Preparing for the 21 st Century Professional Assessment and Comprehensive Evaluation System PACES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohios Educator Standards. Ohios Standards for the Teaching Profession.
Advertisements

USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Instructional Leadership for the 21 st Century University of South Alabama in collaboration with Baldwin and Mobile County Public Schools.
The Core Competencies for Youth Development Professionals were developed with leadership from the OPEN Initiative, Missouri Afterschool Network (MASN),
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Ia Teachers lead in their classrooms. Teachers demonstrate leadership by taking responsibility for the progress of all students to ensure that they graduate.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Dr. Eddie R. Johnson Deputy State Superintendent of Education
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
What it means for New Teachers
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
ORIENTATION PRESENTED BY DR. DAVID PEAK ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FOR HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATORS (NON-SCHOOL BASED) EVALUATION.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Implementing the ASCA National Model
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
CLASS PROJECT: CAREER PATHWAYS CSD 509J Mid-Year Update.
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Colleen Miller, Director of Leadership Development Superintendent Evaluation.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Professional Standards 2009 Suzanne Scott, Ph.D., IDEC, ASID, Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation,
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Collaborative Instructional Leader Becoming a collaborative instructional leader.
Learning Objective III: Diverse Learners Teacher candidates and candidates for other professional school personnel roles exhibit knowledge, competence,
Andy Finch, Ph.D. Vanderbilt University Mary Jo Rattermann, Ph.D. Research & Evaluation Resources
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview Jessica Garner Professional Development Lead Region 6
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
NC Educator Evaluation System Inter-rater Reliability Carteret County Schools Mary Keel, Ed.D Tara Patterson, MSA Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Katie McDermott. National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers The Maryland Technology Consortium has developed Maryland Teacher Technology Standards,
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Dr. Lesley Farmer California State University Long Beach
Teacher Quality Standards Beginning of The Year Self-Assessment.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
New York Institute of Technology
Educator Evaluation System: District Process and Responsibilities.
Leading Beyond the Institution: Graduates as Learners, Leaders, and Scholarly Practitioners Drs. Ron Zambo, Debby Zambo, Ray R. Buss.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Early Childhood Teacher Educators Building Capacities in Future Teacher Leaders --Pamela Owen, Ed.D., Mount Vernon Nazarene University --Krishana White,
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Strategic Plan Proposal The Challenge This strategic plan identifies what must be done, pre- school through grade 12, over the next three.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Building Awareness of Teacher Leadership. Why Teacher Leadership?
Implementing the ASCA National Model The Transformed School Counselor Chapter 7 ©2012 Cengage Learning. These materials are designed for classroom use.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
What it means for New Teachers
Dissemination Training
Align Combine Design.
Colorado Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

Preparing for the 21 st Century Professional Assessment and Comprehensive Evaluation System PACES

Raise expectations for teaching and learning Accommodate new developments in teaching and learning Promote ongoing professional development Enable higher levels of student learning Reduce paperwork PACES was developed to:

M-DCPS/UTD Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation 1994Established by contract agreement to consider revisions to current evaluation system 1996Began initial discussion to develop PACES Conducted Pilot Studies and Field Tests

Members of the Joint Committee M-DCPSUTD Mr. Nelson E. Diaz, Co-Chair Deputy Superintendent Ms. Dia Falco, Co-Chair Bargaining Agent Representative Dr. Joyce Annunziata, Assistant Superintendent Dr. Shirley Johnson, Secretary-Treasurer Mr. John Gilbert, Business Director Ms. Merri Mann, Director Ms. Essie Pace, Personnel Director Mr. John Birk, Director Mr. Marcos Moran, Principal Ms. Marie Mastropaolo, Consultant Dr. Chad D. Ellett, Consultant (Ad Hoc) CDE Research Associates

PACES Program Leaders and Program Assistants 41 Principals Serving as Program Leaders 31 Teachers Serving as Program Assistants

Professional Development Programs: Courses 11,557 Participants 107,863 Person Hours

The Vision of PACES Create a district-wide culture for improved teaching and learning Utilize technologies to improve teaching and learning Support continuous professional development

PACES Focuses on student learning Emphasizes collaboration Promotes climate of trust Uses technology to support learning communities Enables teacher and administrator growth Accommodates differences among teachers and learners Logo for consistency

New Teacher Support PACES requires the establishment of Professional Growth Teams to support and assist teachers new to the school system.

 National Trends  State Standards  District Goals PACES Addresses:

National Trends Higher Order Thinking -- PACES promotes the development of critical and creative thinking Constructivist learning design -- PACES embraces the practice of enabling learners to engage in active learning, therefore constructing their own knowledge in the process. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) -- PACES parallels the mission of establishing high standards for what accomplished teachers should know and be able to do.

State Standards Sunshine State Standards – clearly defined expectations for what students should know and be able to do Professional Growth -- mandated responsibility for professional development activities Accomplished Practices -- specified expectations of what accomplished practitioners should demonstrate Performance Probation -- legislated time limits to demonstrate competence

District Goals: School to Career -- Effective implementation of the PACES will better prepare learners for graduation, employment, and postsecondary education. Effective Learning Environment -- Each of the PACES Domains directly impacts and increases the quality of the learning environment. Efficient Management Practices -- PACES enables administrators to implement professional standards of effectiveness, ethics, and efficiency.

Research Literature Student Learning Effective Teaching Professional Growth Mentoring/Support Teacher Collaboration Teaching Expertise Cooperative Learning Higher Order Thinking Teacher Self- Assessment

Professional Growth... Ongoing process engaged by self, peers and administrators Professional responsibility of the site- supervisor as well as the teacher Self-reflective practice focused on student learning

The PACES Manual Domains Components Indicators

The Seven Domains Planning for Teaching and Learning Managing the Learning Environment Teacher/Learner Relationships Enhancing and Enabling Learning Enabling Thinking Classroom-Based Assessment of Learning Professional Responsibilities I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII.

Indicators Total of 107 for professional development 44 required for evaluation

Classroom-Based Observation School-Based Professional Development & District Professional Growth Experiences School Improvement Improved Classroom Practice Student Learning PACES Focus

PACES PROFESSIONAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION SYSTEM Learn more on the Web at: