CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November 2008 1 Preparing the Return of Infrasound Data Processing into IDC Operations Presented.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

International Data Centre Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization 1 Processing of the new Infrasound Arrays on.

Advertisements

13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

Infrasound Station Ambient Noise Estimates and Models: J. Roger Bowman, Gordon Shields, and Michael S. O’Brien Science Applications International.

Waveform Modeling and Comparisons with Ground Truth Events David Norris BBN Technologies 1300 N. 17 th Street Arlington, VA

THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Infrasound Technology Workshop, November 2007, Tokyo, Japan OPTIMUM ARRAY DESIGN FOR THE DETECTION OF DISTANT.

Evaluation of the ASHE Project, Ecuador M. Garcés 1, D. Fee 1, and A. Steffke 1 D. McCormack 2 and R. Servranckx 3 H. Bass 4 and C. Hetzer 4 M. Hedlin.

Infrasound Signals Observed at I53US and I55US John V. Olson, Charles R. Wilson, C. A Szuberla and D. Osborne Infrasound Group, University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Rethinking Array Seismology in Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Monitoring Steven J. Gibbons Workshop on Arrays in Global Seismology, Raleigh, North Carolina, May.

Global Distribution of Crustal Material Inferred by Seismology Nozomu Takeuchi (ERI, Univ of Tokyo) (1)Importance of Directional Measurements from geophysicists’

Seismo-Acoustic data analysis at I34MN Mongolia - Songino Seismo-Acoustic data analysis at I34MN Mongolia - Songino RESEARCH CENTRE OF ASTRONOMY AND GEOPHYSICS.

The Temporal Morphology of Infrasound Propagation Douglas P. Drob 1, Milton Garces 2, Michael Hedlin 3, and Nicolas Brachet 4 1)Space Science Division,

THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Infrasound Technology Workshop, 3-7 November 2008, Bermuda WIND NOISE REDUCTION AT IMS INFRASOUND STATIONS Douglas R.

Bob Woodward, Bob Busby, Katrin Hafner, and David Simpson

October, 2002 Infrasonic Signal Detection Using The Hough Transform D. J. Brown, B.L.N. Kennett, C. Tarlowski Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian.

1/10Worshop Applied Antineutrino Physics, APC Lab, Dec International Monitoring of Nuclear Test Technologies In Use Legal basis of the international.

LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.

Infrasound detector for Apatity group Asming V.E., Kola Regional Seismological Center, Apatity, Russia.

Collaborators  Rod Whitaker, George Randall [Los Alamos National Laboratory]  Relu Burlacu [University of Utah]  Chris Hayward, Brian Stump [Southern.

Infrasound Signals from Repeating Detonations at the Utah Test and Training Range Recorded in North America J. Roger Bowman and Gordon Shields Science.

Robert Gibson and David Norris Arlington, Virginia USA

CloudNet: TARA status and database H. Russchenberg, O. Krasnov Delft University of Technology – IRCTR, The Netherlands.

IASPEI 2009 The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Development of the Seismic Networks of the International Monitoring System Lassina Zerbo Director,

Infrasound Workshop De Bilt, Netherlands October 2002 Infrasound Processing at the IDC and its Near-term Development Petr Firbas International Data.

Augmentation of IMS Infrasound Arrays for Near- field Clutter Reduction Curt A. L. Szuberla, John V. Olson and Kenneth M. Arnoult, Jr. Wilson Infrasound.

DAM-Île de France Département Analyse, Surveillance, Environnement Infrasound workshop - The Netherlands - October 28-31, 2002 Infrasounds generated by.

From the Installation and Certification Group to the Engineering and Development Section Patrick Grenard Chief, Engineering & Development, IMS Vienna International.

Wide Area Augmentation System Dan Hanlon WAAS Program Manager April 2, 2003.

