COACh program  Consult the TRC website and read clearly the call for research proposals as well as the criteria against which.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computer English For Computer Major Master Candidates
Advertisements

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
AuthorAID Post-PACN-Congress Workshop on Research Writing Accra, Ghana November 2011.
Creating Your Competitive Proposal Projects, Grants, Fellowships...
Counting Down the Top Ten List for Proposal Writing Royal Roads University Office of Research February 26, 2010.
I. Why Proposals Do Get Funded Or Do Not Get Funded Why proposals do get funded –Tangible Reasons: Good Idea Well thought out program/well structured proposal.
Preparing a Grant Proposal: Some Basics
Writing a Project Proposal Fundraising Workshop ILGA-Europe, Krakow By Maxim Anmeghichean.
How to write a winning research proposal
Page 1 Improving Research Grant Quality at GCU Professor John Marshall Director Academic Research Development.
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
1 Grant Process Proposal Preparation Proposal Writing Project Implementation Evaluation and Assessment Reporting.
introduction to MSc projects
WRITING AN EFFECTIVE SURF PROPOSAL Susanne Hall, Hixon Writing Center Coordinator Student presenters: Nerissa Hoglen, Jon Schor February 2013.
Grant Proposal Basics 101 Office of Research & Sponsored Programs.
NSERC has an overview of the discovery grant program on their website:
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
Effective proposal writing Session I. Potential funding sources Government agencies (e.g. European Union Framework Program, U.S. National Science Foundation,
Lecture 2: Project Concept Document
Advanced Research Methodology
Writing a Research Proposal
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Building Sustainable Development Oak Island Resort, NS November 18-19, 2005 How to Write a Successful Proposal Lynn Langille Atlantic Health Promotion.
Tips for Writing a Successful Grant Proposal Diana Lipscomb Associate Dean for Faculty and Research CCAS.
Grants Factory GRANTS FACTORY WRITING GROUPS Essential Elements of a Good Grant Application Mick Tuite School of Biosciences
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
Writing Impact into Research Funding Applications Paula Gurteen Centre for Advanced Studies.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
Preparing Grant Proposals: A Session for INASP Country Coordinators Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH AuthorAID Knowledge Community Editor Bangladesh May 2009.
Proposal Development Sample Proposal Format Mahmoud K. El -Jafari College of Business and Economics Al-Quds University – Jerusalem April 11,2007.
Chapter 13– Strategies for Effective Oral Presentations The goal of the presentation is to communicate, clearly and concisely, the results and implications.
Grant Writing Basics. Topics of This Session Matching funding to your objective Telling your story Writing the budget.
Grant Writing Strategies for Doctoral Students Scott M. Lanyon Professor and Head, Dept. of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior College of Biological Sciences.
Prof. Dr. Shehata El-Sewedy, Dean Dr. Tarek El Sewedy Dr. Hewida Fadel Prof. Dr. Shehata El-Sewedy, Dean Dr. Tarek El Sewedy Dr. Hewida Fadel.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
Developing IFS Research Proposals AuthorAID Proposal Writing Workshop June 2011.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
AuthorAID Workshop on Proposal Writing Rwanda June 2011.
Rejoinders for ARC DP Assessment Reports: Your last chance for influencing the CoE members Zhihong Xu Griffith University.
A Bit on Grants Dr. Jennifer L. Bowie for her brilliant PDC.
Writing a Research Proposal 1.Label Notes: Research Proposal 2.Copy Notes In Your Notebooks 3.Come to class prepared to discuss and ask questions.
Geri Richmond University of Oregon COACh program
The Elements of a Successful Proposal. # 1:The title Choose a title that conveys information about your project. Avoid acronyms that have negative connotations.
Grant Basics Traci Merrill Assistant Director, Sponsored Programs October 6, 2011.
Writing Proposals Nayda G. Santiago Capstone CpE Jan 26, 2009.
The Proposal AEE 804 Spring 2002 Revised Spring 2003 Reese & Woods.
General remarks Goal of the presentation Illustration of the business in a concise way Visual support for your pitch The prompts and tips should be addressed.
FEMS Microbiology Ecology Getting Your Work Published Telling a Compelling Story Working with Editors and Reviewers Jim Prosser Chief Editor FEMS Microbiology.
Ian F. C. Smith Writing a Journal Paper. 2 Disclaimer / Preamble This is mostly opinion. Suggestions are incomplete. There are other strategies. A good.
 Ensure the title is in line with the requirements of the proposed funding agency if they have any specification for the titled page (some do have.
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Abstracting.  An abstract is a concise and accurate representation of the contents of a document, in a style similar to that of the original document.
Research Fellowships. Overview Introduction Why apply for a fellowship Finding the right fellowship The application process Assessment criteria for funding.
Proposal Writing. # 1:The title Choose a title that conveys information about your project. Avoid acronyms that have negative connotations. Make it Brief.
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
+ Grant Writing. + Goal “The overriding principles of grantsmanship are the same – develop a top-flight program and use the proposal to convince the grant.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.
Reviewers Expectations Peter Donkor. Outline Definitions The review process Common mistakes to avoid Conclusion.
GENERAL REMARKS Guidelines and suggestions for GSVC pitch decks Goal of the Presentation Illustration of the business in a concise way Visual support for.
Applying for funding: Tips fom the trenches
Effective writing for bids and grants
Global Social Venture Competition Pitch Deck
CFI Requirements – Research or Technology Development
Dr. Lani (Chi Chi) Zimmerman, UNMC Dr. Bill Mahoney, IS&T
Grant writing Session II.
Research Methods Technical Writing Thesis Report Writing
Bandit Thinkhamrop, PhD
Presentation transcript:

