1 Nowakowski GS et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Advertisements

Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Wilson WH et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 686.
Phase 1/2 Study of Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously.
Facon T et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 2.
Goede V et al. Proc ASCO 2013;Abstract 7004.
Efficacy and Safety of Three Bortezomib-Based Combinations in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from All Randomized Patients.
1Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 114.
Richardson PG et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 535.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Lesokhin AM et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 291.
1 Baz R et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract Lacy MQ et al.
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
A Phase 2 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD30-Positive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: Interim Results in Patients with DLBCL.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Alliance/CALGB 50803: A Phase 2 Trial of Lenalidomide plus Rituximab in Patients with Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma1 The ‘RELEVANCE’ Trial:
Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: Initial Results of a Multicenter, Open Label.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Consolidation with a Single Dose of 90 Y Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin ® ) (Z) vs Maintenance with Rituximab (R)
Dose-Adjusted EPOCH plus Rituximab in Untreated Patients with Poor Prognosis Large B-Cell Lymphoma, with Analysis of Germinal Center and Activated B-Cell.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
The Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor PCI is Highly Active as Single-Agent Therapy in Previously-Treated Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Preliminary.
Dyer MJS et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 1743.
Head-to-Head Comparison of Obinutuzumab (GA101) plus Chlorambucil (Clb) versus Rituximab plus Clb in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and.
Rituximab Maintenance versus Wait and Watch After Four Courses of R-DHAP Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Previously Untreated Young.
A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined with Melphalan and Prednisone Followed by Continuous Lenalidomide Maintenance.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Lonial.
1 Flinn I et al. Proc ICML 2013;Abstract 084.
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
Frontline Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) Shows Superior Efficacy in Comparison to Bendamustine.
Brentuximab Vedotin Administered Concurrently with Multi-Agent Chemotherapy as Frontline Treatment of ALCL and Other CD30-Positive Mature T-Cell and NK-Cell.
ClaPD (Clarithromycin, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Mark TM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 77.
Safety and Efficacy of Abbreviated Induction with Oral Fludarabine (F) and Cyclophosphamide (C) Combined with Dose-Dense IV Rituximab (R) in Previously.
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide for Previously Untreated Deletion (del) 5q Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients Age 60 or Older Who Are Not Candidates.
Significant Prognostic Impact of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET Scan Performed During and at the End of Treatment with R-CHOP in High- Tumor Mass Follicular.
A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shah.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Rituximab (iR) Is Well Tolerated and Induces a High Rate of Durable Remissions in Patients with High- Risk Chronic Lymphocytic.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
R-CHOP with Iodine-131 Tositumomab Consolidation for Advanced Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Southwest Oncology Group Protocol S0433 Friedberg.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Geisler C et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 290.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
CALGB/Alliance 50303: R-CHOP vs DA-EPOCH-R in Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage.
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Fujiwara H et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 181.
San Miguel JF et al. 1 Proc EHA 2013;Abstract S1151.
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.
Ferrajoli A et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 1395.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Final Results of a Frontline Phase 1/2 Study of Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (CRd) in Multiple Myeloma (MM)1 Final Results from.
Vitolo U et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 777.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 99.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
Presentation transcript:

1 Nowakowski GS et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689. Combination of Lenalidomide with R-CHOP (R2CHOP) Is Well Tolerated and Effective as Initial Therapy for Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas — A Phase II Study 1 Rituximab-CHOP21 plus Lenalidomide (LR-CHOP21) Is Effective and Feasible in Elderly Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Results of Phase II REAL07 Study of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL)2 1 Nowakowski GS et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689. 2 Chiappella A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 903.

Nowakowski GS et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689. Combination of Lenalidomide with R-CHOP (R2CHOP) Is Well Tolerated and Effective as Initial Therapy for Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas — A Phase II Study Nowakowski GS et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689.

