MIT Workshop for Advanced Methods on Earthquake Location

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bayesian Belief Propagation
Advertisements

Real-Time Estimation of Earthquake Location and Magnitude for Seismic Early Warning in Campania Region, southern Italy A. Zollo and RISSC-Lab Research.
A Partition Modelling Approach to Tomographic Problems Thomas Bodin & Malcolm Sambridge Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University.
CSCE643: Computer Vision Bayesian Tracking & Particle Filtering Jinxiang Chai Some slides from Stephen Roth.
Various Regularization Methods in Computer Vision Min-Gyu Park Computer Vision Lab. School of Information and Communications GIST.
Lecture 23 Exemplary Inverse Problems including Earthquake Location.
FTP Biostatistics II Model parameter estimations: Confronting models with measurements.
3-D crustal structure using seismic waves P and S (SimulpPS) CNRST – MARWAN Morocco Youssef Timoulali CNRST EUMEDGRID-Support / CHAIN/
Reducing Drift in Parametric Motion Tracking
CHAPTER 2 D IRECT M ETHODS FOR S TOCHASTIC S EARCH Organization of chapter in ISSO –Introductory material –Random search methods Attributes of random search.
Probabilistic tomography
Title Stephan Husen Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland,
Chapter 4: Linear Models for Classification
DA/SAT Training Course, March 2006 Variational Quality Control Erik Andersson Room: 302 Extension: 2627
Aspects of Conditional Simulation and estimation of hydraulic conductivity in coastal aquifers" Luit Jan Slooten.
The loss function, the normal equation,
Visual Recognition Tutorial
Inverse Problems in Geophysics
Constraining Astronomical Populations with Truncated Data Sets Brandon C. Kelly (CfA, Hubble Fellow, 6/11/2015Brandon C. Kelly,
Part 4 b Forward-Backward Algorithm & Viterbi Algorithm CSE717, SPRING 2008 CUBS, Univ at Buffalo.
Lecture 8 The Principle of Maximum Likelihood. Syllabus Lecture 01Describing Inverse Problems Lecture 02Probability and Measurement Error, Part 1 Lecture.
Bayesian Learning Rong Jin.
Using ranking and DCE data to value health states on the QALY scale using conventional and Bayesian methods Theresa Cain.
Single station location Multiple station location
CSC2535: 2013 Advanced Machine Learning Lecture 3a: The Origin of Variational Bayes Geoffrey Hinton.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 10 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Surface wave tomography: part3: waveform inversion, adjoint tomography
H. Sadi Kuleli, W Rodi, Fuxian Song, M. Nafi Toksoz Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,MA,
Finite Differences Finite Difference Approximations  Simple geophysical partial differential equations  Finite differences - definitions  Finite-difference.
Body Waves and Ray Theory
1 Hybrid methods for solving large-scale parameter estimation problems Carlos A. Quintero 1 Miguel Argáez 1 Hector Klie 2 Leticia Velázquez 1 Mary Wheeler.
1 Mohammed M. Olama Seddik M. Djouadi ECE Department/University of Tennessee Ioannis G. PapageorgiouCharalambos D. Charalambous Ioannis G. Papageorgiou.
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass 1 Confidence Intervals and Upper Limits Confidence intervals (CI) are related to confidence limits (CL). To calculate.
Surface wave tomography : 1. dispersion or phase based approaches (part A) Huajian Yao USTC April 19, 2013.
Model Inference and Averaging
Linear(-ized) Inverse Problems
Analytical vs. Numerical Minimization Each experimental data point, l, has an error, ε l, associated with it ‣ Difference between the experimentally measured.
Effect of Velocity Models on the Accuracy of Earthquake Hypocenters Sudipta Sarkar, Youshun Sun, M. Nafi Toksöz Earth Resources Laboratory Massachusetts.
FUNDAMENTALS of ENGINEERING SEISMOLOGY LOCATING EARTHQUAKES.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Deterministic vs. Random Maximum A Posteriori Maximum Likelihood Minimum.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
CS 782 – Machine Learning Lecture 4 Linear Models for Classification  Probabilistic generative models  Probabilistic discriminative models.
SUPA Advanced Data Analysis Course, Jan 6th – 7th 2009 Advanced Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences Dr Martin Hendry Dept of Physics and Astronomy.
2004 SIAM Annual Meeting Minisymposium on Data Assimilation and Predictability for Atmospheric and Oceanographic Modeling July 15, 2004, Portland, Oregon.
A unifying framework for hybrid data-assimilation schemes Peter Jan van Leeuwen Data Assimilation Research Center (DARC) National Centre for Earth Observation.
ELEC 303 – Random Signals Lecture 18 – Classical Statistical Inference, Dr. Farinaz Koushanfar ECE Dept., Rice University Nov 4, 2010.
The good sides of Bayes Jeannot Trampert Utrecht University.
A Passive Approach to Sensor Network Localization Rahul Biswas and Sebastian Thrun International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2004 Presented.
3D Seismic Imaging based on Spectral-element Simulations and Adjoint Methods Qinya Liu Department of Physics University of Toronto 1 st QUEST Workshop,
CISN: Draft Plans for Funding Sources: OES/FEMA/ANSS/Others CISN-PMG Sacramento 10/19/2004.
July 11, 2006Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Probing the covariance matrix Kenneth M. Hanson T-16, Nuclear Physics; Theoretical Division Los.
Sequential Monte-Carlo Method -Introduction, implementation and application Fan, Xin
On Optimization Techniques for the One-Dimensional Seismic Problem M. Argaez¹ J. Gomez¹ J. Islas¹ V. Kreinovich³ C. Quintero ¹ L. Salayandia³ M.C. Villamarin¹.
1 Introduction to Statistics − Day 4 Glen Cowan Lecture 1 Probability Random variables, probability densities, etc. Lecture 2 Brief catalogue of probability.
Inverse Problems in Geophysics
HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.
The Unscented Particle Filter 2000/09/29 이 시은. Introduction Filtering –estimate the states(parameters or hidden variable) as a set of observations becomes.
DirectFit reconstruction of the Aya’s two HE cascade events Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison Method of the fit: exhaustive search simulate cascade events with.
Geology 5670/6670 Inverse Theory 30 Mar 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Last time: Bayesian Inversion Given an Uncertain Model Bayes’ theorem: suggests that a straightforward.
Monte Carlo Sampling to Inverse Problems Wojciech Dębski Inst. Geophys. Polish Acad. Sci. 1 st Orfeus workshop: Waveform inversion.
Generalization Performance of Exchange Monte Carlo Method for Normal Mixture Models Kenji Nagata, Sumio Watanabe Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Goal We present a hybrid optimization approach for solving global optimization problems, in particular automated parameter estimation models. The hybrid.
Earthquake hypocentre and origin time
On Optimization Techniques for the One-Dimensional Seismic Problem
Ch3: Model Building through Regression
Recent Advances in Iterative Parameter Estimation
Introduction to Sensor Interpretation
Introduction to Sensor Interpretation
Introduction to Neural Networks
Yalchin Efendiev Texas A&M University
Presentation transcript:

MIT Workshop for Advanced Methods on Earthquake Location NonLinLoc Non-Linear, Probabilistic, Global-Search Earthquake Location in 3D Media Sudipta Sarkar MIT Workshop for Advanced Methods on Earthquake Location June 26, 2007.

Reference Research Software - maintained and developed by: Dr. Anthony Lomax Software is distributed under the GNU Public License Continuously evolving with feedback/help from users at various research orgs, including MIT. http://alomax.free.fr/nlloc/index.html

The NonLinLoc Codes Vel2Grid: Given a velocity model description, creates a model grid. Outputs a 3D Grid. Grid2Time: Given a 3D Model Grid, calculates travel times from a point within a 3D Grid to all other points within the grid. Outputs a set of 3D Grids. NLLoc: Determines the location for one or more events within a 3D Grid using a systematic grid-search, a stochastic, Metropolis-Gibbs search, or a hybrid "Oct-Tree" method. Outputs misfit or probability density function (PDF) on a 3D Grid, description of best hypocenter, and other results.

A Typical Location Workflow with NonLinLoc Obtaining seismic phase picks in a supported format. Example Phase File formats: NLL, Hypo71, HypoEllipse, HypoDD, SimulPS, NEIC, SEISAN, ETH, Nordic, NCSN, ISC, CSEM, etc. Determining a 3D search region and velocity model for this region. Using Vel2Grid or other software to produce a velocity or slowness model 3D grid file for the search region for each phase type (i.e. P or S). Using Grid2Time to produce travel-time 3D grid files for each phase type at each station. Using NLLoc to locate each event defined by the phase picks. Processing and plotting the location results.

Phase Picks

Pick File

Vel2Grid The Vel2Grid program converts analytic or other velocity model specifications into a 3D grid file containing velocity or slowness values. Velocity (km/s) Depth (km)

Grid2Time Given a velocity model grid, Grid2Time calculates the travel-time from a source point in a 3D grid to all other points in the grid. The travel-time calculation is done using the Eikonal finite-difference scheme of Podvin and Lecomte. [Ref. Podvin, P. and Lecomte, I., 1991, Finite difference computation of traveltimes in very contrasted velocity models: a massively parallel approach and its associated tools., Geophys. J. Int., 105, 271-284.] This method relies on a systematic application of Huygen's principle in the finite difference approximation. Such approximation explicitly takes into account the existence of different propagation modes (transmitted and diffracted body waves, head waves). Local discontinuities of the time gradient in the first arrival time field (e.g. caustics) are built as intersections of locally independent wavefronts. As a consequence, the proposed method provides accurate first travel times in the presence of extremely severe, arbitrarily shaped velocity contrasts.

