W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January 2001 1 Jetset vs Herwig … Once more III Jetset vs Herwig on same selected events.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.

Advertisements

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April The “Underlying Event” at CDF Niccolo’ Moggi Universita’ and I.N.F.N, Bologna for the CDF Collaboration April 15,

1 AHCAL answers IDAG Erika Garutti On behalf of AHCAL analysis team.

Progress in the cone analysis: Optimization and systematic checks n Introduction n Performance n Systematic checks n Conclusions n Introduction n Performance.

1 In the meantime Varied p T cut (1.5 GeV, 1 GeV, 500 MeV) 2. Allowed for events with 2 good tracks only (+  ), originally 4 good tracks where required,

22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:

Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.

ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.

1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.

Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.

W Mass & Width Measurement at LEP II BEACH 04, IIT Chicago, 08/03/04 Ambreesh Gupta, University of Chicago.

University of Gaziantep Department of Engineering Physics August 2006 Page 1/18 A.Beddall, A.Beddall and A. Bingül Department of Engineering Physics University.

1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Analysis Meeting 12 th June 2007.

Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera1 Jet/Calorimeter Cluster Energy Corrections – Status Goal: To improve the individual jet energy determination based.

1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.

1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Jet Note 8 Meeting 7 th June 2007.

1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.

1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.

1 A Feasibility Study for a Strange Sea Asymmetry Analysis at ATLAS: update II Laura Gilbert and Jeff Tseng 13/12/07.

1 Bose-Einstein Correlations in hadronic W decays at LEP Nick van Remortel University of Antwerpen Belgium.

Scintillator (semi)DHCAL? Vishnu Zutshi for. Introduction Can a scintillator (semi)digital calorimeter work? Cell sizes are necessarily 6-12 cm 2 Can.

1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.

My work PAST WORKS: 1) (Madrid) Data Analysis in L3, LEP: - Measurement of the Mass, Width and Cross Section of the W boson production at LEP, Study.

Biagio Di Micco13/02/ Radiative Phi Decays Meeting 1  Biagio Di Micco Università degli Studi di Roma III results.

November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.

1 Shower maximum detector (SMD) is a wire proportional counter – strip readout detector using gas amplification. SMD is used to provide a spatial resolution.

R Value at BESIII Haiming Hu Workshop on Future PRC-US Cooperation in High Energy Physics Beijing, China June 11, 2006.

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.

Outline: (1) The data sample (2) Some news on the analysis method (3) Efficiency revised (4) Background revised (5) Data: spectrum + “phi-curve”

Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.

Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.

1 2vtx tagged diBjets mass cross section measurement Univeristy of Notre Dame Hong Luo Mar 3 th 2005.

4/04/2001Calorimeter shaking -Andrea Venturi - April '01 ALEPH week 1 New ideas and old doubts about the calorimeter shaking procedure Andrea Venturi INFN.

A few slides to summarise what Alessandro and I were up to for March 24th video meeting Taking for granted that W+/- are good measurements to make- are.

Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data

Latest Physics Results from ALEPH Paolo Azzurri CERN - July 15, 2003.

Status of K S   e analysis C. GattiT. Spadaro Selection on data Selection on MC Efficiencies from data, K L   e, K S    ,      , bhabha.

Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,

W Mass and Width at LEP2 Jeremy Nowell ALEPH / Imperial College London On behalf of the LEP collaborations.

Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 13/09/2012.

Cedar and pre-Daikon Validation ● CC PID parameter based CC sample selections with Birch, Cedar, Carrot and pre-Daikon. ● Cedar validation for use with.

Jet Physics at CDF Sally Seidel University of New Mexico APS’99 24 March 1999.

Muons from  /K CSC samples vs generator predictions: preliminary comparisons.

CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.

1 D.Chakraborty – VLCW'06 – 2006/07/21 PFA reconstruction with directed tree clustering Dhiman Chakraborty for the NICADD/NIU software group Vancouver.

Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.

Comments on systematics of corrected MB distributions Karel Safarik (presented by A. Morsch) Meeting of the Minimum Bias and Underlying Event WG CERN,

24/08/2009 LOMONOSOV09, MSU, Moscow 1 Study of jet transverse structure with CMS experiment at 10 TeV Natalia Ilina (ITEP, Moscow) for the CMS collaboration.

1 The comparisons between with and without JES uncertainty. jet with pt > 30 GeV, |eta| 40. Jet Y is calculated by 0.5*log[(E+pz)/(E-pz)] CMS Data.

Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.

Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.

Tuning of trigger simulation parameters (Bossi, Moulson, Palutan, Sciascia) Calorimeter trigger thresholds calibration using prompt photons from K S 

Status Update: Search for Low Mass Strings at CMS Andy Yen.

July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.

Study of tt production at NLO Stan Bentvelsen Edwin Bos.

Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.

Color Reconnection in W Pair Events Guillaume Leibenguth Université Catholique de Louvain Belgium DIS 2003, St. Petersburg On behalf of the LEP collaborations.

September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.

Photon Reconstruction Efficiencies in Higgs → γγ Events Neil Cooper-Smith RHUL ATLAS UK Higgs Meeting - Durham 11/01/07.

Marcello Barisonzi First results of AOD analysis on t-channel Single Top DAD 30/05/2005 Page 1 AOD on Single Top Marcello Barisonzi.

Photon Selection Algorithm Ming Yang ， Mingshui Chen BESIII Meeting

Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008

Efficiency of Muon Reconstruction

Decomposing p+p Events at √s = 200 GeV with STAR

Fake Jet Rejection: Sum Jt

Progress in angular acceptance study

Quarkonium production, offline monitoring, alignment & calibration

Rick Field - Florida/CDF

Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF

Presentation transcript:

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Jetset vs Herwig … Once more III Jetset vs Herwig on same selected events

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Conclusions from 14-June-2000 More reconstructed energy (300 MeV) with Herwig More charged energy in Herwig (300 MeV) –Calibration of Eflow? Herwig Z0 events needed –Explain difference in efficiency Larger particle multiplicity in Jetset Jetset jets are wider –More losses are low/high  Jetset  resolution worst than Herwig Jet-Jet angle larger for Herwig than Jetset Which of the two MC data prefer? Herwig Bug

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January What’s new HERWIG bugs have been fixed by G. Rudolph 1 M Jetset and Herwig same CC03 events have been produced over Christmas by Marcello Today : rapid comparison Jetset vs Herwig With new common Ntuples

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Total Event energy 300 Mev more energy in Herwig Pb of Eflow calibration? Need Herwig Z0 events This explain the higher efficiency of the selection for Herwig ? 14-June-2000

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Total Event energy 300 Mev more energy in Herwig Still there Notice the small Jetset difference : +0.1 GeV

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Charged energy 300 Mev less charged energy in Jetset 14-June-2000

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Charged energy 500 Mev less charged energy in Jetset Notice the Jetset difference : GeV

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Charge multiplicity 0.16 more charged particles in Jetset 14-June-2000

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Charge multiplicity 0.1 more charged particles in Herwig Notice the Jetset difference : +2.36

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Multiplicity per jet Nb of charged tracks/jetNb of Eflow objects/jet More objects/jet in Jetset 14-June-2000

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Multiplicity per jet Nb of charged tracks/jetNb of Eflow objects/jet More objects/jet in HerwigMore objects/jet in Jetset Total Number of objects now

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January  resolution Better  resolution for Herwig  (rec.-gen.) <> =  RMS = 6.22 <> =  RMS = June-2000

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January  resolution  (rec.-gen.) <> =  RMS = 6.25 <> =  RMS = 6.30 Similar  resolution for Herwig ???

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January  (raw-generated) vs  gen. Z  generated Herwig Jetset  (rec.-gen.) vs  gen. Jetset jets are more inside Herwig jets less biased at low  14-June-2000

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January  (raw-generated) vs  gen.  (rec.-gen.) vs  gen. Jetset jets are a still bit less inside

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Sum of Pt2 Wider Jetset jets 14-June-2000

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Sum of Pt2 a bit Wider HERWIG jets Notice the small Jetset difference : GeV

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Jet-jet angle Jet 1 Jet 2  Herwig Ws are more ‘opened’  =  0.04 deg. Strongly related to W mass 14-June-2000

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Jet-jet angle Jet 1 Jet 2  This has been cured ! Strongly related to W mass  = 0.01  0.03 deg. Notice the small Jetset difference : deg.

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Fitted mass : Herwig - Jetset M Herwig - M jetset = 7  7 MeV Before rescaling Super!

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Delta fitted mass vs Nb jets in Barrel M Jetset - M Herwig vs number jets in barrel 33 99 2.5 14-June-2000

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Delta fitted mass vs Nb jets in Barrel M Jetset - M Herwig vs number jets in barrel

W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Temporary conclusions Quick look at recently produced Jetset and Herwig MC samples Most of the differences between Jetset and Herwig have been cured At first look : the net result is NO mass shift between the two fragmentation models However : some differences between new and old Jetset produced evts observed –Need to be understood –Effect of common Ntuple reconstruction ? We are on better shape!