The 11 March 2011 Tohoku-Oki (Japan) Megathrust Event: FEM models of Coseismic and Postseismic deformation captured by DInSAR and GPS Data. Christodoulos.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 11, 2011, Tohoku-oki Earthquake: preliminary outcomes Tohoku-oki INGV Team - Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia – INGV Abstract – On.
Advertisements

A major magnitude 7.0 earthquake ( ) was felt strongly on nearby Adak Island about 94 km west-northwest of the epicenter. No tsunami warnings were issued.
An estimate of post-seismic gravity change caused by the 1960 Chile earthquake and comparison with GRACE gravity fields Y. Tanaka 1, 2, V. Klemann 2, K.
Magnitude 7.1 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN Thursday, April 7, 2011 at 14:32:41 UTC Japan was rattled by a strong aftershock and tsunami warning.
A magnitude 7.1 struck early Saturday off Japan's east coast. The quake hit at 2:10 a.m. Tokyo time about 170 miles from Fukushima, and it was felt in.
Sendai Earthquake NE Japan March 11, 2011 Some explanatory slides Bob Stern, Dave Scholl, others updated March
Subduuction Zone Observatory: Faulting and Deformation Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute and Dept. of Geology and Geophysics University of Alaska.
ALOS PALSAR interferometry of Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand Sergey Samsonov 1,3, John Beavan 1, Chris Bromley 2, Bradley Scott 2, Gill Jolly 2 and Kristy.
Active Folding within the L.A. Basin with a focus on: Argus et al. (2005), Interseismic strain accumulation and anthropogenic motion in metropolitan Los.
Slides for Ben Study Area 500 km N Great Earthquakes, Strongly-Coupled Arc Pacific plate motion 1938, , M S 7.4 tsunami earthquake 1957, 9.1.
03.05.a1 Ocean-Ocean Convergent Boundary One plate moves down = subduction Two oceanic plates move toward one another Trench and island arc.
Evaluation of the Potential of Large Aftershocks of the M9 Tohoku, Earthquake Yo Fukushima, Manabu Hashimoto (DPRI, Kyoto Univ.) Shin’ichi Miyazaki (Grad.
Magnitude 8.9 (9.0) earthquake near Sendai, east coast of Honshu, Japan Friday, March 11, 2011 at 05:46:23 UTC Japan was struck by a magnitude 8.9 (9.0)
USEReST Workshop - Naples, Italy, November 11-14, 2008 The SiGRiS pilot project: producing value-added, EO-based information for the management of the.
Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Deformation Through the Seismic Cycle Jeff Freymueller University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Observing an Earthquake Cycle Within a Decade
Geodetic monitoring of subduction zones Some idea of the kinematics of the subduction interface can be inferred from surface deformation measured from.
Network Strain Filter and its applications on GPS data Matt Wei, Jeff McGuire WHOI September 10, 2011.
Why North China is seismically active while South China remains largely aseismic? Youqing Yang & Mian Liu, Dept. of geol. University of Missouri-Columbia.
Near-Field Modeling of the 1964 Alaska Tsunami: A Source Function Study Elena Suleimani, Natalia Ruppert, Dmitry Nicolsky, and Roger Hansen Alaska Earthquake.
What is an Earthquake? An earthquake is the vibration of the Earth caused by a rapid release of energy. The focus is point in the Earth where the release.
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia SCIENTIFIC EXPLOITATION OF EO DATA FOR EARTHQUAKES AND TECTONICS Stefano Salvi National Earthquake Center.
Research Progress on Joint Inversion of Dynamic Geodetic and Geophysical Data School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University Xu Caijun.
SISMA Seismic Information System for Monitoring and Alert Galileian Plus Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Milano, Italy Politecnico di.
Remote Sensing and Active Tectonics Barry Parsons and Richard Walker Michaelmas Term 2011 Lecture 4.
IGARSS 2011 – July, Vancouver, Canada Investigating the seismic cycle in Italy by multitemporal analysis of ALOS, COSMO-SkyMed and ERS/Envisat DInSAR.
A spherical Fourier approach to estimate the Moho from GOCE data Mirko Reguzzoni 1, Daniele Sampietro 2 2 POLITECNICO DI MILANO, POLO REGIONALE DI COMO.
The 03/11/2011 Mw9.0 Tohoku, Japan Earthquake Educational Slides Created & Compiled by Gavin Hayes & David Wald U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake.
Earth Science Applications of Space Based Geodesy DES-7355 Tu-Th 9:40-11:05 Seminar Room in 3892 Central Ave. (Long building) Bob Smalley Office: 3892.
Intraplate Seismicity Finite element modeling. Introduction Spatial patterns (Fig. 1) –Randomly scattered (Australia) –Isolated “seismic zones” (CEUS)
03/000 Phil R. Cummins March 2005 The Indian Ocean Tsunamis – Science and Seismics Australian Government Geoscience Australia.
A magnitude 5.7 earthquake occurred in the Aegean sea, between Greece and Turkey, at 14:16 on the 8th January The earthquake occurred 32 km below.
