The 2 nd International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment July 13-16, 2003; Paris, France Selected and summarized by Douglas J.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide #1 HIV Entry Inhibitors Trip Gulick, MD, MPH Director, Cornell HIV Clinical Trials Unit Associate Professor of Medicine Weill Medical College of.
Advertisements

ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY Dr. Samuel Mwaniki (BPharm., MSc TID, UoN) University of Nairobi ISO 9001: Certified
Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV/r vs DRV/rATADAR. ATV/r 300/100 mg + TDF/FTC qd N = 91 N = 89 DRV/r 800/100 mg + TDF/FTC qd  Design Randomisation 1: 1 Open-label.
De Luca A 1,2, Bracciale L 1, Doino M 1, Fabbiani M 1, Sidella L 1, Marzocchetti A 1, Farina S 1, D’Avino A 1, Cauda R 1, Di Giambenedetto S 1 Safety and.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Antiretroviral Treatment Highlights of the 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) February 8-11, 2004; San Francisco, California.
Future ART options for HIV-infected children exposed to maternal HAART Lee Kleynhans Experts Roundtable June 2008.
Global HIV Resistance: The Implications of Transmission
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
When to Initiate ART in Adults and Adolescents (2009 WHO Guidelines) Target PopulationClinical conditionRecommendation Asymptomatic Individuals (including.
1 Review of Antiretroviral Therapy in Adults HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Highlights of the 42 nd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy September 27-30, 2002; San Diego, California Selected and summarized.
TO EVALUATE EARLY ANTIVIRAL RESPONSE AND SAFETY OF A DUAL BOOSTED PROTEASE INHIBITORS REGIMEN INCLUDING LOPINAVIR/r (LPV) PLUS AMPRENAVIR (AMP) OR FORTOVASE.
1 Introduction to ARV Therapy HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
1 RESIST Trials - Grade 3 or 4 AST, ALT or Total Bilirubin: Actions and Outcomes Action Taken: TPV/r N=748 CPI/r N=737 Total Number of Grade 3 or 4 ALT,
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
Highlights of the 43rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy (ICAAC) September 14-17, 2003; Chicago, Illinois Selected and summarized.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Prevention and Care Dr S Charalambous WHO guidelines.
02-15 INFC Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: The SPIRAL study* 1 Date of preparation:
A randomized open study comparing the impact of reducing stavudine dose vs. switching to tenofovir on mitochondrial function, metabolic parameters, and.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Potential Utility of Tipranavir in Current Clinical Practice Daniel R. Kuritzkes, MD Director of AIDS Research Brigham and Woman’s Hospital Division of.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Long-Term Comparison of Nevirapine Versus Efavirenz When Combined with Other Antiretroviral Drugs in HIV-1 Positive Antiretroviral-Naïve Persons- The NNRTI.
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
Slideset on: Gathe J, da Silva BA, Cohen DE, et al. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen is noninferior to twice-daily dosing and results in.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
Switch to low dose ATV/r  LASA Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 200 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E) ; non-inferiority.
Tipranavir/Ritonavir Superior to Comparator PI/Ritonavir at Week 48 in Multiclass-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Hicks CB, Cahn P, Cooper DA, et al.
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
EFV versus ATV + RTV, both with ABC-3TC or TDF-FTC ACTG 5202
XVI International AIDS Conference
ART 101 Successful HIV treatment usually consists of at least three drugs from two different “classes” of ARV drugs There are now six classes of ARV drugs:
LPV-RTV versus LPV-RTV + ZDV-3TC in Treatment-Naïve MONARK Trial
St Stephen’s Centre, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, United Kingdom
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Presentation transcript:

The 2 nd International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment July 13-16, 2003; Paris, France Selected and summarized by Douglas J. Ward, MD Dupont Circle Physicians Group Washington, DC Supported by an unrestricted educational grant from

Highlights of 2 nd IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment New Data On: Salvage therapy Approaches to initial/early therapy Complications of antiretroviral therapy Preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission HIV drug resistance New and investigational drugs

Salvage Therapy (1) Enfuvirtide (ENF) – 48-Week Data 48-week data were presented from the TORO 1 and TORO 2 studies, which enrolled heavily treatment-experienced patients: median 12 previous antiretrovirals including all 3 available classes median baseline viral load 5.1 log 10 copies/mL and CD4+ cell count 92 cells/mcL Patients were randomized to receive: an optimized background antiretroviral regimen (OB) of 3-5 agents based on genotypic and phenotypic resistance tests (total n = 334), or OB plus ENF 90 mg twice daily by subcutaneous injection (total n = 661) 24-week data previously presented Abstract LB2.

Salvage Therapy (1) Continued Enfuvirtide (ENF) – 48-Week Data The results show that ENF (versus OB only) can be administered safely, durably and with sustained virologic effects in heavily pretreated patients: % patients achieving < 400 copies/mL at 48 weeks: 30.4 vs 12 (P <.0001) Median time (weeks) to virologic failure: 32 vs 11 (P <.0001) Local injection-site reactions were observed in > 90% of ENF patients – Cause of discontinuation in 4.4% Increased incidence of bacterial pneumonia observed in the ENF arm (6.6 vs 0.6 events per 100 person-years) – Relationship to ENF unexplained Abstract LB2.

Salvage Therapy (2) Enfuvirtide (ENF) – Predictors of Response in TORO 1 & 2 Trials A separate multiple logistic regression analysis of 24-week data. Four characteristics were identified that positively influenced response to ENF: viral load < 100,000 copies/mL at baseline CD4+ cell count > 100 cells/mcL at baseline prior experience with < 10 antiretrovirals > 2 active agents in the OB In the presence of all 4 factors, patients had an 80% chance of achieving viral suppression to < 50 copies/mL. Abstract 116.

Salvage Therapy (3) Factors Contributing to HAART Success – PLATO Collaboration 2488 patients from 13 HIV cohorts with viral load > 1000 copies/mL for > 4 months All had received NRTIs, NNRTIs, and PIs, sequentially or in combination Baseline: CDC/C, 52%; median CD4+ cell count, 199 cells/mcL; median viral load (VL), 4.5 log 10 copies/mL; median duration ART/ HAART 4.7/2.5 years, respectively At 2 years, 17% (95% CI: 15-19) had experienced virologic success (viral load 6 months) Independent predictors (Cox regression) of success: more recent calendar year (related to new agents and physician experience), adding 1-2 new drugs Negative predictors: being off therapy, time off PIs with VL > 1000 Abstract 576.

Salvage Therapy (3) Continued Factors Contributing to HAART Success Independent predictors of virologic successHazard ratio (95% CI) Calendar year (reference: 1996/1997) ( ) 2.6 ( ) 6.8 ( ) Being off treatment0.09 ( ) Adding 1 new PI3.0 ( ) Adding 2 new PIs simultaneously4.1 ( ) Adding 1 new NRTI1.4 ( ) Adding 2 new NRTIs2.4 ( ) Adding a new NNRTI1.5 ( ) Baseline viral load (per log 10 higher)0.69 ( ) Ever achieved viral load < 500 until baseline1.5 ( ) Time on PIs with viral load > 1000 (per year)0.49 ( ) Abstract 576.

Salvage Therapy (4) Multi-PI Regimens in Heavily Treatment-Experienced Patients – ATV/r vs ATV+SQV vs LPV/r (BMS 045) A randomized, open-label trial comparing: once-daily atazanavir (ATV) + ritonavir (r) once-daily ATV + saquinavir (SQV) twice-daily lopinavir (LPV) + r Enrolled patients had at least 2 regimen failures, which included drugs from all 3 antiretroviral classes. Abstract 118.

Salvage Therapy (4) Continued 24-week response to double PIs ATZ = atazanavir, LPV = lopinavir, r = 100 mg of ritonavir, SQV = saquinavir. Virologic efficacy was comparable in all arms. Both ATV groups had significantly better cholesterol and triglyceride levels after 24 weeks than the group taking LPV/r. Saquinavir dose in ATV/SQV is likely insufficient. ATZ/rATV + SQVLPV/r + SQV n Mean drop in viral load (log 10 copies/mL) < 400 copies/mL (%) < 50 copies/mL (%) CD4+ gain (cells/mcL) Abstract 118.

Approaches to Initial/Early Therapy (1) Triple-NRTI Regimens: ACTG 5095 A randomized, double-blind-label trial enrolling 1147 ART-naive patients: Mean baseline viral load: 4.85 log 10 copies/mL; mean baseline CD4+ cell count: 238 cells/mcL Patients randomized to Combivir + efavirenz (EFV), Trizivir + EFV, or Trizivir Data Safety Monitoring Board stopped Trizivir (alone) arm after 32 weeks due to virologic failure rates Abstract 41.

Approaches to Initial/Early Therapy (1) Continued Virologic Failure Rates in ACTG 5095 *Virologic failure defined as confirmed viral load > 200 copies/mL after 16 weeks of treatment. † P <.001 Higher failure rate seen in patients with viral load both 100,000 copies/mL RegimenVirologic Failure*, n (%) EFV arms (combined unblinded data) 85 (11) Trizivir arm 82 (21) † Abstract 41.

