Extending Educational Metadata Schemas to Describe Adaptive Learning Resources Cord Hockemeyer Owen Conlan Paul Lefrere Vincent Wade Dietrich Albert.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning Technology Standards A Layperson's Guide to Who s Who and What s What Updated November 25, 2002 by Jonathan Dean Oracle iLearning Product Management.
Advertisements

Resource description and access for the digital world Gordon Dunsire Centre for Digital Library Research University of Strathclyde Scotland.
Design and Implementation of WBT System Components and Test Tools for WBT content standard K. Nakabayashi, Y. Kubota(NTT-X,Inc./ Advanced Learning Infrastructure.
Terminologies in Education Teachers, Learners & Learning Resources Sarah Currier CETIS Educational Content SIG Coordinator Centre for Academic Practice,
UKOLN is supported by: The JISC Information Environment Metadata Schema Registry (IEMSR): Update DC-2006, Manzanillo, Mexico October 3-6, 2006 Rachel Heery.
Mobile phones as a tool for learning by Mats Reinsby
Overview of IMS Content Packaging Sheila MacNeill.
Standardisation Issues in eLearning by Diptendu Dutta AUNWESHA Presented at IEEE Computer Chapter 19 th October, 2001.
Itembanking Infrastructure: A Proposal for a Decoupled Architecture Mhairi McAlpine and Linn van der Zanden Scottish Qualifications Authority CAA Conference.
IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee Report to Plugfest 9 Prepared by Robby Robson Chair, LTSC February 23, 2005 LTSC This work.
Learning Content Standards Demos, Details, and De-mystification Robby Robson, Eduworks Chair, IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee
The Knowledge Management Research Group 1 Towards an Interoperability Framework for Metadata Standards Presenter: Mikael Nilsson Co-authors: Pete Johnston.
Pete Johnston & Andy Powell, Eduserv Foundation 28 June 2006 Update.
E-Learning: No Standards; No Coalitions - No Boom Ed Walker 7 December 2000.
SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES FOR PERSONALIZED LEARNING AND COLLABORATIVE TEACHING Apple W P Fok Centre for Innovative Applications of Internet and Multimedia.
Topics Introduction 1 / 3 Introduction 2 / 3 Introduction 3 / 3.
Content Reusability in Learning Management Systems Priit Mägi DAP01s.
IM Lab NCCU 1 Introduction of SCORM: Sharable Content Object Reference Model Hao-Chuan Wang Computer Science Department National Chengchi University 2003.
Educational Modelling Language (EML): Adding instructional design to existing learning technology specifications Rob Koper
Design of metadata surrogates in search result interfaces of learning object repositories: Linear versus clustered metadata design Panos Balatsoukas Anne.
Consists of the following components (which are purchased separately) Resource Discovery * Web based deposit (including authorisation)* Full Text Index.
Metadata Standards Anita Coleman, Asst. Prof. School of Information Resources & Library Science, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Manchester, 2007 Adaptive learning paths for improving Lifelong Learning experiences Ana Elena Guerrero Roldán, Julià Minguillón Universitat Oberta de.
The Multi-model, Metadata-driven Approach to Content and Layout Adaptation Knowledge and Data Engineering Group (KDEG) Trinity College,
Asst.Prof.Dr.Surasak Mungsing. By: Akshay Kumar Sharable Content Object Reference Model.
Next Generation Analytics & Big Data (A Reference Model for Big Data) Jangwon Gim Sungjoon Lim Hanmin Jung ISO/IEC JTC1 SC32 Ad-hoc meeting May 29, 2013,
IT Standards for Learning
SCORM By: Akshay Kumar. SCORM 2 What we want? What is SCORM? What is SCORM? Connection with e-learning Connection with e-learning Application of XML Technology.
Accelerating e-Learning Interoperability Introducing the CLEO Lab Tyde Richards IBM Mindspan Solutions Daniel R. Rehak Carnegie Mellon University.
Individualized E-Learning Anastasia Cheetham Jutta Treviranus ATRC, University of Toronto.
THE ADVANCED DISTRIBUTED LEARNING (ADL) INITIATIVE
Practical RDF Chapter 1. RDF: An Introduction
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Niall Sclater, and Lorna M. Campbell,
E-Learning standards and meta-data: Case study ดร. น้ำทิพย์ วิภาวิน Sripatum University Library.
IEEE Learning Technology Standards AICC MEETING – FEB 2004.
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry and IEEE LOM Application Profiles Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath CETIS Metadata & Digital Repositories SIG,
Template Approach For Adaptive Learning Strategies Jana Abbing, Kevin Koidl Telecooperation Group, CS Dept. Prof. Max M ü hlh ä user, Darmstadt University.
The LOM RDF binding – update Mikael Nilsson The Knowledge Management.
The SCORM Runtime Environment Chris Poole: Senior Content Developer The Scorm Runtime Environment An Overview By Chris Poole.
Defining a learning and teaching resource in the context of the FAILTE project Jenny Slater FAILTE Project Officer, LTSN Engineering. 28/02/01.
A Primer on Metadata Standards From Dublin Core to IEEE LOM Julia Innes Rory McGreal Toni Roberts TeleEducation NB.
European workshop Defining electronic standards and procedures for the exchange of student curriculum data between Higher Education Institutions Rome,
Metadata for e-Learning Objects Ya-ning Arthur Chen, Shu-jiun Sophy Chen Computing Centre, Academia Sinica APAN/PRAGMA 2003 Conference in Fukuoka 22 Jan.,
IMS Content Packaging Overview Dec 5, IMS Content Packaging scope Source: IMS Info Model document Fig. 2.1.
SCORM Course Meta-data 3 major components: Content Aggregation Meta-data –context specific data describing the packaged course SCO Meta-data –context independent.
Learning Object Metadata Application Profiles: Lithuanian Approach E. Kurilovas S. Kubilinskienė Centre for IT in Education, MoE Lithuania.
Improving LOM-Based Interoperability of Learning Repositores Germán M. Rivera Bernd Simon Juan Quemada Joaquín.
Eclipse Debug Views Update Policy. 2 Agenda  Background  Requirements  How does it work now?  How to make it more flexible?
Metadata Made Simple LMS² seminar 1 February 2006 Sarah-Jane Saravani Carolyn Paulsen.
2 nd International Workshop on Managing Ubiquitous Communications and Services Trinity College, Dublin December 13 th & 14 th, 2004
LTSC Report to SAB1 Learning Technology Standing Committee Sponsor Report October, 2006.
Overview Collected learning resources Competencies Registry/ Authority Course Delivery system Student Pedagogy Tests/ assessment Activities Communication.
CETIS Educational Content SIG, Learning and Teaching Scotland, September 2004 Content Specifications Update Wilbert Kraan Lorna M. Campbell CETIS.
Current metadata standards ISO/IEC MLR new for Curriculum Erlend Øverby’ Chair ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 36 Information Technology for Learning, Education and Training.
1 Educational Metadata Paul Miller Interoperability Focus UKOLN U KOLN is funded by Resource: the Council for.
March 8 -9, SAB Vice Chair's Report IEEE LTSC SPONSOR REPORT March 9, 2005.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: IEMSR, the Information Environment & Metadata Application.
Thursday, 22 May A Handbook of Guidelines on Metadata Usage Jon Mason Metadata Downunder – Metadata, Semantics and Interoperability in Practice Sydney,
SCORM-kooskõlaliste õpihaldussüsteemide arendamisest Andres Mellik Tallinna Ülikool Veebruar 2006.
Financial Industry Business Ontology (FIBO) Monthly Status/review call Wednesday November 2 nd 2011.
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Lorna M. Campbell and Boon Low CETIS and the University of Strathclyde LMC, SURF Presentation, April 2002.
WP 2: Ontology & Metadata Models ITD
Specs & Standards Update: December 2003
Educational Vocabulary -- ECDL2003
IMS ADL IEEE LTSC Overview and Critique of Standards
How can DDI make the most of RDF?
Developing a Metadata Element Set and/or an Application Profile
San Jose 2008 AICC William Shook
IEEE IT (Information Technology) Strategy – 2005
ISD Reusable Object Working Group Status Meta Data Requirements
Presentation transcript:

Extending Educational Metadata Schemas to Describe Adaptive Learning Resources Cord Hockemeyer Owen Conlan Paul Lefrere Vincent Wade Dietrich Albert

Overview Background of the work presented A basic generic metadata element describing different types of adaptivity An extended adaptivitytype element Summary

Background: The EASEL Project

Interface Standards Involved Learning Environment – Adaptive Content –AICC CMI –SCORM API ContentDescriptions through Metadata –IEEE LTSC LOM –IMS (Learning Resources) Metadata –DC ed

A Generic Adaptivity Element education? adaptivity? adaptivitytype* name= ref= ? langstring*

Example Visual Disability Database concepts

Best Practice Lists for Adaptivitytype Names Compatibility of adaptivity information Acceptance through comprehensive list Hierarchical structure for shared vocabularies

Vocabularies Vocabulary used within adaptivitytype content depends on subject and on pedagogical models Common vocabulary is a prerequisite for interoperability Possibility to use specialised vocabularies

An Extended Adaptivity Element adaptivitytype* name= ref= ? set? type=“one-or-more“|“all“|... set* candidate* langstring*

Example compA KompA

Summary The suggested generic metadata element for describing adaptive learning objects is: suitable for many different types and mechanisms of adaptivity applicable for structured information flexible with respect to vocabularies

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.