The 2003 Bam, Iran earthquake: what we knew, what we didn’t know and what we expect in the future Gareth Funning (University of California, Berkeley) with.
Interseismic deformation with aseismic stress-dependent fault slip Eric A Hetland, Mark Simons, Ravi Kanda, Sue Owen TO brown-bag – 03 April 2007 a very.
NE Caribbean and Hispaniola = major plate boundary, 2 cm/yr relative motion Strike-slip + convergence partitioned between 3 major fault systems Apparent.
DYNAMIC DISPLACEMENTS OF THE SEA BOTTOM DUE TO SUBDUCTION ZONE EARTHQUAKES A.I. IVASHCHENKO Institute of Oceanology, RAS, Moscow L.I. LOBKOVSKY Institute.
Blue – comp red - ext. blue – comp red - ext blue – comp red - ext.
GPS: “Where goeth thou” Thomas Herring With results from Jen Alltop: Geosystems Thesis Katy Quinn: Almost graduated Ph.D
The Mw 7.9 Wenchuan (China) Earthquake: exploring the role of crustal heterogeneities from finite element analysis of DInSAR coseismic deformation In our.
THE APRIL 3, 2010 EARTHQUAKE ALONG THE PERNICANA FAULT (MT. ETNA - ITALY): ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND IN SITU GROUND DEFORMATION DATA INTEGRATED BY THE.
Warm Up 11/4 Why are subduction zones not commonly found at convergent continental-continental boundaries? a. Oceanic lithosphere is too buoyant to be.
Jayne Bormann and Bill Hammond sent two velocity fields on a uniform grid constructed from their test exercise using CMM4. Hammond ’ s code.
FEM model of coseismic deformation measured by DInSAR and GPS: Wenchuan (China) 2008 and L’Aquila (Italy) 2009 Earthquakes IMPLEMENTING REALISTIC TOPOGRAPHY.
Using GPS and InSAR to study tectonics, deformation, and earthquakes GPS displacements, velocities (and transients) InSAR displacements.
Earthquakes (1) John Townend EQC Fellow in Seismic Studies Cotton 520, ph
Earthquakes in the Ocean: Where, Why, and What Happens? As prepared for ESCI Earth Structure & Deformation And Sally Ride Festival, Houston (10/25/06)
The influence of the geometry of the San Andreas fault system on earthquakes in California Qingsong Li and Mian Liu Geological Sciences, 101 Geol. Bldg.,
Simulating big earthquakes Accessing the inaccessible with models.
David Schmidt Ray Weldon Reed Burgette Randy Krogstad Haiying Gao
California Earthquake Rupture Model Satisfying Accepted Scaling Laws (SCEC 2010, 1-129) David Jackson, Yan Kagan and Qi Wang Department of Earth and Space.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.32 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2013), pp Coseismic.
Conceptual model on how to relate geological structures to co-seismic deformation King et al., JGR 1988 and Stein et al., JGR 1988 Seminar 1, October,
2002/05/07ACES Workshop Spatio-temporal slip distribution around the Japanese Islands deduced from Geodetic Data Takeshi Sagiya Geographical Survey Institute.
GeoFEM Kinematic Earthquake Cycle Modeling in the Japanese Islands Hirahara, K. (1), H. Suito (1), M. Hyodo (1) M. Iizuka (2) and H. Okuda (3) (1) Nagoya.
Shaking and Flooding by the Tohoku-Oki earthquake Shengji Wei*, Rob Graves**, Don Helmberger*, Jean-Philippe Avouac* and Junle Jiang* * Seismological Lab,
Seismic Hazard Analysis for Guam & the Northern Mariana Islands Chuck Mueller U.S. Geological Survey Golden, Colorado, USA.
Seismotectonics Mathilde B. Sørensen and J. Havskov.
Images courtesy of Google Earth (top), and USGS (bottom).
Images courtesy of Google Earth
Great Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami, March 11, 2011
Velocities in ITRF – not appropriate for interpretation
RECENT SEISMIC MONITORING RESULTS FROM THE CENTRAL
Creager, Wech, Vidale, Melbourne
A numerical scale used to measure the magnitude or energy released
by Asaf Inbal, Jean Paul Ampuero, and Robert W. Clayton
Creager, Wech, Vidale, Melbourne
Creager, Wech, Vidale, Melbourne
Role of subducted sediments in plate
Types of Plate Boundaries
Fig. 1 Postseismic displacements recorded by land and seafloor GPS sites from September 2012 to May 2016 after the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku earthquake. Postseismic.