COACh program

 Consult the TRC website and read clearly the call for research proposals as well as the criteria against which your proposal will be judged.  Be aware of the priorities and interests of the call for proposals  Know that TRC is looking for unique and important ideas

 Study the TRC and TRESS webpages

Read (and reread) the grant instructions very carefully… HIGHLIGHT ALL THE POINTS THAT MIGHT BE RELEVENT!

 Plan your proposal in terms of the aims and objectives of the request for proposals and not just your own.  Make it clear how you will be helping the funders achieve their priorities.

 Use key words in the grant guidelines in your proposal  Make certain that you meet all requirements  Contact the program officer if you have ANY questions

Consider the questions the funder will be asking: Why fund your ideas? Why fund them now? Why fund you ?... and make sure that the proposal answers them!

Why fund this proposal? What is unique about the ideas in your proposal? What is the benefit to your field of study? What is the benefit to your country and society? How do your ideas align with the interests of the funding agency?

Why fund this proposal now? What ideas that you propose address important issues that are needed now and in the near future? What information/data do you have that supports the need for timely funding of your ideas?

Why fund you? What important skills do you bring to the project? Do you have unique facilities or experiences? Are you working with a team/colleague that is highly experienced? Are you at a university that is known for excellence in the area that you are requesting funding? Optional: Break up into small groups and discuss your answers to these questions.

What you need to understand Criteria for evaluation  Novelty and Originality (Scientific Merit)  Literature  Clarity of Proposal  Significance (outcomes)  Methodology  Qualifications of researchers Reviewers used in review process Study Comments from previous reviews of proposals

Significance of outcomes  Does this study address an important problem?  If aims are met, will knowledge be advanced?  What will be the effect of these studies on concepts or methods that drive the field?

Approach or Methodology  Are the conceptual framework, design, methods and analyses adequately developed, well integrated and appropriate to the project goals?  Does the applicant acknowledge potential problems and consider alternative tactics?

Innovation, Novelty and Originality  Are novel concepts, approaches and methods employed?  Are the goals original and innovative?  Does the project challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or techniques?

Investigator(s)  Is the investigator appropriately trained and well suited to carry out this work?  Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience level of the researcher(s)?

Investigator(s)  Skills training and relevant experience  Relevant publications and other outputs  Demonstrated productivity within opportunities available

Executive Summary (6000 Characters) Intended Research (Keywords 1000 Characters) I. Introduction and Statement of Problem (8000 Characters) II. Literature Review and Analysis of Related Work with References III. Objectives (8000 Characters) IV. Benefits to Oman (4000 Characters) V. Outline of proposed activities/Research Methodology (16000 Characters) VI. Academic, scientific and/or innovation significance (4000 Characters) VII. Potential Economic Impacts (4000 Characters) VIII. Expected social, cultural, educational and welfare benefits (4000 Characters) IX. Intended Research Cost Analysis and Proposed Budget of Expense Structuring the Proposal

Write for a broad and busy audience of reviewers Don’t assume that reviewers will be experts in your field Don’t assume that reviewers will have hours to study your proposal Success in grant writing is a matter of style and format as much as content! Warning!

Additional Warning! Academic Writing is different than Proposal Writing Academic Proposal Scholarly pursuit Sponsor goals Individual passion Service Attitude Past Oriented Future Oriented Theory and thesis Objectives and activities Explaining to reader “Selling” the reader Objective & dispassionate Conveys excitement Few length constraints Strict length constraints Verbosity rewarded Brevity rewarded Specialized terminology Accessible language

Additional Warnings! Reviewers are notoriously skeptical and look for reasons to reject a proposal Writers much use language strong enough to win their support. A good proposal is an elegant sales pitch.

