SOME PERSPECTIVES ON PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING Stephen Ressler, P.E., Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONCEPTUAL WEB-BASED FRAMEWORK IN AN INTERACTIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT FOR DISTANCE LEARNING Amal Oraifige, Graham Oakes, Anthony Felton, David Heesom, Kevin.
Advertisements

CAREWARE TRAINING Adult Learners. Approach Getting It Done Framework Concepts vs. Recipes.
Design, development, and assessment of mobile applications: The case for problem-based learning Massey, A. P., Ramesh, V., & Khatri, V. IEEE Transactions.
PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING & CAPACITY BUILDING
Module 1: Teaching functional skills – from building to applying skills 0 0.
Unit 6: Training Methods Experiential Learning and Technology
Quality First Teaching In Any Subject From Good to Outstanding
Foundation Skills Assessment Tool (FSAT) Melbourne, March 28 th 2014.
Skill Presentation Chapter 7.
The Relationship Between Second Language Acquisition Theory and Computer-Assisted Language Learning Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The Relationship Between Second.
Problem Based Lessons. Training Objectives 1. Develop a clear understanding of problem-based learning and clarify vocabulary issues, such as problem vs.
A Decision Matrix for Designing Staff Training Ronnie Detrich Wing Institute.
USING PROBLEM BASED LEARNING TO ACHIEVE LIFELONG LEARNING OPEN UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA 14 NOVEMBER 2011.
Problem-Based Learning by floating facilitation Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson Courtesy of Deborah Allen and Hal White.
Lesson Planning. Successful Lessons Engaging and challenging Attaining the goals and objectives Exciting and fun Connecting learning content with students’
E-portfolio in TaskStream (DRF) Signature Assignments Signature Assignments Classroom Community (1 st & 2 nd semesters) Classroom Community (1 st & 2 nd.
Drill & Practice “The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new lands, but in seeing with new eyes” Marcel Proust.
3 Chapter Needs Assessment.
Best Practices IIEngineering Engineering Education1 use active learning.
Applying Learning Theories in Your Teaching Presented by Susan M. Zvacek, Ph.D. Fulbright Scholar University of Kansas.
Inductive Model Also known as guided discovery Teacher’s role is to provide examples that illustrate the content and then guide students’ efforts to find.
Thinking, reasoning and working mathematically
Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework A ́ıda Walqui The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
Videoconferencing. What is Videoconferencing? Videoconferencing is a medium where two or more people at different locations can meet face-to-face in real.
DISCOVERY LEARNING THEORY. Definition  Discovery learning method : *Content is not given by the teacher. *Independently discovered by the learner. *Learner.
Kanban “Signboard”.
Recommendations for Best Practice. Best Practice This section will present an analysis of the literature in the following categories: Organization of.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
Managing Learning and Knowledge Capital Human Resource Development: Chapter 12 Workplace learning Copyright © 2010 Tilde University Press.
Boundary crossings: student responsibility for academic language and learning at tertiary level Annie Bartlett Academic Skills and Learning Centre The.
Top 10 Instructional Strategies
Central concepts:  Assessment can measure habits of mind or habits of recall.  Tests have their limits.  It is important to know the purpose the test.
Authentic Assessment Lynne E. Houtz, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Education Creighton University.
Online Course Development and Constructivist Teaching Strategies Susan M. Zvacek, Ph.D
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 15: Capacity development and training on Maternity.
1 Effective Teaching & Learning Dr. Abida Ahmed Associate Professor Department of Physiology Mymensingh Medical College.
Enhancing problem-based learning designs with a single e-learning scaffolding tool:Two case studies using challenge FRAP Advisor : Min-Puu Chen Presenter.
BBA 229 Training and Development
Hummm…  How do I create an engaging online course that facilitates learning?
Advantages of Using Children’s Literature provides a motivating introduction to complex curriculum topics mathematical vocabulary can be reinforced and.
Problem based learning (PBL) Amal Al Otaibi CP, MME.
RPPS Education Development Process Debbie Bender.
Training in the workplace Training in the workplace John Mc Donald Learning outcomes – Monday 9 August 2010 At the end of the session learners.
Small Group Teaching Key Educational Skills Faculty Development Workshop December 9, 2014 Katherine M. Hyland, PhD Marieke Kruidering-Hall, PhD.
Ch. 3 StudyCast SarahBeth Walker. NETS-T Standard 1  Teachers use their knowledge of subject matter, teaching and learning, and technology to facilitate.
1 Granular Approach to Adaptivity in Problem-based Learning Environment Sally He, Kinshuk, Hong Hong Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand Ashok.
Response to Intervention: Tier 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators 1.
Program Evaluation.
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Foundation Subjects MFL: optional module 4.
Transfer Like a Champ! By Michelle Brazeal. Transfer Training Why do we teach?
Dick Clark, Rich DiNinni and Gary Rauchfuss November , 2006
Constructivism A learning theory for today’s classroom.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Direct Vs.Instruction In Elementary School Created By: Jessica Mumm.
Small Group Teaching Key Educational Skills Faculty Development Workshop December 8, 2015 Katherine M. Hyland, PhD Marieke Kruidering-Hall, PhD.
Challenging students to acquire deeper knowledge in HCI course N. Ackovska and M. Kostoska 15 th Workshop on “Software Engineering and Reverse Engineering”
Problem-Based Learning Models
Workplace Training John Mc Donald Training through instruction & demonstration Learning outcomes – February 2011 At the end of the session learners.
指導教授: Chen, Ming-puu 報 告 者: Tsai, Yu-ting 報告日期: 2006/12/19 Kathleen, I. & Deborah, C. (2004). Scenario-based e-learning design. Performance Improvement,43(1)16-23.
Task Presentation Chapter 5. Task Presentation is About Communication How to communicate effectively with learners - improving the clarity How to communicate.
1 IT/Cybersecurity - ICRDCE Conference Day Using Blooms to Write Student Learning Outcomes (SLO’s)
1Clinical Training Skills - Delivering Interactive Presentations DELIVERING INTERACTIVE PRESENTATIONS.
Constructivism is a theory based on observation and scientific study about how people learn. It is a teaching philosophy based on the concept that learning.
3 Chapter Needs Assessment.
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Off-the-Job Training Methods
DEVELOPING TEACHING SKILLS IN PE (GED3043)
Teaching with Instructional Software
Problem Based Learning
Presentation transcript:

