Approved 1/26/2001 – Revised 11/26/2002 GRADUATE PROGRAM CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT, STAFFING AND ASSESSMENT PROCESSES EXECUTIVE COUNCIL DECIDES TO RECOMMEND.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ERP Applications Selection in a Changing Marketplace Evaluation of Software Providers for Midsize Institutions Bill Reed Director, Special Projects Northern.
Advertisements

TASK FORCE CALL TO ARMS Henninger High School 2012.
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Angie Gant, Ed.D. Truett-McConnell College 1.
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator Best Practices: Program Review TCUs Chief Academic Officers Annual Meeting.
Moving Assessment Across ALL Programs and Operations Effective Assessment Solutions for Accreditation.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
SEM Planning Model.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
Building an Online MSW Program from the Ground Up Mary Ann Forgey Cathy Berkman.
Atlanta Public Schools Principal Selection Process Human Resources, Center of Expertise Updated March 3, 2014 East Region Community Meeting April.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Atlanta Public Schools Principal Selection Process Human Resources, Center of Expertise Updated March 3, 2014.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Request from University Graduate Council for Revision to UFS Bylaws.
Program Review In Student Affairs Office of the Vice President Division of Student Affairs Virginia Tech
End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,
Access to Learning Section E STANDARDS & INDICATORS Council of International Schools New England Association of Schools & Colleges.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Dr. Mike Mahan Gordon College 1.
TIME LINE FOR PROGRAM REVIEWS. BASIC MAP OF PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESSES.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
Strategic Planning A Tool for “Charting our Future” Strategic Planning Team May 24-25, 2012.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Implementing an Ability Based Education System Colleen Keyes Dean of Academic Affairs Dr. David England Director of Institutional Effectiveness.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
1 Development of STRATEGIC PLAN through DEVELOPMENT STEPS.
Develop Project Charter
Assessment Liaisons Orientation Meeting October 8.
New Frameworks for Strategic Enrollment Management Planning
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
Academic Program Review Committee Report Faculty Senate meeting November 11, 2008.
Applying for HEA Fellowship What happens after you’ve submitted your application.
Online Learning Plan: Enhancing Quality of Learning and Student Success Short-term work teams to design and in many cases implement strategies, processes,
LCC PTA Program Assessment 2011 Summary of Findings and Next Steps.
6/6/ SOFTWARE LIFE CYCLE OVERVIEW Professor Ron Kenett Tel Aviv University School of Engineering.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
New Faculty Orientation College of Graduate Studies and Graduate Education at Idaho.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
Presented by Rob Till, Chair UAC Craig Bain, Chair UCC Bruce Fox, Chair LSC & member of UAC Niranjan Venkatraman, member UGC & UAC 1 3/10/14.
LSSU Assessment Timeline Phase I (Completed by December 2009) –Create Institutional Assessment Structure –Create Department Assessment Teams –Write College.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Workload Fulfillment Term Faculty Appointments Patricia Linton
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Standard I Systematic Planning.
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Expectations for Degree Programs: Curriculum & Assessment
New Department Chair Workshop
SBI – Senate Mid-Year Update
Academic Affairs Hiring Plan
COLLEGE OF ALAMEDA: INTEGRATED PLANNING & BUDGET MODEL
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
Name of Degree Type of Degree: Proposing unit (College or Department):
Sam Houston State University
به نام خدا ارزشيابی برنامه درسی
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Terminate an Academic Unit
In Preparation to ACCJC team site visit on 10/8-10/11
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Establish a New Academic Unit
Academic Program Review Comprehensive Report
Name of Degree Type of Degree: Proposing Unit (College or Department):
Sam Houston State University
Faculty Preparedness Online Student Services & Support
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Faculty Preparedness Online Student Services & Support
COLLEGE OF ALAMEDA: INTEGRATED PLANNING & BUDGET MODEL
Presentation transcript:

Approved 1/26/2001 – Revised 11/26/2002 GRADUATE PROGRAM CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT, STAFFING AND ASSESSMENT PROCESSES EXECUTIVE COUNCIL DECIDES TO RECOMMEND GRADUATE PROGRAM EXECUTIVE COUNCIL DECIDES TO RECOMMEND GRADUATE PROGRAM STAKEHOLDER REQUEST FOR PROGRAM GRADUATE AND/OR CIBED DIRECTORS ASSESSMENT OF FEASIBILITY COMPATIBILITY WITH COLLEGE MISSION CHAIR ASSESSMENT OF DEPARTMENT ABILITY TO STAFF GRADUATE CIT REVIEWS CURRICULUM MODEL MODE OF DELIVERY ADMISSION PLAN STAFFING PROCESS GRADUATE CIT REVIEWS CURRICULUM MODEL MODE OF DELIVERY ADMISSION PLAN STAFFING PROCESS STAGE 1: PROGRAM APPROVAL GRADUATE CI TEAM INPUT PROPOSAL FOR NEW GRADUATE PROGRAM OR NEW INTAKE OF EXISTING PROGRAM RATIONALE DEMAND ANALYSIS CURRICULUM MODEL MODE OF DELIVERY TIMELINE ADMISSIONS PLAN STAFFING NEEDS STAFFING PROCESS BUDGET ESTIMATES PROPOSAL FOR NEW GRADUATE PROGRAM OR NEW INTAKE OF EXISTING PROGRAM RATIONALE DEMAND ANALYSIS CURRICULUM MODEL MODE OF DELIVERY TIMELINE ADMISSIONS PLAN STAFFING NEEDS STAFFING PROCESS BUDGET ESTIMATES APPROVAL FROM C of B FACULTY U.C.C. O.B.O.R. AS APPROPRIATE APPROVAL FROM C of B FACULTY U.C.C. O.B.O.R. AS APPROPRIATE YES OU GRAD COUNCIL (NEW PROGRAM) OU GRAD COUNCIL (NEW PROGRAM) RECOMMENDATIONS

