2014 OVERVIEW: National Streamgage Network Design by USGS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends in Number of High School Graduates: National
Advertisements

Ways to Move Pay Equity in Your State State Pay Equity
PARTISAN CONTROL AND STATE DECISIONS ABOUT OBAMACARE FULL GO STATES (n = 22) Arkansas Michigan CALIFORNIA MINNESOTA COLORADO NEVADA CONNECTICUT New Hampshire.
Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2004 CONFERENCE, MOBILE, AL OCTOBER 09-11, 2004 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
Fifty Nifty United States
TOTAL CASES FILED IN MAINE PER 1,000 POPULATION CALENDAR YEARS FILINGS PER 1,000 POPULATION This chart shows bankruptcy filings relative to.
Geography Flipbook.
5 Year Total LIHEAP Block Grant Allotment (FY ) While LIHEAP is intended to assist low-income families with their year-round home energy needs,
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
U.S. Civil War Map On a current map of the U.S. identify and label the Union States, the Confederate States, and U.S. territories. Create a map key and.
ACS CAN and the CoC: Making a Difference Saving Lives ACS CAN and the Commission on Cancer.
Regions By Katelyn Ebenkamp Picture background with textured caption
This chart compares the percentage of cases filed in Maine under chapter 13 with the national average between 1999 and As a percent of total filings,
OVERVIEW: USGS Streamgage Network Design. USGS Streamgage Network effective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements.
Fasten your seatbelts we’re off on a cross country road trip!
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
Let’s See What You Know: Draw the outline of the United States Draw California Identify and label our three major bodies of water Star the location of.
The United States.
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
 As a group, we thought it be interesting to see how many of our peers drop out of school.  Since in the United States education is so important, we.
CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
Midwest Northeast West Southwest Southeast.
By Carol Fahringer. I.The United States: Divided Into 8 Different Political Regions.
What is a Region?  Broad geographic area distinguished by similar features ○ Climate ○ Geography ○ Location ○ Natural Resources.
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
Hawaii Alaska (not to scale) Alaska GeoCurrents Customizable Base Map text.
US MAP TEST Practice
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
The United States is a system that can be broken into 5 major parts or regions.
United States Cultural Regions. New England The six states of New England are Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut.
Can you locate all 50 states? Grade 4 Mrs. Kuntz.
Susan Reichelt, Ph.D. Melanie Powley, M.Ed. Aniysa Raiford Morgan Gleason Family and Consumer Sciences Professionals: A Long History of Involvement in.
Midwest Northeast West Southwest Southeast.
REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES
1st Hour2nd Hour3rd Hour Day #1 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5.
2012 IFTA / IRP MANAGERS’AND LAW ENFORCEMENT WORKSHOP
The United States Song Wee Sing America.
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
The United States.
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Physicians per 1,000 Persons
USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1992 – 2012
Name the State Flags Your group are to identify which state the flag belongs to and sign correctly to earn a point.
GLD Org Chart February 2008.
Membership Update July 13, 2016.
2008 presidential election
State Adoption of Uniform State Test
The States How many states are in the United States?
State Adoption of NMLS ESB
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Regions of the United States
DO NOW: TAKE OUT ANY FORMS OR PAPERS YOU NEED TO TURN IN
Regions of the United States
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Regions How many do you know?.
What is this part of the map called? What is it used for?
Europe North America South America Greenland Canada United States 1 2
Presidential Electoral College Map
2008 presidential election
WASHINGTON MAINE MONTANA VERMONT NORTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA MICHIGAN
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA
Presentation transcript:

2014 OVERVIEW: National Streamgage Network Design by USGS

USGS Streamgage Network an effective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements and shared investment guided to meet national priorities

USGS Streamgaging History John Wesley Powell (USGS Director; 1881 – 1894) directed USGS to begin monitoring streamflow in the American west First USGS gage installed 1889 to monitor the Rio Grande near Embudo, New Mexico By 1895, streamflow was being monitored by USGS in 27 states/territories Most stations in 1968 = 8,320 in operation In 2012, USGS was operating 8,025 Streamgages

National Streamgage Network Cooperative Water Program CWP = 4,521 streamgages in 2012 (+750 interpretive studies) National Streamflow Information Program NSIP = 3,504 streamgages in 2012  8,025 total USGS active streamgages an effective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements and shared investment guided to meet national priorities

National Streamgage Network

Cooperative Water Program CWP Mission: to provide reliable, impartial, and timely information needed to understand the Nation's water resources through a program of shared efforts and funding with state, tribal, and local partners to enable decision makers to wisely manage the Nation's water resources.

