Randomised Controlled Trials: What, why and how? Pam Hanley 22 March 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Government Social Research Unit Evidenced Based Policy: The Role of Randomised Controlled Trials Ricky Taylor Government.
Advertisements

TRANSFORMING EDUCATION THROUGH EVIDENCE. The Centre for Effective Education SCHOOL OF Education Conducting Educational Randomised Control Trials in Disadvantaged.
Promoting Rational Drug Use in the Community Monitoring and evaluation.
Using randomised control trials to evaluate public policy – Presentation to DIISRTE/DEEWR workshop, January 31 Jeff Borland Department of Economics University.
‘Trials and Tribulations’ An RCT with the DCSF Carole Torgerson, Andy Wiggins and Hannah Ainsworth.
Building Evidence in Education: Conference for EEF Evaluators 11 th July: Theory 12 th July: Practice
Mywish K. Maredia Michigan State University
∂ What works…and who listens? Encouraging the experimental evidence base in education and the social sciences RCTs in the Social Sciences 9 th Annual Conference.
Experimental evaluation in education Professor Carole Torgerson School of Education, Durham University, United Kingdom International.
Qualitative Data Analysis: An introduction Carol Grbich Chapter 25: Evaluating Qualitative Research Evaluating Qualitative Research.
Adapting Designs Professor David Torgerson University of York Professor Carole Torgerson Durham University.
The brass standard? The scope for RCTs in impact evaluation Jan Willem Gunning VU University Amsterdam University of Sussex, December 5, 2014.
Dr Ian Abrahams Combining randomised control trials with qualitative research approaches: The best of both worlds York
Session 3: Trial management Sarah Miller (Queens, Belfast) Laura Dunne (Queens, Belfast)
Practical Issues in conducting multi-country studies by Ken Stanley, Ph.D. Harvard School of Public Health Collaboration Complexities 10 Basic Principles.
VIII Evaluation Conference ‘Methodological Developments and Challenges in UK Policy Evaluation’ Daniel Fujiwara Senior Economist Cabinet Office & London.
WHY LARGE-SCALE RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS? David Myers Senior Vice President IES 2006 Research Conference David Myers Senior Vice President IES 2006 Research.
Between a Rock and a Hard Place Scientifically Based Evidence in Evaluation Presentation to the Canadian Evaluation Society Vancouver, B.C. June 3, 2003.
Clinical trials methodology group Simon Gates 9 February 2006.
A) The number of potentially eligible patients recruited to randomised clinical trials (RCTs) worldwide is low. Trials often fail to recruit target numbers.
TREATMENT 1 Evaluation of interventions How best assess treatments /other interventions? RCT (randomised controlled trial)
Efsa LEARNING PROGRAMME Module 4 - Session 4.5a Non - Probability Sampling Methods.
Depression: Improving Recruitment into Clinical Trials David A Richards, Professor of Mental Health Services Research.
TCP Treatment Change Project
CDI: Quality Services, Better Outcomes Conference Lynda Wilson Director, Barnardo’s Northern Ireland Julie Healy Programme Manager.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
Dr Amanda Perry Centre for Criminal Justice Economics and Psychology, University of York.
1 Simon Bradstreet: SRN Allison Alexander: NHS Education for Scotland/SRN Scottish Recovery Indicator.
Randomised controlled trials Peter John. Causation in policy evaluation Outcome Intervention Other agency actions External environment.
Non Experimental Design in Education Ummul Ruthbah.
How qualitative research contributes to evaluation Professor Alicia O’Cathain ScHARR University of Sheffield 22 June 2015.
Designing a Random Assignment Social Experiment In the U.K.; The Employment Retention and Advancement Demonstration (ERA)
Criteria for Assessing The Feasibility of RCTs. RCTs in Social Science: York September 2006 Today’s Headlines: “Drugs education is not working” “ having.
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE Effectiveness of therapy Ross Lawrenson.
ARROW Trial Design Professor Greg Brooks, Sheffield University, Ed Studies Dr Jeremy Miles York University, Trials Unit Carole Torgerson, York University,
HSRU is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates. The author accepts full responsibility for this talk. Health.
Randomized Controlled Trials in Rural Finance: An Example from India Michael Faye and Sendhil Mullainathan Harvard University March 2007
NURSING THE OLDEST OF ARTS.
Introduction to Evaluation Odette Parry & Sally-Ann Baker
Building Evidence in Education: Conference for EEF Evaluators 11 th July: Theory 12 th July: Practice
Setting the Stage: Workshop Framing and Crosscutting Issues Simon Hearn, ODI Evaluation Methods for Large-Scale, Complex, Multi- National Global Health.
Implementation and process evaluation: developing our approach Ann Lendrum University of Manchester Neil Humphrey University of Manchester Gemma Moss Institute.
Seeking Funding from the Institute of Education Sciences A Guide for WCER Researchers.
Understanding real research 4. Randomised controlled trials.
Programme Information Incredible Years (IY)Triple P (TP) – Level 4 GroupPromoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS) IY consists of 12 weekly (2-hour)
Using fast-track trial methodology to evaluate a breathlessness intervention service for patients with advanced disease Morag Farquhar Macmillan Post-Doctoral.
Critical appraisal of randomized controlled trial
What is randomization and how does it solve the causality problem? 2.3.
Natural Experiments Versus RCTs Steven Gortmaker, Ph.D. Harvard School of Public Health /Harvard Prevention Research Center.
Overview of Study Designs. Study Designs Experimental Randomized Controlled Trial Group Randomized Trial Observational Descriptive Analytical Cross-sectional.
Study designs. Kate O’Donnell General Practice & Primary Care.
The research challenges of large scale RCTs with volunteers and volunteering organisations Facilitator: Dr Matt Ryan Presenter: Professor Peter John.
PTP 661 EVIDENCE ABOUT INTERVENTIONS CRITICALLY APPRAISE THE QUALITY AND APPLICABILITY OF AN INTERVENTION RESEARCH STUDY Min Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
Strategies for Effective Program Evaluations U.S. Department of Education The contents of this presentation were produced by the Coalition for Evidence-Based.
1 Developing State Specific Evidence on the Costs and Benefits of Early Childhood Education (ECE) Kenneth Troske, Director Center for Business and Economic.
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE AND PHARMACY 1. Evidence-based medicine 2. Evidence-based pharmacy.
Randomisation Bias and Post-Randomisation Selection Bias in RCTs: Barbara Sianesi Institute for Fiscal Studies September 14, 2006 The role of non-experimental.
LifeCIT Development and pilot evaluation of a web-supported programme of Constraint Induced Therapy following stroke (LifeCIT) Meagher C 1, Conlon A 2,
Evidence-Based Mental Health PSYC 377. Structure of the Presentation 1. Describe EBP issues 2. Categorize EBP issues 3. Assess the quality of ‘evidence’
Incorporating Evaluation into a Clinical Project
GOAL To offer evidence of the importance of developmentally appropriate prevention programming, propose basic competencies for prevention programming,
Evaluation in the Early Years: The Maths Champions Programme
Implementation Challenges of Wound Interdisciplinary Teams (WIT): A Community‐Based Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial.
Evaluation of Switch-on
YSGOL GWYDDORAU GOFAL IECHYD / SCHOOL OF HEALTHCARE SCIENCES
Clinical Research: Part 3 RCTs
Key Question WHY USE A NON-TRADITIONAL RCT DESIGN?
Clinical Research: Part 3 RCTs
Dr. Matthew Keough August 8th, 2018 Summer School
Takeyourplace.ac.uk Using data to address ethical challenges in RCTs: activity tracking and process focus Sonia Ilie & Silvia Lucato-Hadeler.
Presentation transcript:

