-D Spatialization and Localization and Simulated Surround Sound with Headphones Lucas O’Neil Brendan Cassidy.
Effect of roving on spatial release from masking for amplitude-modulated noise stimuli Norbert Kopčo *, Jaclyn J. Jacobson, and Barbara Shinn-Cunningham.
Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation
Spectral centroid 6 harmonics: f0 = 100Hz E.g. 1: Amplitudes: 6; 5.75; 4; 3.2; 2; 1 [(100*6)+(200*5.75)+(300*4)+(400*3.2)+(500*2 )+(600*1)] / = 265.6Hz.
There are several clues you could use: 1.arrival time 2.phase lag (waves are out of sync) 3.sound shadow (intensity difference)- sound is louder at ear.
Binaural Sound Localization and Filtering By: Dan Hauer Advisor: Dr. Brian D. Huggins 6 December 2005.
Acoustical Society of America, Chicago 7 June 2001 Effect of Reverberation on Spatial Unmasking for Nearby Speech Sources Barbara Shinn-Cunningham, Lisa.
AP Statistics Day One Syllabus AP Content Outline Estimating Populations and Subpopulations.
Speech Segregation Based on Sound Localization DeLiang Wang & Nicoleta Roman The Ohio State University, U.S.A. Guy J. Brown University of Sheffield, U.K.
Let’s Review for… AP Statistics!!! Chapter 1 Review Frank Cerros Xinlei Du Claire Dubois Ryan Hoshi.
Binaural Sonification of Disparity Maps Alfonso Alba, Carlos Zubieta, Edgar Arce Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí.
On the Preprocessing and Postprocessing of HRTF Individualization Based on Sparse Representation of Anthropometric Features Jianjun HE, Woon-Seng Gan,
Improved 3D Sound Delivered to Headphones Using Wavelets By Ozlem KALINLI EE-Systems University of Southern California December 4, 2003.
Applied Psychoacoustics Lecture: Binaural Hearing Jonas Braasch Jens Blauert.
Issac Garcia-Munoz Senior Thesis Electrical Engineering Advisor: Pietro Perona.
Rumsey Chapter 16 Day 3. Overview  Stereo = 2.0 (two discreet channels)  THREE-DIMENSIONAL, even though only two channels  Stereo listening is affected.
3-D Sound and Spatial Audio MUS_TECH 348. Main Types of Errors Front-back reversals Angle error Some Experimental Results Most front-back errors are front-to-back.
Sounds in a reverberant room can interfere with the direct sound source. The normal hearing (NH) auditory system has a mechanism by which the echoes, or.
THE MANIFOLDS OF SPATIAL HEARING Ramani Duraiswami | Vikas C. Raykar Perceptual Interfaces and Reality Lab University of Maryland, College park.
The Physical Layer Lowest layer in Network Hierarchy. Physical transmission of data. –Various flavors Copper wire, fiber optic, etc... –Physical limits.
Audio for Telepresence and Virtual Reality Colin S. Harrison.
‘Missing Data’ speech recognition in reverberant conditions using binaural interaction Sue Harding, Jon Barker and Guy J. Brown Speech and Hearing Research.
Simulation of small head-movements on a Virtual Audio Display using headphone playback and HRTF synthesis Wersényi György SZÉCHENYI ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY,
3-D Sound and Spatial Audio MUS_TECH 348. Physical Modeling Problem: Can we model the physical acoustics of the directional hearing system and thereby.
L INKWITZ L AB S e n s i b l e R e p r o d u c t i o n & R e c o r d i n g o f A u d i t o r y S c e n e s Hearing Spatial Detail in Stereo Recordings.
Figures for Chapter 14 Binaural and bilateral issues Dillon (2001) Hearing Aids.
Applied Psychoacoustics Lecture 3: Masking Jonas Braasch.
EECE 252 PROJECT SPRING 2014 Presented by: Peizhen Sun Nor Asma Mohd Sidik.
Hearing Research Center
This research was supported by Delphi Automotive Systems
1 8. One Function of Two Random Variables Given two random variables X and Y and a function g(x,y), we form a new random variable Z as Given the joint.
Listeners weighting of cues for lateral angle: The duplex theory of sound localization revisited E. A. MacPherson & J. C. Middlebrooks (2002) HST. 723.
Working towards a revised MPD standard (ISO ) a sneak-peek on the current mind set Bo Söderling; LMI Technologies Ltd.
On the improvement of virtual localization in vertical directions using HRTF synthesis and additional filtering Wersényi György SZÉCHENYI ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY,
3-D Sound and Spatial Audio MUS_TECH 348. Are IID and ITD sufficient for localization? No, consider the “Cone of Confusion”
AUDIOMETRY An Audiometer is a machine, which is used to determine the hearing loss in an individual.
On the manifolds of spatial hearing
Fletcher’s band-widening experiment (1940)
Figure 8-1. Figure 8-2 Correct Rejection Miss FA Hit ‘YES’ ‘NO’ β.
SPATIAL HEARING Ability to locate the direction of a sound. Ability to locate the direction of a sound. Localization: In free field Localization: In free.
Numericals.
3-D Sound and Spatial Audio MUS_TECH 348. What do these terms mean? Both terms are very general. “3-D sound” usually implies the perception of point sources.
Sound Localization and Binaural Hearing
Figure 8.1 (p. 615) Time-domain condition for distortionless transmission of a signal through a linear time-invariant system. Signals and Systems, 2/E.