Approaches to Initial/Early Therapy (2) Triple-NRTI Regimens: 3TC + ABC + TDF Once Daily Pilot study of lamivudine (3TC) + abacavir (ABC) + tenofovir (TDF), all given once daily (dosing ABC once daily remains investigational) 19 ART-naive patients. Mean baseline CD4+ cell count and viral load were 273 cells/mcL and 82,381 copies/mL, respectively 14 of 19 (73.7%) patients experienced virologic failure; 9 of 14 (64.3%) had significant resistance mutations, including 4 with both M184V and K65R Abstract 43.

Approaches to Initial/Early Therapy (3) Induction-Maintenance Strategy 448 ART-naive patients; median baseline CD4+ cell count and viral load were 210 cells/mcL and 5.08 log 10 copies/mL, respectively All patients received induction therapy with Trizivir + efavirenz (EFV) for 48 weeks 166 (37%) of patients discontinued, more than half due to adverse events associated with quadruple therapy Viral suppression to < 50 copies/mL was achieved in 90% of patients who remained on therapy at 48 weeks The 282 patients were randomized 1:1 to continue original regimen or switch to simplified maintenance therapy with Trizivir alone The investigators will study whether this approach to NRTI-only, “step-down” therapy is practicable. Abstract 42.

Approaches to Initial/Early Therapy (4) Treatment Simplification Prospective, open-label study of 355 NNRTI-naive patients with sustained virologic suppression (< 400 copies/mL) on a PI-based regimen Patients were randomized to continue (C) on their current treatment (usually including either nelfinavir or indinavir) or change to once-daily (OD) efavirenz/didanosine/emtricitabine (FTC), taken as 5 tablets in 1 nighttime administration Over 1 year, 36 patients discontinued therapy, equally distributed between the OD and C groups Of the remaining patients, 93% in the OD arm and 95% in the C arm maintained virologic suppression 45% of OD patients experienced HDL increases > 57.7 mg/dL (1.5 mM), compared with 18% of patients receiving PI-based therapy Abstract 37.

Approaches to Initial/Early Therapy (5) Alternating Therapy (SWATCH Study) The SWATCH study was designed to evaluate whether the development of resistance can be delayed by proactively switching ARV regimens. 161 patients were randomized to receive stavudine (d4T) + didanosine (ddI) + efavirenz (EFV) or zidovudine (ZDV) + lamivudine (3TV) + nelfinavir (NFV), or were assigned to alternate between the 2 regimens every 3 months (regimens A, B and C, respectively) Baseline CD4+ cell counts and plasma viral loads were comparable in all arms Data from A and B arms pooled for analysis vs arm C Abstract LB5.

Approaches to Initial/Early Therapy (5) Continued Alternating Therapy (SWATCH Study) At 48 weeks, there was no difference between arms in CD4+ cell count increases, adverse events, or adherence There was a significantly lower rate of virologic failure and development of resistance-associated mutations among patients receiving regimen C compared with patients receiving regimens A or B: – Rate of virologic failure (HIV RNA > 400 copies/mL) was 1.2 vs 4.8 events/1000 person-weeks (P =.01) – Of 15 cases of virologic breakthrough in the pooled A and B treatment arms, 12 (79%) exhibited evidence of drug resistance – No (0%) cases of virologic breakthrough in the C treatment arm showed any evidence of drug resistance Abstract LB5.

Complications of ARV Therapy (1) Incidence/Risk Factors for Severe Adverse Events (SAEs) on PIs Multicenter cohort of 1155 patients started on PIs between May 1997 and June 1998; median follow-up 23 months (2037 patient-years) Grade 3-4 events (except lipodystrophy) prospectively reported; validated by 2 experts 550 SAEs reported; 235 and 169 related to ART and PI, respectively 20% occurred in first 1 month of therapy; 51% in first 4 months Abstract 56.

Complications of ARV Therapy (1) Continued Risk Factors for SAEs on PIs *Multivariate proportional hazard model Factor resulting in  risk for SAE Hazard ratio* (95% CI)P value Creatine clearance < 70 mL/min2.11 ( ).007 Increased ASAT (per 100 UI/L)1.6 ( ).0001 Hepatitis B and/or C coinfection2.56 ( ).0001 HIV RNA > 100,000 copies/mL1.54 ( ).03 Indinavir initiation at baseline1.69 ( ).008 Abstract 56.

