Faculty Commons Faculty Evaluation New Faculty Orientation Sarah Flynn, Faculty Evaluation Coordinator

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Matters Building a Quality Online Course.
Advertisements

Successful strategies for improving outcomes through quality assessment and evaluation of programs Leadership Conference Winston Salem, NC June
Promotion & Tenure Notes 1/2011 Resources – –
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
PORTFOLIO.
Evaluations: Administrative & Classified Employees
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Illinois Educator Code of Ethics Training
Creating a Teaching Dossier
Assessment Plans Discussion CLAS Unit Heads Maria Cimitile, Associate Dean, CLAS Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer January 11, 2006.
April 2005RPT Workshop1 Preparing a Successful RPT Application Gail M. Dummer, KIN Suzanne Wilson, TE.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
TLS Laura Winer Director, Teaching and Learning Services (TLS) MAUT Teaching and Mentoring Workshop for Non-Tenured Academic Staff 24 April 2015 The Teaching.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Creating a Teaching/Professional Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
November 9,  Proving that students are learning  Reaction to challenges in public education  Rising potential, stagnant performance  Regional.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Creating a Teaching Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator Oct. 21, 2013.
Centre for Teaching and Learning c o l l a b o r a t i v e r e s p o n s i v e p r a g m a t i c The CTL Experience for a New Faculty Member Dr Joy Mighty.
Standards For Teacher Preparation. What do you see in the previous slide? Students who are ready to answer the question? Students who are listening and.
Department Head Expectations of Faculty Guidelines for New Faculty from a Department Head Perspective.
ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN DEGREE PROGRAMS CSULA Workshop Anne L. Hafner May 12, 2005.
THE TEACHING & LEARNING CENTER- AN OVERVIEW MOHAMMED EL-AFFENDI AUGUST 2014.
Educator’s Portfolio NAW Workshop 2012 Gloria Kuhn, DO, Ph.D,
Peer Review: Promoting a quality culture Associate Professor Gordon Suddaby & Associate Professor Mark Brown Massey University New Zealand Contact details:
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Teaching Portfolios at McGill
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
Laura Winer Interim Director, Teaching and Learning Services (TLS) MAUT Teaching and Mentoring Workshop for Non-Tenured Academic Staff 25 April 2014.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Senior Promotions Information Session Senior Promotion Information Session Faculty Development December 5, 2014 Molyn Leszcz, MD, FRCPC Professor and Chair.
Assessment Presentation Day For Faculty Cindy J. Speaker, Ph.D. Wells College August 21, 2006.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
A Critical Friend: Peer Review of Teaching at AUS Daniel Kirk Daniel Kirk: Oct 2007.
SAS CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY Professional SAS Strand Rubrics December 14, 2009 DRAFT 1.0 Curriculum Design PAGE 0.
Shared Governance In the past four years, there has been a significant, positive change in the collaborative and collegial relationship between the Provost,
Canadian Business Ethics Research Network – PhD Cluster Professional Development Workshop Pursuing a Successful Academic Career Sheila A. Brown PhD, May.
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
Tenure and Promotion at University of Toledo
Principles of Good Governance
Promotion: Policy and Procedures for COM Faculty in State College
2014 Teachers Award and the classroom
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
The UIS Faculty Personnel Process
NJCU College of Education
SCC Tenure Process November 9, 2016.
Associate Professor to Professor
Lecture Track Faculty Reappointment & Promotion ECAS
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Promotion and Tenure Workshop Fall Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs
DCB Annual Review of Teaching Performance
Tenure and Promotion: Article 6
A Guide to the Sharing Information on Progress (SIP)
Teaching Effectiveness
Presentation transcript:

Faculty Commons Faculty Evaluation New Faculty Orientation Sarah Flynn, Faculty Evaluation Coordinator

Faculty Commons Faculty Evaluation Policies: Instructional Faculty – C5065 Non-Instructional Faculty – C5066

Faculty Commons Principles of Policies Evaluation is guided by the philosophy that we: promote a culture of teaching and learning foster professional development and scholarly activity promote fairness and transparency timely and accurate feedback comply with collective agreements undertake as a process involving multiple stakeholders, and a variety of assessment approaches

Faculty CommonsExpectations Faculty strive for excellence in teaching, which is assessed by: teaching (including curriculum development) research, scholarly, or artistic engagement service (collegiate citizenship) collegiality (professionalism, respect for students & peers, and ethical behaviour) professional development

Faculty Commons Faculty Evaluation Components Online student feedback (Instructional) Stakeholder review (Non-Instructional) Peer review (Both) Teaching/ Professional Dossier (Both) Annual Reports (Both)

Faculty Commons – Instructional Faculty C5065 – Instructional Faculty ContinuingProbationarySessional Teaching Dossier√ Peer Review√ Annual Report√√√ Student Online Feedback√√√ Performance Review√√√ Faculty Evaluation - Performance Measures and Evaluation Components Requirements based on appointment type

Faculty Commons C5065 – Probationary Requirements

Faculty Commons C5066 – Non-Instructional Faculty Faculty Evaluation - Performance Measures and Evaluation Components ContinuingProbationarySessional Professional Dossier√ Stakeholder Review√√√ Peer Review√ Annual Report√√√ Student Online Feedback √ (when assigned courses) √ (when assigned courses) √ (when assigned courses) Performance Review√√√

Faculty Commons C5066 – Probationary Requirements

Faculty Commons Teaching/ Professional Dossiers Dossier is defined as a concise, evidence-based record of academic and professional accomplishments prepared by a faculty member. It is both reflective and qualitative in its assembly.

Faculty Commons Peer Review Peer review is defined as an assessment of performance undertaken by experienced colleagues.

Faculty Commons Stakeholder Review Stakeholder Review is defined as solicited feedback about faculty performance from individuals (e.g. students, clients, staff) who have received service.

Faculty Commons Annual Report Annual Report is defined as a concise description of work accomplishments over the past year, professional development activities undertaken, and goals prepared for the upcoming year.

Faculty Commons Performance Review This review is defined as a cumulative evidence based process drawing upon factors appropriate to each faculty member’s type of appointment.

Faculty CommonsResources What’s online? Student surveys – incl. instructions on accessing CoursEval Policies C5065 & C5066 Chair & Faculty Evaluation Handbook Events, speakers, & workshops Other pure awesomeness

Faculty Commons Faculty Evalution Sarah Flynn Faculty Evaluation Coordinator 7-266L Faculty Commons