Auditory Localization in Rooms: Acoustic Analysis and Behavior
PSYCHOACOUSTICS A branch of psychophysics
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
Hearing Spatial Detail
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
Localizing Sounds.
8. One Function of Two Random Variables
8. One Function of Two Random Variables
Presentation transcript:

Spatial and Spectral Properties of the Dummy-Head During Measurements in the Head-Shadow Area based on HRTF Evaluation Wersényi György SZÉCHENYI ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY, Department of Telecommunications H-9026, Győr, Egyetem tér 1., Hungary Tel.: Fax: Abstract In accurate and repeatable measurements dummy-heads are often used to model the average human head and body. They are suited for standardized measurements and for investigating the human spatial hearing and localization performance. The monaural Head-Related Transfer Functions (HRTFs) of the dummy-head can be used for various investigations. This paper uses the HRTF-set of a Brüel & Kjaer head and torso simulator focusing on the so called monaural head-shadow area, where one of the ears is shadowed by the head itself. Based on long-term measurements using the bare torso as well as other accessories (glasses, clothing etc.) on it, the extent of the head-shadow area will be presented in frequency and space. The head-shadow area is investigated in connection with the overall SNR of the measurement and sensitivity domains of the ears. Introduction HRTF: Head-Related Transfer Function, transmission from free-field to the eardrum(s) Basic localization cue for directional hearing Measurement on real humans or on dummy-heads Reproduction through (equalized) headphones In listening tests are dummy-head HRTFs inferior to individual HRTFs Measurement HRTFs of a Brüel Kjaer 4128 dummy-head Anechoic room, white noise excitation Resolution: 1 degree horizontal, 5 degrees vertical Accuracy in the HRTFs: 1 dB Goal: –Investigating the role of hair, cap, glasses, clothing etc.? –Repeatable property of the dummy-head (left-ear only, horizontal plane) ? –Role of the head-shadow area ? HRTFD HRTFD: Differences in dB between two HRTFs from the same direction but under modified conditions: If condition1 = condition2, HRTFD gives the repeatability property (accuracy) of the measurement (including dummy-head and environment) Eliminates individual differences in re-measured results! Results Sensitivity and antenna-model of the pinna Directional filtering, directional dependent sensitivity Spatial domains where the overall signal level of the HRTFs are high is a „sensitive” region Head-shadow area decreases the sensitivity (both spatial as well in frequency) Footprints: ±20º „stereo area” (binaural sensitivity area) Highest signal HRTF-level: 45º axes (pinna placement) This kind of monaural sensitivity can be recognized between elevations -10º to +30º Worst sensitive area at the contralateral ear about 250º-260º horizontally (head-shadow area) Frequency Limits Hz: –well-known from the literature –separates localization: envelope vs. fine structure (ITD) –We did not observe any effects or deviations in the HRTFDs below 1600 Hz About Hz: –Shadowing effect = random incidence and high frequency disturbances –Cut-off frequency depends on azimuth and elevation –Figure 5 shows the head-shadow area (averaged for all elevations) –Lowest value is about 3000 Hz, average about 3500 Hz Summary Dummy-heads are well suited for long-term, accurate and standardized HRTF measurements. A precisely controlled system is able to set and re-set the spatial directions, to re-measure and to analyze recorded transfer functions easily. We investigated the role of the HRTFs in human localization through accurate HRTF measurements. By analyzing the monaural HRTFs of the dummy-head, we can determine the monaural sensitivity regions of the hearing system. We have found this to be symmetrical to the median plane (±20º) and the axe of 45 degrees as the most sensitive monaural direction. The extent of the monaural „antenna footprint” of the ear in the horizontal plane is from about -20 degrees to 90 degrees. Shadowing effects can be seen as the worst effect: the HRTFs are influenced and they vary too rapidly to allow high- frequency recognition. Re-measured HRTFs in this region vary more than 10 dB above about 2 kHz and they make the incoming signal “noisy”. This is a natural phenomenon in the head-shadow area, especially near to the horizontal plane. Above 30 degrees of elevation it is becoming less important. This fact was also supported by the measurement with the baseball cap. Finally, we tried to determine the spatial extent of this area depending on the environment near the head. The cut-off frequency of the head-shadow area varies from 3-6 kHz, although there seems to be a constant value of about 3500 Hz that separates the lateral-contralateral evaluation. Fig.1. Effect of the pinna at frontal incidence. HRTFs of the Head and Torso Simulator with and without the pinna. Fig.2. Footprints of the ears representing the monaural sensitivity regions based on the HRTF evaluation. Fig.3. 2D spatial representation of the magnitude of HRTF data for a fixed elevation as function of azimuth and frequency. The polar histogram shows the deviations between HRTFs from repeated measurements in the horizontal plane for the right ear. The natural deviations of the HRTFs caused by the filtering and shadowing effects are shown as unsigned absolute values in dB. The circles correspond to frequency domains with 1 kHz bandwidth marked with the center frequency (linear scale). Note the head-shadow area (filled black). Fig.4. HRTF data using a baseball cap on the head of the dummy-head from elevation 10 degrees (left) and 20 degrees (right). Compare with Fig.3, note the effect of the visor. Fig.5. Frequency limit of the head-shadow area as function of azimuth. Result is averaged from all measurement for all elevations. The lowest cut-off freqency of about 3000 Hz is in the head-shadow area (minimum of the monaural sensitivity)