Complications of ARV Therapy (2) Baseline Predictors of Change in Body Fat at 48 Weeks After Switching d4T  ABC or AZT (TARHEEL Study) Patients with viral load 6 months; with lipoatrophy, hyperlactatemia, or both d4T switched to abacavir (ABC) (n = 86) or zidovudine (ZDV) (n = 32); DEXA/CT assessed  in body fat Changes in Body Fat Distribution (results by DEXA) In multivariate logistic regression analysis: Decrease in visceral abdominal fat (CT) associated with baseline lactate, visceral fat Increase in subcutaneous abdominal fat (CT) associated with baseline BMI Body area Body Fat , g (%) Arms239 (35.3%) Legs269 (12%) Trunk859 (16.4%) Abstract 51.

Adverse Events of ARV Therapy (3) Rosiglitazone for Patients With Hyperinsulinemia and Lipoatrophy Patients with lipoatrophy and hyperinsulinemia First 3 months: patients randomized to rosiglitazone 4 mg/d or placebo Next 3 months (open-label): all patients received rosiglitazone 8 mg/d Insulin markers primary study end point Abstract 50.

Adverse Events of ARV Therapy (3) Continued Changes in Markers of Hyperinsulinemia and Lipoatrophy *P <.02 Significant self-reported improvement in lipoatrophy, even during blinded phase of trial During open-label period, insulin sensitivity among rosiglitazone-treated patients continued to show improvement (P =.01), as did SAT MeasureRosiglitazone, 4 mgPlacebo Change in glucose utilization, mg glucose/kg LBM per minute * Change in total cholesterol, mg/dL Change in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), %+15<1 Abstract 50.

Preventing Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission The SIMBA (Stopping Infection from Mother-to-child via Breastfeeding in Africa) Trial HIV-infected pregnant women received zidovudine (ZDV) +didanosine (ddI) from the 36 th week of gestation until 1 week after delivery 397 infants were randomized to receive once-daily lamivudine (3TC) or nevirapine (NVP) until 1 month after breastfeeding was stopped; breast milk was the only source of nutrition to the infant Overall, there were 30 cases of HIV infection (7.6% transmission); 24 cases resulted from intrauterine transmission; 3 cases were probably due to transmission during delivery Of the remaining 370 infants at risk of becoming infected, only 3 (0.8%) became HIV-positive Both 3TC and NVP were equally effective No significant drug-related toxicity was observed Abstract LB7.

HIV Drug Resistance Primary Drug Resistance – The CATCH Study The CATCH study evaluated the rate of primary drug resistance in a number of European countries and Israel Isolates from over 1600 patients were genotyped Overall rate of genotypic resistance was 9.6% NRTIs had the highest rate (6.7%), followed by NNRTIs (2.6%) and PIs (2.2%) 1.7% of isolates demonstrated multiclass resistance The most common mutations are significant in conferring reduced susceptibility to agents such as: – Zidovudine and stavudine (M41V, T215F/Y) – NNRTIs (K103N) – PIs (M46I, G48V, I84V) A higher rate of primary resistance was observed in subtype B vs non-B isolates (11.3% vs 3.3%, P <.001) Abstract LB1.

Data on Selected New and Investigational Agents Agent/Stage of Development Drug Class Abstract No. Comment SPD754 (Phase I/II) NRTILB15All of 4 doses ( mg) were well tolerated, and produced mean reductions in viral load of up to 1.65 log. Has potent activity against isolates with most of the common NRTI resistance mutations except for Q151M. GW (908), Phase 3 PI55848-week studies: 908/RTV (1400 mg/200 mg QD + NRTIs, n = 322): No APV-associated mutations detected. PI & 3TC resistance significantly  in 908/RTV arm compared with NFV arm. Atazanavir (Reyataz), FDA licensed PILB13Metabolic substudy of the pivotal BMS-043 trial demonstrated no significant differences in body fat distribution vs efavirenz.

Data on Selected New and Investigational Agents (continued) Agent/Stage of Development Drug Class Abstract No. Comment Atazanavir (Reyataz), FDA licensed PI54348-week results of patients who had switched from a BID PI-based regimen to a QD regimen of ATV/3TC/d4T XR. 22 subjects were well suppressed prior to switching. 18 patients completed 1 year of QD therapy. Virologic suppression was maintained, mean CD4+ cell counts increased by 86 cells/mcL and lipid profiles improved. No acceleration in decay of cells harboring proviral DNA was observed, however. Tipranavir, Phase 3 PI9This study calculated the inhibitory quotients (IQs) of the TPV/r combination in patients with previous experience with all 3 ARV classes. Patients with IQ of > 50 had reduced virologic response. 67% of patients reached IQ> 50. TMC114, Phase 2 PILB16 50 patients on a failing PI regimen substituted TMC114 at 1 of 3 doses along with low-dose (100 mg) ritonavir. After 14 days, the median reduction in viral load was log. Gastrointestinal upset was the most common side effect. A small number of patients had AST elevations.