Patient Satisfaction After LASIK: Analysis of Over 15,000 Patients Steve Schallhorn MD Consultant for AMO Medical Director Optical Express.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Comparison of bitoric with monotoric laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 Laser. By Mohamed Abdul-Rahman.

Advertisements

ME5888. Night Carrier Operations Spectacles ME5888.

GUSTAVO TAMAYO MD CLAUDIA CASTELL MD

Dose-response for Mitomycin-C in prevention of haze in photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia: Six month preliminary results CDR Elizabeth M. Hofmeister,

Evaluation of Enhancement Rates following Hyperopic LASIK with Femtosecond versus Microkeratome Assisted Flap Creation Raj Rajpara, BS * Richard M. Awdeh,

Steve Schallhorn MD Myth Busters in Patient Selection for LASIK Steve Schallhorn MD.

Tarek Abdel-Wahab, MD Clear Vision Center Cairo,Egypt Clinical Consultant of Schwind and technolase.

World Cornea Congress VII – Electronic Poster Season Tse Wing Yeung, MBBS, FRANZCO Ronan Conlon, MD; Joshua Teichman, MD, FRCSC; Setareh Ziai, MD, FRCSC;

Comparison of Early Outcomes of Topo-Guided PRK With Two Refractive Lasers WCC 2015 San Diego, California Simon P. Holland MB. FRCSC,FRCS,MRCP 1, 2, A,

Anupama Kotha 1, Simar J. Singh 1, William B. Trattler 1,2, Carlos Buznego 1,2 The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Evaluation of Patients with Contralateral Implantation of Two Aspheric Acrylic Intraocular Lenses R. Cionni, MD.

Alex P. Lange The author has no financial interest to disclose.

Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy for Irregular Astigmatism following Penetrating Keratoplasty Johnson Tan, MBBS MRCSEd (Ophth) FRCSEd (Ophth)

Sze H. Wong Emil W. Chynn, MD, MBA Maximiliano Plana, MD Emily Ceisler, MD ASCRS, May 2013 San Francisco, CA LASEK /Epi-LASIK to treat amblyopes is not.

Nizar S Abdelfattah, M.D.1, Marina Israel2, Nermin Osman, M.D.3,

Effects of IOP Lowering Agents on Myopic Regression after Refractive Surgery Lim, Taehyung M.D., Hong, So Jin M.D., Cho, Beom Jin M.D., Ph.D. Chung Kyu-Hyung.

Comparison of flap thickness results using M2 130 micron flap and one use plus 100 micron flap Ahmed El-Massry M.D. Ophthalmology Department Alexandria.

Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of Multizone Laser Vision Correction in Presbyopic Patients ASCRS 2010 Paul Van Saarloos PhD – CustomVis, employee.

Comparison of Wavefront and Corneal Aberration Changes after Advanced Corneal Surface Ablation and Femtosecond Thin Flap LASIK Tahra AlMahmoud, MBBS 1,

ASCRS 08 Changes Of Higher Order Aberrations After Excimer Laser Treatment For Moderate Myopia by Means of Preoperative Wavefront Aberration Levels using.

Prospective Study of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus Scott X. Stevens, MD Bend Ophthalmology, LLC Author has no financial interest.

Corneal CXL in Children With Progessive Keratoconus Author do not have any financial interest in the surgical procedure or the medicines used in this study.

Custom Flap Formation: Advantages of Elliptical Flaps for LASIK Patients Custom Flap Formation: Advantages of Elliptical Flaps for LASIK Patients Henry.

Photorefractive Keratectomy in Posterior Polymorphous Dystrophy [CONTROL ID: ] Edward W. Trudo 1, Kraig S. Bower 2, Charles D. Coe 2, Denise A. Sediq.

March 2011 Bascom Palmer Eye Institute University of Miami Elaine Wu, M.D. Ana Paula Canto, M.D. William Culbertson, M.D. Sonia Yoo, M.D. Financial disclosure:

Clinical outcomes of Epi-LASIK : 1-Year-Long Results of Flap ON/OFF with Mitomycin-C ON/OFF Gil-Joong Yoon (MD/PhD) 1 Seong-Taeck Kim (MD) 2 Jae-Woong.

Refractive outcome after myopic LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome or a femtosecond laser keratome Mark E Johnston, MD, FRCSC No.

LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue CustomCornea CustomCornea A Comparison of Wavefront Guided Refractive Surgery outcomes.

M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD The.

Peter A SimmonsA Cindy Carlisle-WilcoxA Perry S BinderB

Refractive Accuracy of LASIK Using the IntraLase and Zyoptix BACKGROUND Wavefront guided customized lasik procedures are designed to correct both lower.

Myoung Joon Kim, MD / Sara Yoon, MD Tracy Purcell, PhD / David J Schanzlin, MD L aser In Situ Keratomileusis versus Photorefractive Keratectomy for the.

REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES WITH TORIC ICL IMPLANTS CHIEF AUTHOR: Dr. D.RAMAMURTHY CO – AUTHOR: Dr. R.CHITRA The authors have no financial interest in the subject.

2006 年中國上海 COOC 會議 Six Months International Experience with New Iris Registration Technology & its Impact on Clinical Outcomes David Chao-Kai Chang M.D.

Comparison of LASIK and Mitomycin-C Assisted LASEK for Correction of Refractive Errors After Cataract Surgery Dr. Nitin Balakrishnan, Crystal Vision Laser.

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Intracorneal Ring Segment (Intacs SK) in Keratoconus Abdulrahman Al-Muammar, MD, FRCSC I have no financial interest.

Faik Orucov*, MD, Sinan Goker*,MD, Abraham Solomon**, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery**, MD *Refractive Surgery Department, ISTANBUL SURGERY HOSPITAL Istanbul,

Comparison of Patient Profiles: Wavefront-Guided LASIK Versus Conventional LASIK Michiho Suzuki-Judge, MD Inouye Eye Hospital Tokyo, Japan Michiho Suzuki-Judge,

Ocular functional optical zone following hyperopic LASIK/PRK: Analysis based on polychromatic retinal image quality Mitchell P. Weikert, MD Li Wang, MD,

Visual and IOP Outcomes after PRK in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome [Poster Number: P190] Kraig S. Bower, Denise A. Sediq, Charles D. Coe, Keith Wroblewski,

S. Lee/M.Kim 2010 M. Kim 1, H. Lee 1, S. Lee 1,, S.D. Lee 1 1 ASA-Vision Clinics Seoul Comparative Analysis Preliminary Results of.

Comparing laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy in different eyes of the same patient. Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, Faik Orucov, MD*,

Jay Fiore MD, Eric Donnenfeld MD, Hank Perry MD, Dana Morschauser OD

Refractive Outcomes with Advanced Wavefront-Guided LASIK William Trattler, MD Charles Reilly, MD Consultant to the USAF SG for Refractive Surgery Lackland.

Patient Outcomes with Advanced Femtosecond Technologies Mr. Sumith Perera FRCS Mr. Jay Dermott BSc. (Optm) ULTRALASE, United Kingdom The Authors have received.

Investigation of Multifocal Toric IOLs to Compensate for Corneal Astigmatism and to Provide Near, Intermediate, and Distance Vision José L. Rincón, MD.

Omni-Focal Treatment for Correction of Presbyopia in Hyperopes: 1 Year Results Efekan Coskunseven, Baha Toygar, Serife Atun, Haluk Talu, Ebru Arslan Dunya.

Poster produced by Faculty & Curriculum Support (FACS), Georgetown University School of Medicine LASIK Combined with Corneal Cross-linking in Eyes with.

Comparison of Varying the Ablation Diameter in LASIK and LASEK:The Effects on Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD) and Regression at 3 months Minoru Tomita, MD,

Corneal Endothelial Cell Changes After LASIK Using a Femtosecond Laser Minoru Tomita, MD, PhD, Masaru Aoyama, MD, Minoru Tomita, MD, PhD, Masaru Aoyama,

Division of Plastic Surgery University of Puerto Rico Norma I. Cruz, MD Nothing to disclose.

Postoperative Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) versus Preoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) with the WaveLight Refractive Suite (Excimer EX500.

Initial clinical experience with the FS200 Femto and EX500 excimer lasers for LASIK ASCRS, San Diego 2011 A.John Kanellopoulos, MD Professor NYU Medical.

CustomVue vs Conventional LASIK: one year study

A Comparison of Visual Acuity, Refractive Outcomes, and Satisfaction Between LASIK Performed with a Microkeratome and a Femto Laser Nauman hashmani (MBBS),

Incidence of Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis After LASIK with 15 KHz, 30 KHz and 60 KHz IntraLase Femtosecond Laser Flap Creation Carly Guss, BA,1 Christina.

post-lasik corneal ectasia

Corneal Epithelial Healing After LASIK Surgery

Ashkan M. Abbey, BA, Takeshi Ide, MD, PhD, George D

No financial interest for all authors

Preoperative Distribution of Higher Order Aberrations in Patients Undergoing LASIK Perry S. Binder, MS MD.

First 10 Cases with 150 kHz Intralase Enabled Keratoplasty (IEK) Compared to Standard Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK) Christopher L. Blanton, M.D. Financial.

V isual Outcomes and Complications of Mini-Enhancements after Refractive Surgery Lichtinger A, MD; Purcell TL, Ph.D; Bernabe-Ko J, MD; Schanzlin DJ, MD.

Dr Haralabos Eleftheriadis, M.D Ultralase Clinic Bristol UK

Satisfaction Survey of Presbyopic LASIK Patients Up to 11 Years Postop

Mohamed Abdelrahman Awadalla,FRCS Magrabi Eye Hospital Cairo - Egypt

PERRY S. BINDER, MS MD* San Diego, California

University of California, San Diego Shiley Eye Center

Stephen G Slade, MD The Laser Center of Houston Houston, Texas

Presentation transcript:

Patient Satisfaction After LASIK: Analysis of Over 15,000 Patients Steve Schallhorn MD Consultant for AMO Medical Director Optical Express

Methods Consecutive treatments24,309 pts (47,522 eyes) Consecutive treatments24,309 pts (47,522 eyes) Excimer:VISX Star (standard or Custom) (AMO) Excimer:VISX Star (standard or Custom) (AMO) LASIK flaps:Intralase FS-60 (AMO) LASIK flaps:Intralase FS-60 (AMO) Moria Evo3 One Use-Plus (Moria SA) Mean Age39.0 yrsRange18 – 71 yrs Mean Age39.0 yrsRange18 – 71 yrs Male44%Female56% Male44%Female56% Mean MSE-1.86 ± 2.72 D (range to D) Mean MSE-1.86 ± 2.72 D (range to D) Consecutive treatments24,309 pts (47,522 eyes) Consecutive treatments24,309 pts (47,522 eyes) Excimer:VISX Star (standard or Custom) (AMO) Excimer:VISX Star (standard or Custom) (AMO) LASIK flaps:Intralase FS-60 (AMO) LASIK flaps:Intralase FS-60 (AMO) Moria Evo3 One Use-Plus (Moria SA) Mean Age39.0 yrsRange18 – 71 yrs Mean Age39.0 yrsRange18 – 71 yrs Male44%Female56% Male44%Female56% Mean MSE-1.86 ± 2.72 D (range to D) Mean MSE-1.86 ± 2.72 D (range to D)

Completion of Questionnaire 55% of pts completed a 1 month Questionnaire 55% of pts completed a 1 month Questionnaire – 13,370 pts (26,137 eyes) Analysis of pts who completed Questionnaire vs those that didn’t Analysis of pts who completed Questionnaire vs those that didn’t – No significant differences observed in pre- or post-op: Sphere Sphere Cylinder Cylinder UCVA UCVA BCVA BCVA – Statistically significant differences in: Age 0.3 years Age 0.3 years Gender 3% Gender 3% 55% of pts completed a 1 month Questionnaire 55% of pts completed a 1 month Questionnaire – 13,370 pts (26,137 eyes) Analysis of pts who completed Questionnaire vs those that didn’t Analysis of pts who completed Questionnaire vs those that didn’t – No significant differences observed in pre- or post-op: Sphere Sphere Cylinder Cylinder UCVA UCVA BCVA BCVA – Statistically significant differences in: Age 0.3 years Age 0.3 years Gender 3% Gender 3%

Questionnaire Computer-based Computer-based Completed in the clinic at 1D, 1W, 1M, 3M Completed in the clinic at 1D, 1W, 1M, 3M Responses data-based and analyzed Responses data-based and analyzed

What does the questionnaire assess? Appearance of the facilities Appearance of the facilities Wait times Wait times Visual outcome Visual outcome Quality of care provided Quality of care provided Performance, care, compassion of staff Performance, care, compassion of staff Questions answered Questions answered Expectations met Expectations met Impact on life Impact on life Satisfaction Satisfaction Appearance of the facilities Appearance of the facilities Wait times Wait times Visual outcome Visual outcome Quality of care provided Quality of care provided Performance, care, compassion of staff Performance, care, compassion of staff Questions answered Questions answered Expectations met Expectations met Impact on life Impact on life Satisfaction Satisfaction

How satisfied are you with the post-operative care that we have provided for you since your treatment? 1 month postop 99% Satisfied

How Satisfied are you with your vision today? 1 month postop 96% of satisfied

Satisfaction as a Function of Age

Satisfaction as a Function of UCVA

Satisfaction as a Function of Preop Sphere

Effect of Ablation Profile: Satisfaction as a Function of Preop Sphere WFG vs Standard Ablation (all femto flaps) Insufficient data % of Patients Satisfied

Conclusions Patient satisfaction multifactoral Patient satisfaction multifactoral Care provided, friendliness of staff, wait time, etc. Care provided, friendliness of staff, wait time, etc. Most significant correlations for outcomes: Most significant correlations for outcomes: UCVA UCVA Latest technology (WFG & Femtosecond) Latest technology (WFG & Femtosecond) Based on large sample size Based on large sample size Patient satisfaction multifactoral Patient satisfaction multifactoral Care provided, friendliness of staff, wait time, etc. Care provided, friendliness of staff, wait time, etc. Most significant correlations for outcomes: Most significant correlations for outcomes: UCVA UCVA Latest technology (WFG & Femtosecond) Latest technology (WFG & Femtosecond) Based on large sample size Based on large sample size