ATOS Analysis of Technical & Organisational Safety for major-accident prevention Risk analysis method integrating both technical and organisational factors.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
Advertisements

Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Integra Consult A/S Safety Assessment. Integra Consult A/S SAFETY ASSESSMENT Objective Objective –Demonstrate that an acceptable level of safety will.
Future Trends on Student Involvement in Quality Assurance Agencies
Application of the PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT in Piedmont Region.
General Presentation of the Project
Confernece on transport, energy and environmental issues Dr. Gerhard Kuschnig, Vienna Waterworks Dr. Slobodan Miko, Croatian Geological Survey Vienna/
Module N° 7 – Introduction to SMS
Accident and Incident Investigation
Major Accident Prevention Policy (MAPP) and Safety Management System (SMS) in the Context of the Seveso II Directive.
E-OCVM (Version 2) Explained Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Alistair Jackson EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
Soft Systems Methodology
Introduction to Soft Systems Methodology
Aviation Safety, Security & the Environment: The Way Forward Vince Galotti Chief/Air Traffic Management ICAO Safety and Efficiency An ICAO Perspective.
Professional Development: Problems and Perspectives Danguolė Subačienė Manager of Personnel Training Division National Audit Office of Lithuania.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO HELP ENSURE FINANCIAL INTEGRITY.
Slide 1 OHSI Presentation on Risk Profile Kimberley Turner Chief Executive Officer Aerosafe Risk Management EXHIBIT/P
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
1 SOFTWARE PRODUCTION. 2 DEVELOPMENT Product Creation Means: Methods & Heuristics Measure of Success: Quality f(Fitness of Use) MANAGEMENT Efficient &
HAZARD AND RISK ASSESSMENT. Today’s Session 1.Taking a look at hazard and risk assessment. 2. Definitions. 3.What hazard and risk management does for.
Safety Hazard Identification on Construction Projects Gregory Carter1 and Simon D. Smith2 ASCE, February 2006.
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Quality Risk Management ICH Q9 Annex I: Methods & Tools
Romaric GUILLERM Hamid DEMMOU LAAS-CNRS Nabil SADOU SUPELEC/IETR ESM'2009, October 26-28, 2009, Holiday Inn Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
FAA ICAO ANNEX 6 PROPOSAL & OVERSIGHT ISSUES IN DISPATCH
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Evgeny A. Gorbunov, General Director, Union of Aviation Industrialists
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
1 Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına Yönelik Teknik Yardım Technical Assistance.
EuropeAid/131555/C/SER/RS Major Accident Prevention Policy Safety Management System Ernst SIMON, Styrian Regional Government, Austria Belgrade, December.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
SMS Operation.  Internal safety (SMS) audits are used to ensure that the structure of an SMS is sound.  It is also a formal process to ensure continuous.
Towards an activity-oriented and context-aware collaborative working environments Presented by: Ince T Wangsa Supervised by:
George Firican ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
ISO 9000 & TOTAL QUALITY ISO 9000 refers to a group of quality assurance standards established by the International Organization for Standardization.This.
Scenario Based Auditing
Centro de Estudos e Sistemas Avançados do Recife PMBOK - Chapter 4 Project Integration Management.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Environmental Business Support in the UK : Providing Added Value to Business Progress Towards Sustainability? Frances Hines BRASS Cardiff University.
Lecture Topics covered CMMI- - Continuous model -Staged model PROCESS PATTERNS- -Generic Process pattern elements.
University of Palestine Dept. of Urban Planning Introduction to Planning ( EAGD 3304 ) M.A. Architect: Tayseer Mushtaha Mob.:
PREPARED BY MS. ROSITA ARMAN MICHAEL ANNIAH MBA IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT (UTM) BA. ESTATE MANAGEMENT (UITM)
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
Bratislava april Preparation of an inspection plan: The Dutch approach Theo de Gelder Senior Inspector Regional Inspectorate South-West Dutch Ministry.
11th International Symposium Loss Prevention 2004 Prague Ľudovít JELEMENSKÝ Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, STU BRATISLAVA, SLOVAKIA.
Minerals Industry Safety and Health Centre The University of Queensland What works best at improving mine worker safety and why does it work Carmel Bofinger.
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN APPLICATION OF THE SEVESO II DIRECTIVE LESSONS LEARNT FROM IMPLEMENTATION IN SMEs O. Salvi, I. Vuidart, M. Caumont, F. Prats.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
PLC Workshop at ITER, 4-5 th of December 2014 A. Nordt, ESS, Lund/Sweden.
The Risk Management Process
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Smart Home Technologies
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 5 Slide 1 Project management.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Defence in Depth Safety Culture Lecturer.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
Gdansk International Air & Space Law Conference November 2013 Authority and Organisation Requirements “effective management systems for authorities and.
Toward a New ATM Software Safety Assessment Methodology dott. Francesca Matarese.
The Context of Reliability Theory in Engineering Systems David Blockley University of Bristol Bristol UK by.
Evolving Best Practice in Governance Policy Developing Consumer Confidence in Risk Analysis Applied to Emerging Technologies Department of food science.
Thoughts on IT Enterprise Architecture Maturity Models for the
An Overview on Risk Management
Project Integration Management
HSE Case: Risk Based Approach.
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
Planning process in river basin management
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT.
Contingency Planning for Accidental Surface Water Pollution​ GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-705) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule sets specific requirements to be.
