The freeze-out source shape: recent results from the STAR energy scan Mike Lisa (Ohio State University) for the STAR Collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PID v2 and v4 from Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV at RHIC
Advertisements

Multi-Particle Azimuthal Correlations at RHIC !! Roy A. Lacey USB - Chem (SUNY Stony Brook ) What do they tell us about Possible Quenching?
Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.
Detailed HBT measurement with respect to Event plane and collision energy in Au+Au collisions Takafumi Niida for the PHENIX Collaboration University of.
Anisotropic Flow at RHIC Jiayun Chen (for Collaboration) Institute of Particle Physics, HZNU, Wuhan, , P.R.China Brookhaven National Lab, Upton,
Phase transition of hadronic matter in a non-equilibrium approach Graduate Days, Frankfurt, , Hannah Petersen, Universität Frankfurt.
January 12, 2007J. Sandweiss Two Important Long Range Programs for RHIC In addition to the many important RHIC research programs that are currently underway.
5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.
High p T identified hadron anisotropic flow and Deuteron production in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for the PHENIX Collaboration.
WWND, San Diego1 Scaling Characteristics of Azimuthal Anisotropy at RHIC Michael Issah SUNY Stony Brook for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Perfect Fluid: flow measurements are described by ideal hydro Problem: all fluids have some viscosity -- can we measure it? I. Radial flow fluctuations:
Behind QGP Investigating the matter of the early Universe Investigating the matter of the early Universe Is the form of this matter Quark Gluon Plasma?
ISMD31 / Sept. 4, 2001 Toru Sugitate / Hiroshima Univ. The 31 st International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics on 1-7, Sept in Datong, China.
Strange and Charm Probes of Hadronization of Bulk Matter at RHIC International Symposium on Multi-Particle Dynamics Aug 9-15, 2005 Huan Zhong Huang University.
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.
Measurements of the Charge Balance Function at RHIC from √s NN = 7.7 to 200 GeV Gary D. Westfall, for the STAR Collaboration (Michigan State University)
Two Particle Correlations and Viscosity in Heavy Ion Collisions Monika Sharma for the Wayne State University STAR Collaboration Outline: Motivation Measurement.
Nu Xu1/12 ”DNP“, Newport Beach, California, December , 2012 Energy Dependence of the High Moments from Transport Model Simulations Xiaofeng Luo.
QM’05 Budapest, HungaryHiroshi Masui (Univ. of Tsukuba) 1 Anisotropic Flow in  s NN = 200 GeV Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at RHIC - PHENIX Hiroshi Masui.
Partonic Collectivity at RHIC ShuSu Shi for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Central China Normal University.
Grazyna Odyniec STAR physics program and technical challenges with the RHIC Au+Au energy scan Grazyna Odyniec/LBNL for STAR collaboration QM 2008, Jaipur,
Higher moments of net-charge multiplicity distributions at RHIC energies in STAR Nihar R. Sahoo, VECC, India (for the STAR collaboration) 1 Nihar R. Sahoo,
HuaZhong Normal University IWND09, August 22~25, Shanghai 1 Event-by-Event Fluctuations of Net-Baryon Distribution and Higher Order Cumulants ZHOU You,
Soft Physics at RHIC Michal Šumbera Nuclear Physics Institute AS CR, Řež/Prague (for the STAR and PHENIX Collaborations) 1 Hadron Collider Physics Symposium.
Study of the QCD Phase Structure through High Energy Heavy Ion Collisions Bedanga Mohanty National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER)
M. Oldenburg Strange Quark Matter 2006 — March 26–31, Los Angeles, California 1 Centrality Dependence of Azimuthal Anisotropy of Strange Hadrons in 200.
July 21, 2011M.Š. EPS-HEP 2011, Grenoble11 Three-dimensional Kaon Source Extraction from STAR Experiment at RHIC Michal Šumbera NPI ASCR Prague (for the.
Hydrodynamics, together with geometric fluctuations of the Glauber model make specific predictions for a dipole and triangle terms in the observed azimuthal.
Mike Lisa - ISMD, Berkeley - August A menu of expectations for femtoscopy* 1.0 at LHC/ALICE Mike Lisa Ohio State University *femtoscopy (fem-ta-skö-pee)
1 Jeffery T. Mitchell – Quark Matter /17/12 The RHIC Beam Energy Scan Program: Results from the PHENIX Experiment Jeffery T. Mitchell Brookhaven.
Energy Scan of Hadron (  0 ) Suppression and Flow in Au+Au Collisions at PHENIX Norbert Novitzky for PHENIX collaboration University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Flow fluctuation and event plane correlation from E-by-E Hydrodynamics and Transport Model Victor Roy Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China Collaborators.
Hadron Collider Physics 2012, 12/Nov/2012, KyotoShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Heavy Ion results from RHIC-BNL ShinIchi Esumi Univ. of Tsukuba Contents.