Presentation transcript:

The 11 March 2011 Tohoku-Oki (Japan) Megathrust Event: FEM models of Coseismic and Postseismic deformation captured by DInSAR and GPS Data. Christodoulos Kyriakopoulos 1, Salvatore Stramondo 1, Marco Chini 1, Christian Bignami 1, Timothy Masterlark 2, Sven Borgstrom 4, Francesco Guglielmino 3, Giuseppe Puglisi 3, Valeria Siniscalchi 4 1. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy. 2. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States 3. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Catania, Italy 4. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Napoli, Italy. U51B-0040 PRELIMINARY RESULTS INTRO FINITE ELEMENT MODEL The Mw 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake on March occurred near the northeast coast of Honshu, Japan. No historical records exist of an equal or greater magnitude earthquake along the Japan Trench. The Jogan earthquake of AD 869 may be the only possible exception. The Tohoku-Oki earthquake resulted from a thrust faulting on the subduction zone boundary between the Pacific and North America plates. Previous modeling of the megathrust earthquake indicate that the fault ruptured over an area approximately 400km long (strike direction) by 150 km wide (down-dip direction). In order to investigate the surface displacement field we have applied Differential SAR Interferometry (DInSAR) to Envisat and ALOS PALSAR data. We have processed three strips composed of 13 (track 347, descending orbit), 8 (track 074) and 6 (track 189) Envisat frames over Honshu island. We have also processed ALOS data along ascending path. The interferometric strips cover the whole Honshu Island and the epicentral region and a large coastal area. The strips have been unwrapped to measure the Line Of Sight surface movement. The maximum displacement reaches about 2.5 m relative to a reference point within the entire frames located nearby the southern boundary. They provided a map overview of the interferogram, as well as detailed views of Fukushima, Chiba and Sendai. The Preliminary GPS time series are provided by the ARIA team at JPL and Caltech. All original GEONET RINEX data provided to Caltech by the Geospatial Information Authority (GSI) of Japan. Here we present 3D Finite Element Model (FEMs) for the 11 March earthquake constrained from the available DInSAR and GPS data. The model presented is designed to simulate coseismic and postseismic deformation for the megathrust fault, while simultaneously accounting for the known geologic structure and geophysical context of Japanese subduction zone. We estimate the slip distribution pattern by combining space deformation data and FEMs generated kernels into a linear inversion scheme. Furthermore the coseismic estimated slip is used in a forward problem to predict the viscoelastic deformation. In this poster we present a preliminary slip distribution based on the linear inversion of ONLY the GPS data (ARIA solution + 5 seafloor GPS). Map of central and northern Honshu, Japan. The yellow star indicates the epicenter of the Mw March 2011 main event. The aftershocks (black dots) are extracted from the USGS catalog and span from March 11 to May 5. Surface displacements due to the Tohoku-Oki earthquake were observed by more than 1200 continuously recording Global Positioning System (GPS) sites (red triangles) installed and operated by the Geodetic Survey of Japan (GSI). The displacement above the hypocenter is detected from 5 GPS installed in the seafloor and using the GPS/acoustic combined technique (Sato et., al 2011). 1.Simulation of the transient Poroelastic deformation 2.DInSAR data integration for the linear inversion 3.Viscoelastic deformation 4.Afterslip 5.Gravity constraints (GOCE ESA mission) Special Thanks to Dr.Dapeng Zhao and Dr.Zhouchuan Huang for provide us with the seismic tomography of the Honsu Arc. Oceanic crust elastic E=56GPa,v=0.31 Lithospheric mantle E=150GPa,v=0.25 Mantle E=150GPa, v=0.25 Sed. layer over crust 56GPa,v=0.31 Volcanic Arc E=40GPa,v=0.34 Backarc sediment E=15GPa,v=0.34 Backarc basement 70GPa,v=0.28 Forearc E=15GPa,v=0.34 Wedge E=15GPa,v=0.34 Sed. Over crust Backarc Sediment Volcanic Arc Lithosphere Mantle Forearc 1300 km 600 km 1300 km The mesh of the entire model is composed by 1.2 million tetrahedral elements and is generated by CUBIT 12.2 (SANDIA) Several geophysical features of the Japan trench are implemented into the FE model. Bathymetry and topography from the ETOPO Global Relief Project (NOAA) are implemented as well The MOHO depression (Huang et al., 2011) caused by the load of the volcanic island is implemented into the FE model The material properties and geological complexity are taken into account The whole FE model domain extends L2600 km x W2800 km x H600km. In this poster only the central part of the model is presented The Subducting slab geometry is implemented from USGS and Gavin Hayes Slab 1.0 project. In this section we present the Coseismic Slip distribution derived from the linear inversion of 708 GPS points provided by the the ARIA team at JPL and Caltech. In order to constraint better the offshore displacement, geodetic seafloor observations-5 GPS points above the hypocenter-from Sato et al., 2011 are included in the inversion. In the first experiment (W0 inversion) the data are weighted only by the corresponding sigma value while in the second experiment (W10 inversion) the 5 seafloor GPS are weighted by a factor of 10. Coseismic and postseismic vertical deformation Coseismic Coseismic + viscoelastic relaxation 20 years MOHO W10W0 The viscosity value for the mantle used in this experiment is Pa*s (m) (m) (m) Observed vs Modeled vertical GPS data Coseismic slip distribution Observed vs Modeled horizontal GPS data W10W0 W10W0 WORK IN PROGRESS Coseismic deformationCoseismic + viscoelastic relaxation 10 years The input coseismic slip distribution is derived from the preliminary inversion presented in the right panel