National Science Foundation Revolutionizing science and engineering research though cyberinfrastructure by David G. Messerschmitt Member, NSF Blue Ribbon.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

DELOS Highlights COSTANTINO THANOS ITALIAN NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL.

Advertisements

Supporting Research on Campus - Using Cyberinfrastructure (CI) Public research use of ICT has rapidly increased in the past decade, requiring high performance.

Joint CASC/CCI Workshop Report Strategic and Tactical Recommendations EDUCAUSE Campus Cyberinfrastructure Working Group Coalition for Academic Scientific.

Network Science and Engineering (NetSE) Research Agenda: v1.0 5 th GENI Engineering Conference Seattle, WA 21 July 2009 Ellen Zegura, Georgia Tech.

Presentation at WebEx Meeting June 15,  Context  Challenge  Anticipated Outcomes  Framework  Timeline & Guidance  Comment and Questions.

CyberInfrastructure ( CI ): Whence? Thomas J. Greene, Ph.D. Sr. Program Dir. for CISE-ANIR, National Science Foundation.

ACCI TASK FORCES Update CASC September 22, Task Force Introduction Timeline months or less from June 2009 Led by NSF Advisory Committee on.

Data, Cyberinfrastructure, and Interoperability: Highlights from Infrastructure Studies Florence Millerand, Karen S. Baker, David Ribes *Florence:

Research CU Boulder Cyberinfrastructure & Data management Thomas Hauser Director Research Computing CU-Boulder

GENI: Global Environment for Networking Innovations Larry Landweber Senior Advisor NSF:CISE Joint Techs Madison, WI July 17, 2006.

EInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) US Resource Centers Perspective: implementation and execution challenges Alan Blatecky Executive Director SDSC.

1 Cyberinfrastructure Framework for 21st Century Science & Engineering (CIF21) NSF-wide Cyberinfrastructure Vision People, Sustainability, Innovation,

1 Cyberinfrastructure Framework for 21st Century Science & Engineering (CF21) IRNC Kick-Off Workshop July 13,

Cyberinfrastructure - Revolutionizing Discovery, Learning & Innovation Deborah L. Crawford Deputy Assistant Director of NSF for Computer & Information.

1 Intellectual Architecture Leverage existing domain research strengths and organize around multidisciplinary challenges Institute for Computational Research.

NSF and Environmental Cyberinfrastructure Margaret Leinen Environmental Cyberinfrastructure Workshop, NCAR 2002.

McGuinness – Microsoft eScience – December 8, Semantically-Enabled Science Informatics: With Supporting Knowledge Provenance and Evolution Infrastructure.

Data Sources & Using VIVO Data Visualizing Scholarship VIVO provides network analysis and visualization tools to maximize the benefits afforded by the.

Cyberinfrastructure: Framing the Issues on Your Campus What is it? Why do we care? What do we do about it now? 11 Peter M. Siegel CIO and Vice Provost,

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Symposium on Knowledge Environments for Science and Engineering National Science Foundation Nov , 2002.

THE JOINED UP WORLD OF E-RESEARCH Professor Neil McLean National Technical Standards Adviser to the Department of Education Science and Training (DEST)

Knowledge Environments for Science and Engineering: Overview of Past, Present and Future Michael Pazzani, Information and Intelligent Systems Division,

1 Building National Cyberinfrastructure Alan Blatecky Office of Cyberinfrastructure EPSCoR Meeting May 21,

Computing in Atmospheric Sciences Workshop: 2003 Challenges of Cyberinfrastructure Alan Blatecky Executive Director San Diego Supercomputer Center.

Unless otherwise noted, the content of this course material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Noncommercial – Share Alike 3.0 License.

Advances in Cyberinfrastructure with a Focus on Data: a U.S. National Science Foundation Overview Alliance for Permanent Access to Records of Science in.

DuraCloud A service provided by Sandy Payette and Michele Kimpton.

Research Cyberinfrastructure Alliance Working in partnership to enable computationally intensive, innovative, interdisciplinary research for the 21 st.

Presenter: Karla Strieb Assistant Executive Director Transforming Research Libraries June 3, 2010 Supporting E-science: Progress at Research Institutions.

Data Infrastructures Opportunities for the European Scientific Information Space Carlos Morais Pires European Commission Paris, 5 March 2012 "The views.

CI Days: Planning Your Campus Cyberinfrastructure Strategy Russ Hobby, Internet2 Internet2 Member Meeting 9 October 2007.

Sharing Research Data Globally Alan Blatecky National Science Foundation Board on Research Data and Information.

Transformation of Research and Education in the 21 st Century Edward Seidel Director, Office of Cyberinfrastructure National Science Foundation

Mehdi Ghayoumi Kent State University Computer Science Department Summer 2015 Exposition on Cyber Infrastructure and Big Data.

DASISH Final Conference Common Solutions to Common Problems.

Cyberinfrastructure Planning at NSF Deborah L. Crawford Acting Director, Office of Cyberinfrastructure HPC Acquisition Models September 9, 2005.

National Science Foundation Blue Ribbon Panel on Cyberinfrastructure Introduction, Context & Charge Dan Atkins, Chair University of Michigan.

Cyberinfrastructure A Status Report Deborah Crawford, Ph.D. Interim Director, Office of Cyberinfrastructure National Science Foundation.

T. Scott Plutchak UAB Lister Hill Library of the Health Sciences Georgia Health Sciences Library Association Atlanta March 9, 2012.

National Science Foundation Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering (CISE) Trustworthy Computing and Transition to Practice Secure.

CyberInfrastructure workshop CSG May Ann Arbor, Michigan.

“ … a new age has dawned in scientific and engineering research, pushed by continuing progress in computing, information and communication technology,

Organizational Structure Coordination and Leadership Group (CLG) AD Council BIOCISEEHRENGGEOMPSSBE OIIA Charge: Coordinating NSF’s cyberinfrastructure.

The Minority-Serving Institutions (MSI) Cyberinfrastructure (CI) Empowerment Coalition [MSI- CIEC] Providing the “human middleware” to build and enhance.

Breakout #2 Generic Classes of Issues Hardware –big iron (capability, not just capacity) Network –last-mile problem –computational grid Software/frameworks.

Distributed Geospatial Processing Michael F. Goodchild University of California Santa Barbara.

Cyberinfrastructure (CI) "It is easier to invent the future than to predict it" - Alan Kay Clifford A. Jacobs National Science Foundation Division of Atmospheric.

Cyberinfrastructure What is it? Russ Hobby Internet2 Joint Techs, 18 July 2007.

The Minority-Serving Institutions (MSI) Cyberinfrastructure (CI) Institute [MSI C(I) 2 ] Providing a scalable mechanism for developing a CI-enabled science.

“A Library outranks any other one thing a community can do to benefit its people.” --Andrew Carnegie.

Digital Scholarship Joanne Evans Monash University.

GEOSCIENCE NEEDS & CHALLENGES Dogan Seber San Diego Supercomputer Center University of California, San Diego, USA.

1 Cyberinfrastructure: The Future and Its Challenges Oklahoma Supercomputing Symposium 2003 September 25, 2003 Peter A. Freeman Assistant Director of NSF.

Three Critical Matters in Big Data Projects for e- Science Kerk F. Kee, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Chapman University Orange, California

1 NSF/TeraGrid Science Advisory Board Meeting July 19-20, San Diego, CA Brief TeraGrid Overview and Expectations of Science Advisory Board John Towns TeraGrid.

April 14, 2005MIT Libraries Visiting Committee Libraries Strategic Plan Theme III Work to shape the future MacKenzie Smith Associate Director for Technology.

List of Nominations Welcome! CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION.

Cyberinfrastructure Overview Russ Hobby, Internet2 ECSU CI Days 4 January 2008.

Cyberinfrastructure: Many Things to Many People Russ Hobby Program Manager Internet2.

Digital Data Collections ARL, CNI, CLIR, and DLF Forum October 28, 2005 Washington DC Chris Greer Program Director National Science Foundation.

