Faculty Commons Faculty Evaluation New Faculty Orientation Sarah Flynn, Faculty Evaluation Coordinator

Faculty Commons Faculty Evaluation Policies: Instructional Faculty – C5065 Non-Instructional Faculty – C5066

Faculty Commons Principles of Policies Evaluation is guided by the philosophy that we: promote a culture of teaching and learning foster professional development and scholarly activity promote fairness and transparency timely and accurate feedback comply with collective agreements undertake as a process involving multiple stakeholders, and a variety of assessment approaches

Faculty CommonsExpectations Faculty strive for excellence in teaching, which is assessed by: teaching (including curriculum development) research, scholarly, or artistic engagement service (collegiate citizenship) collegiality (professionalism, respect for students & peers, and ethical behaviour) professional development

Faculty Commons Faculty Evaluation Components Online student feedback (Instructional) Stakeholder review (Non-Instructional) Peer review (Both) Teaching/ Professional Dossier (Both) Annual Reports (Both)

Faculty Commons – Instructional Faculty C5065 – Instructional Faculty ContinuingProbationarySessional Teaching Dossier√ Peer Review√ Annual Report√√√ Student Online Feedback√√√ Performance Review√√√ Faculty Evaluation - Performance Measures and Evaluation Components Requirements based on appointment type

Faculty Commons C5065 – Probationary Requirements

Faculty Commons C5066 – Non-Instructional Faculty Faculty Evaluation - Performance Measures and Evaluation Components ContinuingProbationarySessional Professional Dossier√ Stakeholder Review√√√ Peer Review√ Annual Report√√√ Student Online Feedback √ (when assigned courses) √ (when assigned courses) √ (when assigned courses) Performance Review√√√

Faculty Commons C5066 – Probationary Requirements

Faculty Commons Teaching/ Professional Dossiers Dossier is defined as a concise, evidence-based record of academic and professional accomplishments prepared by a faculty member. It is both reflective and qualitative in its assembly.

Faculty Commons Peer Review Peer review is defined as an assessment of performance undertaken by experienced colleagues.

Faculty Commons Stakeholder Review Stakeholder Review is defined as solicited feedback about faculty performance from individuals (e.g. students, clients, staff) who have received service.

Faculty Commons Annual Report Annual Report is defined as a concise description of work accomplishments over the past year, professional development activities undertaken, and goals prepared for the upcoming year.

Faculty Commons Performance Review This review is defined as a cumulative evidence based process drawing upon factors appropriate to each faculty member’s type of appointment.

Faculty CommonsResources What’s online? Student surveys – incl. instructions on accessing CoursEval Policies C5065 & C5066 Chair & Faculty Evaluation Handbook Events, speakers, & workshops Other pure awesomeness

Faculty Commons Faculty Evalution Sarah Flynn Faculty Evaluation Coordinator 7-266L Faculty Commons