Argumentation Chapter 19
Most demanding pattern of writing Has an argumentative edge—the writer takes a stand An attempt to convince an audience that the author’s opinion is correct and/or move the audience to action Author presents a point of view about subject in the form or an assertion or thesis
Logical Argument Highly rational Appeals to reader’s intellect Logical Objective evidence
Persuasive Argument Strongly emotional Appeals to reader’s feelings Uses emotional details Selective language
Topics Something that is arguable or controversial One you have a clear opinion about
Factors in an Argument Logos—quality of arguing soundly – EX: facts, statistics, examples, authority statements, reason Pathos—connecting to the reader’s emotion – EX: values, attitudes, psychological needs Ethos—credibility or honesty of writer – EX: knowledgeable, trustworthy or ignorant, shiftless
Establish an Assertion Assertion—the opinion you want the reader to accept (proposition or thesis) – The high-fashion fur industry should be curtailed. – The state should resume capital punishment
Provide Evidence Evidence—proof of your assertion – Personal experience Legitimate support of your position – Experience of others Be sure you verify the information as accurate – Authoritative sources Facts (but be careful of statistics) Research Be sure the source is recognized as such – Physicist’s opinion on gun control isn’t worth much for your agrument
Arrange the Argument Logically Inductively – Details to a generalization – Presents evidence then draws a conclusion Deductively – Generalization to a specific – Presents a generalization, considers a specific case, then arrives at a conclusion – Often called syllogistic
Recognize the Type of Reader Supportive readers—already agree with you – Don’t need to overload with facts and statistics – Can emphasize pathos (emotion)
Type of Reader Wavering readers—uncommitted or uninformed – Use logos—facts, solid evidence – Use ethos—establish your trustworthiness and honesty
Type of Reader Hostile readers—apathetic, skeptical, sometimes mean – Give facts—rely on logos Simple dramatic – Pathos won’t work—they don’t have the same feelings on the topic you do – Ethos won’t work—they don’t trust your side already
Examine the Argument Toulmin model—three things to look at when examining an argument – The claim is the conclusion drawn from the information—the thesis – The grounds is the information related to the issue—the evidence – The warrant is the principle that links the evidence to the thesis—the assumption
EXAMPLE Claim: We can’t go camping Ground: We have a midterm exam Warrant: Students should stay home and study before a test The warrant does not have to be stated (it can be implied).
EXAMPLE 2 Claim: Films that feature characters who smoke should carry warnings about the dangers of smoking. Ground: Films that feature characters who smoke are a form of advertisement. Warrant: Advertisements for cigarettes should carry warning about the dangers to health that smoking poses.
Structure