Approved 1/26/2001 – Revised 11/26/2002 DEPARTMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS (IF COMMITTEE EXISTS) PROGRAM DIRECTOR SENDS OUT A REQUEST FOR FACULTY INTEREST (INCLUDING SELECTION CRITERIA) PROGRAM DIRECTOR SENDS OUT A REQUEST FOR FACULTY INTEREST (INCLUDING SELECTION CRITERIA) MIX OF NEW AND EXPERIENCED FACULTY DEPARTMENT CHAIR SELECTS FACULTY TO RECOMMEND DEPARTMENT CHAIR SELECTS FACULTY TO RECOMMEND PROGRAM DIRECTOR ACCEPTS FACULTY OR EXPRESSES CONCERNS PROGRAM DIRECTOR ACCEPTS FACULTY OR EXPRESSES CONCERNS FACULTY DEVELOPMENT GOALS FACULTY CREDENTIALS/ EXPERIENCE FIT WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROGRAM FIT WITH SELECTION CRITERIA STAGE 2: FACULTY SELECTION FACULTY EXPRESS INTEREST TO DEPARTMENT CHAIR FACULTY EXPRESS INTEREST TO DEPARTMENT CHAIR DEPARTMENTAL RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS PAST FACULTY EVALUATION CONCERNS GRAD CIT INFORMED OF SELECTED FACULTY TEAM GRAD CIT INFORMED OF SELECTED FACULTY TEAM PROGRAM DIRECTOR SELECTS EXTERNAL FACULTY SUBJECT TO DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL NO CoB FACULTY ABLE OR WILLING TO STAFF SLOT CoB NON-CoB FACULTY RATIO EXECUTIVE COUNCIL RESOLVES CONCERNS EXECUTIVE COUNCIL RESOLVES CONCERNS RECONSIDER PROGRAM /INTAKE FEASIBILITY STRATEGIC ISSUES CANNOT USE OUTSIDE STAFF USE OUTSIDE STAFF APPROVED NONCoB FACULTY SELECTED FACULTY UNRESOLVED CONCERNS ACCEPTED CoB FACULTY APPROVED CoB FACULTY EXECUTIVE COUNCIL CONSIDERS USING OUTSIDE STAFF EXECUTIVE COUNCIL CONSIDERS USING OUTSIDE STAFF NO APPROVED NONCoB FACULTY NOT APPROVED INPUT FROM DIRECTOR OF GRADUATE PROGRAMS

Approved 1/26/2001 – Revised 11/26/2002 PROGRAM CURRICULUM MODEL AND MODE OF DELIVERY PROGRAM DIRECTOR REPORT STRATEGIC VALUE OF PROGRAM ADMISSION / GRADUATION STATS RECORD OF STAFFING USED PROGRAM ADVISORY GROUP FEEDBACK STAGE 3: CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT FACULTY TEAM DEVELOPS AND DELIVERS PROJECT / COURSE COMPONENTS FACULTY TEAM DEVELOPS AND DELIVERS PROJECT / COURSE COMPONENTS GRADUATE CIT RECOMMENDATION CONTINUE AS IS CONTINUE WITH SPECIFIED MODIFICATIONS TERMINATE PROGRAM GRADUATE CIT RECOMMENDATION CONTINUE AS IS CONTINUE WITH SPECIFIED MODIFICATIONS TERMINATE PROGRAM PROGRAM DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE COUNCIL CoB FACULTY GRADUATE CIT ASSESSES PROGRAM NEW PROGRAM AFTER YEAR 1 CONTINUING PROGRAM EVERY 3 YEARS GRADUATE CIT ASSESSES PROGRAM NEW PROGRAM AFTER YEAR 1 CONTINUING PROGRAM EVERY 3 YEARS CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CURRICULUM OR DELIVERY FACULTY TEACHING IN PROGRAM STUDENT FEEDBACK EXIT SURVEY DESIGNED BY GRAD CIT, PROGRAM FACULTY AND DIRECTOR PROGRAM ASSESSMENT DATA COLLECTED PROGRAM ASSESSMENT DATA COLLECTED EXTERNAL REVIEW PANEL INCLUDES 3 NON-COB FACULTY 1 BUSINESS PERSON 1 ALUMNUS EXTERNAL REVIEW PANEL INCLUDES 3 NON-COB FACULTY 1 BUSINESS PERSON 1 ALUMNUS