Terrestrial Snow Don Cline Office of Climate, Water and Weather Services, National Weather Service, NOAA National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmental Application of Remote Sensing: CE 6900 Tennessee Technological University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Course Instructor:
Advertisements

An example of a large-scale interdisciplinary carbon problem Multidecadal climate variability Atmospheric evidence Ocean source? (upwelling, biological.
Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
Objective: To bring together those involved in the activities of water management in Latin America with the Earth observation data providers, in order.
DS-01 Disaster Risk Reduction and Early Warning Definition
A thermodynamic model for estimating sea and lake ice thickness with optical satellite data Student presentation for GGS656 Sanmei Li April 17, 2012.
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measurement (Mission). Why TRMM? n Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a joint US-Japan study initiated in 1997 to study.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
MODIS Science Team Meeting - 18 – 20 May Routine Mapping of Land-surface Carbon, Water and Energy Fluxes at Field to Regional Scales by Fusing Multi-scale.
Sensing Winter Soil Respiration Dynamics in Near-Real Time Alexandra Contosta 1, Elizabeth Burakowski 1,2, Ruth Varner 1, and Serita Frey 3 1 University.
Introduction to Breakout Session 2.2 Essential Variables for GEO SBAs (Chair: Antonio Bombelli) Coordinator of the GEO Task CL-02 “Global Carbon Observations.
ATS 351 Lecture 8 Satellites
SMOS – The Science Perspective Matthias Drusch Hamburg, Germany 30/10/2009.
Princeton University Global Evaluation of a MODIS based Evapotranspiration Product Eric Wood Hongbo Su Matthew McCabe.
Globally distributed evapotranspiration using remote sensing and CEOP data Eric Wood, Matthew McCabe and Hongbo Su Princeton University.
VENUS (Vegetation and Environment New µ-Spacecraft) A demonstration space mission dedicated to land surface environment (Vegetation and Environment New.
Millimeter and sub-millimeter observations for Earth cloud hunting Catherine Prigent, LERMA, Observatoire de Paris.
Outline Background, climatology & variability Role of snow in the global climate system Indicators of climate change Future projections & implications.
IPY Satellite Data Legacy Vision: Use the full international constellation of remote sensing satellites to acquire spaceborne ‘snapshots’ of processes.
A Multi-Sensor, Multi-Parameter Approach to Studying Sea Ice: A Case-Study with EOS Data Walt Meier 2 March 2005IGOS Cryosphere Theme Workshop.
Page 1 Water vapour and clouds Important for: –accurate precipitation forecasts. –estimating surface energy budgets. –assessing climate feedback effects.
Cold Land Processes Jared K. Entin May 28 th, 2003.
Snow Cover: Current Capabilities, Gaps and Issues (Canadian Perspective) Anne Walker Climate Research Branch, Meteorological Service of Canada IGOS-Cryosphere.
Satellite Retrieval of Snow Cover Properties in Northern Canada  Current Capabilities and Plans for IPY  Anne Walker Climate Research Division, Science.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
DOCUMENT OVERVIEW Title: Fully Polarimetric Airborne SAR and ERS SAR Observations of Snow: Implications For Selection of ENVISAT ASAR Modes Journal: International.
Recent advances in remote sensing in hydrology
Science themes: 1.Improved understanding of the carbon cycle. 2.Constraints and feedbacks imposed by water. 3.Nutrient cycling and coupling with carbon.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
Slide #1 Emerging Remote Sensing Data, Systems, and Tools to Support PEM Applications for Resource Management Olaf Niemann Department of Geography University.
Princeton University Development of Improved Forward Models for Retrievals of Snow Properties Eric. F. Wood, Princeton University Dennis. P. Lettenmaier,
Retrieving Snowpack Properties From Land Surface Microwave Emissivities Based on Artificial Neural Network Techniques Narges Shahroudi William Rossow NOAA-CREST.
Water Cycle Breakout Session Attendees: June Wang, Julie Haggerty, Tammy Weckwerth, Steve Nesbitt, Carlos Welsh, Vivek, Kathy Sharpe, Brad Small Two objectives:
The Merton Report an AIMES/IGBP-ESA partnership As Earth System science advances and matures, it must be supported by robust and integrated observation.
Polar Communications and Weather Mission Canadian Context and Benefits.
15-18 October 2002 Greenville, North Carolina Global Terrestrial Observing System GTOS Jeff Tschirley Programme director.
Passive Microwave Remote Sensing
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO Ocean Studies Board November 10, 2009.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
VQ3a: How do changes in climate and atmospheric processes affect the physiology and biogeochemistry of ecosystems? [DS 194, 201] Science Issue: Changes.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Opportunities for Research in the Dynamics of Water Processes in the Environment at NSF Pam Stephens Directorate of Geosciences, NSF Directorate of Geosciences,
Climate and Cryosphere (CliC): Legacy for 2013 and Beyond Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS Chair, CliC Observation and Products Panel (Agenda item )
Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment Background (1) The IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) “Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation.
The global hydrologic cycle Ground water, surface water, soil moisture, snow pack, glaciers, ocean, atmosphere.
NASA Snow and Ice Products NASA Remote Sensing Training Geo Latin America and Caribbean Water Cycle capacity Building Workshop Colombia, November 28-December.
How do ocean ecosystems work? Use remote sensing to address fundamental questions Lack of field data on BGC processes, impeding calibration and validation.
Working Group on Surface Fluxes In situ issues Elizabeth Kent National Oceanography Centre, Southampton.
1 National HIC/RH/HQ Meeting ● January 27, 2006 version: FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
1 National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center February 2-3, 2005 Arctic Climate Science Priorities Workshop Don Cline National Operational Hydrologic.
Scientific Plan Introduction –History of LBA Background –Definition of Amazon –7 Themes with achievements Motivation for Phase II –Unresolved questions.
Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS Madison, Wisconsin The Cryospheric Observing System for the IPY and Beyond WDC/NSIDC 30th AnniversaryOctober 25, 2006.
The Polar Prediction Workshop, Oslo, Norway, 6-8 October 2010.
Science Enabled by New Hyperspectral Observations Related to Physiology and Functional Types (HyspIRI) Dar Roberts, Frank Muller-Karger Reiterate Break.
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
Metrics and MODIS Diane Wickland December, Biology/Biogeochemistry/Ecosystems/Carbon Science Questions: How are global ecosystems changing? (Question.
1 - What are the local, regional, and continental-scale exchanges of carbon, nitrogen, and reactive species? What are their relationships to underlying.
NOAA Vision and Mission Goals Pedro J. Restrepo, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Scientist, Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA/NWS First Q2 Workshop (Q2 - "Next.
SCM x330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
Over 30% of Earth’s land surface has seasonal snow. On average, 60% of Northern Hemisphere has snow cover in midwinter. About 10% of Earth’s land surface.
Passive Microwave Remote Sensing
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 STAR Enterprise Synthesis.
Terrestrial-atmosphere (1)
EG2234 Earth Observation Weather Forecasting.
NPOESS Airborne Sounder Testbed (NAST)
Improved Forward Models for Retrievals of Snow Properties
Forests, water & research in the Sierra Nevada
Presentation transcript:

Terrestrial Snow Don Cline Office of Climate, Water and Weather Services, National Weather Service, NOAA National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center Cryosphere Theme

October 16-18, Third Cryosphere Theme Workshop, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Role of Snow in the Cryosphere, Science & Society Snow Observation Needs Status of Observing Systems Current Remote Sensing Capabilities and Requirements Preliminary Recommendations Remaining Tasks Outline

Agriculture Disasters Climate Ecology Energy Health Oceans Water Weather Transportation Engineering Commerce SOCIETY Role of Snow in Cryosphere, Science & Society Water and Energy Fluxes Water and Energy Fluxes Biogeochemical Fluxes Biogeochemical Fluxes Insulation Mechanics & Dynamics Mechanics & Dynamics Radiative Transfer SNOW SCIENCE Atmospheric Dynamics Atmospheric Dynamics Freshwater Input to Oceans Freshwater Input to Oceans Ecosystem Dynamics Ecosystem Dynamics Floods Avalanches Soil Freeze/Thaw Permafrost Soil Freeze/Thaw Permafrost Snowmelt Runoff Aquifer Recharge Water Quality Trafficability Carbon Cycle Soil Moisture Habitat/Forage EARTH SCIENCE kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 SNOW PROPERTIES

October 16-18, Third Cryosphere Theme Workshop, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Snow Observation Needs Snow Cover Extent Used by many models as fundamental control on hydrologic, atmospheric, and ecological processes. First-order inference Mass and energy information Snow Water Equivalent Volume of water storage. Establishes “memory” and first-order predictability. Complements precipitation observation. Greatest popular interest Used in atmospheric models for surface roughness. Key factor in determining insulative properties for soil/ecosystems. Snow Depth Varies widely between 35-95% Required to accurately determine radiation and energy budgets. Sensitive to difficult-to-model factors (e.g. dust) Snow Albedo Models sensitive to forcing errors Snow Temperature Needed for radiation and energy budgets. Constrains memory-propagation of forcing errors in subsequent fluxes.