Randomised Controlled Trials: What, why and how? Pam Hanley 22 March 2013

What are RCTs? “Gold standard” for a trial – find out which intervention is most effective at achieving a specific, measurable outcome Most familiar from medicine eg drugs trials Divide a group of people, schools etc at random Compare “intervention” group(s) with a “control” group

Why do we need them? “… to test the effectiveness of new and existing interventions …; to learn what is working and what is not; and to adapt our policies so that they steadily improve and evolve both in terms of quality and effectiveness.” Haynes, Service, Goldacre & Torgerson (2012) (Cabinet Office Report: Test, Learn, Adapt)

Examples of RCTs in Education Reading eg beginning reading, struggling readers Maths Technology and reading, maths etc Primary science School reform programmes Social and emotional learning

Benefits to RCT participants Intervention groups: early triallists and some influence on development Control group: benefit from refinements made as a result of trial Participants are equally vital to the study regardless of group

Evaluation process Intervention A Control Initial sample Randomly assign to group Assess for eligibility and invite to participate Measure outcomes Intervention B

Challenges Recruiting schools Large-scale study Long-term commitment (legacy year) Changes in school staff (and schools)

Three possible objections to RCTs 1. Ethics: only unethical if we already know the intervention works 2. Education is too complex: but unknown factors are more likely to be balanced out through randomisation 3. RCTs don’t explain HOW: need to use in conjunction with other methods, eg observations, focus groups, interviews