November 2008Infrasound Technology Workshop, BermudaPage 1 Presented to: Infrasound Technology Workshop Bermuda PTS Portable Infrasound Array John Coyne,

Modeling of Infrasound from the Space Shuttle Columbia Reentry Robert Gibson and David Norris BBN Technologies Arlington, Virginia, USA Infrasound Technology.

Infrasound Workshop De Bilt, Netherlands October 2002 Current Status of Infrasound Processing at the IDC Nicolas Brachet International Data Centre/Waveform.

Detection, Propagation, and Modeling Infrasound Technology Workshop Bermuda, 2008.

Changes in the Performance of the IMS Infrasound Network due to Seasonal Propagation Effects David Norris and Robert Gibson BBN Technologies 1300 N. 17.

Page 1 British Crown Copyright 2008/MOD Assessing the detection capability of the International Monitoring System infrasound network David Green and David.

Recent Applications of the Time-Domain Parabolic Equation (TDPE) Model to Ground Truth Events Robert Gibson and David Norris BBN Technologies Arlington,

Acoustic-gravity wave monitoring for global atmospheric studies Elisabeth Blanc 1 Alexis Le Pichon 1 Lars Ceranna 2 Thomas Farges 1 2- BGR / B3.11, Hannover,

Infrasound Workshop San Diego, USA October 2003 Infrasound Processing at the IDC and its Near-term Development P. Firbas, N. Brachet International.

Infrasound Technology Workshop – Tokyo, November The Buncefield Explosion: A benchmark for infrasound analysis in Europe L. Ceranna, D. Green, A.

Infrasound Technical Workshop 2008 Session 1 Summary – Sensors and Calibration.

Infrasounds and Background Free Oscillations Naoki Kobayashi [1] T. Kusumi and N. Suda [2] [1] Tokyo Tech [2] Hiroshima Univ.

Systems Check. Milton Garces and Claus Hetzer Infrasound Laboratory, University of Hawaii, Manoa PMCC analyses of signals from the North American and.

1 Location and Characterization of Infrasonic Events Roger Bowman 1, Greg Beall 1, Doug Drob 2, Milton Garces 3, Claus Hetzer 3, Michael O’Brien 1, Gordon.

Infrasound from lightning Jelle Assink and Läslo Evers Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute Seismology Division ITW 2007, Tokyo, Japan.

Infrasound Technology Workshop Tokyo, Japan November 2007 Smooth Introduction of Infrasound Data into the IDC Reviewed Event Bulletin Part I: Procedure.

October The Woomera Infrasound and Seismic Experiment David Brown 1 ; Clive Collins 1 ; Brian Kennett 2 1. Geoscience Australia 2. Australian National.

STATUS of the International Data Center and International Monitoring System Network of the PTS Florian Haslinger IMS Seismic Monitoring Section Preparatory.

Infrasound Technology WS – Bermuda, November 6 th, Microbarom signals recorded in Antarctica - a measure for sudden stratospheric warming? L. Ceranna,

HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.

1 Description and Analysis of Infrasound Signals Recorded from the North Pacific Event of February 22, 2003 Joydeep Bhattacharyya 1, Claus Hetzer 2,Milton.

A Study on Characteristics of Seasonally Dependent Infrasound Propagation Based on the Ground-Truth Events from a Long- Term Experiment at a Quarry mine.

Analysis of regional infrasound signals at IMS infrasound array in Mongolia a RCAG/MAS P.O.B-152, Ulaanbaatar-51Mongolia b CEA/DASE BP12, Bruyeres-le-Chatel,

November, 2008 Bermuda ITW Numerical Simulation of Infrasound Propagation, including Wind, Attenuation, Gravity and Non-linearity Catherine de Groot-Hedlin.

Infrasound Technology Workshop Bermuda, 2008 Enhancements to the CTBTO operational automatic infrasound processing system David Brown, Nicolas Brachet,

November 2007Infrasound Technology Workshop, Tokyo, JapanPage 1 Presented to: Infrasound Technology Workshop Tokyo, Japan PTS Experimental Infrasound Array.

