Metropolitan Washington Region 2002 Vanpool Survey TPB Technical Committee Meeting April 4, 2002 Technical Committee Item # 8.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I-95 Transit & TDM Plan I-95 Transit and TDM Plan Summary of Recommendations Slide 1.
Advertisements

DURHAM RIDESHARE Save Money…Save Time Take Back Your Morning.
Dulles Area Transportation Association June 14, 2007.
#EMF2014 Transportation Solution Roundtable. #EMF2014 Post-Presentation Discussion Period.
Let’s Ride! The Complete Get-to-Work Program A Central Texas Solution for: Brought to you by the Commute Solutions Coalition.
Is Metrorail in Prince William County the Answer?.
1 HOV Attitudinal Research Among Hampton Roads Commuters Sponsored by Conducted by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC August 2002.
Vanpooling Vanpooling in the US 36 Corridor. Louisville-based nonprofit organization founded in 1998 Mission: Enhance the mobility of commuters along.
Capital Bikeshare National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Jim Sebastian District Department of Transportation.
Overview of JARC & New Freedom Projects, FY 2013 HSTC Task Force Meeting February 20,2014 Lynn Winchell-Mendy Transportation Planner National Capital Region.
COG / TPB Regional Analysis: Impacts of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Recommendations For the Metropolitan Washington.
Doing our Share to Clear the Air. Sustain-ability? Sustain-ability?  Ability to Sustain  Are there enough resources on planet Earth for all to have.
Vanpool 101 Vanpool Works for Transit Caryn Souza, Director, RideshareNation and Associate Director Community Transportation Association of America, Washington,
Greater Washington’s Health Care Workforce Shortage Presented by: Alison Gold Program Manager, Potomac Conference February 8, 2005.
2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Changes in Daily Travel Patterns 1994 to 2007/2008 Robert E. Griffiths Technical.
1 The 2010 Financially Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan And FY Transportation Improvement Program TPB Technical Committee November.
The Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law.  The CTR Law requires major employers - in Urban Growth Areas throughout Washington - to implement an employee.
1 Regional Priority Bus Projects List Steve Yaffe, Arlington County December 17, 2008 TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee Presented to the Transportation Planning.
Trains are better for our environment than other modes of travel.
1 Draft Regional Priority Projects List Steve Yaffe, Arlington County November 20, 2008 TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee Presented to the TPB Access For All.
WELCOME COMMUTER WORKSHOP September 13, Great Resource For Fort Belvoir Employees!
Transportation 101 June 12, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  GG & C Bus Company, Inc.  Mid Mon Valley Transit.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
Reconciliation of Population, Labor Force and Job Growth in the WashCog Planning Region Cooperative Forecasting Group April 5, 2005 Maryland Department.
WeGoMil - Real-Time Rideshare August 8, 2012 WeGoMil Real-Time Ridesharing Funded by FHWA & VDOT grants 6 month pilot Exclusively for military personnel.
WELCOME FORT BELVOIR COMMUTER WORKSHOP. RIDESHARING CARPOOL AND VANPOOL SAVE TIME AND MONEY!
1 Briefing on the Round 8.0 Cooperative Forecasts Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director Department of Transportation Planning TPB Technical Committee.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director TPB Technical Committee September.
AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS OF THE 2013 CONSTRAINED LONG RANGE PLAN & FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DRAFT June 13, 2013 Transportation.
Commuting to Work in the Metropolitan Washington Region Some Preliminary Results from the 2000 Census Robert E. Griffiths Cooperative Forecasting and Data.
Transportation 101 August 7, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  IndiGO: Indiana County Transit Authority 
I-95 Transit & TDM Plan I-95 Transit and TDM Plan I-95 Corridor Stakeholder and Service Provider Meeting #2 June 13, 2011.
Envision Central Texas Presentation Cellular Mass Transit (CMT) by Richard Shultz Concerned Citizen March 24, 2008.
Annoyed by high gas prices? Open your eyes to options available. Cheaper Transportation for Jefferson County Commuters.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) December 19, 2012 (updated from November 28, 2012)
Professor: Keren Mertens Horn Office: Wheatley 5-78B Office Hours: TR 2:30-4:00 pm ECONOMICS OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA 212G,
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
1 Transit and Climate Change April 10, 2008 Deborah Lipman Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Additional Findings by Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Regional On-Board Bus Survey Proposal Presentation to the TPB Technical Committee Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director October 5, 2007.
DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS Key Transport Facts: Trend 1: Growth in passenger transport and freight compared with.
1 Transit Capacity Constraint Presented to: TPB Technical Committee April 1, 2005 Lora Byala Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Business.
Confidential. Property of vRide, Inc. Not to be disclosed without vRide’s prior written consent. Vanpool Program.
1 Briefing on the Preliminary Round 7.2 Cooperative Forecasts TPB Technical Committee Timothy Canan, AICP 7 November 2008 Item 11.
GCAA Feb 17, Results 1.2 million miles of travel 600 tons of air pollution Each day these efforts reduce: Currently partnering with more than 1650.
Annoyed by high gas prices? Open your eyes to options available. Cheaper Transportation for Jefferson County Commuters.
Prince William County Potomac River Commuter Ferry Study & Route Proving Exercise A Summary of Project Purpose and Results Presented by: Charles “Cody”
This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED 355th Logistics Readiness Squadron Vanpooling Program 2Lt Brittany Ziehler OIC, Distribution 17 Apr 09.
Community Partnership Program Don Okazaki, Planner Accessible Services King County Metro.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Findings on Weekday Travel Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
1 Briefing on the Round 8.0 Cooperative Forecasts Paul DesJardin Department of Community Planning and Services COG Board of Directors Meeting November.
COG/TPB Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) Update Project Robert E. Griffiths Presentation to the TPB Scenario Study Task Force April 16, 2008.
The 2006 Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan: Plan Performance Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning October 18, 2006 Item #7.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Policy on Level of Service in Activity Centers Board Transportation Committee December 17, 2013 Department of Transportation.
SPRAWL What is Sprawl?. SPRAWL is…  Ask ten people, you’ll probably get 10 different answers  Random unplanned growth  Inadequate access to housing,
“The ONE BILLION Challenge” Claire Haigh Campaign Director.
Vanpooling Vanpooling in the US 36 Corridor. Louisville-based nonprofit organization founded in 1998 Mission: Enhance the mobility of commuters along.
Ridesharing, Public Transportation, biking, and walking
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
Technical Committee Item # 9
National CAPITOL REGION STATE OF THE COMMUTE
DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS
April 23, 2018.
Charles “Cody” Smith, PE
VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS
Presentation transcript:

Metropolitan Washington Region 2002 Vanpool Survey TPB Technical Committee Meeting April 4, 2002 Technical Committee Item # 8

1 What is a Vanpool? –A vanpool is generally defined as a group of 7 to 15 people who commute together on a regular basis in a van –Vanpools can be owned by an individuals or leased from private agencies –Vanpool riders are eligible for a US Federal tax code “transportation benefit” if:  the vanpool has a 6+ adult seating capacity, not including the driver  at least 80% of the vanpool’s mileage is for commuting purposes  the number commuters in the vanpool is at least ½ the seating capacity

2 Why Vanpooling is Important Vanpooling is an extremely efficient mode for long distance commuting.  One vanpool takes as many as 14 cars off the road. Fewer cars on the road means less traffic congestion and pollution. –Vanpooling cuts driving stress and saves commuters money. If HOV lanes are used, vanpools can also reduce commuting times. –Vanpooling assists employers in recruiting employees, improving morale and reducing tardiness. –Vanpools are generally long-lived commuting arrangements.  Experience shows that once a vanpool is up and running, it is likely to continue to operate for many years. –Vanpooling requires little public subsidy.

Vanpool Survey Purpose: Analyze vanpooling practices and trends Methodology: Mail-out/Mail-back with telephone follow-up survey of 736 vanpool operators/drivers Response: 440 Completed surveys, 60% response rate

4 Survey Results – Vanpool Seating Capacity 79% of the vanpools were passenger vans. 8% had a seat capacity of 8-12 passengers 13% were 7 passenger mini-vans

5 Survey Results – Number of Regular Members About half the vanpools surveyed had 12 or more regular members. 13% of the vanpools currently had fewer than 7 regular members Mean number of regular vanpool members was 10.7

6 Survey Results – Typical Weekday Occupancy 29% of the vanpools carried 12 or more commuters on a a typical weekday 20% of the vanpools carried fewer than 7 commuters Mean number of commuters carried on a typical weekday was 9.5

7 Survey Results – Trip Length (Distance) The average one-way distance from the vanpool driver’s home to work location was 48 miles. The line-haul portion of the vanpool trip, from the last pick-up point to the first drop off point, was 39 miles.

8 Survey Results – Use of HOV More than 3 out 4 vanpool drivers reported use of an HOV lane during their trip to work.

9 Survey Results – Vanpool Origins 80% of the vanpools originated in Virginia Greatest number of vanpools began in Stafford (237) followed by Prince William (135), Spotsylvania (65), Fairfax (42), Howard (31), Frederick (26), Anne Arundel (21), Prince George’s (21), Fauquier (21), Loudoun (18), Montgomery (16), and Baltimore (13).

10 Survey Results – Vanpool Destinations 57% of the vanpools were destined to DC, 34% to Northern VA and 9% Suburban MD Major vanpool destinations were: NW Washington (194), SW Washington (127), SE Washington (55), Alexandria (38), Pentagon (36), Crystal City (30), Rosslyn (25), McLean (23), Lexington Park (15), Carderock (14), Springfield (14), Fort Belvoir (13), Baileys Crossroads (13), Fairfax (10), and Reston (10).

11 Survey Results – Vanpooling Trends Vanpooling declined in the 1990s both locally and nationally Growth in commuter rail and commuter bus service, expansion of Metrorail to Springfield-Franconia and flexible alternative work schedules have had an impact on the number commuters who vanpool

12 Survey Results – Vanpool Issues of Concern Finding new riders (3.0) Congestion in HOV lanes (2.9) Insurance costs (2.7) Finding back-up drivers (2.6) HOV hours too short (2.4) Risk of rollover accidents (2.3)