DESY_ILCW07 Global Design Effort-CF&S 1 Beam Delivery System & Interaction Region Fred Asiri CF&S Point of Contact.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Delivery Approaches for Wastewater Utilities in Minnesota June 24, 2008 Metropolitan Council Environment Committee.
Advertisements

CFS TIME SCHEDULE EDR - CFS Europe – Kick-Off Meetings Kick-Off Meetings, CERN, 3, 4, 5 September ILC PROJECT ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT CFS Europe.
Feb. 6, 2007 BILCW07 Global Design Effort 1 CF&S EDR Plans Main Linac Parallel Session Tom Lackowski Atsushi Enomoto, Jean Luc Baldy, Vic Kuchler.
The decision box represents key management decisions and serve as the GATES which delineate phases. The decision can be to proceed, exit, or recycle. More.
Lunchtime Topics Craig Weise Construction Reform Program Director Lisa Conomy Construction Counsel OSU Office of Legal Affairs.
Nov. 19, 2008 ILC08 Global Design Effort 1 Status Report Alternative Siting and Tunnel Design Tom Lackowski.
1 DOE Annual Review -June 15,2005 An Overview of Conventional Facilities (Civil Construction) U. S. ILC Civil studies and cost issues for Snowmass Fred.
Systems Engineering Management
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
CFS near term & Required ADI input CFS near term & Required ADI input 6-12 month activities, required ADI information 10. AUG 2014CFS-ADI Joint Meeting1.
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
Project X RD&D Plan Conventional Facilities (Civil Construction) Russ Alber AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
S/W Project Management
AV Project Management Using InfoComm Standards
Global Design Effort 1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Overview A. Enomoto, J-L. Baldy, V. Kuchler GDE.
Global Design Effort BDS KOM Opening remarks/comments from EDR Project Management SLAC Marc Ross / Nick Walker.
1 Phases in Software Development Lecture Software Development Lifecycle Let us review the main steps –Problem Definition –Feasibility Study –Analysis.
Global Design Effort - CFS CLIC 09 Workshop - WG 5 Technical Systems 1 CLIC 09 WORKSHOP Working Group 5 - Technical Systems ILC REBASELINE ILC.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP Status and Overview.
Global Design Effort U.S. ILC Cost Translation R. Stanek, et al. Vic Kuchler 1/26/07.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Global Design Effort Push-pull studies How to proceed LCWS07 June 1, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi.
Global Design Effort - CFS SiD Collaboration Meeting - SLAC 1 VERTICAL ACCESS ILC IR LAYOUT for SiD and ILD CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING.
What is a Business Analyst? A Business Analyst is someone who works as a liaison among stakeholders in order to elicit, analyze, communicate and validate.
Fred Asiri1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update November.
Global Design Effort Americas Region Efforts and Resources Mike Harrison GDE.
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS PRIME CONTRACTS Format and Major Components CHAPTER - 4.
LCFOA Meeting at SLAC Linear Collider Forum of the Americas 1 LINEAR COLLIDER FORUM OF THE AMERICAS CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES OVERVIEW Victor R. Kuchler.
BASICS IN IRRIGATION ENGINEERING 2.1. Planning Irrigation systems 2.2. soil-plant-water relation – over view 2.3. Crop water requirement 2.4. Base, delta.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
PROJECT PHASES ACT Objective To provide an understanding of the design & construction process and the roles of the different participants in this.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Global Design Effort 1 Possible Minimum Machine Studies of Central Region for 2009 Reference, ILC Minimum Machine Study Proposal V1, January 2009 ILC-EDMS.
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Key Steps to Delivering Project 1.Lead agency submits final project scope, budget and schedule to MTC 2.MTC.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ILC AD&I MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP UPDATE V.
WBS x.11 Conventional Facilities Americas Region ILC Fermilab ART Meeting1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group Americas Region FY.
Aug. 22, 2007 CF7S Americas EDR Kick-Off A&E Selection the Fermi Process Tom Lackowski.
Fred Asiri1 Conventional Facilities SLAC April 9, 2006 Acknowledgment: Clay Corvin, Jerry Aarons, and Jonghoon Kim.
NCSX Systems Engineering Management Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons May 15, 2003.
Project Delivery Methods Part I. What is A Project Delivery Method? The owner’s selection of the organizational structure of the project. Three popular.
Project Scoping. Project Scoping – learning objective Who should complete the Project Initiation Package (PIP)? How is PDP Path used in scoping? Task.
1 Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Controls & LLRF Working Group: Tuesday Session (29 May 07) John Carwardine Kay Rehlich.
Global Design Effort - CFS AD & I Meeting - DESY AD & I Meeting - DESY 1 AD&I Meeting CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP Main Linac Tunnel.
Global Design Effort - CFS DESY Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ACCELERATOR INTEGRATION AND DESIGN MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Conventional Facilities and Siting GG Global Design Effort BILCW 07 - Beijing1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group Summary Report.
Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Americas Region Team WBS x.2 Global Systems Program Overview for FY08/09.
Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group Global Design Effort CFS EDR Kick-Off Mtg, FNAL Aug 22 – 24, CFS EDR FNAL Kick-Off Planning.
The Planning Phase Recognize the problem MIS steering committee 7. ManagerSystems analyst Define the problem Set system objectives Identify system constraints.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC CFS and Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC CFS AND GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP CFS.
Fred Asiri1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update December.
The categories for ILC budget planning are: R&D – work done in laboratories to develop and verify subsystem components. This supports the cost reduction.
Construction Management At Risk Process
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AT RISK Prepared by: Nancy Fouad Carey Attorney AGC Alabama Birmingham Section Meeting November 5, 2012.
1 R&D Plans for Impedance Driven Single-Bunch Instabilities (WBS 2.2.1) M. Venturini ( presented by M. Zisman) LBNL LCWS07 DESY, Hamburg May 30 - June.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Temecula Valley Recycled Water Pipeline Joe Mouawad Sr. Director of Engineering September 2, 2015.
Fred Asiri1 Conventional Facilities SLAC Match 5, 2006 Acknowledgment: Clay Corvin, Jerry Aarons, and Jonghoon Kim.
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (ARCFS)
Installation Global System
Conventional Facility & Siting (CF&S) Overview for the Positron Source
EDR HLRF Work Packages Draft Summary
ILC PROJECT ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT CFS Europe – KICK OFF MEETING
Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update December 10, 2007 Acknowledgment: Jerry Aarons, Clay Corvin, and Esther Kweon Fred Asiri.
FIVE PROJECT PHASES 5C-3 Sun. 8:00-10:00am 21/ 2/2016.
AX7665D82 Areawide Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Design-Build
JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
Presentation transcript:

DESY_ILCW07 Global Design Effort-CF&S 1 Beam Delivery System & Interaction Region Fred Asiri CF&S Point of Contact

Global Design Effort-CF&S 2 DESY_ILCW07 Current Status CF&S Planning for EDR –Prepare Engineering Project Description Document Defining physics requirement in RDR to engineering requirements Defining boundaries, interfaces, utility needs and functional environment for each subsystem.

Global Design Effort-CF&S 3 DESY_ILCW07 Current Status CF&S

Global Design Effort-CF&S 4 DESY_ILCW07 Current Status BDS & IR Snapshots at Beam Delivery Systems

Global Design Effort-CF&S 5 DESY_ILCW07 Total CFS Costs and Statistics DISTRIBUTION BY CONTRACT TYPE, BASED ON AMERICAS ESTIMATE Current Status BDS & IR

Global Design Effort-CF&S 6 DESY_ILCW07 Snapshots at Interaction Regions Current Status BDS & IR

Global Design Effort-CF&S 7 DESY_ILCW07 Current Status BDS & IR

Global Design Effort-CF&S 8 DESY_ILCW07 Total CFS Costs and Statistics for Interaction Region/Experimental Hall

Global Design Effort-CF&S 9 DESY_ILCW07 Generic CF&S- EDR Plan Generic Goal: –To Provide Facility Design that Meets Requirements at the Lowest Cost Assumption for Planning Purposes –Concept Design Document by FY10 –Start of Site Selection Process and Preliminary design, FY 10 –Start of Construction, FY 12 In US, Prerequisite to start the preliminary design are: –To have the Project Engineering and Design (PED) Funds available We need the development of a 35% design for the project –To have a site selected We need to obtain rights of access to the site for surveying and site characterization work This implies that the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process should be made prior to start of preliminary phase. DOE, NEPA Process can take on average 2-4 years or more Thus, it does not seem feasible to start the ILC construction in American region as early as 2012, if we have to adhere to the above rules.