Infrasound Technology Workshop – Tokyo, November Listen to the Sounds of the Antarctic Atmosphere L. Ceranna, A. Le Pichon & E. Blanc BGR / B3.11,

Milton Garces, Claus Hetzer, and Mark Willis University of Hawaii, Manoa Source modeling of microbarom signals generated by nonlinear ocean surface wave.

International Data Centre October 2015Page 1 Progressive Commissioning Jerry Carter, Senior Scientist W. Randy Bell, Director Gerhard Graham, Coordinator.

Bias and Uncertainty in Parameter Estimation in Infrasound Arrays

Robert Gibson1, Douglas Drob2 and David Norris1 1BBN Technologies

Charles R. Wilson, John V. Olson and Daniel L

Infrasound Technology Workshop, Bermuda Section 6

Refinement of Bolide Characteristics from Infrasound measurements

ANALYST EVALUATION OF MODEL-BASED BAYESIAN SEISMIC MONITORING AT THE CTBTO Logic, Inc. Nimar S. Arora1, Jeffrey Given2, Elena Tomuta2, Stuart J. Russell1,3,

Conclusions and Further Work

Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates

EGU István Bondár1, Ronan Le Bras2, Nimar Arora3, Noriyuki Kushida2

Infrasound uses many new attributes such as Center Frequency

Preliminary Results of Localization and Characterization of Steady Infrasound Source as Detected by I31KZ A. Smirnov1, V. Kunakov1, A. Le Pichon2, J.

IMS Infrasound Station Observations of the Recent Explosive Eruptions of Okmok and Kasatochi Volcanoes, Alaska J. V. Olson, K. Arnoult, C. A. L. Szuberla,

Summary of 2003 Infrasound Technology Workshop

Infrasonic observations of chemical explosions

Presentation transcript:

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound Data Processing into IDC Operations Presented at: Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda 3-7 November 2008 Nicolas Brachet, Pierrick Mialle, David Brown and John Coyne Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization Provisional Technical Secretariat / International Data Centre Vienna International Centre P.O. Box 1200 A-1400 Vienna AUSTRIA

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Outline of Presentation Final preparation for moving infrasound into operations  Tuning the automatic infrasound processing Detection/detection categorization/phase association  Interactive review of infrasound signals Enhancement of the automatic infrasound processing  Station Noise characterization & Amplitude computation (cf. David Brown’s presentation)  Atmospheric modeling (atm. specifications & simulation tools)

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound in IDC Operations

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound in IDC Ops Milestones Historical Operational Milestones September 2003: Guidelines from CTBT/WGB/TL-2/79 “Significant effort should be directed into assessment and further development of infrasound tools for analysis. It is recognized that some existing tools (e.g. PMCC) show considerable potential for forming the basis for infrasound analysis, but are not yet in a form suitable for routine operations.” March 2004: Infrasound are temporarily disconnected from network processing until a solution is found to reduce the number of (bogus) infrasound events in the IDC automatic bulletins. July 2004: DFX-PMCC installed in Operations November 2004: Detection categorization installed in Operations July 2007: Interactive infrasound review tool (ARS-Geotool-PMCC) in Operations

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound in IDC Ops Milestones And also offline development & testing work … 2006: Use of frequency-distance attenuation curve to reduce the number of false associations of infrasound detections 2007: Preliminary analyst procedure & guidelines for saving infrasound events (selected infra started to be added to REB) Ongoing: Enhancement of existing automatic and interactive software … Accomplishments in 2008 New functions implemented in Geotool-PMCC interactive review tool Prepare DFX-PMCC low frequency configuration for Solaris/Linux Tune detection categorization Work on Station Noise characterization & Amplitude computation Tune GA to reduce the number of false associations with infra detections

