New York State Education Department Informational Webinar October 8, 2015 2015-16 Progress Reporting and Performance Management for Receivership Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Advertisements

USING NEEDS ASSESSMENTS & CREATING ACTION PLANS September 25, 2012 Greg Lobdell, Center for Educational Effectiveness Candace Gratama, The BERC Group Travis.
Timelines & Milestones A practical approach Terminology Use of milestones Determine quarterly progress/success Determine funding renewal Steps to the completion.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services What happens after Focused Monitoring? -
1 Department of State Program Evaluation Policy Overview Spring 2013.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY14) February 24, 2015 Office of Educator Effectiveness Aviva Baff Isadora Choute Cynthia Mompoint Deborah.
National Quality Framework Self-assessment and Quality Improvement Planning Podcast Series: 2 April 2012 Draft and Confidential 1.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Virginia Foundation for Educational Leadership Virginia Department of Education Webinar Series 2012 Welcome to Webinar 7.
Cohort 2 Focus School Technical Assistance Webinar Session 4 January 7, 2014 Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of School Improvement.
The Academy of Pacesetting Districts Introducing...
Presentation Topics School Improvement Plans Combing Title I Schoolwide with SIPs Submitting Plans & Required Documents Districtwide Initiatives Training.
School Improvement Planning With ASSIST 1. What is ASSIST? 2  ASSIST = Adaptive System of School Improvement Support Tools  Partner = AdvancED  Web-based.
Division Liaison Update Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary January 7, 2013.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Indistar® Support and Coaching. The Who, What, When an d Where of Coaching.
IES Statistical and Research Methodology in Education Grant Program (84.305D) 2010 Program Meeting.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting July 6, 2011 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
Family Engagement Indicators: Moving Towards Family Engagement BIE FAMILY ENGAGEMENT Facilitated by: Debriefing.
Family Engagement Indicators: Moving Towards Family Engagement BIE FAMILY ENGAGEMENT Facilitated by: Planning Indicators.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
What is Expected in Updating Your SIP? Metro-Nashville Public School System School Improvement Plan Process September 2008.
NCLB Monitoring September 19, 2012 Webinar.
Presentation to Staff/Curriculum Development Network By James Viola Executive Director NYS Education Department December 7, 2007.
Family Engagement Indicators: Moving Towards Family Engagement BIE FAMILY ENGAGEMENT Facilitated by: Monitoring Indicators.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
School Improvement Leadership: Developing the Action Plan CIA Team Denise Behrends Chad Dumas Beth McCracken February 23, 2012.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Ensuring Success For Each Student AdvancED District Accreditation Process Five-Year External Review March 13 – 16, 2016 Produced by Mr. Tony Pickett, Assistant.
Data Analysis Needs Assessment Improvement Plan Implement & Monitor ●Set annual goals ●Identify a strategy ●Set quarterly goals ●Determine interventions.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
NH Restructuring Planning Year (SINI 4 ) Schools: Submitting the Restructuring Plan Presenter: Karen Laba, NH DOE Consultant for School Improvement.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Office of Service Quality
Presentation to Contract for Excellence School Districts By James Viola Executive Director NYS Education Department April 9, 2008.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Chair: Linda Miller, Great Lakes West Comprehensive Center Statewide Systems of Support: The RCC & State Story.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15) November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker Meagan Steiner David LeBlanc.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Southampton City Council School School Improvement Service
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
District Accreditation
360o Feedback Report Post-Training After-Session Actions
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)
Presentation transcript:

New York State Education Department Informational Webinar October 8, Progress Reporting and Performance Management for Receivership Schools

Agenda Progress Reporting and Performance Management for Receivership Schools Today’s webinar will cover the following topics: Quarterly Reporting Components Self-assessment Submission, Posting and Do/Don’t Performance Review Telephone Calls Who, When, What to expect Performance Management On-site Monitoring Questions, Comments and Next Steps (During the course of the presentation, please send questions to

Quarterly Reporting Progress Reporting and Performance Management for Receivership Schools Each Quarterly Report Consists of… Executive Summary Key Strategies Receivership Actions Analysis of Indicators Fiscal/Budget Management Quarterly reports are intended to be completed by the superintendent (or his/her designee), or by EPO leadership and verified for accuracy

Quarterly Reporting Progress Reporting and Performance Management for Receivership Schools GreenExpected results for this phase of the project are fully met, work is on budget, and the school is fully implementing this strategy with impact. YellowSome barriers to implementation/outcomes/ spending realized; with adaptation/correction school will be able to achieve desired results. RedMajor barriers to implementation/outcomes/ spending encountered; results are at-risk for not being realized, major strategy adjustment is required. Self-assessment represents rigorous reflection on the part of the district/EPO

Quarterly Reporting Progress Reporting and Performance Management for Receivership Schools Quarterly Reports should be submitted on: October 30 th, 2015 January 29 th, 2016 April 29 th, 2016 July 29 th, 2016 Reports should be sent electronically to both and and posted to the district’s web-site.

Quarterly Reporting Progress Reporting and Performance Management for Receivership Schools Do’s and Don'ts DO solicit feedback from key stakeholders within the school, district and community-at-large DO NOT use acronyms and/or terms uncommon to the community at-large when writing the Executive Summary DO provide evidence of impact when discussing strategies, actions and analyses DO NOT leave any sections of the quarterly report blank or unanswered DO allow community engagement teams an opportunity to review and provide input before submitting to NYSED

Performance Review Calls Progress Reporting and Performance Management for Receivership Schools Who?When?What to Expect? District Superintendent Or EPO Leadership Big Five (NYC, Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse and Yonkers) MONTHLY Discussion of performance as described in current quarterly report. District-Level staff responsible for oversight/support and reporting All other districts and EPO-led schools QUARTERLY Questions/ clarification of quarterly report with emphasis on evidence and impact

Performance Review Calls Progress Reporting and Performance Management for Receivership Schools Performance Management Means: Methodically and routinely monitoring the connection between the work being done and the goals that are sought Discussions that are outcomes-based rather than compliance- based Building the capacity of all parties involved to specifically monitor, assess and support the needs of the school Transparent self-assessment, critical feedback, and understanding the sense of urgency Specific and time-phased next steps

On-site Monitoring Progress Reporting and Performance Management for Receivership Schools NYSED staff may, depending on need, conduct on-site visits to any one or a number of schools under Receivership in a district. May be conducted with or without notification, and district staff may or may not be present If a school selects one of the Tenets as an indicator, an Integrated Intervention Team (ITT) will schedule and conduct an NYSED-led on-site review. Debriefing may occur on-site at the time of the visit, at the district office at the conclusion of a series of visits, or in written form as a document sent to the district electronically.

Questions and Next Steps Progress Reporting and Performance Management for Receivership Schools Questions/Comments submitted during the webinar Send additional questions, comments and concerns to NYSED will contact each district to schedule upcoming performance review calls Thank you