Global Design Effort-CF&S 10 DESY_ILCW07 Generic Approach for EDR Plan Based on Systems Engineering Management Approach Functional Requirements Identification Design Configuration Control Document Interface Control Optimization Studies –Design Alternatives Trade-Offs –Trade Studies –Constructability Studies –Value Engineering Study Preliminary verification of suitability of American Region Candidate Site –Preliminary Site Characterizations –Initial Environmental Assessment

Global Design Effort-CF&S 11 DESY_ILCW07 Beam Delivery System & Interaction Region are an integral part of the Central Area Current Status BDS & IR

Global Design Effort-CF&S 12 DESY_ILCW07 ~ 5.5 km Central Area fits inside the Fermilab boundary Site Characterization of the Central Area can be done ~ Boundary of Fermilab Suggestion for American Region

Global Design Effort-CF&S 13 DESY_ILCW07 Tentative CF&S for EDR Plan General Description – There are three phases in this plan; Concept Design Phase; Preliminary Design Phase; and Final Design/Build Phase. –This requires taking exception to the DOE rules by proposing alternative ways that have certain element of risks. Plan-To presents a tentative work plan for the ILC in the America Region (Fermilab) in accordance with the RDR. –Because the ILC configuration of the underground facilities for the central area is very difficult and it is Located in the Fermilab boundary, it is prudent to have a complete Concept level Design prepared for this area. This should also include site characterization and environmental assessment of this region. These efforts, not only will provide a reliable cost estimate and verifiable bases for the EDR, but also provides a compelling argument for considering the Fermilab as the ILC American candidate site.

Global Design Effort-CF&S 14 DESY_ILCW07 Tentative CF&S for EDR Plan Concept Design Phase – Consists of the following Major Efforts: –Generic Design – In-house team provides conventional facilities concept level design for non site specific as well as details of all major components of the machine and the utilities interfaces. –Geotechnical Investigations- A geotechnical firm will be selected to drill 5 for preferably 7 borings about 100 m into the Galena-Platteville rock. Field and laboratory testing of both the overburden soil and rock will be performed to enable to perform geotechnical analysis of the Central Area, as well as an assessment of the rest of the alignment. –Environmental Assessment – This task will provide focused consultant effort and expertise to understand and characterize the environmental aspects of a regionally specific site. Initial work in this area will concentrate on the characterization and assessments of the Central Area as well as the understanding of the mitigation process, information and documents needed to meet all of the environmental requirements applicable to the project for the American region.

Global Design Effort-CF&S 15 DESY_ILCW07 Tentative CF&S for EDR Plan Concept Design Phase – Consists of the following Major Efforts (2): –Vibration Characterization of IR– This task will provide actual a vibration measurements by performing cross-hole, down-hole (up- hole) testing using 3 of the borings at the Interaction Region, as well as 3D computer modeling and vibration propagation analysis of the IR using the SASSI. –Site Specific Concept Design of the Central Area - An Architect-Engineer will be selected to prepare drawings, specification and cost estimates that defines the facilities to house machine. Details will be based on machine design (prepared by in-house), machine specifications, ILC RDR, R&D studies, and information obtained from the above tasks. The A-E must provide assurances that the construction of these facilities at Fermilab is totally feasible. This effort will lead to development of the Proposal to Consider Fermilab as an American Candidate Site for ILC.

Global Design Effort-CF&S 16 DESY_ILCW07 Tentative CF&S for EDR Plan

Global Design Effort-CF&S 17 DESY_ILCW07 Preliminary Design Phase –The in-house team in Fermilab will continue to provide conventional facilities preliminary level design for non site specific and managing and interfacing with outside the A-E firms, as a well as interfacing with all major components of the machine and the utilities. –Three (3) A-E firms will be selected to make each a competitive preliminary design for the total ILC Conventional Facilities. The design will be based on the approved concept design and any new developments generated by on-going R&D efforts, tests and detailed machine design. Each firm will make a lump sum bid for Final Design/Build of the project. The bid most advantageous to the DOE/Project management will be selected to execute the Final Design/Build for the C.F. portion of the ILC project for the Lump Sum bid. All three firms (bidders) will be paid for their effort. Firms selected for this preliminary design effort must agree to the selection of one geotechnical firm doing the geotechnical investigation of the whole site and must agree to accept this firm findings and recommendations. Tentative CF&S for EDR Plan

Global Design Effort-CF&S 18 DESY_ILCW07 Final Design/Build Phase –The present in-house team in Fermilab and SLAC will continue to provide conventional facilities design for non site specific and managing and interfacing with the A-E firm, as a well as interfacing with all major components of the machine and the utilities. –One A-E firm will be selected to perform the final design and build the CF for the project through evaluation and negotiation process from among the three firms under. Tentative CF&S for EDR Plan

Global Design Effort-CF&S 19 DESY_ILCW07 Tentative CF&S for EDR Plan