TITLE and SUMMARY -- descriptive, concise, and memorable!

Should be short and clear Should allow the reviewer to understand the intentions of the research A title posing a question or including a apparent contradiction may be more interesting and easily remembered Elements of a Good Title

It should be a concise summary of the WHOLE project.  Use the abstract to identify the need for this research, state what you intend to do and how you intend to do it.  Do not include unnecessary detail  Make each phrase count.  Remember: it’s the first impression a reviewer gets of an applicants worth!  YOU DON”T NEED TO HAVE 6000 CHARACTERS Elements of a Good Executive Summary

Ask a colleague to read your summary. If it is well written, they should be able to understand the essence of the project from the abstract alone Elements of a Good Executive Summary TIPS

Provides an overview of the proposed project. Motivates the reviewer to want to continue reading the proposal. Convinces the reviewer that you know what you are talking about. Expands the abstract but without all the details that are to be presented in oncoming sections. Break it up into at least two sections. Elements of a Good Introduction and Statement of the Problem

Answers the “So What” question Intellectual: why is it being done? Benefits: Social, economic, environmental (with an emphasis on the interests of the funder.) Elements of a Good Introduction

Answers the “Why you” question What unique talents and expertise you and your team bring to the problem How your laboratory/institution is uniquely equipped to aid in the success of the project Elements of a Good Introduction

Answers the “Why now” question Why is the problem that you seek to solve important now? What unique opportunities can you bring together at this time to solve the problem? Elements of a Good Introduction

Put the work into context a: What has been done before? How will the proposed work add to it? What is the innovative aspect in the research project? Build your case by demonstrating your capability and familiarity in the area Elements of a Good Literature Section

What you intend to achieve by this piece of work. Small steps you need to reach to achieve your goal. Needs to be specific and clearly stated Should be realistic, consistent and link to the methods, timetable and outcomes. Bulleted points are particularly good in this section. Questions can also be effective. Project Objectives Section

Clearly describe your: Implementation plan Timelines Milestones Elements of a Good Methodology Section

Provide a clear research plan: Demonstrate how the specific goals are to be investigated Be specific and demonstrate your knowledge of where barriers may arise and how you would move around or over them. Make it clear that appropriate facilities and personnel are available for the research. If your own experience is limited, consider adding collaborators. Describe any preliminary work. Break this up into readable sections. Elements of a Good Methodology Section

How will your studies advance your field? Could it lead to new technologies in such areas of energy, environmental sustainability, health or new product development? What else? Academic, scientific and/or innovation significance

What are the broader impacts of your work to a broad range of beneficiaries? What are the benefits beyond your field of study? to students? to families? to how we educate students? Expected social, cultural, educational and welfare benefits

If successful, Will your projects result in new ways of doing business? Will it reduce the costs of the delivery of health, energy and education? What else? Potential Economic Impact

The budget request should be in proportion to the volume and complexity of the work activities Be realistic! Can you recruit the necessary personnel that matches with the project needs? Make certain that your supplies and expenses truly reflect what is needed by the project Do not build a budget largely based on “bragging rights” Intended Research Cost Analysis

Program Assessment: Help the reviewer Position your important points strategically ...and make it easy for a busy reviewer to pick them out of the surrounding text

Program Assessment: Understand the review process Invite potential reviewers to register to review proposals. Study past proposals and their reviews.

The Review Process Position in the ranking is important – it could mean the difference between success and failure. Proposals are often ranked into the following categories: Fund Fundable Invite resubmission (used by some funders) Reject

 Failure to follow directions  Poor logical organization  Lack of detail  Failure to consider the funder’s objectives  Failure to anticipate reviewers’ objections 42

Allow plenty of time to revise

Avoid jargon – say what you mean in clear, simple language Don’t be afraid to state the obvious Anticipate questions that may arise, before they arise Ask a colleague to review your proposal Present your proposal in terms of the aims and objectives of the funder

Be enthusiastic about your idea – if you don’t sound interested, why should anyone else be ?

The Review Process If the project is retained for funding – Celebrate! If invited for resubmission - revise proposal based on feedback from review If rejected DO NOT GIVE UP, - try to get feedback and remember - it is a learning process

Progress Report Progress reports are important. Take them seriously. Always be thinking about what will go in your next progress report

And Finally - Best wishes for a successful research proposal and research program!