Em Griffin A First Look at Communication Theory 8 th edition © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Talk About Theory 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Traditions of Communication Theory  Multiple theories and perspectives will always characterize the field of communication studies.  Lacking a unifying.
Advertisements

Chapter The Supervisor as Leader A leader’s job is to make people’s strengths effective and their weaknesses irrelevant. —Peter Drucker 8.
Behind the welter of names – positivism, naturalism, post-positivism, relativism, feminist standpoint epistemology, foundationalism, postmodernism, each.
Don't forget to read the chapters in Foss too!
Chapter Three Building and Testing Theory. Building Theory Human Nature –Determinism: assumes that human behavior is governed by forces beyond individual.
 Rhetoric The rhetor, the rhetorician, and the rhetorical.
Qualitative Research Concepts
What is “College Writing”? Getting the Most Out of TS English Fall Quarter.
Business Communication Research Class 1 : What is Research? Leena Louhiala-Salminen, Spring 2013.
What is Philosophy? The investigation of causes and laws underlying reality Inquiry into the nature of things based on logical reasoning rather than empirical.
CHAPTER FIVE: THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings ELEVENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction to Psychology Chapter 1.
RESEARCH IN EDUCATION Chapter I. Explanations about the Universe Power of the gods Religious authority Challenge to religious dogma Metacognition: Thinking.
Sociological Research
Chapter 2 Objectives Explain why differences in perception occur
KRISTEN K. TISCIONE JUNE 2014 The History of Rhetoric.
Week 1, Class 2. The rhetorical triangle is a way of thinking about what's involved in any communication scenario. It involves three main parts: a rhetor.
McGraw-Hill © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Nature of Research Chapter One.
McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 1 SOCIOLOGY An Invitation to Sociology 1.
--- Hephizibah Roskelly and David A. Jolliffee, Everyday Use
Copyright 2006 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. Caring for School-Age Children Chapter 5 Development in Middle Childhood: Cognitive.
Basics of Argumentation Victoria Nelson, Ph.D.. What is an argument? An interpersonal dispute.
Literary Theory How Do I Evaluate a Text?.
FFocuses on language, structure, and tone IIntrinsic Reading vs. Extrinsic FFormalists study relationship between literary devices and meaning.
Introduction to Rhetoric
Chapter 3 CA 301 Chapter 3 Lecture Building and Testing Theory.
 Science A body of knowledge and the process for building that knowledge of the natural world. Based on inquiry that develops explanations and is rooted.
© 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 1 ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Quizzes added to syllabus First Quiz:ANTH : 9/25.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
Organizational Culture, Socialization, & Mentoring
Qualitative Research January 19, Selecting A Topic Trying to be original while balancing need to be realistic—so you can master a reasonable amount.
Biology and YouSection 2 Section 2: Scientific Methods Preview Bellringer Key Ideas Beginning a Scientific Investigation Scientific Experiments Scientific.
LITERARY THEORIES An Introduction to Literary Criticism.
Rhetoric In the study of rhetoric, the focus should be how a writer uses elements of language – diction, detail, image, tone, syntax, logical ordering,
What is Psychology? Chpt 1.
Em Griffin A First Look at Communication Theory 8 th edition © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Mapping the Territory (Seven Traditions.
Chapter Five Critical Perspectives on Theory Development Copyright © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
RECOGNIZING, ANALYZING, AND CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS
SCIENCE The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to identify and evaluate scientific methods and assumptions.
Week 5 -- Theory. Core Questions Who am I as a communicator? What resources enable me to communicate? How am I different from other communicators? How.
1CCT200 Week #10: RT Rhon Teruelle Class #9 – November 12, 2012 CCT200: Intercultural Communication Intercultural Communication in the Workplace Cross.
Effective Speech Communication
Advertising. u Advertising and propaganda are complex communication forms u They employ sophisticated and subtle methods of persuasion u they play to.
Copyright © 2013, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Interpersonal communication. defining the process of message transaction between people to create and sustain shared meaning.
6 Coordinated Management of Meaning (CMM) of W. Barnett Pearce & Vernon Cronen.
Chapter 2 Perspectives On Human Communication Human Communication in Society 3 rd Edition.
What is Research?. Intro.  Research- “Any honest attempt to study a problem systematically or to add to man’s knowledge of a problem may be regarded.
Inquiry II Cultural & Historical Interrogation.
© 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 1 Introduction to Research in Communication Research: –Process of asking questions.
What is rhetoric? What you need to know for AP Language.
The Idea of Theory Chapter Two. Communication Theory Theory defined Variations of theory How they are generated Type of research used How they are presented.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. Part One INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS RESEARCH.
Dramatism Of Kenneth Burke Identification: Without It, There is No Persuasion  Burke was less concerned with enthymeme and example than he was with.
Chapter 2 Culture & Intercultural Communication
Using Ethos, Pathos and Logos.  Rhetoric (n) - the art of speaking or writing effectively (Webster's Definition). According to Aristotle, rhetoric is.
© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3.
Talk About Theory Objective or Interpretation Chapter 2.
COMMUNICATION THEORY Chapter 1 or What is a theory?
What is an Analysis and how does it work? In this essay you will analyze.
Introduction to Rhetoric February 14 th, Defining “Rhetoric” What do you think it means? Have you heard this term? Consider these quotations: “Obama’s.
Communication Theory and Metatheory
Sociological Research
Sociological Analysis of Culture
Introduction to critical theory: Organizations, power, and rhetoric, pt. 1 Why Critical Theory? Eventually, we are going to examine and analyze communication.
Critical Theories.
Through Rose-Colored Glasses: The Feminist Lens
University of Northern IA
Chapter Fourteen The Persuasive Speech.
Strategies to Persuade Your
Presentation transcript:

Em Griffin A First Look at Communication Theory 8 th edition © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Talk About Theory 2

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Talk About Theory  Two Communication Scholars View a Diehard Fan Two Communication Scholars View a Diehard Fan  Objective or Interpretive: Sorting Out the Labels Objective or Interpretive: Sorting Out the Labels  Ways of Knowing: Discovering Truth of Creating Multiple Realities? Ways of Knowing: Discovering Truth of Creating Multiple Realities?  Human Nature: Determinism or Free Will? Human Nature: Determinism or Free Will?  The Highest Value: Objectivity or Emancipation? The Highest Value: Objectivity or Emancipation?  Purpose of Theory: Universal Laws or Interpretive Guides? Purpose of Theory: Universal Laws or Interpretive Guides?  Objective or Interpretive: Why Is It Important? Objective or Interpretive: Why Is It Important? Slide 2

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Talk About Theory  Glenn Sparks is a behavioral scientist –applies the scientific method to describe, predict, and explain recurring forms of human behavior  Marty Medhurst is a rhetorician – studies ways symbolic forms can be used to identify with people, or to persuade them to a certain point of view Slide 3

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Talk About Theory  Need to grasp crucial differences between the objective and interpretive approaches to communication Glenn Sparks: behavioral scientist, conducts experiments Marty Medhurst: rhetorician; interpret texts Slide 4

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Two Communication Scholars View a Diehard Fan  MasterCard “Priceless” campaign Ad Week: “Peyton Manning is one of the few superstar athletes who shows he can act in his commercials. We’ve seen his cheerleader- for-the-everyday guy before. This time he’s rooting for the waitress who drops her tray, the latte guy who’s burned by escaping steam, and the movers who let a piano escape down a hill. “That’s okay guys. They’re not saying ‘boo,’ they’re saying moooooovers.’” Slide 5

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Two Communication Scholars View a Diehard Fan  Glenn: An Objective Approach Objective approach – assumption that truth is singular and is accessible through unbiased sensory observation; committed to uncovering cause-and-effect relationships Slide 6

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Two Communication Scholars View a Diehard Fan  Glenn: An Objective Approach (continued) MasterCard convinced Manning’s celebrity appeal will rub off on the public image of their credit card Source credibility – perceived competence and trustworthiness of a speaker or writer that affects how the message is received Slide 7

