22 June 2000 D  2000 - NIU Workshop S. Doulas From Detector to Ntuples: Muons Steven Doulas Northeastern University Boston, MA D0 Muon Upgrade Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.

DoE Review June 6-7, 2000 Current Detector Configuration June 6, 2000  Solenoid, Central Preshower installed in central bore  A-layer MDTs installed.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
FPCP 2002, 05/16-18/2002 p. 1 Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityCDF Run II Status Status of CDF and Prospects Flavor Physics and CP Violation.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.
APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.
Workshop on Quarkonium, November 8-10, 2002 at CERN Heriberto Castilla DØ at Run IIa as the new B-Physics/charmonium player Heriberto Castilla Cinvestav-IPN.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
EPS 2003, July 19, 2003David Buchholz, Northwestern University Performance of the D0 Experiment in Run II Detector Commissioning and Performance Accelerator,
BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.
L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
Jiawen Zhang, IHEP, 2008, April 10, frascati Status of BEPCII/BESIII and Physics preparation Jiawen Zhang 2008/4/7—10 , PHIPSI08, Frascati.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger 1.
Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 16 to July 22 D0 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.6pb -1 u Recorded:
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
Forward Muon Installation and Commissioning Dmitri Denisov Fermilab Director’s review 7/12/1999 Plan Forward muon detectors Mini-drift tubes installation.
D0 PMG 6/15/00 PMG Agenda June 15, 2000  Overview (Tuts) u Detector status u Reportable milestones u Financial status u Summary  Response to DOE review.
Fermilab Users Meeting June R.J. Tesarek Fermilab CDF 2002 Toward Physics Richard J. Tesarek Fermilab For the CDF Collaboration.
Particle Identification at BESIII Kanglin He April 23, 2007, Amsterdam.
W/Z Plan For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001.
Diffractive W/Z Bosons Andrew Brandt UTA Run I Diffractive W/Z Boson Production Recap Run II Preliminary Search for Diffractive Z Bosons (Courtesy of Tamsin.
Aurelio Juste (Fermilab) Rencontres de Moriond, March OUTLINE Tevatron Run 2 The upgraded DØ Detector Status Performance First Physics Results Outlook.
Forward Carriage Commissioning CLAS Collaboration Meeting 6/19/2015CLAS12 CalCom Status Update1 ECAL PCAL FTOF Panel 1A FTOF Panel 1B Detector Status PMT.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
First results from SND at VEPP-2000 S. Serednyakov On behalf of SND group VIII International Workshop on e + e - Collisions from Phi to Psi, PHIPSI11,
Director’s Review Dec 1999 DO Timeline Old Version J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M D Install silicon front-end ICD FPS Lum (L0) CFT install/hookup.
Collaboration Mtg April 14, 2000 DO Timeline J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M D Install silicon front-end ICD FPS Lum (L0) CFT install/hookup 1/2.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
The Performance of the ALICE experiment for cosmic ray physics B. Alessandro, V. Canoa, A. Fernández, M. Rodríguez, M. Subieta for the ALICE Collaboration.
11 September 2001D0 Collaboration Meeting Data Analysis Jamboree S.Doulas Central Muon Scintillators Steven Doulas D0 Muon Upgrade Group Northeastern University.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
W/Z Muon Selection For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001 “Tight” and “Loose” Muon selection for the WZ group.
The CDF Upgrade - Incandela -CERN - January 26, 2001 slide 1 96 wire planes –(8 superlayers) –50% are 3 o stereo –Uniform drift (0.88 cm cell) –30,240.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
Detection of atmospheric muons using ALICE detectors
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
Special edition: Farewell for Valerie Halyo
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
LHCb Trigger, Online and related Electronics
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas From Detector to Ntuples: Muons Steven Doulas Northeastern University Boston, MA D0 Muon Upgrade Group

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Muon Upgrade Detector Bottom B/C Scint Central Trigger Scint ( A-  ) Forward Trigger Scint (Pixels) Forward Tracker (MDTs) Shielding PDTs

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Muon Detector Status u Forward Shielding n N/S EF plugs installed n North EMC truss shielding complete, needs mounting hardware & pre-install. survey n South EMC truss shielding assembly in progress  Forward Muon u Tracking Chambers - Mini-Drift Tubes n A-layer MDT’s octants(8+8) installed on N&S end Iron (EF) n C-layer MDT’s completely assembled, these are the largest (Lab F) n B-layer assembly has begun (Lab F)

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Muon Detector Status u Trigger Counters n A-layer assembly started on shielding wall, shooting to have N&S on EF by early July n B&C-layer assembled and tested, in storage at Lab F.

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Level 1 Triggering  Purpose of Level 1 Muon Trigger (L1MU) is to identify muon candidates to Trigger Framework (TF) u L1MU decision <3.3  s after Beam crossing  L1MU tools to reduce L1 trigger rates u Match L1CFT track (P T info) with scintillator hits u Timing window for scintillator hits u Forming centroids from wire chamber hits in different planes and correlations between layers  L1MU triggers are user-defined u L1MU(mult,P T,eta,scint,wire,sign) n Mult:0,1,2,3 n P T :2, 4, 7, 11 GeV n eta: C, N, S, NX, SX, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 n CFT and scintillator: L, T, X n Wire and scintillator: L, T, X n Sign: S, O, X  Commissioning of pre-production muon trigger cards is in progress.

