Operational Excellence: Outcomes Evaluation System Impact and Outcomes Breakout Session June 14 th, 2011 Sandra LaFleur, Senior Director of Youth Outcomes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing Organizational Commitment to Cultural Competence
Advertisements

Statewide Children’s Wraparound Initiative COSA Conference Presenters: Erinn Kelley-Siel Mary Lou Johnson Larry Sullivan.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Research Insights from the Family Home Program: An Adaptation of the Teaching-Family Model at Boys Town Daniel L. Daly and Ronald W. Thompson EUSARF 2014/
1 An Introduction to Mentoring and the Alberta Mentoring Partnership.
What is Mentoring? Mentoring is the presence of a caring individual(s) who provides a young person with support, advice, friendship, reinforcement and.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
The Importance of Mentoring on the Development of the Whole Child Kansas Governor’s Conference on Mentoring Tuesday, April 14, 2009 Topeka.
Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs for Youth: Current Status and Future Prospects Invited Presentation for the Big Brothers Big Sisters -- Large Agency.
Rusk County Joint implementation by: UW-Extension, Social Services, Family Resources of ICAA For Parents And Youth STRENGTHENING PROGRAM PROGRAM.
Introduction to Strengthening Families: An Effective Approach to Supporting Families Massachusetts Home Visiting Initiative A Department of Public Health.
Implementation and Evaluation of the Rural Early Adolescent Learning Project (REAL): Commonalities in Diverse Educational Settings Jill V. Hamm, Dylan.
Setting the Pace to Graduate Date1 Parent Mentor Partnership September 2013.
Youth mentoring and the well-being of young people: Evidence from an Irish mixed- methods evaluation Dr Bernadine Brady Child & Family Research Centre.
6/20/ H Study of Positive Youth Development - MO Wave H Study of Positive Youth Development Missouri Wave 6 Update.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
APP Middle School’s Project Kirklees. The Vision Every child knows how they are doing and what they need to do to improve and how to get there. They get.
University of Kentucky
Miyo Wahkohtowin Community Education Authority Maskwacis Student Success Program Presented by Ahmad Jawad March 8, 2011.
The CIS Model Research, Rationale, & a Business Plan.
Restructuring Sustaining the Change Sam Redding Center on Innovation & Improvement
Higher Education Access Tracker Helping member universities to target, monitor and evaluate outreach programmes Sharon Smith - Director of HEAT project.
NW Minnesota Council of Collaborative’s: “Our Children Succeed Initiative” Overview 2/7/07.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 Updates continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director & Caroline Lansdown.
Strategic planning break-out June 15, Agenda Review strategic planning and context (15 min) Round-table discussion (10 min) Share proposed articulation.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
1 1 M. Elena Lopez Senior Consultant Harvard Family Research Project Family Engagement for High School Success Toolkit Family Engagement for High School.
Implementation and its Correspondence to the Strategic Map ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIOS AND STETSON UNIVERSITY.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Bridlington Children’s Centres Development Plan East Riding Children’s Centres Bridlington “working in partnership”
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
National IVE Roundtable June 4, 2015 Title IV-E Collaborations with Private Partners Susan Ault Senior Director Strategic Consulting.
Joint Infant and Toddler Steering Committee/Early Learning Regional Coalition Statewide Meeting “Using our Data for Continuous Improvement” Organizational.
Developing and Writing Winning Individual, Corporate and Foundation Proposals Robin Heller, Director, Corporate and Foundation Philanthropy, BBBSA Robert.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Big Brothers Big Sisters of …
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
Measure What Matters Karen MacDonald, BGCA Midwest Leadership Conference October 16, 2009.
Stephanie Curry-Reedley College James Todd- ASCCC Area A Representative.
Caruth Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Initiative.
RTI Response to Intervention A View of the Ascension Experience.
A Systems Approach to Improving Substance Abuse Treatment for Latino Youth: Latino Caucus of the APHA Annual Meeting November 6, 2006 URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER.
Evaluation Results Missouri Reading Initiative.
Guiding agency leadership through a discussion about using your outcomes to build a case for support B uilding the links between our Outcomes Evaluation.
The New Outcomes System Stage I: Adopting the Youth Outcomes Survey AIM Agencies June 2009.
 Necessity for successful youth mentoring has grown in the United States substantially over the years  Indianapolis Star series focus “Our City Our.
Start Something Enhanced School-Based Mentoring [Leadership Discussion] [Date] ™ Modify this slide: -Insert audience (e.g., Board Meeting, Senior Leadership.
New Communities Meeting 2010 February 9, 2010 Washington, DC Only Connect! and Other Axioms of System Implementation Four Critical Lessons from Successful.
Operational Excellence: SDM Enhancements for Results 2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas June
Using Performance Data to Improve Governor Effectiveness Julie Johnson Assistant Director of Schools (Primary) Diocese of Shrewsbury Department of Education.
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Single Plan for Student Achievement. 1. Increase student achievement in reading/writing (ELA). 2. Increase Student Achievement in Math. 3. Improve the.
The inspection of arrangements for the protection of children and young people Ofsted unannounced inspections from May 2012.
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
“Strength of Relationship” Overview February 2008.
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P21 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Measuring outcomes.
Assessor Training 11 TH FEBRUARY Key Messages from Ofsted  Strengths  The partnership has a clear vision for improving the quality of practice.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
Talk Boost A targeted intervention for 4-7 year olds with language delay Wendy Lee Professional Director, The Communication Trust Mary Hartshorne Head.
Big Brothers Big Sisters By Kristin D, Jody C, Jackie C, Lisa S.
Evaluation Itself is a Value: Combining Effectiveness Research and Epidemiology in a Naturalistic Realist Evaluation Paper presented at American Evaluation.
Meeting the LEAPS Act May 5, PEI: Building Rigorous and Robust PreK-3 Family Engagement 1.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Performance and Progress 2012/2013. Why We Do an Annual Data Presentation To assess the Levy’s performance in various categories against goals. To highlight.
intandem Evaluation Presentation contents Why do we do evaluation?
NAEYC Early Childhood Standards
Presentation transcript:

Operational Excellence: Outcomes Evaluation System Impact and Outcomes Breakout Session June 14 th, 2011 Sandra LaFleur, Senior Director of Youth Outcomes 2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas June

Purpose & Desired Outcomes Review critical components of BBBS’ Outcome Evaluation System (OES) Highlight latest data analyses / results Reinforce focus on and clarify understanding of the OES Others?

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Today’s framing… Understand it! – The rationale for it – The connection to both the past and the present Do it! – Are you using RR, SoR, YOS? – How are you tracking it? Use it! – Case for support – Indications for improvement

Big Brothers Big Sister’s Outcomes Evaluation System (OES) Click to add text 2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas BBBS’ collective, evidenced-based approach to mentoring–a professional system that changes the lives of our children for the better, forever. Builds upon our two P/PV study findings that indicate specific areas where our work yields impact Builds upon BBBS’ ability to institute common service delivery methodologies and measures through AIM Gives us real-time, agency-specific information on our progress at achieving critical youth outcomes in addition to our nationwide reach

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Established positive impact of mentoring on key youth development areas – risk reduction, educational success and attitudes 1995 BBBS P/PV Randomized-Controlled Study (CBM) Continued to support positive impact of mentoring; but highlighted the importance of match quality (retention) 2007 BBBS P/PV Randomized-Controlled Study (SBM) The YOS survey is designed to measure those areas where impact was found in BBBS Randomized- Controlled Studies. YOS Survey Data Connecting Research to YOS Survey Leveraging long-standing research to account for real-time progress in our youth across the Big Brothers Big Sisters network

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas We didn’t get here overnight… BBBS has developed Unmatched Capabilities to Link Research & Process to Drive Outcomes on a National Scale

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Components of BBBS’ Outcomes Evaluation System (OES) Eight (8) Measurable Outcome Areas Focused on: Community Impact Future: Additional 3 rd party research Future: Targeted hard data collection Youth Outcomes: YOS survey Match Quality Strength (SOR survey) Outcomes/Accountabilities Educational success Avoidance of risky behavior Aspirations, confidence, relationships What We Achieve & Why It Matters Match Quality Length (RR=retention rate) Community Impact

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Research…to Outcomes…to Accountabilities

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Reflect… Does your board know this information? Does your agency leadership understand this information? Does your program staff recognize their connection to this?