SOME PERSPECTIVES ON PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING Stephen Ressler, P.E., Ph.D.

A Problem  You will need to use a complex multi-featured software package in your work.  You have no previous experience with this software.  Your work will require you to use some, but not all, of the software package’s features.

Which Solution Would You Choose? 1. Receive a lecture and demonstration of the software from an expert. 2. Receive a lecture and demonstration of the software from an expert, with an opportunity to use the software while observing the demonstration. 3. Work through several standard tutorials provided with the software package. 4. Use the software for a relevant task or project, learning basic functions on your own from the user’s manual. 5. Use the software for a relevant task, learning basic functions from the user’s manual and asking questions of an expert when necessary.

Option 1  Advantages:  Learning is based on correct information, provided by the expert.  Demonstration provides a model for you to follow.  Disadvantages:  The expert decides what you need to know.  The learner is not engaged in real time.

Option 2  Advantages:  Learning is based on correct information, provided by the expert.  Learner is engaged and can reinforce learning in real time.  Disadvantages:  The expert decides what you need to know.  Ability to replicate the expert’s demonstration does not necessarily result in “transfer of learning.”

Option 3  Advantages:  Learning is based on correct information, provided by the tutorials.  The learner owns the learning process and is engaged.  Learner might be able to select relevant tutorials.  Disadvantages:  There is no expert available to assist or validate the learning process.  Tutorials might not be relevant to the learner’s individual needs.

Option 4  Advantages:  The learner owns the learning process and is engaged.  The task or project is relevant to the learner’s needs.  Disadvantages:  Learning will take more time.  Learning may be frustrating or even overwhelming, depending on the complexity of the task.  There is no expert available to assist or validate the learning process.  Some of the learning may be incorrect or incomplete.

Option 5  Advantages:  The learner owns the learning process and is engaged.  The task or project is relevant to the learner’s needs.  An expert is available to assist and validate the learning process.  Disadvantages:  Learning will take more time.  Learning may be frustrating. Mitigated by the availability of the expert

Which Solution Would Your Students Choose? 1. Receive a lecture and demonstration of the software from an expert. 2. Receive a lecture and demonstration of the software from an expert, with an opportunity to use the software while observing the demonstration. 3. Work through several standard tutorials provided with the software package. 4. Use the software for a relevant task or project, learning basic functions on your own from the user’s manual. 5. Use the software for a relevant task, learning basic functions from the user’s manual and asking questions of an expert when necessary.

The Essence of PBL  Project focus vs. Content focus  Deductive vs. Inductive  Push vs. Pull

Challenges  Cognitive overload  Learner frustration  Students’ tendency to:  Seek approved solutions  Seek someone else’s solution  Invent theory

Meeting the Challenges  Problem design:  Stimulate the demand for relevant knowledge and skills  Not too easy; not too hard  Just-in-time delivery of content  Systematic monitoring of student progress

A Useful Theoretical Framework: Perry’s Model (Culver and Hackos, 1982)