1 Why is Digital Curation Important for Workforce and Economic Development? Alan Blatecky Office of Cyberinfrastructure Symposium on Digital Curation in.

30 November 2001 Advisory Panel on Cyber Infrastructure National Science Foundation Douglas Van Houweling November 30, 2001 National Science Foundation.

National Science Foundation Blue Ribbon Panel on Cyberinfrastructure Summary for the OSCER Symposium 13 September 2002.

EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI-InSPIRE EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI strategy and Grand Vision Ludek Matyska EGI Council Chair EGI InSPIRE.

NSF Draft Strategic Plan for Data, Data Analysis, and Visualization Chris Greer Program Director National Science Foundation.

Black and White Introduction to Cyberinfrastructure Eric Shook Department of Geography Kent State University.

PAA on Scientific Data and Information Roberta Balstad Chair, PAA Panel.

Jarek Nabrzyski Director, Center for Research Computing

Mentoring the Next Generation of Science Gateway Developers and Users

Bird of Feather Session

Presentation transcript:

National Science Foundation Revolutionizing science and engineering research though cyberinfrastructure by David G. Messerschmitt Member, NSF Blue Ribbon Panel on Cyberinfrastructure

National Science Foundation NSF Blue Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure Daniel E. Atkins, Chair University of Michigan Kelvin Droegemeier University of Oklahoma Stuart Feldman IBM Hector Garcia-Molina Stanford University Michael Klein University of Pennsylvania Paul Messina California Institute of Technology David G. Messerschmitt UC-Berkeley Jeremiah P. Ostriker Princeton University Margaret H. Wright New York University

National Science Foundation The vision “Digital science” will assume a prominent place in science and engineering research, supplementing theoretical and experimental methodologies Already well along, but –Long term challenges not yet addressed –Needs focused attention and more funding –Major price for not moving now

National Science Foundation What is digital science? Vast collection and repositories of data Modeling, computing, visualization Distributed instrumentation Scholarly publishing Distributed software applications Collaboration Transparency to geography and institution Cyberinfrastructure supporting all the above

National Science Foundation What is cyberinfrastructure? Cyberinfrastructure supporting digital science is not just scientific computing and networking, but also –Support for collaboration –Data and information repositories and access –Preserving data and artifacts –Support for distributed applications –Etc.

National Science Foundation Layered structure Core technologies incorporated into cyberinfrastructure Conduct of science and engineering research Applications of information technology to science and engineering research Cyberinfrastructure supporting applications

National Science Foundation Research Development Operations Use Cyberinfrastructure supporting applications Core technologies incorporated into cyberinfrastructure Conduct of science and engineering research Applications of information technology Technology transfer

National Science Foundation Examples of some major technical challenges Collection, organization, metadata, access to huge and numerous data repositories Distributed applications across disciplines and organizations and repositories and international boundaries Preservation over centuries –Data and scholarly collections –Software (for documentation and execution) –Simulation/visualization results

National Science Foundation Major goals Enable (rather than inhibit) cross-disciplinary collaboration and shared data Ease development of parallel and distributed applications –Cyberinfrastructure includes major software Usability, documentation, support

National Science Foundation Some tensions SharedLocal CentralizedLocal Commonality and interoperability Disciplinary needs and innovation Support Processing, storage, data management

National Science Foundation Major organizational challenges Common standards for metadata, languages, etc. (vs. disciplinary autonomy) Generic applications (vs. discipline specific) (Mostly) common infrastructure Technology transfer to and from industry Advance IT informed by these technology-driver needs Integrating domain science and computer science NSF matrix management across all (!) Directorates Achieving consensus and coordination in a highly fragmented NSF community Coordination across agencies and internationally

National Science Foundation Conclusions A major opportunity, and also major challenges Costs of not moving aggressively: fragmentation, inflexibility, duplication of effort, lowered efficacy and effectiveness About $1B/year added budget in NSF (more in other agencies): Mostly human resources NSF has opportunity to take the lead, but needs to work with other agencies and international bodies