PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, 2007 1 Curriculum and Programme Objectives: Mapping of Learning Outcomes Oleg V. Boev, Accreditation Centre, Russian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning Outcomes in quality enhancement
Advertisements

Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
State of Play and Main Challenges Related to Armenian National Qualifications Framework (ANQF) Armen Ashotyan Minister of Education and Science Strasbourg,
The Future of the Profession Inputs and Outputs. The Future of the Profession  New Output Standards  New Output Standards  A new accreditation handbook.
Chalmers University of Technology A COMPARISON OF THE CDIO AND EUR-ACE QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEMS Johan Malmqvist Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg,
National Academic Reference Standards
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
ABET-ASAC Accreditation Workshop ABET Criteria and Outcomes Assessment
The Priority of Research and Doctoral School Nino Zhvania Head of the Quality Assurance Office.
2 The key challenge to maintain a robust petroleum industry is ensuring an adequate supply of well trained professionals now and in future The development.
Carolyn Bew Anne Boddington University of Brighton
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Postgraduate Engineering Education in the Arab World: What is Really Needed? Muhammad Taher Abuema’atti King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals.
Outcomes-Based Accreditation: An Agent for Change and Quality Improvement in Higher Education Programs A. Erbil PAYZIN Founding Member and Past Chairman.
Regulating the engineering profession 1 EC UK Experience in Accreditation of Engineering Programmes Professor Ian Freeston University of Sheffield, UK.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
CAFEO 31 Building Blocks for Quality in Engineering Education [An Australian Experience] Paul Mitchell FIEAust CPEng APECEng Engineers Australia.
© Engineering Council 2011 UK Engineering Degree Accreditation Engineering Doctorate EngD ENAEE, November 2012 Deborah Seddon, Head of Policy and.
A Decade of Experience On Outcome Based Accreditation: Still a Long Way To Go A. Erbil PAYZIN Bülent E. PLATIN Chair, MÜDEK Executive Board Member, MÜDEK.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Yerevan, Armenia, 2008 European qualifications framework Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis,
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
ECTS definition : Student centred system, Student centred system, Based on student workload required to : Based on student workload required to : Achieve.
OBE Briefing.
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF TAJIKISTAN 63/3, N. Karaboev street, Dushanbe, Tajikistan ZIP code : Telephone: ( ) Fax: ( )
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
PRO-EAST Workshop Rome, 9 – 11 May 2007 Promotion and Implementation of EUR-ACE Standards Two Cycles of European Engineering Education: Dublin Descriptors,
Bishkek 3/5/2011 DoQuP Standards for QA of SPs in PCs 1 WP.1 - Deliverable 1.1 Standards for Quality Assurance of Study Programmes DoQuP standards for.
© Engineering Council (UK) 2002 Regulation and Accreditation in the UK Jim Birch Head of International Recognition.
KNU - Bishkek (KS) 21 April 2015 DOQUP PROJECT FINAL DISSEMINATION CONFERENCE 1 Tempus Project n TEMPUS IT-SMGR Documentation for QA of.
Ways for Improvement of Validity of Qualifications PHARE TVET RO2006/ Training and Advice for Further Development of the TVET.
PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Final Report, Accreditation Decision, Register and Results Publication Oleg V. Boev, Accreditation Centre, Russian.
PRO-EAST Workshop, May 9-11, 2007, Rome, Italy1 Self-Assessment Report & On-Campus Evaluation How to plan & how to run Professor Sergey Gerasimov Siberian.
national qualification framework and the learning outcomes based education Petar Bezinović University of Rijeka and Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 1 DoQuP Project WP.1 - Deliverable 1.3 The DoQuP Model: milestone of the DoQuP project Marina Cavallini CRUI.
Genova 3-4/11/2011 DoQuP Presentation 1 Presentation of the Tempus Project Number TEMPUS IT-TEMPUS-SMGR ( / ) “Documentation.
Rome May 31st, 2006 University towards E-learning: a Focus on Finland, France and Italy1 CONFERENCE University towards E-learning: a Focus on Finland,
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.
Qualifications frameworks and qualifications standards Bryan Maguire Quality and Qualifications Ireland Conference on National Qualifications Framework.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION (O.B.E) (For Students) by: OBE Sector Committee 2016, FKMP, UTHM With Wisdom We Explore Faculty of Mechanical and.
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
Practice learning of social work students is composed of practical education and field education and has visible place in a curricula of higher education.
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Presenter: Sue Hackett
Masters and Doctorate – what are these?
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
EUR-ACE Engineering Programme Accreditations
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance
Assessment and Accreditation
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Presentation transcript:

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Curriculum and Programme Objectives: Mapping of Learning Outcomes Oleg V. Boev, Accreditation Centre, Russian Association for Engineering Education

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, General Definitions Accreditation Accreditation of an engineering educational programme is the primary result of a process used to ensure the suitability of that programme as the entry route to the engineering profession. Accreditation involves a periodic assessment against accepted standards of engineering education. It is essentially based on a peer review process, undertaken by appropriately trained and independent teams comprising peers from both academia and engineering practice. The process normally involves both scrutiny of data and a structured visit to the university/department running the programme.

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Generally, the team task is to verify, if the learning outcomes of the programme are consistent with the indicated programme outcomes and if the programme has: ◦ a curriculum and related processes which ensure achievement of the programme outcomes; ◦ academic and support staff, facilities, financial resources and cooperation agreements with industry, research institutions etc. adequate to accomplish the programme outcomes; ◦ appropriate forms of assessment which attest the achievement of the programme outcomes; ◦ a management system able to ensure the systematic achievement of the programme outcomes. General Definitions

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, First and Second Cycle Degree In accordance with the EHEA framework, the accreditation process must distinguish between programmes of the First and Second Study Cycles, defined in accord with the “Dublin Descriptors” developed by the Joint Quality Initiative and the Report “A Framework for Qualification of the European Higher Education Area”, both documents endorsed by the Bergen Ministerial meeting of May The degree while the term “Degree” describes a qualification awarded to an individual term “Cycle” is used to describe a study programme leading to an academic by a recognised HEI after successful completion of a study programme. General Definitions

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Consecutive FCD and SCD and Integrated Programmes The programme outcomes and accreditation criteria outlined in the EUR-ACE Framework Standards have been designed to be applied to the accreditation of the two main cycles defined in the Bologna Declaration and subsequent documents i.e. to First Cycle and Second Cycle engineering programmes in series. The use of programme outcomes makes the Standards applicable also to the accreditation of programmes leading directly to a degree equivalent to a Second Cycle Degree (‘Integrated Programmes’), that are still a very significant part of the European engineering education system. General Definitions

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Objectives of the educational programme – a complex of knowledge, abilities, skills and methods that should be acquired by the graduates of the programme in some time after graduation from the programme. Some objectives can be achieved by all graduates while others only by some graduates. Learning Outcomes – a complex of knowledge, abilities, skills and methods that should be acquired by the graduates upon completing the programme or the discipline. Programme Objectives and Learning Outcomes

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, The evaluation of the programme should be started from its objectives. The programme objectives are to be compliant with the HEI’s mission and needs of programme’s constituents. The programme has to identify its constituents, study their requirements, and periodically review the programme objectives. The programme objectives have to be published and available to all constituents. Programme Objectives and Learning Outcomes

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Programme Objectives The evaluation of the programme should be started from its objectives. The programme objectives are to be compliant with the HEI’s mission and needs of programme’s constituents. The programme has to identify its constituents, study their requirements, and periodically review the programme objectives. The programme objectives have to be published and available to all constituents. Programme Objectives and Learning Outcomes

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Learning Outcomes The Learning Outcomes must ensure the fulfilment of the programme objectives. The Learning Outcomes of each module/discipline (as well as curriculum and teaching process) must ensure the achievement of programme learning outcomes. The programme must ensure the achievement of the learning outcomes by all the graduates. Programme Objectives and Learning Outcomes

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, The EUR-ACE requirements to Learning Outcomes of accredited engineering programmes are given in: 1.Knowledge and Understanding; 2.Engineering Analysis; 3.Engineering Design; 4.Investigations; 5.Engineering Practice; 6.Transferable Skills. Programme Objectives and Learning Outcomes