Background R-CHOP21 is the standard treatment for untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but this treatment fails for a significant proportion of patients. Lenalidomide monotherapy exhibits about a 30% overall response rate in relapsed/refractory DLBCL (Ann Oncol 2011;22:1622). Higher response rates have been recorded with the nongerminal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) subtype than with the germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) subtype (Cancer 2011;117:5058). A Phase I study demonstrated that 25 mg of lenalidomide (days 1- 10) can be safely combined with R-CHOP21 as initial therapy for aggressive B-cell lymphomas (Leukemia 2011;25:1877). Study objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide with R-CHOP (R2CHOP) in patients with newly diagnosed aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Nowakowski GS al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689.

Phase II Study Design Eligibility (N = 51) Newly diagnosed CD20-positive Stage II to IV DLBCL or Grade III follicular lymphoma No history of life-threatening or recurrent thrombosis or embolism unless receiving anticoagulation therapy during treatment R2CHOP (6 cycles, 21 d each):* Lenalidomide 25 mg PO, d1-10, rituximab (375 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2), vincristine (1.4 mg/m2) IV, d1 and prednisone (100 mg/m2) PO, d1-5 * Pegfilgrastim (6 mg SC) administered on d2 of each cycle and aspirin (325 mg PO) administered daily Nowakowski GS al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689.

Response rate, % (PET Criteria) Response to R2CHOP Response rate, % (PET Criteria) ORR PD PR CR 15% 2% 98% 83% Evaluable patients (n = 47) 4/51 patients were not evaluable (3 refusals, 1 death before evaluation) With permission from Nowakowski GS al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689.

Proportion Event-free Progression-Free Survival (PFS) with R2CHOP versus R-CHOP Case-Matched Controls Censor Proportion Event-free 12 Month (95% CI): 0.62 (0.53-0.73) 12 Month (95% CI): 0.73 (0.61-0.87) RCHOP (n = 87) R2CHOP (n = 51) Time (Months) R-CHOP case-matched controls: Patients with Stage II (n = 20), III (n = 14) and IV (n = 53) DLBCL (same eligibility criteria) identified in the MCR lymphoma database; no difference in clinical characteristics With permission from Nowakowski GS al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689.

PFS by GCB versus Non-GCB Subtype with R2CHOP versus R-CHOP Censor Censor Proportion Event-free Proportion Event-free GCB (n = 18) Non-GCB (n = 15) GCB (n = 59) Non-GCB (n = 28) p = 0.004 p = not significant Time (Months) Time (Months) With permission from Nowakowski GS al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689.

Select Adverse Events Adverse event (n = 51) Grade 3 Grade 4 Hematologic Neutropenia Thrombocytopenia Anemia 18% 20% 17% 70% 2% Infection Neutropenic fever Pneumonia Sepsis 10% 4% 0% Venous thrombosis Grade 4 neutropenia was common; infectious complications were rare; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was not accompanied by bleeding complications; 1 death due to perforation/sepsis Nowakowski GS al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689.

Author Conclusions R2CHOP is well tolerated, including in elderly patients. Efficacy of R2CHOP appears to be promising when compared to that of R-CHOP. Addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP may ameliorate the negative effect of the non-GCB phenotype on outcome. A randomized study is required to evaluate R2CHOP versus R-CHOP ECOG-E1412 is in development Nowakowski GS al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689.

Investigator Commentary: R2CHOP Is Well Tolerated and Effective as Initial Therapy for Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas Single-agent lenalidomide (Len) has a response rate of approximately 30% for relapsed DLBCL. This activity is more robust in patients with the ABC cell of origin as opposed to the GCB cell of origin subtype. The addition of Len to R-CHOP in this study showed an overall response rate of 98% and a complete response rate of 83%, which is impressive. A comparison of PFS to that for a matched historical control group of patients who received R-CHOP indicated a benefit with the addition of Len. When the results were analyzed by cell of origin, the addition of Len appeared to be more effective for patients with the non-GCB or ABC subtype of DLBCL. From a toxicity standpoint, it appears that the addition of Len increased the incidence of Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. But this did not translate into any serious adverse events for patients. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group will conduct a randomized Phase II trial for more than 200 patients with untreated DLBCL, and patients will be randomly assigned to R2CHOP or R-CHOP. Cell of origin subtyping will be performed for all patients, and outcomes will be analyzed by cell of origin. Interview with Brad S Kahl, MD, January 17, 2013

Chiappella A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 903. Rituximab-CHOP21 plus Lenalidomide (LR-CHOP21) Is Effective and Feasible in Elderly Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Results of Phase II REAL07 Study of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) Chiappella A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 903.

