I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Advertisements

Sustaining and Spreading Change Mike Davies, MD Chief of Staff VA Black Hills.
The Olympic Team Trials: An Orientation to the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough Series* Joe Kyle, MPH Kim McCoy, MPH, MS *some adaptations.
Quality Improvement Methodology – Next Steps
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Coaching Workshop.
Overview of NIATx & Process Improvement Process Improvement Overview and Basic Training 2008.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Charting a course PROCESS.
This material was produced under grant number SH SH-1 from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor. It does not.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”
Fostering Change: How to Engage the Practice Julie Osgood, MS Senior Director, Operations MaineHealth September 25, 2009.
Change Measurement Workbench Introduction January 2012.
Continual Improvement Process Oregon Department of Education April, 2012.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Investing in Change: Funding Collective Impact
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Striving for Quality Using continuous improvement strategies to increase program quality, implementation fidelity and durability Steve Goodman Director.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Sustaining and Spreading surgical safety improvements with SUSP Mike.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Everyone Has A Role and Responsibility
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Data Collection and Measurement Diane Abatemarco, PhD, MSW Ruth S. Gubernick, MPH Practicing Safety Learning Session May 30, 2009.
Part I – Data Collection and Measurement Ruth S. Gubernick, MPH Quality Improvement Advisor Lori Morawski, MPH CHES Manager, Quality Improvement Programs.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Sustaining Change May 2009 Follow-up Calls (Call #6) Based on the fall 2008 CATES Training Series Contra Costa County, San Bernardino County, & Sutter.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Actions Set a clear aim for the performance of your eligibility system Define why your key audiences (governor, legislature, public) should support it.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Group Medical Visits Health Literacy Patient Self-Management Learning Session 3.
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
Holding the Gains and Spread California Chronic Care Learning Communities Initiative Collaborative Learning Session 3 June 8, 2005 Angela Hovis Improvement.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
Part I (AAP QI) - Results Ruth S. Gubernick, MPH Quality Improvement Advisor Florida Pediatric Medical Home Demonstration Project Learning Session 3 December.
© 2001 Change Function Ltd USER ACCEPTANCE TESTING Is user acceptance testing of technology and / or processes a task within the project? If ‘Yes’: Will.
I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME.
GHA Hospital Engagement Network HAC-Learning Collaborative Webinar ~ June 20, 2012 Kelley Dotson, GHA Nancy Fendler, GMCF Anne Hernandez, GMCF Kathy McGowan,
Strategies for Knowledge Management Success SCP Best Practices Showcase March 18, 2004.
I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
IHI Breakthrough Series (6 to 18 Months Time Frame) Select Topic (Develop Mission) Planning Group Develop Framework & Changes Participants ( Teams)
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Testing and Implementing Change Learning Session 2 November 14, 2002 Vicki Grant & Ron Moen.
Practice Key Driver Diagram. Chapter Quality Network ADHD Project Jen Powell MPH, MBA Edward Lewis MD Starting with the End in Mind: Creating a Reliable.
Chapter Quality Network ADHD Project Jen Powell, MPH, MBA The Model for Improvement: The Three Questions.
Spread and Sustainability Robert A. Gabbay, MD, PhD Connie Sixta, PhD, RN, MBA.
Practice Key Driver Diagram. CQN ADHD Learning Session 1 Nancy Adams MSM January 6, 2016 Where Do We Go From Here?
Summary of Action Period 2 TN Patient Safety Collaborative: Reducing Physical Restraints Learning Session 3 October 6, 7 & 8 th, 2009.
How Do I Do? PDSA Cycles Accelerating Change Dannie Currie, RN, MN, DHSA Safety Improvement Advisor Atlantic Node Safer Healthcare Now!
CAREER AND SKILLS TRAINING STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK Planning is key to success.
Planning for Sustainability 1 Susan Ramsey Pearls of Wisdom Consulting Lia Katz ASTHO (202)
Courtesy Reminders: During the webinar, you may select *7 on your phone to speak, and use *6 to mute. Please refrain from placing the phone on HOLD during.
Where Do We Go From Here? Joseph J. Abularrage, MD, MPH, M.Phil, FAAP, President, NYS AAP - Chapter 2 Jennifer Powell, MPH, MBA, Quality Improvement Consultant.
Account Management Overview
Framework for Getting Results at Scale
Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Story
Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Story
The Board’s Role in Quality
Holding the gains: Tips for Sustaining Improvements Over Time
Presentation transcript:

I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME activity. I do not intend to discuss an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device in their presentation. Strategies for Sustaining Improvements and Spread Ruth S. Gubernick, MPH QI Advisor Newborn Screen Positive Infant ACTion Project Learning Session 2 February 11-12, 2011

Objective  To enable you to apply current knowledge about holding and spreading improvements to your setting so that you… can sustain and spread the improvements in this project have skills to sustain and spread other improvements in future activities.

Breakthrough Series (6-12 Months Time Frame) Select Topic Planning Group Develop Framework & Changes Participants Prework LS 1 P S AD P S AD LS 3 LS 2 Expert Meeting Strategy: -test -implement -hold the gain -spread Beyond LS 3 How well do successful teams “hold the gains” after LS3?

2003 IHI Survey on “Holding the Gains” Brief History-surveyed 33 successful teams from different collaboratives. Objective: To determine how well successful teams involved in IHI’s Breakthrough Series Collaboratives (i.e. teams with gains to hold) have sustained their progress after the end of the final learning session.

Question: What is your current level of performance compared to the end of the final learning session for the key outcome measure? BTS Successful Teams Much Better BetterSameWorse 13 initial responders follow-up responders Total Teams 10 (30.3%) 12 (36.4%) 10 (30.3%) 1 (3.0%) Summary 97% of teams at least “held the gains” from the BTS 67% of teams are now performing better than at end of BTS

Additional Survey Findings Question% Yes Are you still tracking your performance? 85% Is there periodic reporting to leadership regarding performance? 88% Were other residual benefits gained in the improvement process that took hold? 91% Do you and your colleagues continue to use improvement methodology in your work? 91%

Additional Survey Findings (strategies for holding the gains) Question%Yes Did the team begin to plan how to sustain its progress early on in the improvement process? 78% Did you document the improvement process? 81% Did you document the process of holding performance at your new level? 66% Was a financial return on investment tied to the improvement that occurred? 16% Has the team taken specific action in order to make the improvement process more permanent? 70%

Additional Survey Findings (spread) Question%Yes Has your organization pursued a spread plan? 97% Was the same level of performance spread to other areas? 55%

General impressions  The power of internal publicity (establish the high-water mark)  Commitment to real sustainability versus “quick hits” (leadership, resources, ambition)  Understanding that the end of the formal collaborative is only the beginning (and that success is only a step in the right direction)

Hold Gains Spread Improvement Creating a New System

Table Exercise  1. Describe a specific change you have implemented during this project.  2. Assume your collaborative team members all retire: Will this change continue to be used? What could make your organization revert to the old system?

Strategies to Hold the Gains Improvement Hold Gains Implement I. During testing II. During implementation III. After implementation Test

 Test the changes under a wide range of conditions (robust design)  Foolproof the new process/procedure  Use technology where appropriate I. During Testing

Examples of Using a Wide Range of Conditions  Set up two groups that have different conditions: Group 1: experienced with screening and referral follow up Group 2: inexperienced with screening tools or Group 1: full schedule Group 2: open schedule or Group 1: Parent partners Group 2: No parent partners

Test the changes with both groups  If the changes show improvement from both groups, the change is robust against the different conditions.  If the changes show improvement from one planned group but not in other, further test cycles are needed to better understand the relationship between the change being tested and the different conditions.