October 16-18, Third Cryosphere Theme Workshop, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Snow Observation Needs Required to asses biogeochemical fluxes and estimate potential impacts of release from storage (through snowmelt) on water quality and ecosystems. pH, conductance, alkalinity, base cations, strong mineral acids, silica, ammonium, dissolved organic carbon, total and dissolved organic nitrogen, total phosphorous. Chemical & Nutrient Constituents Required to determine net carbon balance of snow-covered ecosystems. Single most important is CO 2 Trace Gas Fluxes Density, Liquid Water Content, Grain Size, Grain Shape, Stratigraphic Structure, Strength, Stability. Required to asses avalanche hazards. Model development, parameterization and testing, process understanding, and advancement of observing systems are fundamentally dependent. Microphysical & Mechanical Properties

kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 Snow Observation Needs PastPresentFuture Snow Science Earth Science Applications Earth System Science Snow Cover, Albedo Water Equivalent, Depth kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 Snow Cover, Albedo Water Equivalent, Depth Snow Cover, Albedo Water Equivalent, Depth Snow Cover, Albedo Water Equivalent, Depth kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 Various Uncoupled, Independent Physics Processes Observation Coupled, Integrated, Linked to Observing Systems

kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 Snow Observation Needs PastPresentFuture Snow Science Earth Science Applications Earth System Science Snow Cover, Albedo Water Equivalent, Depth kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 Snow Cover, Albedo Water Equivalent, Depth Snow Cover, Albedo Water Equivalent, Depth Snow Cover, Albedo Water Equivalent, Depth kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 Various Uncoupled, Independent Physics Processes Observation Coupled, Integrated, Linked to Observing Systems

kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 Snow Observation Needs PastPresentFuture Snow Science Earth Science Applications Earth System Science kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 Snow Cover, Albedo Water Equivalent, Depth Snow Cover, Albedo Water Equivalent, Depth Snow Cover, Albedo Water Equivalent, Depth kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 kg h CO 2 pH N d R0R0 Various Uncoupled, Independent Coupled, Integrated, Linked to Observing Systems Physics Processes Observation

October 16-18, Third Cryosphere Theme Workshop, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Snow properties are observed using wide variety of instruments on surface, airborne, and satellite platforms In Situ – graduated probes and stakes – acoustic snow-depth sounders – snow coring devices – snow pillows (pressure transducers) – excavation of snow pits with detailed sampling using various instruments Remote Sensing – terrestrial gamma radiation from low-flying aircraft – visible and infrared radiance from aircraft and both low Earth-orbit (LEO) and geostationary (GEO) satellites – microwave emissions and backscatter using passive and active sensors on aircraft and LEO satellites These observations are used and combined in many different ways depending on the application, required scales and accuracies, and the types of observations available. Status of Snow Observing Systems

October 16-18, Third Cryosphere Theme Workshop, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Worldwide, networks have diminished or been lost completely. Point observations are only representative of small area, problematic in context of high spatial variability of snow properties. Observations often are not representative of surrounding area – may be intended as indices or be otherwise intentionally biased. SWE is essential, but SWE observations are sparse and in many areas completely absent. Observation of other snow properties is comparatively rare and occurs in context of specific projects/applications. Data are often unavailable. Value is reduced by large inconsistencies in measurement methods, observation frequency, and reporting times and standards. Many in situ snow observations lack adequate metadata. Often little more than a coordinate and a value is available. Effects of changing site conditions (e.g. vegetation growth) on snow accumulation is becoming a major problem. With lack of metadata, climatological interpretation of long-term records is difficult. Shortcomings of In Situ Observing Systems

