Relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Disintegrated Planning: Exploring and Crossing the Natural and Built.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
This is not a Plan Spatial planning is not a function of the European Union, as defined in its Treaties But it would be surreal if Territorial Cohesion.
Advertisements

A time for rural recognition: can we achieve social justice? CARNEGIE COMMISSION FOR RURAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Kate Braithwaite – Director of Rural Programmes.
Brazil-UK research planning workshop Improving integration between urban and environmental policies The case of green infrastructure – Brazil & UK.
Land Use, Landscape and Governance: How to Make Better Policies and Decisions Alister Scott Birmingham City University.
Dawn Griffiths Health and Environment Advisor Climate Change and Green Infrastructure.
The Green Arc Vision “Bringing the Big Outdoors closer to everyone – by creating, linking and managing extensive and valued landscapes for people and.
Towards a Worcestershire Green Infrastructure Strategy WPEG, 5 September 2012 Marta Dziudzi Planning Policy Assistant Strategic.
North Central Regional Center for Rural Development
Green Infrastructure and RDPs Ágnes Zólyomi, CEEweb for Biodiversity RDP workshop, Budapest 12 June 2014.
Evidence Based Planning: Councillors & Decision Making- the Role of the Evidence Base Deirdre Scully, BA, MRUP, MA, MIPI Senior Planner, Dublin City Council.
Building a Resilient Natural Environment Aberdeen City Council SUMMARY Aberdeen City Council is working with European partners on two green themed, innovative.
. Partnerships for Sustainable rural-urban development: existing evidences – Staffordshire, UK Councillor Philip Atkins – Leader, Staffordshire County.
Rehema White ESD AT UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS. contents ‘academic excellence’ SD Programme Other aspects of SD at the University Future plans.
The Natural Capital City – a blueprint for the future? UKWRIP 2014 Nick Grayson Climate Change & Sustainability Manager, “Metanoia”
A Green Infrastructure Strategy for Rochdale MBC.
„South East Europe Programme” as a financing opportunity for projects in the Danube region and complementarity to other instruments COMPLEMENTARITY OF.
The Ecosystem approach: from theory to application in England Tom Tew Natural England Delivering Nature’s Services.
Ecosystems – Joining things up in floodplains Cranfield University: Joe Morris, Tim Hess, Peter Leeds-Harrison, Paul Trawick, Helena Posthumus, Quentin.
1 payback from investment in landscape ian phillips mrtpi, cmli 5th European Landscape conference, 2011.
Relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Is there a method in the madness? Uniting Spatial Planning and the Ecosystem Approach relu Rural Economy and.
Relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Whose fringe is it anyway: prospects and opportunities for integrated.
Natural England protecting and enhancing the natural environment The Climate Change Bill, the issues, and the rise of adaptation Rosie Manise
MSUE Greening Michigan Institute Rick Foster, director and professor.
Ecosystem Services What Nature Does for Us.
Land Use Strategy Rural Development Council 1 February 2010.
Wiltshire Green Infrastructure Strategy. What is green infrastructure? The Wiltshire Green Infrastructure Strategy Wiltshire’s existing green infrastructure.
Forward Planning. 3 components: i) Forward planning Plans (County Development Plan and 12 Local Area Plans) Strategies (Housing/Retail/Wind) Studies (Housing.
Kent Local Nature Partnership – realising the value of nature.
SNH PERSPECTIVE ON PLANNING AND THE ENVIRONMENT Derek Manson Planning Adviser.
Mapping the Mersey Forest Exploring the significance of community-scale green infrastructure Gemma Jerome | PhD Student | University of Liverpool| ESRC.
Natural England State of the Natural Environment, Strategic Direction refresh, and Manifesto Dr Helen Phillips, Chief Executive, Natural England.
Partnership for Urban South Hampshire Sustainable Growth.
CYMRU FYW: A LIVING WALES A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR OUR ENVIRONMENT,OUR COUNTRYSIDE AND OUR SEAS.
Education for Sustainable Development Network Alona Rauckiene Lithuania 2009 Visby.
Climate Change Council November 2011 draft ACT Planning Strategy.
The European Regional Development FundEuropean Union Rural Services Network, Nottingham Trent, Whose Urban (Rural) Fringe? M. Wishardt, S.Littlewood,
Supporting a Better Local Business and Investment Climate – AN OVERVIEW – SIMON WHITE Strategies and Practices Toward a More Enabling Business and Investment.
A Pacific Response to Climate Change Green Economies An Extraordinary Emphasis on Biodiversity, Environment and Resilient Societies.
IGIBS Kick Off Meeting 11 th April 2011 Colin Chapman.
Professor Philip Lowe Newcastle University Director of UK Research Councils’ Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Researching Environment - Society Relations.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Biodiversity – a common responsibility for society. Börje Alriksson, Ministry of the Environment, Sweden.
Conservation Growth Poles A landscape level development pathway.
Graduates for the 21 st Century - Perspective from Research Ian Diamond RCUK.
Approaches and Mainstreaming of Ecosystem-based Adaptation in Europe International workshop “Mainstreaming an ecosystem based approach to climate change.
Chapter 6: Integrating Knowledge and Action Scott Kaminski ME / 9 / 2005.
Facilitator: Dr Alex Ryan Associate, Higher Education Academy Interdisciplinary Sustainability Education: Insights, Momentum and Futures 14 th December.
Research on Rural Resource Management and the Rural Economy: Addressing the Local and Regional Dimension Royal Society of Edinburgh 16 May 2007.
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Chris Cousins Head of Sustainable Development Service.
Welcome and Introduction to GNTP Forum Councillor Jane Urquhart Portfolio Holder for Transport and Area Working Nottingham City Council.
Emily May Green Infrastructure: An Evidence Base for Birmingham.
Introducing the Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Professor Philip Lowe and Jeremy Phillipson.
A UK Spatial Planning Framework Will French RTPI National Planning Forum 20 June 2006.
Sustainable Development and Neighbourhood Plans Chris Gooding and Bill Bloxsome Data Orchard/Community First.
Agenda item 4.B Green Infrastructure CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature 8 th meeting – 22/06/10.
Strategic Land Use: Crossing the Urban Rural Divide A RELU / SUE Workshop Interdisciplinary Research Practices Professor Chris Rogers University of Birmingham.
Objectives for biodiversity protection beyond 2010 A perspective from environmental citizens organisations John Hontelez, EEB Secretary General Athens.
India Development Strategy (FY2012–FY2016) ADB India’s Country Partnership Strategy (2013 – 2017) ADB’s Long-Term Strategic Framework (Strategy 2020)
Future Funding Opportunities Pippa Langford. Quiz: Who or what are they?
From URF (urban rural fringe) to RUF (rural urban fringe) Whose opportunity space? Alister Scott Claudia Carter, Mark Reed, Peter Larkham, Nicki Schiessel,
What are sustainable communities?
Applying a Territorial Lens to Rural Transformation
What are sustainable communities?
NATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING FRAMEWORK (NUDHF)
Progress of the preparations for a White Paper on Adaptation to Climate Change Water Directors’ meeting Slovenia June 2008 Marieke van Nood, Unit.
Nick Grayson – Climate Change & Sustainability Manager
Green Infrastructure and Natura 2000
Communication on Green Infrastructure
HMG’s 25 Year Environment Plan
Biodiversity, Natura 2000 & Green Infrastructure in the Regional Policy Mathieu Fichter European Commission, DG Regio Team leader "sustainable.
Presentation transcript:

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Disintegrated Planning: Exploring and Crossing the Natural and Built Environment Divide. Alister Scott BA PhD MRTPI Claudia Carter, Richard Coles, David Collier, Chris Crean, Rachel Curzon, Bob Forster, Nick Grayson, Andrew Hearle, David Jarvis, Miriam Kennet, Peter Larkham, Karen Leach, Mark Middleton, Nick Morton, Mark Reed, Hayley Pankhurst, Nicki Schiessel, Ben Stonyer, Ruth Waters and Keith Budden

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme 1. The lenses of spatial planning and the ecosystem approach

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme 1. The lenses of spatial planning and the ecosystem approach 2. The disintegrated development of the built and natural environment

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme 1. The lenses of spatial planning and the ecosystem approach 3. Crossing the divide: framework, tools and applications 2. The disintegrated development of the built and natural environment

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme 1. The lenses of spatial planning and the ecosystem approach 3. Crossing the divide: framework, tools and applications 2. The disintegrated development of the built and natural environment 4. Lessons for policy and practice

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme The purpose.....To boldly go… Beyond boundaries Beyond biodiversity Beyond planning Beyond the status quo Beyond OUR comfort zones

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme “The divide of ‘built’ and ‘natural’ environment, is particularly evident within the specialist focus on the ‘urban’ or the ‘rural’. It is deeply engrained in academic disciplines and professional training paths. Interdisciplinarity is much talked about but yet few truly practice it or use it to structure research, degree courses or professional qualifications. So, not surprisingly, we end up with rural specialists and urban specialists. But this artificial separation is unhelpful and affects our understanding, research, policy and practice. In reality, there are so many interdependencies and linkages that ignoring one to focus on the other only makes partial sense and only provides partial answers.” Carter 2012 Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Connecting People-Place-Environment Dan’s cartoon please EA