Sergey Panitkin Current Status of the RHIC HBT Puzzle Sergey Panitkin Brookhaven National Lab La Thuile, March 18, 2005.
Masashi Kaneta, First joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of APS and JPS 1 / Masashi Kaneta LBNL
Peter Kolb, November 18, 2003Momentum Anisotropies1 Momentum Anisotropies -- Probing the detailed Dynamics Department of Physics and Astronomy State University.
Azimuthal HBT measurement of charged pions With respect to 3 rd event plane In Au+Au 200GeV collisions at RHIC-PHENIX Takafumi Niida for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Elliptic flow and shear viscosity in a parton cascade approach G. Ferini INFN-LNS, Catania P. Castorina, M. Colonna, M. Di Toro, V. Greco.
Abhilash Nair STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago 1 STAR.
Search for QCD Critical Point at RHIC Bedanga Mohanty National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER) Outline:  Phase diagram of QCD  Observables.
Results from an Integrated Boltzmann+Hydrodynamics Approach WPCF 2008, Krakau, Jan Steinheimer-Froschauer, Universität Frankfurt.
R ECENT RESULTS ON EVENT - BY - EVENT FLUCTUATIONS FROM RHIC BEAM ENERGY SCAN PROGRAM AT STAR EXPERIMENT Nihar R. Sahoo (for the STAR Collaboration) Texas.
1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.
Femtoscopy of identified particles at STAR Neha Shah for the STAR Collaboration University of California Los Angeles Quark Matter - Washington, D.C. -
Bulk properties of the system formed in Au+Au collisions at √s NN = 14.5 GeV using the STAR detector at RHIC Vipul Bairathi (for the STAR Collaboration)
Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook, ISMD, Kromĕříž, Roy A. Lacey What do we learn from Correlation measurements at RHIC.
Budapest, 4-9 August 2005Quark Matter 2005 HBT search for new states of matter in A+A collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev Based on the paper S.V. Akkelin,
24 Nov 2006 Kentaro MIKI University of Tsukuba “electron / photon flow” Elliptic flow measurement of direct photon in √s NN =200GeV Au+Au collisions at.
Charged and Neutral Kaon correlations in Au-Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV using the solenoidal tracker at RHIC (STAR) Selemon Bekele The Ohio State.
1 Probing dense matter at extremely high temperature Rudolph C. Hwa University of Oregon Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China April 20, 2009.
Systematic Study of Elliptic Flow at RHIC Maya SHIMOMURA University of Tsukuba ATHIC 2008 University of Tsukuba, Japan October 13-15, 2008.
Measurement of Azimuthal Anisotropy for High p T Charged Hadrons at RHIC-PHENIX The azimuthal anisotropy of particle production in non-central collisions.
Helen Caines Yale University Strasbourg - May 2006 Strangeness and entropy.
Global and Collective Dynamics at PHENIX Takafumi Niida for the PHENIX Collaboration University of Tsukuba “Heavy Ion collisions in the LHC era” in Quy.
PHENIX Results from the RHIC Beam Energy Scan Brett Fadem for the PHENIX Collaboration Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics 2016.
Paul Chung for the STAR Collaboration Nuclear Physics Institute ASCR Prague WPCF 2011, Tokyo 3D kaon source extraction from 200GeV Au+Au collisions.
Soft physics in PbPb at the LHC Hadron Collider Physics 2011 P. Kuijer ALICECMSATLAS Necessarily incomplete.
PHENIX. Motivation Collaboration PHENIX Roy A. Lacey (SUNY Stony Brook) PHENIX Collaboration I N T E R N A T I O N A L W O R K S H O P O N T H E P H.
Observation of antimatter hypernuclei at RHIC Jinhui Chen Kent State University for the STAR Collaboration 10 th International Conference on Hypernuclear.
High p T hadron production and its quantitative constraint to model parameters Takao Sakaguchi Brookhaven National Laboratory For the PHENIX Collaboration.
What do the scaling characteristics of elliptic flow reveal about the properties of the matter at RHIC ? Michael Issah Stony Brook University for the PHENIX.
Anisotropic flow of charged and strange particles in PbAu collisions at 158 AGeV measured in CERES experiment J. Milošević 1),2) 1)University of Belgrade.
Offline meeting Azimuthally sensitive Hanbury-Brown-Twiss (HBT) Interferometry Lukasz Graczykowski Warsaw University of Technology Johanna.
Anisotropic flow at RHIC: How unique is the NCQ scaling ?
Takafumi Niida from Univ. of Tsukuba for the PHENIX Collaborations
Takafumi Niida from Univ. of Tsukuba for the PHENIX Collaborations
The Study of Elliptic Flow for PID Hadron at RHIC-PHENIX
Hiroshi Masui for the PHENIX collaboration August 5, 2005
What have we learned from Anisotropic Flow at RHIC ?
Two particle hadron correlations with higher harmonic reaction plane in Au+Au 200 GeV collisions at RHIC-PHENIX T. Todoroki for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Presentation transcript:

The freeze-out source shape: recent results from the STAR energy scan Mike Lisa (Ohio State University) for the STAR Collaboration

Outline ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 general motivation RHIC BES program asHBT a growing database of asHBT systematics (another) anomalous behaviour at SPS? new STAR data reconciling RHIC, SPS results? centrality cuts RP resolution correction schemes rapidity (underway) conclusion 2

RHIC energy scan: √s=7-40 GeV (2010~2012 (?)) ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 Probe QCD phase diagram via statistics/fluctuations dynamic system response transport models (phase structure in EoS) bulk collectivity (low-p T measurements) Brachmann et al, PRC 2000 Kolb&Heinz

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 Central 7.7 GeV event in STAR TPC 4

Collision Energies (GeV) ObservablesMillions of Events Needed v 2 (up to ~1.5 GeV/c) v1v1 0.5 Azimuthally sensitive HBT PID fluctuations (K/) net-proton kurtosis differential corr & fluct vs. centrality n q scaling /K/p/ (m T -m 0 )/n<2GeV  to p T /n q =2 GeV/c R CP up to p T ~4.5 GeV/c (at 17.3) 5.5 (at 27) & 6 GeV/c (at 39) untriggered ridge correlations parity violation ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 20115

Collision Energies (GeV) Mevents taken (2010/11)~5~11~17~37~170 ObservablesMillions of Events Needed v 2 (up to ~1.5 GeV/c) v1v1 0.5 Azimuthally sensitive HBT PID fluctuations (K/) net-proton kurtosis differential corr & fluct vs. centrality (e.g. bal. fctn) n q scaling /K/p/ (m T -m 0 )/n<2GeV  to p T /n q =2 GeV/c R CP up to p T ~4.5 GeV/c (at 17.3) 5.5 (at 27) & 6 GeV/c (at 39) untriggered ridge correlations parity violation55555 ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct Status as of Oct

