Info gathering complete? Info gathering complete? Evaluate Alternatives Evaluate Alternatives Reality Check Reality Check Team Review Team Review SOP’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Requested Faculty Input 4 Packages 1.Course catalog description, List of CLO (Achieved) 2.List of assessments, List of activities- Today 3.Course topics.
Advertisements

Delivering a Planning Services Engagement Software Assurance Planning Services.
Employed Educator Report (EER) Report Form & Instructions.
Submitting Book Chapters via Manuscript Central A Short Guide for Wiley-VCH Authors.
Measuring for Success Module Nine Instructions:
FLORIDA SONS OF THE AMERICAN LEGION COLLEGE SYSTEM – COURSE 8 Sons of The American Legion Reporting Requirements.
1 Addendum Fall 2006 Limited-Term RFP Detailed Instructions for Bidder Registration and Proposal Submission ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. September 11, 2006.
IPortfolio assignment Mandatory Unit evidence. Centres may use some or all of these activities or some of their own devising to help candidates complete.
JavaScript Form Validation
CTRP User Call April 3, 2013 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
AQS Web Quick Reference Guide Changing Raw Data Values Using Maintenance 1. From Main Menu, click Maintenance, Sample Values, Raw Data 2. Enter monitor.
SYSTEM PLANNING Addendum FALL 2003 RFP Detailed Instructions for Bidder Registration and Proposal Submission ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. October 2003 PLEASE.
Tracking Online Student Engagement Presented by Kimberly Webster eLearning Instructional Coach Ottawa-Carleton District School Board.
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Defect Management and Prevention QMS Training.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
New TIR – EPD submission process. Contents  New TIR-EPD Submission  TIR-EPD status check  TIR-EPD printable documents  Using previously submitted.
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Roster Validation Quick Reference Guide for Teachers Office of Achievement and Accountability April
ECPIC Quick Guide: eCPIC-ITDB Interactions Purpose: The eCPIC-ITDB Interactions Quick Guide has been developed to provide a high-level, informational overview.
PPAR Workflow National Projects 1 Report request sent by PMO two weeks prior to the end of the reporting period, i.e. 15 June & 15 Dec. 2 CP can start.
1 Thank you for visiting our site and welcome to the “Introduction to ISO 22000” Presentation that you requested. For more information.
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Configuration Management QMS Training.
BUDGET INFORMATION SEMINAR IOC Meeting February 12, 2009.
| Data Validity and Usability in the RI/FS Process CHRISTINA MOTT FRANS, JOSH HOPP, CHRISTINE RANSOM.
Using the Right Method to Collect Information IW233 Amanda Murphy.
0 eCPIC Admin Training: OMB Submission Packages and Annual Submissions These training materials are owned by the Federal Government. They can be used or.
ASys: Demo Problem to solve ASys (Assessment system) Analisys of the properties Architecture of the system DFD to mark one exam Testing using test cases.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
ITU-R Liaison Group Report - Session #62 Opening Plenary IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE L /0072 Date.
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
Developing Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plans for Alternate/Alternative Assessments Virginia Department of Education Division of Student Assessment and School.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Dual Logo Procedures Alex Zamfirescu IEC USNC TA TC93 Convener IEC TC93 WG2 November 2004.
Unit 17: SDLC. Systems Development Life Cycle Five Major Phases Plus Documentation throughout Plus Evaluation…
Input into DLESE Collections Suggest a Resource Begin quality discussion Threshold criteria Is it ESS Does it work Supply metadata Create metadata Review.
1 Addendum FALL 2004 RFP Detailed Instructions for Bidder Registration and Proposal Submission ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. November 2004.
HMIS Management Reports and Data Quality Training Last updated:1/26/2012.
GMAP Grant Management, Application, and Planning Consolidate Application Training.
Engage | Develop | Growwww.synergita.comEngage | Develop | Grow Synergita – 360° Feedback Management Bringing performance management - Closer to your people.
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency 3rd Health Programme The Electronic Submission System (JA 2015) Georgios MARGETIDIS.
© JABEE 2015 Fundamental Concept of JABEE Evaluation and Accreditation JABEE evaluation and accreditation is to confirm the engineering educational program.
Online Reimbursement Management System Group Members: Clint Schramek Lawrence Brown Junior Bowen Data Flow Diagrams.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
PearsonAccess EOC Training
What is an AGM??? Handover Guide.. What is an AGM??? Handover Guide.
Approval of Assessments
For Out of Range Environmental and Water Quality Measurements
PROJECT CHANGES.
Request a Content Change for Novartis.com
Implementation Strategy July 2002
Current Resource Accessioning (updated )
360o Feedback Report Post-Training After-Session Actions
OSD Verification of Certification
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Leading for the First Time? Strive to be a Ballon d'Or - Goal!!
For Out of Range Environmental and Water Quality Measurements
Windows Summit /1/2018 © 2010 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be.
Testing Impropriety/Irregularity Tutorial
Parent Portion of the Student Profile
Supplemental Educational Services (SES)
JavaScript Form Validation
How to SEE / acknowledge FEEDBACK ON YOUR Booking Requests?
Approval of Assessments
How to Submit your Booking Requests?
ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. February 23, 2006
How to Use templates?.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Planning Services Meeting Client Communications
Wealth Management Meeting Asset Management Execution
Presentation transcript:

Info gathering complete? Info gathering complete? Evaluate Alternatives Evaluate Alternatives Reality Check Reality Check Team Review Team Review SOP’s Updated SOP’s Updated Field Review Field Review Quick review of SOP alternatives - Evaluation based on selection criteria - Outcome is the draft SOP - Sub-Team Review. Are there omission/commission errors? - Indirectly validates selection criteria - Leads send to whole Team for review - Feedback sent back to Leads - SOP changes identified and made - Make needed changes for the Field Review - Produce Field Review Package Executive Review Executive Review - Sent through PM/BL to the GTG for review - Sub-Teams review feedback

SOP Developed SOP Developed GSTOP Team Review GSTOP Team Review Feedback to Sub-Team Leads Feedback to Sub-Team Leads SOP’s Updated SOP’s Updated Sub-Team Executive Review Package Sub-Team Executive Review Package Project Level Exec. Review Package Project Level Exec. Review Package Compile & Review Feedback Compile & Review Feedback SOP’s Updated SOP’s Updated Sub-Team Field Review Package Sub-Team Field Review Package Project level Field Review Package Project level Field Review Package Field Review - Using Template format - Including applicable template items Leads submit SOP’s to whole GSTOP team for review Feedback submitted back to appropriate Leads - Feedback reviewed by sub-teams - Needed changes identified and made Leads submit updated SOP’s to PM/BL for Executive Review PM/BL compiles sub-team reviews for Executive Review package Feedback submitted back to Leads Through the PM/BL Leads submit updated SOP’s to PM/BL for Field Review PM/BL compiles sub-team reviews for Field Review package

1.Examine input data to make sure that it is complete. This is to ensure that all the needed information is present. 2.Evaluate the SOPs based on predefined selection criteria. 3.Produce draft SOPs using the template provided by the Project Manager (PM). Leads should fill out as much of the template as possible. 4.Reality Check review: perform a reality check review to make sure that evaluation results do not have any omission or commission errors. That is, the results of the evaluation truly give the best set of SOPs based on the selection criteria. This step also serves as an indirect validation of the selection criteria. 5.GSTOP Team Review: Sub-Team Leads will submit SOP reviews to all team members. This review is meant to catch any glaring errors before submission to the field. A feedback period of 10 business days would be requested. 6.Feedback from the Team review is compiled and reviewed. Sub-teams decide what if any corrections, additions, or deletions are necessary before the Executive review. Any necessary changes to SOPs are made. 7.Executive Review Package: Each sub-team will produce an Executive Review package to be given to the Project Manager and/or Business Lead (BL). The PM/BL will compile the packages into a Project level Executive Review package and submit it to the GTG. 8.Feedback from the Executive Review will be funneled down to the Sub-Team Leads through the PM/BL. Sub-Teams will compile and review feedback. Necessary changes will be identified and made. 9.Field Review Package: Each sub-team will produce a Field Review package to be given to the Project Manager and/or Business Lead (BL). The PM/BL will compile the packages into a Project level Field Review package. 10.Field Review: The process of conducting the Field Review will be determined at the April GSTOP Work Session in Denver.