Background Lenalidomide monotherapy exhibits significant activity in relapsed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and has synergistic activity with rituximab and chemotherapy in vitro. Therefore, a Phase I/II trial of lenalidomide and R-CHOP21 (LR-CHOP21) was initiated for elderly patients with untreated DLBCL. The dose-finding Phase I portion of the study established lenalidomide at 15 mg (days 1-14) as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in combination with R-CHOP21 (Ann Oncol 2011;22(S4):Abstract 331a). Study objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of LR-CHOP21 in elderly patients with untreated DLBCL. Chiappella A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 903.

REAL07 Phase II Study Eligibility and Endpoints Eligibility (N = 49*) Age 60-80 y, fit CD20+ DLBCL or Grade IIIb FL Ann Arbor Stage II-IV IPI: Low-intermediate/intermediate-high/high risk No peripheral neuropathy, CNS disease or recent DVT No prior chemotherapy or prior malignancies in past 3 years * Includes 9 patients treated at MTD in Phase I Primary endpoints: Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) Secondary endpoints: Included 2-year overall survival (OS) and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) Chiappella A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 903.

REAL07 Phase II Study Design Treatment cycles Lenalidomide at MTD: 15 mg daily on days 1-14 (Vitolo U, ASH 2010) Days 1 14 21 Lenalidomide daily on days 1-14 () Rituximab Cyclophosphamide Doxorubicin Vincristine Prednisone 375 mg/m2 750 mg/m2 50 mg/m2 1.4 mg/m2 (capped at 2.0 mg) 40 mg/m2 on days 1-5 Prophylaxis included: GCSF or PEG-GCSF, low-molecular-weight heparin or low-dose aspirin, co-trimoxazole Chiappella A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 903.

Final Response After 6 Cycles of LR-CHOP21 86% ORR 92% (n = 49) 6% 6% 2% PR = partial response; NR = no response Chiappella A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 903.

Select Adverse Events Adverse event Grade 3 Grade 4 Hematologic* Leukocytopenia Neutropenia Febrile neutropenia Thrombocytopenia Anemia 15% 9% 3% 6% 4% 13% 22% 1% 7% <0.5% Nonhematologic† Cardiac Neurological Infection DVT 2% 4% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% * Recorded in 277 cycles of treatment; † In the population of 49 patients Chiappella A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 903.

Author Conclusions Lenalidomide with R-CHOP21 is highly effective, with an ORR of 92% and a CR (PET-negative) of 86% in elderly patients with DLBCL. With limited follow-up, these results (data not shown) compare favorably to historical R-CHOP21 data (NEJM 2002;346(4):235 2-year OS rate: 92% vs 70% 2-year PFS rate: 73% vs 57% LR-CHOP21 induced a high 2-y PFS rate of 65%, even in patients with poor-risk disease (data not shown). The addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP21 is safe without unexpected toxicities and does not impair the dose and timing of R-CHOP. These encouraging data warrant a future Phase III randomized trial comparing LR-CHOP21 to R-CHOP21 in elderly patients with untreated DLBCL. Chiappella A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 903.

Investigator Commentary: Phase II REAL07 Study of LR-CHOP21 in Elderly Patients with Untreated DLBCL This Phase II trial investigated the addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP21 for elderly patients with DLBCL. One reason why the combination of lenalidomide and rituximab may be synergistic is that it may restore the ability of the immune system to attack cancer cells. Malignant cells have the ability to repel immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. In vitro, lenalidomide can overcome that inhibition and restore normal immunomodulatory synapse formation. The results showed a high complete response rate of 86% and a 2-year PFS of 73%, which is better than historical controls. This study provides evidence that the addition of lenalidomide to an R-CHOP backbone is beneficial. Randomized trials will provide a definitive answer and are in the planning stage. Interview with Brad S Kahl, MD, January 17, 2013