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Level 2 Algorithms  Level 2 (L2) is used as a rejection tool and pre-processing for Level 3 u Total L2 bandwidth ~1kHz to L3 u L2 has 3 stage processing:~100  s u Muon object finding u ID quality assignments  Stage 1 - SLIC Cards u Fast calibration - T 0 subtracted scintillator hit time and PDTs have drift distances u 3D track segment finding for A and BC layers separately  Stage 2 - Alpha pre-processor u Assembles 3D muon tracks u Assigns track quality (L/T) u Calculates momentum u Time stamp(prompt,slow,out-time)

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Level 2 Algorithms  Stage 3 - Global Level 2 u Collects muon candidates (from Alpha) and physics objects from other L2 subsystems. n Objects: Jet,EM,ME T,MU,TRK,IP u Muon Selection (Num,P T,  -range,quality) u Muon Relations (Global L2 ablilities) n Isolation, angular sep., muon inside jet, CFT track match(P T, ,  ) u Muon candidates sent to Global and Muon Level 3 for unpacking u Global can select and correlate different L2 objects and confront them with L2 trigger menu. u Global L2 is the first instance of complete event accessibility.

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Level 3 Filtering  Level 3 (L3) will access the muon system and other subdetectors (CFT, SMT, Cal,...) to find muon candidates u Total L3 bandwidth ~50Hz to Tape u Time budget of 1ms  L3 will: u Muon Tracking n Fits all hits w/drift distance n Uses best fit, better P and track counting u Muon Scintillator n Good TOF(  t  1-2ns),correlate A and C times, fit for velocity, separate muons from low  cosmics, look at opposite sides u Calorimeter n Track like object n Isolation independent z-vertex,  z vtx  20cm

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Level 3 Filtering u CFT n 3D matching,  z vtx  1cm u SMT n Primary vertex  z vtx  cm, secd vtx  Trigger decisions are made by Filters, Filters obtain info from tools, ScriptRunner runs Filters.

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Detector Coverage  Forward: Efficiency vs.  and   Central: Efficiency vs.  and 

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Detector Overview  Detector Thickness u Calorimeter n Varies between 5-9 interaction lengths n E min =1.6 GeV for muon exit u Iron n Varies between 7-9 interaction lengths n E min =3.3 GeV for muon exit

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Current Online/DAQ  Detector Readout - East Side Central Muon u 2 PDT front-end crates (B&C-layer) u 2 SCINT front-end crates (A&C-layer)  Triggering on cosmics  Collecting data(L1 trigger,L2,L3- format) writing to disk u Plugged into Trigger Framework  Using PDT wire hit frequency and raw data for commissioning and testing FE electronics  Data format looks okay  Need to readout more crates  Data is read offline by EXAMINE

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas EXAMINE Data  Run 691 (C and Aphi counters)

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Offline Muon ID  Muon ID tools u Trigger Info n Momentum at different trigger levels? u Global track fit u Probability of missing A,B,C layers u Tracking-based isolation u Muon reconstruction in Calorimeter u Matching scintillator times, track velcity  Current Muon ID u Segment reconstruction in/out toroid u Fit track in muon system (Saclay alg) n Fit track through calorimeter and toroid taking into account MCS and Energy loss u Match CT and A-layer segment n P T >1.5 GeV u Muon Particle results from successful fit n no muons <2 hits in A-layer u Muon Particle parms = CT parameters u Tracking-based isolation

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Check of Muon System Performance  Detector u Efficiency n # of hits in tracks and clusters u Thresholds n MDTs,PDTs, and Scintillators u Operation of calibration system u Operation of electronics  Trigger u Rejection rates n Will see this w/trigger monitor (data) u Efficiencies n Compare simulation w/real data  Reconstruction u Measures peaks u Efficiencies n Compare with known cross sections: W and Z’s, J/ , etc... u Muon ID Cuts n Define quality cuts

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Offline Reconstruction  Muon Momentum Reconstruction u Wamus, Famus: results of single track studies u Central tracking: Using mass resolution for dimuon resonances n  (M  ) = 3.5 GeV at Z, =1.1 n  (M  ) = 2.8 GeV at Z, =0 n  (M  ) = 45 MeV at J/ , =1.1

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Offline Reconstruction  Muon Reconstruction Efficiency u Current min. Requirement for Muon ID (loose muon): A-layer segment matched a w/CT track n Acceptance for A-layer segment |  |<2 is 80% n CT acceptance |  |<2 is ~88% u Reconstruction efficiency per loose muon is defined as the ratio of the # of reconstructed muons(MC confirmed) to all accepted trajectories n Z->  : 96% n J/  ->  : 92% n Z -> bb : 95% n Note: MC muons at P T >1.5 GeV, |  |<2 (yellow), reconstructed muons with MC confirmation (green)

22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas Summary