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound in IDC Ops Tuning of the Automatic Processing Low frequency DFX-PMCC for Solaris (and Linux) Objective: Enhanced detection capability, especially for distant events Processing frequency bands between 0.07 and 4.0 Hz Acceptable CPU time for Solaris machines (IDC Operations): Use of 11 frequency bands and duration of cross correlation windows between 30 and 60 seconds Validation of the new detector configuration using the IRED* Example from IRED: Kasatochi eruption on August 8, 2008 detected at I22FR (New Caledonia), distance=8410km, signal frequency<0.1Hz *IDC Infrasound Reference Event Database

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound in IDC Ops Tuning of the Automatic Processing Tuning of DFX-PMCC for oceanic infrasound stations (I04AU, I05AU, I13CL, I14CL, I18DK, I27DE, I36NZ, I52GB, I55US) Objective: Reduce the oversensitivity of DFX-PMCC to local ocean surf noise IMS array configuration including very small aperture sub-arrays (~100m) may not be optimum for seaside areas 1.5km 80m Robinson Crusoe I14CL 130m 110m 80m Inner sub-array at I14CL

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound in IDC Ops Tuning of the Automatic Processing Tuning of DFX-PMCC for oceanic infrasound stations (cont.) Action Do not start DFX-PMCC processing with too small inner triplet configuration or/and Increase the required minimum number of detecting elements in an array to ensure distant elements also contribute to the final detection solution. Inner sub-array at I14CL 200m 180m 160m

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound in IDC Ops Tuning of the Automatic Processing Before tuning 131 detections related to surf and microbaroms After tuning 74 detections related to surf and microbaroms Results: The number of detections due to ocean surf decreased, with more stable detection attributes (back azimuth/trace velocity values) Example of I13CL (Easter Island), 26 October 2008 period 00:00-04:00UTC

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound in IDC Ops Tuning of the Automatic Processing Tuning of network processing (GA) Objective: reduce the number of false automatic associations with infra detections to a manageable level for analyst review (~10 to 15 automatic events per day) Set up a testing/review environment (development LAN/InfraNet) and elaborate new infrasound criteria for GA All SHI events SHI events using new criteria Review signal detections & events Geotool-PMCC IRED Database InfraNet

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound in IDC Ops Tuning of the Automatic Processing Tuning of network processing (cont.) Positive criteria: retain only certain types of infrasound associations Large events: Events built with a minimum of arrivals from 3 primary stations (infra + eventually seismic), provided the first detected infrasound arrival is within 40 deg. Seismic events: Events built with at least 1 seismic phase detected on infra station (+ seismic phases on seismic stations) Significant events: Events including at least 1 significant infra detection (Cfreq between 0.4 Hz and 2.5 Hz ; family size>20 pixels ; family duration>120s), provided the first detected infrasound arrival is within 40 deg Negative criteria:  Give zero weight to very small low frequency infrasound detections (Cfreq<0.25Hz and family size<12 pixels)  and reject events with less than 2 primary stations

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound in IDC Ops Tuning of the Automatic Processing Tuning of network processing (cont.) Current statistics (on development LAN) with 37 operating infra arrays Daily average: SEL3 events (SHI) - 45 “infra” events before GA criteria - 17 “infra” events after GA criteria (min. 5, max. 32) Before criteriaAfter criteria

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound in IDC Ops Tuning of the Automatic Processing Tuning of network processing (cont.) Interactive review of the remaining automatic “infra” events after GA criteria Comments: The automatic bulletin contains ~1 valid event per day (usually including only 1 infra station), Some possible events could not be validated (built with 2 infra stations), The number of events built with infra stations decreases during week-ends (when there are fewer large detections related to human activity) Week-ends Database problem

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound in IDC Ops Interactive review of infrasound signals More functional interactive review tool for infrasound data (update of Geotool-PMCC) Detection background at the station (24 hour summary) Expandable panel for detection pixels (Azimuth, speed, consistency, correlation, RMS amplitude, number of detecting sensors, F-stats) Automatic/Manual beam forming Linear/Log frequency scale Various polar plots Wind frequency Time Azimuth

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Enhancement of the automatic infrasound processing: Atmospheric modeling - Models and tools -