NLLoc The earthquake location algorithm implemented in the program NLLoc follows the probabilistic formulation of inversion presented in Tarantola and Valette (1982) and Tarantola (1987). [Ref. Tarantola, A. and Valette, B., 1982, Inverse problems = quest for information., J. Geophys., 50, 159-170. Tarantola, A., 1987, Inverse problem theory: Methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 613p.] Information on Data and Model, Prior PDF, Forward relationship Bayesian Framework Posterior Density Function (PDF) The maximum likelihood (or minimum misfit) point of the complete, non-linear location PDF is selected as an "optimal" hypocenter.

ETH Example: Irregular, extensive PDF Figure Courtesy: Anthony Lomax

ETH Example: Elongated PDF Figure Courtesy: Anthony Lomax

? Difficulties: Depth-origin time trade-off Δ < depth P+S P, S P, S accurate velocity model (3D?)

ETH Example: well located event epicentre location PDF Figure Courtesy: Anthony Lomax

Likelihood/Misfit Functions The LS-L2 Likelihood Function Most earthquake location algorithms are based on an L1 or L2 norm of the misfit between observed and calculated travel times for each observation, given a nominal error for each observations. An outlier observation has a residual greater than its nominal error. The Equal Differential Time (EDT) Likelihood Function An alternative to the LS-L2 likelihood function that is very robust in the presence of outliers. With both the EDT and LS-L2 likelihood functions, the errors in the observations (seismic wave arrival times) and in the forward problem (travel-time calculation) are assumed to be Gaussian. This assumption allows the direct, analytic calculation of a maximum likelihood origin time for the LS-L2 likelihood function, while the EDT determination is inherently independent of any origin time estimate. Thus the 4D problem of hypocenter location reduces to a 3D search over latitude, longitude and depth.

Probabilistic, global-search event location Probability Density Function The goal of probabilistic, global-search event location is to efficiently determine a complete image of the location Probability Density Function (PDF). The PDF is formed by some function f of the misfit between observed and predicted data, and includes information about the uncertainties in the observed data and in the forward calculation used to generate predicted data. The PDF may be visualized as contours of confidence (left), as a scatter density plot (right), or by other means. The maximum likelihood hypocenter (star) may be of interest for certain analyses.

RMS/L2 vs EDT Probability Density Function “satisfy all the observations” EDT (Equal Differential Time) With an L2 norm and least-squares misfit function, the PDF represents the probability that all the observations are satisfied. In contrast, the EDT PDF represents the probability that the largest number of observations are satisfied. Thus the EDT function is more robust when some of the observations are outliers and cannot be satisfied. The EDT formulation is also independent of origin time since it uses only time differences. “satisfy the most pairs of observations” independent of origin time

RMS/L2 vs EDT with outlier data perfect data (6 obs) 1 outlier data (err=10) RMS/L2 RMS/L2 all residuals ~ 0 all residuals ~  EDT EDT With perfect data (left panels), both RMS/L2 and EDT find the same maximum likelihood location. With 1 outlier datum (right panels), the RMS/L2 maximum likelihood location is biased to the northwest, the high probability region of the PDF does not overlap the true location, and the residuals for all data are similar and large. Thus the solution is biased but the solution statistics give no indication of this nor do they give and understanding of the cause of the bias. In contrast, the EDT maximum likelihood location is the same as with perfect data, and the correct, very large residual for the outlier data is determined. residual outlier ~ 10 other residuals ~ 0 all residuals ~ 0

Global-Search methods: Grid search  PDF image  multiple minima  efficiency

Global-Search methods: Directed walk  PDF image  multiple minima  efficiency simulated annealing metropolis methods simplex…

Search methods: Importance sampling  PDF image  multiple minima  efficiency [Genetic algorithm] Neighbour methods Oct-tree

Oct-Tree importance sampling: Fast, probabilistic earthquake location in 3D models Anthony Lomax Andrew Curtis

The Oct-Tree method Solution probability density function (PDF): Grid of sampled cells (Oct-Tree in 3D): Probability solution is in a cell with volume Vi : Pmax Pj Pk Pmin Ordered list of probability values for all previously sampled cells:

The Oct-Tree method Sub-division of highest probability cell: 1 sample 8 new samples cell volume cell volume / 8

Oct-Tree sampling procedure a) true PDF b) initial sampling c) subdivision d) subdivision e) subdivision f) many subdivisions

Oct-tree search: Discussion Much faster than grid-search (factor 1/1000) More global and complete than Metropolis Very few parameters (initial grid size, number samples)

Summary: NonLinLoc event location  resolve PDF image  find multiple minima  efficiency  3D & complex models  non-linear  more complete than linearized loc