Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive have a written plan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Criteria for the trustworthiness of data centres Jens Klump Helmholtz Centre Potsdam German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ) DataCite Summer Meeting.
Advertisements

Long-Term Preservation. Technical Approaches to Long-Term Preservation the challenge is to interpret formats a similar development: sound carriers From.
PRINCIPLES OF A CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
HATHI TRUST A Shared Digital Repository Digital Repositories for Preservation and Access Digital Directions 2013 Jeremy York July 22, 2013 Unless otherwise.
Software Quality Assurance Plan
An Introduction June 17, 2013 Open Archival Information System (OAIS)
Institutional Repositories It’s not Just the Technology New England Archivists Boston College March 11, 2006 Eliot Wilczek University Records Manager Tufts.
PREMIS in Thought: Data Center for LC Digital Holdings Ardys Kozbial, Arwen Hutt, David Minor February 11, 2008.
ISO & OAI-PMH By Neal Harmeyer, Amy Hatfield, and Brandon Beatty PURDUE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH REPOSITORY.
Security Controls – What Works
Lecture 8. Quality Assurance/Quality Control The Islamic University of Gaza- Environmental Engineering Department Environmental Measurements (EENV 4244)
Pertemuan 16 Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Kevin L. Glick Electronic Records Archivist Manuscripts and Archives Yale University ECURE Arizona State University March 2, 2005 Fedora and the Preservation.
PAWN: A Novel Ingestion Workflow Technology for Digital Preservation
CSE 4482, 2009 Session 21 Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act Payment Card Industry standard Web Trust Sys Trust.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
Copyright © Center for Systems Security and Information Assurance Lesson Eight Security Management.
System Design/Implementation and Support for Build 2 PDS Management Council Face-to-Face Mountain View, CA Nov 30 - Dec 1, 2011 Sean Hardman.
Records Survey and Retention Schedule Recertification 2011.
DCC Conference, Glasgow November, Digital Archive Policies and Trusted Digital Repositories MacKenzie Smith, MIT Libraries Reagan Moore, San Diego.
SQA Architecture Software Quality By: MSMZ.
Chinese-European Workshop on Digital Preservation, Beijing July 14 – Network of Expertise in Digital Preservation 1 Trusted Digital Repositories,
Digital Preservation measuring our capability and ‘confronting the abyss’ Sarah Slade on behalf of the NSLA Digital Preservation Group.
City of Seattle Office of the City Clerk Open Government = Access Challenges and Opportunities with Digital Records.
1 A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. Chinese Proverb.
DIGITAL IMAGING What Every Archivist and Records Officer Should Know DIGITAL IMAGING What Every Archivist and Records Officer Should Know Presented by.
A disaggregated model for preservation of E-Prints Gareth Knight SHERPA DP Project Arts and Humanities Data Service.
OAIS in the Library Environment Managing and Preserving Electronic Resources FLICC/CENDI Washington DC, December 11,2001 Anne Van Camp RLG, Member Initiatives.
OAIS Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT Issued document 1.0.
Use & Access 26 March Use “Proof of Concept” Model for General Libraries & IS faculty Model for General Libraries & IS faculty Test bed for DSpace.
The FCLA Digital Archive Joint Meeting of CSUL Committees, 2005.
1 Chapter Nine Conducting the IT Audit Lecture Outline Audit Standards IT Audit Life Cycle Four Main Types of IT Audits Using COBIT to Perform an Audit.