October 16-18, Third Cryosphere Theme Workshop, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Resolution of most snow and land-surface models has far surpassed that of microwave sensors with significant capability to observe SWE or depth. Skill of SWE and snow depth retrievals using current passive microwave sensors is generally insufficient. Due in part to sensor resolution and to limitations of the algorithmic approach in general use, which is under-determined Regional tuning of algorithms has had some success but not widely adopted Limited to maximum SWE of ~20 cm  therefore both algorithm and resolution not suited for mountainous areas Snow cover observation is reasonably mature, but snow/cloud discrimination remains a problem Spectral resolution, bandwidth, and dynamic range are fundamental constraints Broadband snow-albedo observation-accuracy is sufficient for many applications, but, increasingly, greater accuracy and multi-spectral albedo are needed Snow surface temperature could be useful for constraining models, but current accuracy is insufficient Shortcomings of Remote Sensing Systems

Parameter CTOCTO Measurement Range Measurement Accuracy Resolution Comment / Principal Driver SpatialTemporal LHUVUVUVU Snow Cover C20100%15-20%1kmdaye.g. MODIS T0100%10%0.5km1day Hydromet O0100%5%0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Shallow) C00.2m2-10cm25km1day e.g. AMSR-E T00.3m3cm0.5km6day Hydromet O00.3m2cm0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T0.33m10%0.5km6day Hydromet O0.33m7%0.1km12hr Snow Depth (Shallow) C0~0.7m6-35cm25km1daye.g. AMSR-E T01m10cm0.5km6dayHydromet O01m6cm0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Depth (Mod-Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T110m %0.5km6dayHydromet O110m6%0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Albedo (Broadband) C30100%7%1km1day e.g. MODIS T0100%1%8km1hr Hydromet O0100%0.5%5km30min Snow Surface Temperature CTBD T200275K1K1km1hr Hydromet O200275K0.1K km30min

Parameter CTOCTO Measurement Range Measurement Accuracy Resolution Comment / Principal Driver SpatialTemporal LHUVUVUVU Snow Cover C20100%15-20%1kmdaye.g. MODIS T0100%10%0.5km1day Hydromet O0100%5%0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Shallow) C00.2m2-10cm25km1day e.g. AMSR-E T00.3m3cm0.5km6day Hydromet O00.3m2cm0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T0.33m10%0.5km6day Hydromet O0.33m7%0.1km12hr Snow Depth (Shallow) C0~0.7m6-35cm25km1daye.g. AMSR-E T01m10cm0.5km6dayHydromet O01m6cm0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Depth (Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T110m %0.5km6dayHydromet O110m6%0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Albedo (Broadband) C30100%7%1km1day e.g. MODIS T0100%1%8km1hr Hydromet O0100%0.5%5km30min Snow Surface Temperature CTBD T200275K1K1km1hr Hydromet O200275K0.1K km30min Snow Cover Improve detection of < 20% snow cover Improve sensor capabilities to enhance snow-cloud discrimination Improve spatial resolution of high-temporal repeat sensors Shallow SWE (< 20 cm) (Similar for depth) Improve spatial resolution of sensors Improve accuracy of algorithms Mod-Deep SWE (> 20 cm) (Similar for depth) Need high-frequency SAR Albedo Improve sensor capabilities to improve accuracy Surface Temperature Improved sensors and algorithms needed Enhancing Enabling Enhancing Enabling

October 16-18, Third Cryosphere Theme Workshop, Noordwijk, The Netherlands A coordinated plan for in situ snow observation networks should be developed, first at national then at international levels. Should address: Needs for improved consistency in observing methods and reporting standards Need for observation of other snow parameters beyond SWE, depth The capability of satellite observations should be improved. Improved passive and active microwave instruments with higher spatial and spectral resolution are needed. High-frequency SAR should be considered a priority, especially for mountainous regions. Priority be given to research, development and validation of algorithms and new sensors to measure SWE under a wide range of vegetation conditions. Moreover, it may be possible to improve algorithms to more effectively use existing sensors. Recommendations (Preliminary) Continued…