Repeated use of the cycle over a broad range of conditions builds a robust design Successful Tests of Change Full, Sustained Implementation AP SD A P S D AP SD D S P A DATA 1. Early tests are simple designed to succeed 2. Test over a wide variety of conditions to identify weaknesses 3. Later tests designed to predict and prevent failures

Examples of fool proofing the new process/procedure  Decrease the likelihood that a needed item is left off or undone - checklists  Make it impossible to do the wrong thing or leave a vital task incomplete - toll booth  Differentiate lookalikes- Use of colors or shapes

 Computer to edit and cross-check entries  EMR - registry, reminders, recall, EBM  Bar coding  Alarms or reminders (Outlook) Examples of Using Technology

Strategies to Hold the Gains Improvement Hold Gains Implement I. During testing II. During implementation III. After implementation Test

II. During Implementation  Use multiple PDSA cycles to implement the change  Collect data over time when conditions are expected to change  Redesign support processes for new process  Address the social aspects of change

Use Multiple PDSA Cycles to Implement  Seek and use input from others, specially those affected by the change, during testing  PDSA cycles useful for managing the implementation phase  PDSA cycles could address parts of the implementation

Collect Data Over Time When Conditions Are Expected To Change Baseline Testing Successful Testing Begin implementation on pilot unit Evidence of improvement during implementation

Redesign support processes  Make changes to job descriptions  Provide training on the new process Chance to explain the “why” of the change New skills may be needed Include method of maintenance  Map out the flow of the new process

PROJECT TEAM WORKSHEET: Redesign of Support Processes for Implementation of Change Change Implemented: D ate: Cycle No. Change Tested or Implemented Lead Feb 2011 March April May June July Policies Documentation Hiring Procedures Staff education/training Job descriptions Information Flow Equipment Purchases

 Provide information on why the change is being made and how the change will effect people (WIFM)  Show appreciation for people’s efforts  Understand and address the causes of resistance  Publicize the results and learning Address the Social Aspects of Change

Strategies to Hold the Gains Improvement Hold Gains Implement I. During testing II. During implementation III. After implementation Test

Hold the Gains  Aim: Increase your “degree of belief” that the new system will be better than the old system in the future

III. After Implementation  Readiness for “Holding the Gains”  Success of collaborative team  Intention to hold gains  Organizational priority  Leadership responsibility clear  Appropriate Infrastructure in place  Attention focus on measures/dash boards

Old System New System  “We met our goals”  “We assumed the improvement would hold”  Other priorities took all resources away (not on senior management’s radar screen)  Did not learn how to hold the gains  Infrastructure not in place III. After Implementation Some Inhibitors

Readiness for “Holding the Gains” After Implementation  Success of collaborative team  Intention to hold gains  Organizational priority  Leadership responsibility clear

Teams who hold the gains  Use data and continue with run charts  Continue to report and create accountability  Have leadership’s support  Meet periodically  Train and orient, make policy  Assign responsibility for key tasks

III. After Implementation Key Components of Strategy  Communication  Infrastructure  Design effective Control System

Communication  Make aims, successes, learnings, and benefits to all stakeholders clear  Document the improvement efforts  Keep in contact with your team and other teams

 Address training and development of new skills  Make changes to job descriptions, policies, and procedures  Assign ownership for improvement and maintenance work of the new process  Ensure senior leaders hold responsibility to sustain changes & remove inhibitors that might allow slippage back to old system Infrastructure

 Plan to standardize new process and verify conformance to the standard  Continue to use run charts and control charts to monitor measures for performance/outcomes  Outcome measures required  Process measures may be desirable as early warning signals Design Effective Control System

Hold Gains Spread Improvement Creating a New System

Spread: Why & how do ideas spread?  Diffusion characteristics: See it Try it Is it:  Compatible?  Easy to use?  Better? What supported it? Hindered it?

Set-up Target population Adopter audience Key partners A Framework for Spread Social System Adopter types Key messengers Communication Strategies Knowledge Management Measurement and Feedback Leadership Topic is a key strategic initiative Goals and incentives aligned Executive sponsor assigned Day-to-day managers identified Better Ideas Successful tests Positive attributes

Create a spread plan...  Take your better idea(s)  What  Who  How: show, tell, share story, data  When:  Next level:  Share with team members Group reflection

Spread Strategy Matrix JanFebMarAprMay NorthA B C SouthA BC EastABC WestAB C CentralA B C A=Discussion with Parents, B=Registry, C=Co-management

QUESTIONS?? Thank you! Special thanks to Jane Taylor, Ed.D