Cooperative Water Program CWP = hydrologic data + investigative studies Program started as a 50:50 cost-share not authorized by Congress, except for specific direction in annual federal appropriations legislation Engages more than 1,500 cost-share “Cooperators” Active in every state & most territories Guided to meet national priorities

Cooperative Water Program CWP = hydrologic data + investigative studies Data collection by USGS maintaining high QA/QC Accessible to all without charge Consistent, Reliable & Available 24x7x365 Data & studies are limited by funding, but Cooperators are paying 2x the USGS funds – Competitive selection applying national priorities – USGS scientists get direct involvement in latest challenges – Cooperators get impartial science expertise from a national agency that has no regulatory function

National Streamflow Information Program (NSIP) Requested by Congress in 1998 USGS design was reviewed by NAS/NRC in 2004 NSIP was authorized by Congress in 2009 Program concept is to establish a reliable national “backbone” streamgage network to meet 5 specific, national needs and provide benchmark for monitoring by others Design = Network of 4,759 streamgages Strategic locations across America as Foundation for other streamgage networks Reliable + Continuous  Federal Funded 4,759 does not provide sufficient resolution to meet federal needs and constrain uncertainty without CWP supplement to bring national streamgage network to more than 8,000

National Research Council Review 2004 review of USGS design for NSIP 2007 review of USGS River Science 2009 review of USGS Water Program New science and more data are needed by federal, state, tribal, interstate and local officials to effectively manage water towards sustainable ends American water community needs a national leader in water sciences Favorable review of USGS operations, science capabilities and NSIP design

National Streamflow Information Program Reliable national streamgage network to meet 5 specific, national needs Design =network of 4,759 monitoring sites reliable + continuous  federal funded Actual < 75% currently operating, and 87% of those 3,504 streamgages lack reliable funding (i.e., depend on CWP Cooperators & OFAs), which defeats the intended reliability of NSIP A fully implemented NSIP would require $115 M to complete and $110 M/yr to operate

National Streamflow Information Program Implementation Status

National Streamgage Network Total NSIP + CWP Streamgages

National Streamgage Network effective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements and shared investment guided to meet national priorities Contact ICWP/Peter Evans (703) or

USGS Streamgage Network An effective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements and shared investment guided to meet national priorities Cooperative Water Program without the cost-share investment federal government would not have adequate coverage National Streamflow Information Program without reliable funding for the set of “backbone” streamgages federal government loses long-term records needed to identify trends and support interpretive science  8,025 total USGS active streamgages providing the benchmark needed by USGS and other agencies

Stakeholder Support Coalition Organized by ICWP with help from: – Western States Water Council – Association of State Floodplain Managers – American Society of Civil Engineers – National Water Resources Association – American Rivers – National Wildlife Federation

Stakeholder Support Coalition Focused effort to inform the Administration ( Interior & OMB ) and Congress 57 organizations endorsed the 2014 letters

2014 Stakeholder Coalition Alabama Rivers Alliance American Canoe Association American Meteorological Society American Rivers American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Resources Association American Water Works Association American Whitewater Appalachian Mountain Club Association of American State Geologists Association of California Water Agencies Association of Clean Water Administrators Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies Association of State Dam Safety Officials Association of State Floodplain Managers Bear River Commission California Sportfishing Protection Alliance Coastal States Organization Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum Colorado Water Congress Delaware River Basin Commission Environmental Defense Fund Farmington River Watershed Association Great Lakes Commission Hydropower Reform Coalition Idaho Rivers United Idaho Water Users Association Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin Interstate Council on Water Policy Irrigation Association Maryland Water Monitoring Council Missouri River Association of States & Tribes National Association of Clean Water Agencies National Association of Flood& Stormwater Management Agencies National Association of State Boating Law Administrators National Drought Mitigation Center National Hydrologic Warning Council National Hydropower Association National Water Resources Association National Tribal Water Council National Wildlife Federation The Nature Conservancy New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission Oregon Water Resources Congress Red River Compact Commission Susquehanna River Basin Commission Texas Water Conservation Association Trout Unlimited Upper Colorado River Compact Commission Upper Mississippi River Basin Association Washington State Water Resources Association Water Environment Federation Western Landowners Alliance Western States Water Council Yellowstone River Compact Commission

36 States Support Alabama Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Idaho Illinois Iowa Kansas Kentucky Maine Maryland Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri Montana Nevada Nebraska New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Dakota Oklahoma Oregon Rhode Island Texas South Carolina South Dakota Utah Vermont Virginia Washington

National Streamgage Network by USGS effective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements and shared investment guided by national priorities