October 16-18, Third Cryosphere Theme Workshop, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Targeted field projects be conducted that deal directly with the measurement of snow in multiple environments. These should seek to advance coordinated remote sensing of snow cover, albedo, and temperature (optical measurements) together with snow water equivalent and depth (microwave measurements). Study areas for intensive campaigns should be established with long-term plans to maintain them for “Super Sites” to provide reliable reference targets for multi-sensor remote sensing and modeling applications. Integrated multi-sensor data fusion and global analysis systems that blend snow observation from all sources should be improved. Improved algorithms for the objective, optimal combination of snow observations from multiple disparate sources must be developed. The ideal global snow observing system will use observations from all relevant sources in coherent, consistent, high-resolution analyses of (at a minimum): Snow cover, snow depth, snow water equivalent, and snow wetness. Recommendations (Preliminary)

October 16-18, Third Cryosphere Theme Workshop, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Collective requirements for non-satellite observations? Can we differentiate needed improvements by sensor type? This is how technical elements of space agencies are organized Strategic planning for implementation Can the ideal snow observing system be realized? Remaining Tasks (Theme Report)

Terrestrial Snow Don Cline Office of Climate, Water and Weather Services, National Weather Service, NOAA National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center Cryosphere Theme

October 16-18, Third Cryosphere Theme Workshop, Noordwijk, The Netherlands A coordinated plan for surface-based snow-observation networks be developed, first at the national, then at the international level. The plan should address the needs for improved consistency in observation methods and reporting standards and for improved exchange of data. It should address current and emerging needs for measurement of other snow properties besides snow depth and SWE. A consistent approach to compiling and facilitation of using considerably improved metadata for snow observations are needed. The capability of satellite observations be improved. The development/validation of satellite remote sensing techniques, including the validation of existing products, support of new systems (e.g., E-GPM/CGPM and CloudSat for solid precipitation), and support of algorithm development is required. High-frequency active and passive microwave observations, which are uniquely well-suited to observing SWE and snow depth, have low spatial and spectral resolution. Improved instruments with higher spatial and spectral resolution are required. High- frequency (Ku, X-band) SAR should be considered a priority for global SWE observation. Priority be given to research and development of algorithms and new sensors to measure SWE, under a wide range of vegetation conditions. Furthermore, it may be possible to design improved algorithms to more effectively use existing data sources. Further research is necessary to realize the retrieval of SWE from SAR data, with their higher spatial resolution. E.g., SAR is the only instrument capable of mapping wet snow cover at the fine spatial resolution required in mountainous terrain (where the hydrology is dominated by the melting snow pack). Techniques are developed to merge in situ measurements and satellite retrievals. Targeted field projects should be conducted to deal directly with the measurement of snow in multiple environments. These should seek to advance coordinated remote sensing of snow albedo and surface temperature (i.e. optical measurements) together with SWE and snow depth (i.e. microwave measurements). Study areas for intensive field campaigns should be established with long-term plans to maintain them as “Super Sites” to improve knowledge of snow processes and to provide reference targets for multi-sensor remote sensing and modeling applications. Integrated multi-sensor data fusion and global analysis systems that blend snow observations from all sources be improved. The ideal global snow observing system will use observations from all relevant sources in coherent, consistent high-resolution analyses of (at a minimum): 1) the extent of snow cover, 2) snow depth, 3) SWE, and 4) snow wetness. No current system provides global coverage, and a more complete system would include snow albedo and temperature, microphysical properties, and chemical constituents. Improved algorithms for the objective, optimal combination of snow observations from widely disparate sources must be developed. These must address both mass and energy considerations of snow models. Recommendations (Preliminary)

October 16-18, Third Cryosphere Theme Workshop, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Vision Ideal Global Snow Observing System Will use observations from all relevant sources in coherent, consistent, high-resolution global analyses of (at a minimum): extent of snow cover, snow water equivalent, snow depth, snow wetness. Multi-sensor Data Fusion

Parameter CTOCTO Measurement Range Measurement Accuracy Resolution Comment / Principal Driver SpatialTemporal LHUVUVUVU Snow Cover C20100%15-20%1kmdaye.g. MODIS T0100%10%0.5km1day Hydromet O0100%5%0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Shallow) C00.2m2-10cm25km1day e.g. AMSR-E T00.3m3cm0.5km6day Hydromet O00.3m2cm0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T0.33m10%0.5km6day Hydromet O0.33m7%0.1km12hr Snow Depth (Shallow) C0~0.7m6-35cm25km1daye.g. AMSR-E T01m10cm0.5km6dayHydromet O01m6cm0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Depth (Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T110m %0.5km6dayHydromet O110m6%0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Albedo (Broadband) C30100%7%1km1day e.g. MODIS T0100%1%8km1hr Hydromet O0100%0.5%5km30min Snow Surface Temperature CTBD T200275K1K1km1hr Hydromet O200275K0.1K km30min C = Current Capability T = Threshold Requirement (Minimum needed) O = Objective Requirement (Increased benefit can be realized by achieving these requirements)