Presentation transcript:

ATOS Analysis of Technical & Organisational Safety for major-accident prevention Risk analysis method integrating both technical and organisational factors and using safety performance indicators ---- J-C. LE COZE, F. PRATS, O. SALVI Institut National de l ’Environnement Industriel et des Risques Parc Technologique Alata, BP 2, F Verneuil-en-Halatte, France Phone: , fax: , Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 1. The theoritical approach of ATOS 2. How to use the concept The context High complexity of organisations Difficulty to read through this complexity in order to foresee major accidents Need for a good safety climate/culture Need for a structured management system Need for indicators on the level of organisational efficiency for major accident prevention The following model describes how those constraints should be integrated in ATOS. First of all, the organisation is seen as the interaction of three elements. The technical (tools, equipment…), the system (act ivities, processes, procedures) and the people. The SMS is described as the structural aspect of the organisation, in other words, the treacability of the prevention system in place, called the FORMAL. The Human Factor is approached from the sociological angle, using a tool called “l’analyse stratégique” that aimed at assessing the organisation efficiency, integrating power plays and cultural aspects of the organisation. This represents the INFORMAL side of the organisation. Several types of organisations exist as described in figure 1. If we consider the positive assumption that various types of organisations can reach a high level of prevention efficiency, then we can represent them on a scale taking into account two parameters: 1. The quantity of INFORMAL activities happening everyday on site for the major accident prevention and the quantity of FORMAL activities described in the SMS. In the case of the European Directive SEVESO 2, the regulation imposes that the FORMAL side meet at least the SMS specifications described in the annexe 3 of the directive. The minimum balance is therefore to meet those specifications and to be able to demonstrate (paper focused) that the system exists and performs. 2. As the oil in an engine, the INFORMAL side must support the effective implementation and operability of the structure. If the oil is not appropriate, even with a good engine, the chance to reach high motor’s performance is low. It is the same with an appropriate oil used for a bad designed engine. Somehow, a balance is required between a good FORMAL activity (meeting the requirements of a good safety management system) and an INFORMAL activity (meeting the requirements of a sociological definition of the organisational efficiency) toward efficiency. The INFORMAL activity must be the effective support of a real working FORMAL structure. How could this be assessed? The aim of the ATOS methodology is to give a position of the organisation integrating those parameters defining the minimum balance as described in figure 2. The ATOS method is based on a concept of the organisation integrating the FORMAL and the INFORMAL sides. The FORMAL side is assessed through a classical audit approach of the management systems, a quality based approach, in order to evaluate the presence or not of the adequate structure. As shown in figure 3 the FORMAL aspect in our concern covers the SMS main chapters from the SEVESO 2 Directive. There are seven of them, from the organisation and personnel to the review of the system. The INFORMAL side, on the left of the figure 3, is assessed through a sociological approach, containing 7 chapters as well, defining the organisational parameters required for an efficient organisation. The idea of this figure is to show the fact that if both of the FORMAL and INFORMAL sides match, we can theoretically think that the organisation meets its prevention efficiency. The ATOS method is mainly concerned by the major hazard prevention. It means that it focuses only on the activities which give support to this prevention. It implies therefore an identification of those activities. Figure 4 shows a high view of the Major Hazard Prevention Activity. The inputs considered here are the one needed for the start of the ATOS methodology application. This is the information concerning the major hazards. Those information can be represented according to the Bow Tie approach figure 5. We need to know the potential scenario and the Line of Defence ( L.O.D) in place against the occurrence of the scenario from the initiating events to the consequences. Two alternatives are therefore possible: - trying to work on the causes of the initiating events which is quite a hard task as the experience do not allow us (fortunately) to find the whole organisational shortcomings creating the event condition, - or, better in that case, trying to work on the Line of Defence, and see how the organisation can assure the efficiency of them. Therefore, THE METHOD IS BASED ON THE DETERMINATION OF THE L.O.D IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY THE ORGANISATIONNAL ACTIVITIES REQUIRED FOR THE ASSURANCE OF THOSE BARRIERS. The outputs are the numbers of major accidents, the efficiency of the technical barriers or the number of initiating events if it is possible to identify them. The resources are actually what we describe above as being the organisation. At the bottom of the representation in figure 6 there is the risk control. The efficiency of the risk control is directly related to the resources above. Figure 6 is another proposed representation with the FORMAL and INFORMAL side. General organisational policies exist on the FORMAL side, at the higher level. There are here various main structural system policies like Quality, Environmental, Security of Information, Safety… The INFORMAL activity is composed by power plays, cultural aspects…directly related to human behaviour in an organisation. The figure 7 shows how the ATOS method is applied on this model. Figure 4 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 5 Figure 8 Figure 9Figure 10 Practically the analysis is operated as described in figure 9 and 10: - a classical technical risk analysis, - the identification of the activities required to be assured for the efficiency of the line of defence identified through the risk analysis. Once this is done the sociological tool is used in order to assess what truly happens, beyond what is written. The management structure is assessed through a quality based system audit. Conclusion At the moment, the concept is developed and we intend to implement it in the forthcoming months with industrialists, particularly SMEs. The figure 8 draw s the type of indicators which can be collected through the use of the method in order to build a score board fort he safety managers. The methodology indeed is foreseen to be transferable to the safety managers, according to the principles “you cannot manage if you cannot measure”.