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Mind the gap

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Disintegrated Development Natural Environment lens 1.Natural Environment White Paper 2.Habitat and Landscape 3.DEFRA 4.Ecosystem Approach 5.Classifying and Valuing 6.National Ecosystem Assessment 7.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 8.Nature Improvement Areas 9.Local Nature Partnerships 1.Natural Environment White Paper 2.Habitat and Landscape 3.DEFRA 4.Ecosystem Approach 5.Classifying and Valuing 6.National Ecosystem Assessment 7.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 8.Nature Improvement Areas 9.Local Nature Partnerships Built Environment lens 1.National Planning Policy Framework 2.Local 3.DCLG 4.Spatial Planning 5.Zoning and Ordering 6.Sustainability Assessments 7.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 8.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 9.Local Enterprise Partnerships 1.National Planning Policy Framework 2.Local 3.DCLG 4.Spatial Planning 5.Zoning and Ordering 6.Sustainability Assessments 7.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 8.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 9.Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Disintegrated Development Natural Environment lens 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships Built Environment lens 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Natural Environment lens 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships Built Environment lens 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Natural Environment lens 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships Built Environment lens 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Natural Environment lens 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships Built Environment lens 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Natural Environment lens 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships Built Environment lens 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Natural Environment lens 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships Built Environment lens 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Natural Environment lens 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships Built Environment lens 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Natural Environment lens 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships Built Environment lens 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Natural Environment lens 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships Built Environment lens 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Natural Environment lens 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships 1.Incentives 2.Natural Environment White Paper 3.Habitat and Landscape 4.DEFRA 5.Ecosystem Approach 6.Classifying and Valuing 7.National Ecosystem Assessment 8.Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9.Nature Improvement Areas 10.Local Nature Partnerships Built Environment lens 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments (SEA) 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships 1.Control 2.National Planning Policy Framework 3.Local 4.DCLG 5.Spatial Planning 6.Zoning and Ordering 7.Sustainability Assessments (SEA) 8.Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9.Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 10.Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme The BCU Response New ways of doing research and policy Building a new model of interdisciplinarity Bridging the natural and built environment divide

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Is there a method in the madness? Uniting Spatial Planning and the Ecosystem Approach relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Alister Scott Claudia Carter, Mark Reed, Peter Larkham, Nicki Schiessel, Karen Leach, Nick Morton, Rachel Curzon David Jarvis, Andrew Hearle, Mark Middleton, Bob Forster, Keith Budden, Ruth Waters, David Collier, Chris Crean, Miriam Kennet, Richard Coles and Ben Stonyer

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Building a Team  Birmingham City University - Birmingham School of the Built Environment  University of Aberdeen - Aberdeen Centre for Environmental Sustainability  Birmingham City University - Birmingham School of the Built Environment  University of Aberdeen - Aberdeen Centre for Environmental Sustainability  Forest Research  National Farmers Union  David Jarvis Associates  Natural England  Localise West Midlands  Green Economics Institute  Birmingham Environment Partnership  West Midlands Rural Affairs Forum  Worcestershire County Council  West Midlands Regional Assembly  Forest Research  National Farmers Union  David Jarvis Associates  Natural England  Localise West Midlands  Green Economics Institute  Birmingham Environment Partnership  West Midlands Rural Affairs Forum  Worcestershire County Council  West Midlands Regional Assembly

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme SP/EA Synergies  New ways of thinking  Holistic frameworks  Cross-sectoral  Multi-scalar  Negotiating  Enabling  Long term perspective  Connectivity  Governance  Inclusivity  Equity goals  Regulatory  Market-orientated

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Time – Long-termism – Learning lessons from the past Connectivity – Flows and linkages vs urban and rural – Multi-scalar relationships and dependencies Values – Core values and belief systems – Professionals (Planner, Environmentalist) and Publics Unpacked Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Crossing the Divide 1.Rufopoly 2.Green Infrastructure 3.Community Infrastructure Levy

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme RUFopoly Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Stimulate economic growth Protect and enhance cultural heritage Protect and enhance the landscape, geodiversity and the natural environment Enhance and conserve biodiversity Aid climate change mitigation and adaptation Promote sustainable transport Promote lifelong learning; volunteering Promote health and wellbeing Benefits of GI network

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Concept Plans via Worcestershire GIP

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme built and natural environment is part of one connected system Concluding points for Policy and Practice Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme need to develop and use tools and methods that cross the divide rather than perpetuate it Key Points for Policy and Practice Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Need inclusive partnerships across economy, society and environment – LEPS LNPS emphasize the disintegration although some progress is being made. Key Points for Policy and Practice Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain

relu Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Questions ESRC grant award under the RELU programme award for ‘Managing Environmental Change at the Fringe’ - ES/H037217/1 Policy Brief Videos 1.Rediscovering the rural urban fringe here Reconnecting the built and natural environmental divide Enhancing connections by crossing boundaries in the rural urban fringe. 4.Managing Contested values in the rural urban fringe Long Termism