Parameter CTOCTO Measurement Range Measurement Accuracy Resolution Comment / Principal Driver SpatialTemporal LHUVUVUVU Snow Cover C20100%15-20%1kmdaye.g. MODIS T0100%10%0.5km1day Hydromet O0100%5%0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Shallow) C00.2m2-10cm25km1day e.g. AMSR-E T00.3m3cm0.5km6day Hydromet O00.3m2cm0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T0.33m10%0.5km6day Hydromet O0.33m7%0.1km12hr Snow Depth (Shallow) C0~0.7m6-35cm25km1daye.g. AMSR-E T01m10cm0.5km6dayHydromet O01m6cm0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Depth (Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T110m %0.5km6dayHydromet O110m6%0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Albedo (Broadband) C30100%7%1km1day e.g. MODIS T0100%1%8km1hr Hydromet O0100%0.5%5km30min Snow Surface Temperature CTBD T200275K1K1km1hr Hydromet O200275K0.1K km30min

Parameter CTOCTO Measurement Range Measurement Accuracy Resolution Comment / Principal Driver SpatialTemporal LHUVUVUVU Snow Cover C20100%15-20%1kmdaye.g. MODIS T0100%10%0.5km1day Hydromet O0100%5%0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Shallow) C00.2m2-10cm25km1day e.g. AMSR-E T00.3m3cm0.5km6day Hydromet O00.3m2cm0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T0.33m10%0.5km6day Hydromet O0.33m7%0.1km12hr Snow Depth (Shallow) C0~0.7m6-35cm25km1daye.g. AMSR-E T01m10cm0.5km6dayHydromet O01m6cm0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Depth (Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T110m %0.5km6dayHydromet O110m6%0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Albedo (Broadband) C30100%7%1km1day e.g. MODIS T0100%1%8km1hr Hydromet O0100%0.5%5km30min Snow Surface Temperature CTBD T200275K1K1km1hr Hydromet O200275K0.1K km30min

Parameter CTOCTO Measurement Range Measurement Accuracy Resolution Comment / Principal Driver SpatialTemporal LHUVUVUVU Snow Cover C20100%15-20%1kmdaye.g. MODIS T0100%10%0.5km1day Hydromet O0100%5%0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Shallow) C00.2m2-10cm25km1day e.g. AMSR-E T00.3m3cm0.5km6day Hydromet O00.3m2cm0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T0.33m10%0.5km6day Hydromet O0.33m7%0.1km12hr Snow Depth (Shallow) C0~0.7m6-35cm25km1daye.g. AMSR-E T01m10cm0.5km6dayHydromet O01m6cm0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Depth (Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T110m %0.5km6dayHydromet O110m6%0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Albedo (Broadband) C30100%7%1km1day e.g. MODIS T0100%1%8km1hr Hydromet O0100%0.5%5km30min Snow Surface Temperature CTBD T200275K1K1km1hr Hydromet O200275K0.1K km30min

Parameter CTOCTO Measurement Range Measurement Accuracy Resolution Comment / Principal Driver SpatialTemporal LHUVUVUVU Snow Cover C20100%15-20%1kmdaye.g. MODIS T0100%10%0.5km1day Hydromet O0100%5%0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Shallow) C00.2m2-10cm25km1day e.g. AMSR-E T00.3m3cm0.5km6day Hydromet O00.3m2cm0.1km12hr Snow Water Equivalent (Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T0.33m10%0.5km6day Hydromet O0.33m7%0.1km12hr Snow Depth (Shallow) C0~0.7m6-35cm25km1daye.g. AMSR-E T01m10cm0.5km6dayHydromet O01m6cm0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Depth (Deep) CNone--- Need HF SAR T110m %0.5km6dayHydromet O110m6%0.1km1hrTransportation Snow Albedo (Broadband) C30100%7%1km1day e.g. MODIS T0100%1%8km1hr Hydromet O0100%0.5%5km30min Snow Surface Temperature CTBD T200275K1K1km1hr Hydromet O200275K0.1K km30min