2 fm/c 4 fm/c 8 fm/c 6 fm/c 0 fm/c phi- the sexy direction ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 evolution from initial “known” shape depends on pressure anisotropy (“stiffness”) lifetime Both are interesting! We will measure a convolution over freezeout model needed P. Kolb, PhD

2 fm/c 4 fm/c 8 fm/c 6 fm/c 0 fm/c phi- the sexy direction ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct O’Hara et al, Science 2002

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 Extremely high pressures ( ∼ 10 TPa) and temperatures (5×10 5 K) have been produced using a single laser pulse (100 nJ, 800 nm, 200 fs) focused inside a sapphire crystal. The laser pulse creates an intensity over W/cm 2 converting material within the absorbing volume of ∼ 0.2 μm 3 into plasma in a few fs. A pressure of ∼ 10 TPa, far exceeding the strength of any material, is created generating strong shock and rarefaction waves. This results in the formation of a nanovoid surrounded by a shell of shock-affected material inside undamaged crystal. Analysis of the size of the void and the shock-affected zone versus the deposited energy shows that the experimental results can be understood on the basis of conservation laws and be modeled by plasma hydrodynamics. Matter subjected to record heating and cooling rates of K/s can, thus, be studied in a well-controlled laboratory environment. MicroexplosionsFemtoexplosions √s ε10 17 J/m 3 5 GeV/fm 3 = J/m 3 T10 6 K200 MeV = K rate10 18 K/sec10 35 K/s Extremely high pressures ( ∼ 10 TPa) and temperatures (5×10 5 K) have been produced using a single laser pulse (100 nJ, 800 nm, 200 fs) focused inside a sapphire crystal. The laser pulse creates an intensity over W/cm 2 converting material within the absorbing volume of ∼ 0.2 μm 3 into plasma in a few fs. A pressure of ∼ 10 TPa, far exceeding the strength of any material, is created generating strong shock and rarefaction waves. This results in the formation of a nanovoid surrounded by a shell of shock-affected material inside undamaged crystal. Analysis of the size of the void and the shock-affected zone versus the deposited energy shows that the experimental results can be understood on the basis of conservation laws and be modeled by plasma hydrodynamics. Matter subjected to record heating and cooling rates of K/s can, thus, be studied in a well-controlled laboratory environment. MicroexplosionsFemtoexplosions √s0.1 μJ 1 μJ ε10 17 J/m 3 5 GeV/fm 3 = J/m 3 T10 6 K200 MeV = K rate10 18 K/sec10 35 K/s 9

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 Extremely high pressures ( ∼ 10 TPa) and temperatures (5×10 5 K) have been produced using a single laser pulse (100 nJ, 800 nm, 200 fs) focused inside a sapphire crystal. The laser pulse creates an intensity over W/cm 2 converting material within the absorbing volume of ∼ 0.2 μm 3 into plasma in a few fs. A pressure of ∼ 10 TPa, far exceeding the strength of any material, is created generating strong shock and rarefaction waves. This results in the formation of a nanovoid surrounded by a shell of shock-affected material inside undamaged crystal. Analysis of the size of the void and the shock-affected zone versus the deposited energy shows that the experimental results can be understood on the basis of conservation laws and be modeled by plasma hydrodynamics. Matter subjected to record heating and cooling rates of K/s can, thus, be studied in a well-controlled laboratory environment. MicroexplosionsFemtoexplosions √s0.1 μJ 1 μJ ε10 17 J/m 3 5 GeV/fm 3 = J/m 3 T10 6 K200 MeV = K rate10 18 K/sec10 35 K/s energy quickly deposited transition to deconfined (plasma) phase hydrodynamic expansion cool back to confined (atomic) phase Extremely high pressures ( ∼ 10 TPa) and temperatures (5×10 5 K) have been produced using a single laser pulse (100 nJ, 800 nm, 200 fs) focused inside a sapphire crystal. The laser pulse creates an intensity over W/cm 2 converting material within the absorbing volume of ∼ 0.2 μm 3 into plasma in a few fs. A pressure of ∼ 10 TPa, far exceeding the strength of any material, is created generating strong shock and rarefaction waves. This results in the formation of a nanovoid surrounded by a shell of shock-affected material inside undamaged crystal. Analysis of the size of the void and the shock-affected zone versus the deposited energy shows that the experimental results can be understood on the basis of conservation laws and be modeled by plasma hydrodynamics. Matter subjected to record heating and cooling rates of K/s can, thus, be studied in a well-controlled laboratory environment. 10