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Two Communication Scholars View a Diehard Fan  Glenn: An Objective Approach (continued) Hovland and Weiss suggest that expertise and trustworthiness are two main ingredients of perceived credibility Slide 8

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Two Communication Scholars View a Diehard Fan  Glenn: An Objective Approach (continued) Kelman: when people forge a body of identification with a figure like Manning, they’ll gladly embrace his persuasive pitch Identification – perceived role relationship that affects self-image and attitudes; based on attractiveness of role model, and sustained if relationship remains salient Slide 9

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Two Communication Scholars View a Diehard Fan  Glenn: An Objective Approach (continued) Do viewers transfer Manning’s expertise from the gridiron to credit cards? “I would want an objective test to find out if celebrity appeals really work” –Is ad campaign followed by increase in new card applications or number of charges? –Test whether ad has same effect on viewers who do not know who Manning is Slide 10

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Two Communication Scholars View a Diehard Fan  Marty: An Interpretive Approach Interpretive approach – linguistic work of assigning meaning or value to communicative texts; assumes that multiple meanings or truths are possible Slide 11

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Two Communication Scholars View a Diehard Fan  Marty: An Interpretive Approach (continued) MasterCard uses Manning in an attempt to identify manliness with money Invites viewer to become part of “team” being instructed by “Coach” Manning Burke’s dramatistic pentad – five- pronged method of rhetorical criticism to analyze a speaker’s persuasive strategy – act, scene, agent, agency, purpose Slide 12

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Two Communication Scholars View a Diehard Fan  Marty: An Interpretive Approach (continued) Ad starts with confusion, moves through pain and destruction, and arrives at manliness, money, and acceptance Symbolic transformation has taken place Manning “coaching” the right attitude Symbolic equivalence established between being manly and being “in the money” Slide 13

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Objective or Interpretive: Sorting Out the Labels  Objective approach and interpretive approach to communication study clearly differ in starting point, method, and conclusion Glenn, social scientist who works hard to be objective Marty, rhetorical critic who does interpretive study Slide 14

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Objective or Interpretive: A Difference that Matters  Most interpretive scholars are humanists, but a growing number of postmodern communication theorists reject that tradition Humanistic scholarship – study of what it is like to be another person, in another time and place; assumes there are few important panhuman similarities Slide 15

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Objective or Interpretive: A Difference that Matters  Separate worldviews of interpretive scholars and scientists reflect contrasting assumptions about ways we arrive at knowledge, the core of human nature, questions of value, and the purpose and methods of research Slide 16

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Ways of Knowing: Discovering Truth or Creating Multiple Realities?  Epistemology – study of the origin, nature, method, and limits of knowledge Scientists assume Truth is singular Interpretive scholars regard truth as socially constructed through communication Slide 17

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Human Nature: Determinism or Free Will?  Determinism – assumption that behavior is caused by heredity and environment Scientists stress forces that shape human behavior (biology and environment) Interpretive scholars focus on conscious choices made by individuals Slide 18

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Highest Value: Objectivity or Emancipation?  Most social scientists place high value on objectivity that is not biased by ideological commitments  Interpretive scholars believe that ability to choose separates humanity from the rest of creation, and value scholarship that expands free choice (emancipation) Slide 19

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Highest Value: Objectivity or Emancipation?  Emancipation – liberation from political, economic, racial, religious, or sexual oppression; empowerment  Deetz claims that every general communication theory has two priorities – effectiveness and participation Slide 20

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Purpose of Theory: Universal Laws or Interpretive Guides?  As a behavioral scientist, Glenn works to pin down universal laws of human behavior that cover a variety of situations Theory testing is basic activity Slide 21

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Purpose of Theory: Universal Laws or Interpretive Guides?  As rhetorical critic, Marty strives to interpret a particular communication text in a specific context Explores web of meaning that constitutes human existence Slide 22

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Objective or Interpretive: Why Is It Important?  When you understand what each type of theorist is about, your comfort zone will expand and your confusion will diminish Metatheory: theory about theory; stated or inherent assumptions made when creating Both seek to improve society Slide 23

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Figure 2-2: Classification of Communication Theories According to Objective/Interpretive Worldview Slide 24