Audit in electronic records management - Filip Boudrez - - Antwerp City Archives - ErpaWorkshop Antwerpen 16 april 2004.
WGISS /09/2015 DATA PRESERVATION – CNES APPROACH B. Chausserie-Laprée.
Information Security 14 October 2005 IT Security Unit Ministry of IT & Telecommunications.
Selene Dalecky March 20, 2007 FDsys: GPO’s Digital Content System.
OAIS Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT Issued document 1.0.
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part II A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 Technical Issues.
April 12, 2005 WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE AN ARCHIVES? Trusted Digital Repository Model Original Presentation by Bruce Ambacher Extended by Don Sawyer 12.
The Project Three-year grant from the National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC), April 2010-March 2013 Develop electronic records.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Recommended Tabulations and Dissemination Section B.
The OAIS Reference Model Michael Day, Digital Curation Centre UKOLN, University of Bath Reference Models meeting,
HDF and HDF-EOS: Implications for Long-Term Archiving and Data Access.
Managing Access at the University of Oregon : a Case Study of Scholars’ Bank by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
June 21, 2011EDMC Workshop in Silver Spring, MDDan Kowal Submission Agreements: The role they play in supporting the relationship between the Data Producer/Provider.
The OAIS Reference Model and Trustworthy Repositories Josh Lubell Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory NIST
Institutional Repositories July 2007 DIGITAL CURATION creating, managing and preserving digital objects Dr D Peters DISA Digital Innovation South.
SEDAC Long-Term Archive Development Robert R. Downs Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center Center for International Earth Science Information Network.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Records Management Practices: Doing Right by the Records John Faundeen ASPRS May 1, 2008 Portland,
Infrastructure Breakout What capacities should we build now to manage data and migrate it over the future generations of technologies, standards, formats,
The OAIS model SEEDS meeting May 5 th, 2015, Lausanne Bojana Tasic.
Rights Management for Shared Collections Storage Resource Broker Reagan W. Moore
Building Preservation Environments with Data Grid Technology Reagan W. Moore Presenter: Praveen Namburi.
Chang, Wen-Hsi Division Director National Archives Administration, 2011/3/18/16:15-17: TELDAP International Conference.
Data Management and Digital Preservation Carly Dearborn, MSIS Digital Preservation & Electronic Records Archivist
OAIS (archive) Producer Management Consumer. Representation Information Data Object Information Object Interpreted using its Yields.
Setting up long term digital preservation DLM Forum Member Meeting Luxembourg 14-15th October 2015.
OAIS (archive) OAIS (archive) Producer Management Consumer.
Joint Meeting of CSUL Committees,
Introduction for the Implementation of Software Configuration Management I thought I knew it all !
CESSDA SaW Training on Trust, Identifying Demand & Networking
OAIS Producer (archive) Consumer Management
Building A Repository for Digital Objects
Policy-Based Data Management integrated Rule Oriented Data System
Active Data Management in Space 20m DG
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II
Research data preservation in Canada
Robin Dale RLG OAIS Functionality Robin Dale RLG
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part II
Presentation transcript:

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive have a written plan which spells out and justifies its assumptions and practices? Does the archive have a mission statement? This defines collection parameters, and annual work plans. Is the plan acceptable to the archive sponsor, resource allocator, data creator, certifying board? Is there a plan for staging ingestion of data into archive? This defines the at-risk components. Is there a concept of operations plan for the archive? Has a legal authority been defined for the archive to justify retention of data? Do you have a governing board for the archive?

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Has the archive validated its procedures and capabilities against this implementation standards checklist? Have the legal authority requirements been met? Does the archive comply with relevant “NARA / ISO” standards that have become available? DOD standard for ingesting office records ISO PDTR draft records management standard ISO legal imaging standard or best practices from DLM forum Is there a validation plan or audit process that reconfirms the archive compliance over time? Are updated versions of the checklist used, that include current best practices?

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Is the nature of the interaction of the archive staff with data providers defined? How does the archive help the provider understand the data and meta-data standards to which the provider must/should conform? Are guidelines and requirements for preparation and submission of data provided? How does the archive support the providers in the data preparation? Is training and outreach provided? Are required protocols for data ingestion specified? Is the accession process for scheduling data access defined?

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Can the data ingestion process handle the expected data transfer in a manner acceptable to the provider? Does the data ingestion process scale to handle the expected growth in the data flow? Does the data ingestion process support the accepted practices of the provider? What types of data ingestion can be supported (formats, data rates)? Are the ingestion mechanisms appropriate for the planned data ingestion schedule? Is electronic data transfer supported? Are expectations set for the sustainable data transfer rates?

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive have approaches to insure that the accessioning process maintains the fidelity of the original data? Are mechanisms provided to track fidelity of data? Can integrity of data be monitored through checksums, and are the checksum algorithms documented? Are data flows tracked to identify sources of error? Are content validation mechanisms provided to check the data as received, and after delivery to a user?

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Are adequate environmental and security controls provided for the archive? ANSI recommended practices for environmental controls Temperature, humidity, dust,... Computer room controls (36 CFR 188) Security access controls Physical security IT security (viruses) Backup and disaster recovery Physical location of archive (faults, tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, fires)

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive have (and follow) processes to migrate data across media? Are mechanisms provided to check fidelity of information over the life of the archive? Are annual checks of readability done (36 CFR 1234)? Are certified media used (defined)? NARA standard, National Media Lab (nta.org or nml.org) Are mechanisms provided to monitor media viability (OAIS criteria)? Is automatic error checking done for media (SMART technology)? What are the maximum allowed error levels? Are best practices followed for archiving to tape? Are “stable” technologies used for media?

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive have (and follow) processes to migrate data and meta-data across technologies? Do you have a test plan to validate your migration procedures that follows industry best practices? Are “stable” IT technologies used in archive generation, preservation and maintenance? Are documented formats used for data sets and meta- data? Is an information model used to characterize collections? Are access mechanisms provided that meet user “leading or cutting edge” expectations? Are you monitoring your user community access requirements?

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive make its data and services known to its customer community? Is outreach information made available that is appropriate for the user community? Does the archive effectively publicize its services? Is the archive a member of the Society of American Archivists, or the Association of Archivists, or the International Council on Archives, or regional archive organizations? Do you solicit input from your user community to assess needs and future requirements?

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive make its data and services effectively available to its customer community? Are access delivery mechanisms in synch with the expectations of the user community? Is cataloging information provided that is sufficient for locating data based on descriptive information? Does the archive provide unique identifiers for data sets that support tracking of information? Is cataloging information available to the customer community? Are mechanisms provided to track usage of the archive? Mechanisms for handling confidentiality requirements? Do you have mechanisms to handle copyright? Support for proprietary data access control?

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Are the archive’s data correctly and independently usable by the designated community? Is there enough and adequate representational information provided for the data to be usable? Is the meta-data context correctly defined? Can the data be used without needing expert advice? Are mechanisms provided to collect this information from the data providers? Is the level of expertise defined for access to the data sets? Are data sets provided that correspond to the level of expertise of the user community?

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive provide an infrastructure independent representation for the data and meta-data? Can the collection be migrated forward in time? Do you have an infrastructure independent representation for the database itself? Mechanisms for handling proprietary formats? Will conversion tools exist? Do you provide (archive) original software? Do you provide alternate representations or formats? Are the formats documented or published?

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Are mechanisms provided for life cycle maintenance? Is validation of data integrity done on a regular basis? Is the OAIS checklist followed on a regular basis? Is there a plan for regular migration of data? Is copyright permission format evolution tracked? Do you have permission to migrate to a new form? (Need to extend fair use and rights of preservation to digital materials.) Pre-ingest checklist is needed

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Best Practice Development Use ingest and identification workgroup criteria for checklist ID meta-data Cataloging (finding aids) Unique identifier within local collection, within archive community, … Check compliance of the certification/best practices list with the OAIS model and mandatory responsibilities section 3.

Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Best Practice Development What is the appropriate data set description? Correspondence to OAIS terminology Descriptive information –Dublin Core PDI - Reference, context, provenance, fixity Packaging information Representation information Structure Management - audit trails Preservation What is the information model for the structure of meta- data?