Characterizing Ground-Water Flow Paths in High -Altitude Fractured - Rock Settings Impacted by Mining Activities Mike Wireman, U.S. EPA Region 8 Dr. Mark.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Erosion Erosion = the transport of sediments from weathering. *Gravity and Water are biggest factors* 1. Streams 2. Glaciers 3. Landslides 4. Waves.
Advertisements

Nitrate Distribution, Fate and Transport in Helena Area Waters James Swierc, PG Lewis & Clark Water Quality Protection District Lewis & Clark County, MT.
The Barton Springs Part of the Edwards Aquifer: Basic physical and hydrologic characteristics pertinent to permitted discharges Raymond Slade, Jr, Certified.
By Hung Nguyen Lime Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage at Leviathan Mine, California.
Mining Contamination in the Rocky Mountains By Kaley Williams.
Advanced Hydrogeology Malcolm Reeves Civil and Geological Engineering.
Summitville Gold Mine Disaster
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Iron Mountain Mine California Acid Mine Drainage Discharge Stuart Gaunt Guy Laurie.
Economic Geology Teaching program: Ore Geology Ore Mineralogy
Please note: this presentation has not received Director’s approval and is subject to revision.
Impact of Mine Drainage and Distribution of Heavy Metal Contamination in the James Creek Watershed Laura Harrington, Duke University Joe Ryan and Ned Turner,
Isotope mass balance – Mica Creek Paul Koeniger, Tim Link, John Marshall 03/28/2006 – Mica Creek Group Meeting Department of Forest Resources – University.
Economic and environmental considerations
Mark Williams, CU-Boulder Forensic Hydrology. What is “Forensic Hydrology” Geoscientists are really “Geodectives” forensic geochemistry and forensic geology.
Core from Lake Wheeler Site 2 A’ Seven research sites are proposed for hydrologic investigation Map Number of Proposed Study Sites 1)Bent Creek Research.
Hydrologic Issues in Mountaintop Mining Areas Ronald Evaldi, USGS-WSC, Charleston, WV Daniel Evans, USGS-WSC, Louisville, KY Hugh Bevans, USGS-WSC, Charleston,
Erosion and Deposition
Surface Water & Groundwater Interactions Middle Reach of Russian River
Geology, Mining, and Water Quality by Matthew A. Sares.
XII. Streams A.The Hydrologic Cycle (components and pathways) B.Stream Velocity (controls and results) C.Drainage Patterns and Landscape Features (results.
Figure from Press and Seiver?. From Horowitz et al., 1990; Horowitz, 1991.
DUSEL S-1 Themes Evolution of the Biosphere Resources: Origin, Discovery and Exploitation Humans and the Environment Problems Questions?
California’s Economic Resources
Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences 1 © Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Importance of Ground-Water Flow and Travel Time on Nitrogen Loading from an Agricultural Basin in.
Groundwater Flux to the Upper Mississippi River – Approach and application to nutrient understanding.
Seasonal Changes in Biogeochemistry of a Natural Wetland Receiving Drainage from an Abandoned Mine Diane McKnight and Eric August – University of Colorado.
Highlights A Study of Phosphorus Loading of Ballston Lake by Tributary Inflow Presentation to BLIA Annual Meeting June 16, 2014 Scott Miller, Bob Duncan,
April 3, 2012 Acid Mine Drainage Source Control Program Design Investigation Upper Tenmile Creek Mining Area Site Angela Frandsen, PE Helena, Montana.
Rubin Pajoohan Fartak International Engineering co.
Mining. Mining Minerals are naturally occurring substances found in rocks, soils, or sediments. Minerals deposits that can be mined profitably are called.
Abandoned Mine Lands Assessment of the North Yuba Watershed.
What makes Earth unique. Where is the water on our planet ?
Watershed interactions and water quality assessment of previously mined mineralized areas Willow Creek Demonstration Watershed, Madison Co., MT,
Three topics of interest at the Shingobee River Headwaters Area  GW/SW interactions  Peeper studies (poster)  Watershed-scale processes  Synoptic studies.