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 Extremely high pressures ( ∼ 10 TPa) and temperatures (5×10 5 K) have been produced using a single laser pulse (100 nJ, 800 nm, 200 fs) focused inside a sapphire crystal. The laser pulse creates an intensity over W/cm 2 converting material within the absorbing volume of ∼ 0.2 μm 3 into plasma in a few fs. A pressure of ∼ 10 TPa, far exceeding the strength of any material, is created generating strong shock and rarefaction waves. This results in the formation of a nanovoid surrounded by a shell of shock-affected material inside undamaged crystal. Analysis of the size of the void and the shock-affected zone versus the deposited energy shows that the experimental results can be understood on the basis of conservation laws and be modeled by plasma hydrodynamics. Matter subjected to record heating and cooling rates of K/s can, thus, be studied in a well-controlled laboratory environment. MicroexplosionsFemtoexplosions √s0.1 μJ 1 μJ ε10 17 J/m 3 5 GeV/fm 3 = J/m 3 T10 6 K200 MeV = K rate10 18 K/sec10 35 K/s energy quickly deposited transition to deconfined (plasma) phase hydrodynamic expansion cool back to confined (atomic) phase Extremely high pressures ( ∼ 10 TPa) and temperatures (5×10 5 K) have been produced using a single laser pulse (100 nJ, 800 nm, 200 fs) focused inside a sapphire crystal. The laser pulse creates an intensity over W/cm 2 converting material within the absorbing volume of ∼ 0.2 μm 3 into plasma in a few fs. A pressure of ∼ 10 TPa, far exceeding the strength of any material, is created generating strong shock and rarefaction waves. This results in the formation of a nanovoid surrounded by a shell of shock-affected material inside undamaged crystal. Analysis of the size of the void and the shock-affected zone versus the deposited energy shows that the experimental results can be understood on the basis of conservation laws and be modeled by plasma hydrodynamics. Matter subjected to record heating and cooling rates of K/s can, thus, be studied in a well-controlled laboratory environment. 11

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 Extremely high pressures ( ∼ 10 TPa) and temperatures (5×10 5 K) have been produced using a single laser pulse (100 nJ, 800 nm, 200 fs) focused inside a sapphire crystal. The laser pulse creates an intensity over W/cm 2 converting material within the absorbing volume of ∼ 0.2 μm 3 into plasma in a few fs. A pressure of ∼ 10 TPa, far exceeding the strength of any material, is created generating strong shock and rarefaction waves. This results in the formation of a nanovoid surrounded by a shell of shock-affected material inside undamaged crystal. Analysis of the size of the void and the shock-affected zone versus the deposited energy shows that the experimental results can be understood on the basis of conservation laws and be modeled by plasma hydrodynamics. Matter subjected to record heating and cooling rates of K/s can, thus, be studied in a well-controlled laboratory environment. MicroexplosionsFemtoexplosions √s0.1 μJ 1 μJ ε10 17 J/m 3 5 GeV/fm 3 = J/m 3 T10 6 K200 MeV = K rate10 18 K/sec10 35 K/s Extremely high pressures ( ∼ 10 TPa) and temperatures (5×10 5 K) have been produced using a single laser pulse (100 nJ, 800 nm, 200 fs) focused inside a sapphire crystal. The laser pulse creates an intensity over W/cm 2 converting material within the absorbing volume of ∼ 0.2 μm 3 into plasma in a few fs. A pressure of ∼ 10 TPa, far exceeding the strength of any material, is created generating strong shock and rarefaction waves. This results in the formation of a nanovoid surrounded by a shell of shock-affected material inside undamaged crystal. Analysis of the size of the void and the shock-affected zone versus the deposited energy shows that the experimental results can be understood on the basis of conservation laws and be modeled by plasma hydrodynamics. Matter subjected to record heating and cooling rates of K/s can, thus, be studied in a well-controlled laboratory environment. energy quickly deposited transition to deconfined (plasma) phase hydrodynamic expansion cool back to confined (atomic) phase probe EoS under extreme conditions (√s dep.) 12