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, All six groups of the programme outcomes apply to both FCD and SCD programmes, there are important differences in the requirements at the two levels. These differences in the levels of FCD and SCD accredited engineering programmes should inform the interpretation of the programme outcomes by HEIs and by accrediting panels. The differences are particularly relevant to those learning activities that contribute directly to Engineering Analysis, Engineering Design, and Investigations. Programme Objectives and Learning Outcomes

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Knowledge and Understanding The underpinning knowledge and understanding of science, mathematics and engineering fundamentals are essential to satisfying the other programme outcomes. Graduates should demonstrate their knowledge and understanding of their engineering specialisation, and also of the wider context of engineering. EUR-ACE Standards

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Engineering Analysis Graduates should be able to solve engineering problems consistent with their level of knowledge and understanding, and which may involve considerations from outside their field of specialisation. Analysis can include the identification of the problem, clarification of the specification, consideration of possible methods of solution, selection of the most appropriate method, and correct implementation. Graduates should be able to use a variety of methods, including mathematical analysis, computational modelling, or practical experiments, and should be able to recognise the importance of societal, health and safety, environmental and commercial constraints. EUR-ACE Standards

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Engineering Design Graduates should be able to realise engineering designs consistent with their level of knowledge and understanding, working in cooperation with engineers and non-engineers. The designs may be of devices, processes, methods or artefacts, and the specifications could be wider than technical, including an awareness of societal, health and safety, environmental and commercial considerations. EUR-ACE Standards

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Investigations Graduates should be able to use appropriate methods to pursue research or other detailed investigations of technical issues consistent with their level of knowledge and understanding. Investigations may involve literature searches, the design and execution of experiments, the interpretation of data, and computer simulation. They may require that data bases, codes of practice and safety regulations are consulted. EUR-ACE Standards

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Engineering Practice Graduates should be able to apply their knowledge and understanding to developing practical skills for solving problems, conducting investigations, and designing engineering devices and processes. These skills may include the knowledge, use and limitations of materials, computer modelling, engineering processes, equipment, workshop practice, and technical literature and information sources. They should also recognise the wider, non-technical implications of engineering practice, ethical, environmental, commercial and industrial. EUR-ACE Standards

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Transferable Skills The skills necessary for the practice of engineering, and which are applicable more widely, should be developed within the programme. EUR-ACE Standards

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Programme objectives: Each objective must correspond to one or more needs of constituents Each objective must be shared and understood by those constitutuents An objective must be clearly (and shortly) identified An objective must be much broadly defined than learning outcomes At least one learning outcome has to be assigned to each programme objective Programme evaluation

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Learning outcomes: Each Learning outcome Defines knowledge/skill to be achieved by a graduate Has to be defined properly to be assessed at the graduation Corresponds to one or more programme objectives All Learning outcomes Specify the graduates’ knowledge and skills to be taught within programme Programme evaluation

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Programme objectives: Needs of interested parties: Have the needs of the interested parties been identified? Modes and periods of relationships with the constituencies Needs identified for each of the identified interested parties Are the objectives consistent with needs of the interested parties? Transparency and publicity of the programme objectives Mission of HEI: Are the objectives consistent with HEI’s mission? Programme evaluation

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Programme Learning Outcomes: Correspondence with: Programme objectives Accreditation Criteria Curriculum: Does the curriculum ensure the achievement of the learning outcomes? Syllabi (modulus outcomes) Transparency Publicity Credits etc. Programme evaluation

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Correspondence of Programme Objectives and Learning Outcomes Р1Р2Р3Р4..Р11..Р13..Р16 O1O1 √√√√√√ O2O2 √√√√√√ O3O3 √√√ O4O4 √√ O5O5 √√√ Programme evaluation

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Correspondence of Programme Learning Outcomes and Learning Outcomes for Accreditation Р1Р2Р3Р4..Р11..Р13..Р16 L1L1 √ L2L2 √ … L11 √√ L12 √√ Programme evaluation

PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Thank you for attention