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Enhancement of the automatic infra processing Atmospheric models available at the IDC Zonal winds at latitude 49N 2 March GMT G2S-ECMWF HWM93 = latest HWM07 (Drob et al.,2008) in progress… = G2S-ECMWF ECMWF Altitude (km) Longitude

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Enhancement of the automatic infra processing Atmospheric models available at the IDC G2S-ECMWF HWM93 HWM07 Meridional winds at latitude 49N 2 March GMT + = in progress… = G2S-ECMWF ECMWF Altitude (km) Longitude

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Enhancement of the automatic infra processing Atmospheric modeling: Tools New tools for infra atmospheric modeling at the IDC Application for producing G2S-ECMWF models (Drob,2007) has been ported to 64 bit Linux In June 2008, the IDC received a new software ( WASP-3D sph.*, Virieux et al.) for simulation of infrasound wave propagation in a complex heterogeneous medium WASP-3D has been enhanced in order to integrate real-time atmospheric variability (ECMWF data) and recent wind model (HWM07) WASP-3D should help better understand the atmospheric propagation and be used at the IDC for comparison with other tools (e.g. Taupc, InfraMAP) Distance (km) Traveltimes (s) I26DE 0 SourceI26DE Altitude (km) V T (km/s) 0.36 * Windy Atmospheric Sonic Propagation 3D in Spherical Coordinates

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Novaky explosion (Slovakia), 2 March 15:28:04 GMT Enhancement of the automatic infra processing Atmospheric modeling: Case study (IRED) Slovakia Hungary Czech Rep. Poland Austria IS26 IS31 IS46 VRAC GERES 4500 km 2825 km IS46 IS3 1 Novaky Explosion 4 km REB Event location refined by analysts REB Location is 5km from GT SEL3 event built with 3 Infra+1 Seismic arrays Automatic location 75km from Ground Truth Source: EMSC and P.Labak

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Enhancement of the automatic infra processing Atmospheric modeling: Case study (IRED) I26DE (350 km) I31KZ (2825 km) I46RU (4500 km) Novaky explosion, Waveforms and DFX-PMCC detections

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Enhancement of the automatic infra processing Atmospheric modeling: Case study (IRED) Novaky explosion, WASP-3D ray tracing at I26DE using different atm. models HWM93 HWM07 G2S- ECMWF I26DE Ray tracing (color=shooting angle) Travel time curves (color=Trace velocity) I26DE 100km

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Enhancement of the automatic infra processing Atmospheric modeling: Case study (IRED) Novaky explosion, WASP-3D ray tracing at I31KZ using different atm. models HWM93 HWM07 Only stratospheric rays are displayed It branches Is branches G2S- ECMWF I31KZ 50km

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November I26DEI31KZI46RU DFX-PMCC Cel. (m/s) ∆Az (deg.) Atm. models HWM93 G2S- ECMWF HWM07HWM93 G2S- ECMWF HWM07HWM93 G2S- ECMWF HWM07 Taupc Cel. (m/s) ∆Az (deg.) WASP-3D Sph Cel. (m/s) ∆Az (deg.) Enhancement of the automatic infra processing Atmospheric modeling: Case study (IRED) Novaky explosion, Summary of ray tracing results (observed/predicted celerity and back az. deviation)

CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Summary Pre-requisite for moving infrasound into IDC Operations  Tuning the automatic infrasound processing to reduce the number of bogus infrasound events down to a manageable level for analyst interactive review (~15 automatic infrasound events/day)  Suitable tool for Interactive review of infrasound signals  Analyst procedure & guidelines for building infrasound events  Scheduled re-introduction of infrasound into Operations (beginning of 2009) Enhancement of the automatic infrasound processing New acquisitions at the IDC in 2008 for atmospheric modeling  Atmospheric specifications: HWM2007, integration to G2S-ECMWF in progress  Simulation tool: WASP-3D ray tracing  Encouraging results, need for intensive testing and validation of the new models and tools on reference events (IRED)