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 Extremely high pressures ( ∼ 10 TPa) and temperatures (5×10 5 K) have been produced using a single laser pulse (100 nJ, 800 nm, 200 fs) focused inside a sapphire crystal. The laser pulse creates an intensity over W/cm 2 converting material within the absorbing volume of ∼ 0.2 μm 3 into plasma in a few fs. A pressure of ∼ 10 TPa, far exceeding the strength of any material, is created generating strong shock and rarefaction waves. This results in the formation of a nanovoid surrounded by a shell of shock-affected material inside undamaged crystal. Analysis of the size of the void and the shock-affected zone versus the deposited energy shows that the experimental results can be understood on the basis of conservation laws and be modeled by plasma hydrodynamics. Matter subjected to record heating and cooling rates of K/s can, thus, be studied in a well-controlled laboratory environment. MicroexplosionsFemtoexplosions √s0.1 μJ 1 μJ ε10 17 J/m 3 5 GeV/fm 3 = J/m 3 T10 6 K200 MeV = K rate10 18 K/sec10 35 K/s Extremely high pressures ( ∼ 10 TPa) and temperatures (5×10 5 K) have been produced using a single laser pulse (100 nJ, 800 nm, 200 fs) focused inside a sapphire crystal. The laser pulse creates an intensity over W/cm 2 converting material within the absorbing volume of ∼ 0.2 μm 3 into plasma in a few fs. A pressure of ∼ 10 TPa, far exceeding the strength of any material, is created generating strong shock and rarefaction waves. This results in the formation of a nanovoid surrounded by a shell of shock-affected material inside undamaged crystal. Analysis of the size of the void and the shock-affected zone versus the deposited energy shows that the experimental results can be understood on the basis of conservation laws and be modeled by plasma hydrodynamics. Matter subjected to record heating and cooling rates of K/s can, thus, be studied in a well-controlled laboratory environment. energy quickly deposited transition to deconfined (plasma) phase hydrodynamic expansion cool back to confined (atomic) phase probe EoS under extreme conditions (√s dep.) examine final shape/size of system MicroexplosionFemtoexplosion measure geometry infer momentum measure momentum infer geometry 13

measuring lengths ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 C(Q out ) C(Q side ) C(Q long ) 1/R SIDE big R S typical “Gaussian” fitting function 14

measuring shape ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 C(Q out ) C(Q side ) C(Q long ) 1/R SIDE big R S small R S 15

measuring shape ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 out side 16

measuring shape ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 out side R 2 out-side < 0 more info. six “HBT radii” 17

Azimuthal dependence of HBT radii at RHIC ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 STAR, PRL (2004) Retiere&MAL PRC70 (2004)

Azimuthal dependence of HBT radii at RHIC ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 STAR, PRL (2004) “No-flow formula” estimated good within ~ 30% (low pT) Retiere&MAL PRC70 (2004) Mount et al, PRC84:014908,

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 Welcome to the machine It’s a bit more complicated than using a microscope like the femtosecond laser guys do... 20

