Copyright PMunday 20081 Cleaning it Up: The Role of Culture, Community & Values Pat Munday, PhD Professor of Science & Technology Studies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
June 6, 2013 SURFACE RECLAMATION OF THE CAPTAIN JACK MILL SUPERFUND SITE Nick Anton, CDM Smith Todd Bragdon, CDM Smith Mary Boardman, CDPHE Joy Jenkins,
Advertisements

Antidegradation Demonstration: Alternatives Analysis Analysis WHAT IS IN THIS PAPER- Distinguish between need and necessity Recognize three general types.
1 BoRit Asbestos & The Superfund Process Stacie Peterson, Remedial Project Manager (RPM)
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
Eagle Mine and River Cleanup By Kathryn Adams Environmental Policy 333 December 2006.
1 Presented by: Glenn Kistner USEPA Region 9 Brownfields Program Brownfields & Superfund For Tribes Overview.
Copyright PMunday Historical Preservation, Environmental Cleanup, and the Restoration Economy Pat Munday, PhD Professor of Science & Technology Studies.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
INTRODUCTION TO THE USE OF CERCLA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS USDA FOREST SERVICE Grants and Agreements Workshop February 28, 2002 Great Falls,
Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1
+ Water Quality & Human Health: From Arsenic Exposure to Biological Response Understanding how contaminants move through the environment UNC Superfund.
Ecological Revitalization: Turning Contaminated Properties Into Community Assets Michele Mahoney EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.
MILLTOWN SUPERFUND SITE MISSOULA COUNTY, MT Geol Michael Armstrong & Heather Pung.
WATER AND THE BALKANS peace, democracy and cooperation between people IP Borders, Mobilities, Identities:European educational action Madrid 17 th july.
June 23, 2007 Alternatives Brainstorming Workshop Brisbane Baylands Specific Plan EIR.
Upper Blackfoot Mining Complex
Fourth Grade Social Studies Guiding Questions. Unit 1: Map Skills-Examining the United States’ Place in the World 1.Can students identify and interpret.
1 Natural Resource Damages (NRD) – James Woolford Director – Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office/OSWER NGA – Federal Facilities Task Force.
Georgia Power Community & Economic Development. What is it? Most simply, it is the creation of wealth. Economic Development.
U.S. Environmental History 1965 Solid Waste Disposal Act (WSDA) 1976 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) – Identification of wastes (characteristics.
Policymaking for Health Care and the Environment Chapter 19.
Solid Waste Laws. Federal Legislation RCRA (1976)- The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) CERCLA (1980) –The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
Berkeley Pit The Deadly Mine of Butte, Montana. The Pit The Town County Seat of Silver Bow County, Montana One of the largest and most notorious copper.
Date: April 14, 2011 Topic: Policy Making for Health Care and the Environment. Aim: How does the government form opinions on health care and the environment?
Definitions for Environmental Reclamation, Remedy, and Restoration.
Economic Opportunities from Environmental Harms: The Passaic River Example Bill Jackson
Spectron Superfund Site Proposed Plan Contaminated Shallow Soils U.S. EPA Region III June 26, 2003 Philadelphia, PA Robert J. Sanchez US EPA - Remedial.
Portland Harbor Superfund Site. Overview of Statutes CERCLA - Federal law –Provides EPA with authority for clean up –Provides for liability, compensation,
Centennial of the Clark Fork’s Great Flood June 1908 – June 2008.
The Evolution of Mining Reclamation and Regulation in the San Juan Mountains Mark Walker Technical Assistance to Brownfields (TAB) Program May 29, 2015.
  16 th Annual OSC Readiness Training Program Community Involvement Case Study – Standard Mine Gina Cristiano R8 Emergency Planning.
How do we define the underlying principles of American government? LESSON 1 Principles of Government.
Coastal Brownfields: At the Water’s Edge Panel: Waterfront Revitalization and Marine Transportation.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
Pmunday copyright “ Clark Fork Revival: Remedy & Restoration at America’s largest Superfund site ” Pat Munday, PhD
Frank Avvisato, EPA Superfund Redevelopment Initiative Reuse Planning and Regional Seeds.
Chapter 39 Environmental Law. 2  Under what common law theories may polluters be held liable?  What is an environmental impact statement? What is the.
Ned Black, US EPA R9 CERCLA Ecologist channeling John Hillenbrand, US EPA R9 CERCLA Mining Coordinator Cordero.
Munday copyright Bound for Glory: An Environmental History of Anacaonda, Montana Pat Munday, PhD.
Implementing Greener Cleanups through ASTM's Standard Guide Webinar Introduction November 17, Carlos S Pachon Superfund Program US Environmental.
Providing Safe Waterfowl Feeding Habitat in Toxic Floodplains
Coeur d’Alene Basin TLG Repository PFT meeting December 9, 2003.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  Founded by U.S. government (under Richard Nixon) in 1970  William Ruckleshaus was first EPA administrator  a.
Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design and Cleanup Plans September 2014.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
Hazardous Waste Management Legislation RCRA – Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Regulate management and disposal of wastes currently being produced.
The Strategy – PRERED, Forum outcomes Pablo Torrealba.
© Copyright IBM Corporation 2009 Advanced Learning Institute December 2009 Obama Administration: A Status Update on Its Open Government Initiative John.
FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF OSLO The principle of integration and its dilemmas Hans Chr. Bugge Professor of Environmental Law University of Oslo.
The Dalles, Industrial Certification Northwest Aluminum Company The Dalles, Oregon Douglas C. MacCourt Ater Wynne LLP US German Bilateral Working.
Silver Bow Creek: A History of Use, Abuse and Reuse Presented By: Montana Natural Resource Damage Program.
OPENING APRIL 21, 2016 America’s First Earth Day The paragraph below tells about a special date in April history. Can you find and mark ten errors in the.
Former Spellman Engineering Site Project Update Meeting March 18, 2008 William C. Denman, P.E. Remedial Project Manager (404)
Uranium in Colorado: Past, Present, and Potential Future
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
SILVER BOW CREEK HEADWATERS PARK. SILVER BOW CREEK HEADWATERS PARK.
TIME CRITICAL REMOVAL ACTION IN RESPONSE TO CONTAMINATED SOILS ALONG THE EASTSIDE DITCH NEAR DEER LODGE, MONTANA G.S. Vandeberg1, D.J. Dollhopf1, D.R.
Environmental Studies Program
NRDA Statutory Elements And Defenses
Chapter 5: Political Parties Opener
Sora Oyaizu Bodas, Period 6 5/2/18
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 1986, 1990 (Superfund) Operated by the EPA The CERCLA provides a Federal.
UNC Superfund Research Program
Major NRD Settlements in Montana
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Hazardous Waste Management
Presentation transcript:

copyright PMunday Cleaning it Up: The Role of Culture, Community & Values Pat Munday, PhD Professor of Science & Technology Studies

copyright PMunday America’s Largest Superfund Site

copyright PMunday Montana NRDP Silver Bow Creek (before)

copyright PMunday NRDP Photo Toxic Wasteland

copyright PMunday NRDP Photo Tailings Removal

copyright PMunday NRDP Photo Stream Reconstruction

copyright PMunday M Vincent photo Authentic Restoration

copyright PMunday Timeline of Superfund Process 1980: Superfund (CERCLA, NPL) 1982: Silver Bow Creek studied; NPL : in-depth studies; alternatives developed (state as lead agency) 1994: Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (up to $87 mill for remedy) 1995: Record of Decision 1999: NRD settlement

copyright PMunday Public Participation: Overview Phase I: “The Fourth Branch” ( ) –The Montana Standard (Foote and O’Brien) –U.S. Representative Pat Williams –Inception of “the restoration economy” Phase II: “Thick Democracy,” –EPA realizes obligation for public participation –Rise & fall of CTEC (“Citizens Technical Environmental Committee”) TAG –Competition with B-SB

copyright PMunday Estimated Cost (1995 dollars) for Alternative Remedies Proposed Remedy Millions of Dollars

copyright PMunday Key Issues STARS –“Streambank Tailings and Revegetation Studies:” in situ treatment –Reclamation Research Unit, MSU + Schafer & Associates Waste repository –Many small vs. one large regional (Opportunity or Browns Gulch) –Initial ROD: many small repositories…

copyright PMunday Alternatives “Remedies” The Greenway –MERDI (ARCO-funded) –Suspicion of co-option Supported by BLDC, ALDC, BSB Chamber of Commerce, B-SB & A-DL government –Little explicit public support (18/321) ARCO Alternative –Little public support (18/321)

copyright PMunday Support re: “Greenway” Don Peoples, MERDI “…[the proposed alternative] seems unreasonable and dangerous… [It] eliminates the likelihood that ARCO will participate in the building of a greenway.”

copyright PMunday Public Suspicion re: “Greenway” George Waring, CTEC “…the MERDI “Greenway” proposal has introduced an element of major confusion” “…local governments appeared to be basing their non-acceptance of the State’s proposed cleanup mainly on the political activity and all-out public relations campaign undertaken by MERDI and ARCO.”

copyright PMunday Public Participation in ROD CTEC’s public meetings, newsletters 321 total comments STARS: 36 for; 144 against Waste repository: Public comment favored Berkeley Pit/Yankee Doodle Tailings Pond; opposed Brown’s Gulch Majority (174/321) for Alt. 6 or 7 Organizations commenting: 31

copyright PMunday Record of Decision State preferred Alternative 6 Alt. 6 chosen (with initial changes + more w/ NRDP)

copyright PMunday Actor Network Theory

copyright PMunday Actor Network Theory

copyright PMunday Actor Network Theory

copyright PMunday Actor Network Theory

copyright PMunday Actor Network Theory

copyright PMunday Actor Network Theory

copyright PMunday Actor Network Theory

copyright PMunday Actor Network Theory

copyright PMunday Grassroots Alliances CTEC (Butte) CLEJ (Butte)MEIC (Helena) CF-POC (Missoula) MTAC (Missoula) MT-TU (Missoula) TU-WC (Missoula) MTWF (Helena) NWF SSAI (Butte)

copyright PMunday Participation: Culture & Values Usual Frame –Utilitarianism vs. Environmentalism –Utilitarianism as economic, corporate model: “nature” is just another resource to be used as we see fit –Environmentalism: ecocentric, or nature-for-nature’s sake Another Frame: Cultural History & Politics –Butte’s “above/below ground” perspective –Grassroots similar to union solidarity Butte vs. other Superfund sites, e.g. Silver Valley

copyright PMunday The author thanks the National Science Foundation for supporting this work (Award ID ). Questions? America’s largest Superfund site Silver Bow Creek Superfund timeline Public participation—overview Key issues Alternative “remedies” Public participation in ROD Actor Network Theory Participation—culture & values