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas

MATCH SUPPORT Match Support Complete % 96 %95.5%89.7%6.3% Match Support On Time % 84.7 %84.9%66.5%18.2% % Completion SOR/SITE 3 MO % 75%100% 52.0% % Completion SOR/COMM 3 MO %64% 59.0% 46.0% % Completion of YOS/Baseline %97.9% 91.7% 92.2 %6.2% % Completion of YOS/Annual201170% 52.9%65.0% 0 % Average Match Length SITE mo mo 11.5 mo-19.1 mo Average Match Length COMM mo 16.7 mo18.7 mo 17.3 mo -3.2 mo 12 Month Retention COMM % 56.6 %49.2% 15.1%41.5% 12 Month Retention SITE % 37.3 %36.1% 11.8%25.5% TEAM Total Youth Served /680CB 248SB 1028/727CB 301SB 1,225/704 CB 310SB -10.5% Closures201140%12.3%8.6%12.4% -1.1%

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas SoR 3 month vol compliance YOS follow-up compliance REGIONS 2010Q Q NE 45%64% 45%50% SE 61%75% 59%66% MW 55%61% 63%52% SW 63%78% 58%60% W 57%70% 57%53%

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Reflect… Are you currently tracking your agency’s performance on 12 month RR, SoR compliance, and YOS compliance? Do you share these numbers with the whole staff? Are these goals broken down into individual goals for appropriate staff? Are they held accountable for performance on those individual goals critical to OES?

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Developing Your Case for Support Define Your Strategic Outcome Areas Select Appropriate YOS Measures Based on an Understanding of Your Trends Collect & Analyze Data (compliance is key) Tell Your Story

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Outcomes Data – More Terms Correlates to the three accountability areas identified in the BBBSA Strategic Direction. Your local needs may differ or may require a focus in one particular area. Strategic Outcomes Areas Also called Outcome categories (8) and sub-categories on the YOS Score and Outcome reports. Outcomes Measures Refers to the number of youth whose scores indicate improvement (NOT the percentage change from baseline score to follow-up score) Percentage of Youth Improving Percentage of Youth Staying the Same Statistically Significant Refers to the number of youth whose scores indicate no change. For example, staying the same in a measure that tends to decline as a child enters teen years could be meaningful. A statistical significance test determines whether a change in scores is due to chance. For example, if the p value =.05, there is only a 5% likelihood that the change is due to chance

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Preliminary YOS Data: Early evidence of positive youth outcomes YOS ScalesCBSB Social acceptance** Scholastic competency** Grades* Educational expectations** Attitudes towards risk*(*) Parental trust** Truancy Special adult**

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Preliminary YOS Data: Early evidence of positive youth outcomes SUB SCALES YOS ScalesCBSB Finish High School (Educ Exp)** Go to college* Finish college* Drugs* Hitting* Breaking rules in school* Being late to school*

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Preliminary YOS Data: SPECIAL POPULATIONS YOS ScalesCBMSBMCBM Children w/ incarcerated parent SBM Hispanic Girls SBM Hispanic Boys Social acceptance***** Scholastic competency ***** Grades** Educational expectations **** Attitudes towards risk *(*)* Parental trust*** Truancy Special adult*****

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Preliminary YOS Data: (Future Analysis) SPECIAL POPULATIONS YOS Scales Foster Care Youth Juvenile Justice referrals CBM African American SBM African American CBM Native American SBM Native American Social acceptance Scholastic competency Grades Educational expectations Attitudes towards risk Parental trust Truancy Special adult

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Predicting match closures with SoR… when controlling for background variables, both 3 month volunteer and child SoR scores are predictive of match closures Vol SoR scale ranking: Confidence Lack of Frustration Closeness Connectedness Child SoR scale ranking: Closeness Lack of Disappointment Coping

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Revisiting SoR Cut Points Volunteer 3 month SoR Score > % more likely to “survive” than matches below this level Child 3 month SoR Score > % more likely to “survive” than matches below this level

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Reflect… How successfully is your agency leveraging your OES data in building your case for support? Are your OES performance results used to discuss improvements or enhancements to program operations?

2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas Next steps… Assess your obstacles and your facilitators Talk with your agency team – build your action plan