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct (8) 3D corr. functions Welcome to the machine 21

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct (8) 3D corr. functions 4 (8) RP-corrected CFs Welcome to the machine 22

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct (8) 3D corr. functions 4 (8) RP-corrected CFs 4 (8) sets of 4 (6) radii Welcome to the machine 23

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct (8) 3D corr. functions 4 (8) RP-corrected CFs 4 (8) sets of 4 (6) radii 7 (9) Fourier Coefficients Welcome to the machine 24

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct (8) 3D corr. functions 4 (8) RP-corrected CFs 4 (8) sets of 4 (6) radii 7 (9) Fourier Coefficients 1 eccentricity estimate Welcome to the machine 25

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct (8) 3D corr. functions 4 (8) RP-corrected CFs 4 (8) sets of 4 (6) radii 7 (9) Fourier Coefficients 1 eccentricity estimate Welcome to the machine see, e.g. E. Mount et al PRC84:014908,2011 ~30% 26

Generic expectation ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct fm/c 4 fm/c 8 fm/c 6 fm/c 0 fm/c lifetime, “push” 27

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 An excitation function begging for more 2 fm/c 4 fm/c 8 fm/c 6 fm/c 0 fm/c non-monotonic excitation function of bulk observable? interesting in proposed scan region but: tilt issue – need 1 st -order plane in scan!! RHIC scan 28

A pleasant daydream ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 Focus on effect of EoS. Keep ε init and effective lifetime fixed ε ε init sound speed early “stiffness” 29

A pleasant daydream ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 Focus on effect of EoS. Keep ε init and effective lifetime fixed ε ε init sound speed early “stiffness” 30

Related? ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 Andronic arXiv:

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 An excitation function begging for more 2 fm/c 4 fm/c 8 fm/c 6 fm/c 0 fm/c non-monotonic excitation function of bulk observable? interesting in proposed scan region but: tilt issue – need 1 st -order plane in scan!! reminiscent of (unobserved) non-monotonic v2(root(s)) RHIC scan Sollfrank, Kolb, Heinz, nucl-th/

transport predictions (or “untuned postdictions”) ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 naive expectation: absent something special, monotonic decrease higher energy  more pressure  evolve to smaller ε F higher energy  longer lifetime  evolve to smaller ε F (hybrid models – special case) certainly no minimum Lisa et al, New J. Phys

10+ years of asHBT systematics ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct : E895/AGS PLB496 1 (2000)

10+ years of asHBT systematics ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct : E895/AGS PLB496 1 (2000) 2004: STAR/RHIC 200 GeV PRL (2004)

10+ years of asHBT systematics ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 !? Something special? : E895/AGS PLB496 1 (2000) 2004: STAR/RHIC 200 GeV PRL (2004) 2008: CERES/SPS PRC (2008)

10+ years of asHBT systematics ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 !? Something special? !? A real minimum? – speculation of P.T. (Lisa et al, New J. Phys 2011) : E895/AGS PLB496 1 (2000) 2004: STAR/RHIC 200 GeV PRL (2004) 2008: CERES/SPS PRC (2008) 2010 (WPCF Kiev): STAR/RHIC 62.4 GeV

10+ years of asHBT systematics ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 !? Something special? !? A real minimum? – speculation of P.T. (Lisa et al, New J. Phys 2011) !!!? A real sharp minimum at the “special” kink/horn/step energy? : E895/AGS PLB496 1 (2000) 2004: STAR/RHIC 200 GeV PRL (2004) 2008: CERES/SPS PRC (2008) 2010 (WPCF Kiev): STAR/RHIC 62.4 GeV 2011 (QM Annecy): STAR/RHIC 7.7, 11.5, 39 GeV arXiv:

10+ years of asHBT systematics ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct : E895/AGS PLB496 1 (2000) 2004: STAR/RHIC 200 GeV PRL (2004) 2008: CERES/SPS PRC (2008) 2010 (WPCF Kiev): STAR/RHIC 62.4 GeV 2011 (QM Annecy): STAR/RHIC 7.7, 11.5, 39 GeV arXiv: (WPCF Tokyo) STAR/RHIC 19.6 GeV 2011 (WPCF Tokyo) PHENIX/RHIC 200 GeV Soon: ALICE/LHC !? Something special? !? A real minimum? – speculation of P.T. (Lisa et al, New J. Phys 2011) !!!? A real sharp minimum at the “special” kink/horn/step energy? Uh-oh 39 PHENIX – WPCF 2011 (10-30%)

the beauty of a single, collider detector ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 Au+Au 39 GeVAu+Au 7.7 GeVAu+Au 200 GeV Identical techniques, systematics, acceptance... BUT: cannot get complacent Important measurement, and cross-checks are important, if we take data at all seriously. 40

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 can CERES and STAR be reconciled? at this point, the energies measured are too close to reasonably expect such a difference. What else could it be? different reaction-plane resolution correction technique? different centrality? different fitting parameters? different rapidity range? New J. Phys (2011) 41

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct (8) sets of 4 (6) radii 7 (9) Fourier Coefficients 1 eccentricity estimate Welcome to the machine 4 (8) 3D corr. functions 4 (8) RP-corrected CFs Reaction-plane resolution correction: STAR: RP resolution correction done bin-by-bin to correlation functions CERES: correction done to HBT radius parameters (similar to v2) (question to CERES: was finite bin-width also accounted for? (Δ/2)/sin(Δ/2)) ~5% effect) R. Wells PhD thesis (2002): methods yielded similar results in that case Reaction-plane resolution correction: STAR: RP resolution correction done bin-by-bin to correlation functions CERES: correction done to HBT radius parameters (similar to v2) (question to CERES: was finite bin-width also accounted for? (Δ/2)/sin(Δ/2)) ~5% effect) R. Wells PhD thesis (2002): methods yielded similar results in that case 42

RP resolution correction ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 very small effect in STAR analysis Similar at other energies No guarantee this will be true for any other experiment, but probably not the issue correcting CFs correcting radii 43

Centrality ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct % 10% 20%30%40%50% E895 CERES STAR

Centrality ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct % 10% 20%30%40%50% E895 CERES STAR

Centrality ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct % 10% 20%30%40%50% E895 CERES STAR

Centrality ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct % 10% 20%30%40%50% E895 CERES STAR

Centrality ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct % 10% 20%30%40%50% E895 CERES STAR

Fitting techniques ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct radii: symmetry [Phys. Rev. C66, (2002)] : vanish at y=0 no 1 st -order oscillations at any y, using 2 nd -order RP no symmetry rule against λ, oscillation, but keeping it fixed reduces #parameters small effect (maybe more than gut intuition?) 49

ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 can CERES and STAR be reconciled? at this point, the energies measured are too close to reasonably expect such a difference. What else could it be? different reaction-plane resolution correction technique? different centrality? different fitting parameters? different rapidity range?  presently under investigation in data (models may help, too) New J. Phys (2011) 50

summary & outlook ma lisa - Workshop On Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs - Brookhaven National Lab - Oct 2011 asHBT in HIC: probe for non-trivial structure on the QCD phase diagram unique, valuable information, but nontrivial analysis... models show significant sensitivity to important physics growing systematics of asHBT over the past decade intriguing possible minimum in ε(√s) not supported by preliminary STAR BES other than CERES point, slow gradual decrease of eccentricity with √s any possible structure would be remarkably narrow remarkable agreement with prediction of UrQMD PHENIX pions at 200 GeV agree with STAR PHENIX also reports kaons! outlook rapidity study in STAR in continuing attempt to understand CERES and develop systematic errors 1 st -order, 3 rd -order studies in STAR & PHENIX ongoing asHBT studies in ALICE 51