Rivers 11.1 – Zones in rivers From Miller’s Living in the Environment.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey End-Member Mixing Analysis Applied to the Karstic Madison Aquifer Using Water Chemistry in the Southern.
ICGGE 2003 Mike Wireman US EPA Region
Geochemistry and Petrology Research Opportunities at the Homestake Mine Edward F. Duke South Dakota School of Mines and Technology International Workshop.
Source waters and flow paths in an alpine catchment, Colorado, Front Range, United States Fengjing Liu, Mark W. Williams, and Nel Caine 2004.
Monitoring and Evaluating Reclamation Outcomes: A Case Study of the Roy Pray Mine By: Ashley Bembenek Environmental Consultant Image retrieved from Google.
Ground-Water Quality Trends in the South Platte River Alluvial Aquifer, Colorado Suzanne S. Paschke, Shana L. Mashburn, Jennifer L. Flynn, and Breton Bruce.
Metal Sorption Properties The binding behavior of Zn, Cu, and Pb relates to the surface complexation constant, K int. Dzombak and Morel, 1990 Assessment.
TARGETED SOURCE CONTROL
RI/FS/RD/RA USEPA Region III PADEP Golder Associates Inc. Berks Landfill Superfund Site.
Two Kyt-projects: GeochemM: U-migration and retention in granitic rock U in Water-rock Interaction.
Surface and Ground water Chapter 11. Hydrologic Cycle.
CH 7 RESOURCES AND ENERGY. Background  Earth’s crust contains useful mineral resources.  The processes that formed many of these resources took millions.
Surface water and Barton Springs What do we know? –After a storm –The rest of the time Current study objectives TCEQ – USGS study approach Additional research.
Copper Source Loading Estimates (Process Profiles) Physical & Chemical Characterization of Wear Debris (Clemson University) Water Quality Monitoring (ACCWP)
Economic Geology Teaching program: 1) Ore Geology 2) Ore Mineralogy 3) Hydrothermal Geochemistry 4) Modeling Hydrothermal Systems 5) Mining Course Economic.
Nutrient and Pesticide Accounting in the Chipola River/Floridan Aquifer System—Update Presented by Rick Hicks of FDEP And Christy Crandall of USGS This.
1 INSPIRE Conference, Edinburgh 1 Themes Geology & Mineral Resources Short overview description Main achievements Open issues 2 themes: Geology & Mineral.
Silver Bow Creek: A History of Use, Abuse and Reuse Presented By: Montana Natural Resource Damage Program.
Stream and Watershed Information What does it consist of? Who has it? Where do you find it?
CORRELATION BETWEEN HYDROLOGICAL, GEOCHEMICAL AND MICROBIOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN GROUNDWATER-STREAM WATER MIXING ZONE Heejung Kim, Seong-Sun Lee, Yunjung.
WETLANDS AT RISK: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT WOLF CREEK PASS SKI AREA, CO Ashley Nielson and Mark Williams Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research and Department.
Mining.
Near-surface Geologic Environments
Lesley A. Sebol, P. Barkmann, E. Johnson, F.S. Fitzgerald & W. Curtiss
Water quality characterization of the Pebble prospect area in Southwestern Alaska Comparison of PLP and independent science team scope, methods, and results.
Hydrological changes resulting from dam construction
A Look Back at Groundwater Geochemistry as an Exploration Tool for Lead and Zinc Deposits in Sinking Valley 82 Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists.
Metal Loading to the Animas River
Water Quality in the Animas Watershed 1/24/18
7-1 Mineral Resources.
Mining.
Hydrologic Investigation Summary
Hydrothermal mineral deposits
Presentation transcript:

Characterizing Ground-Water Flow Paths in High -Altitude Fractured - Rock Settings Impacted by Mining Activities Mike Wireman, U.S. EPA Region 8 Dr. Mark Williams, University of Colorado Mine Design, Operations & Closure Conference -2004

Mary Murphy Gold Mine Applied Research Site Research Objectives: * To Develop Tools for Characterization of Site Hydrology and Geochemistry * To Better Understand Role of Ground Water Transport of Metals to Chalk Creek. Remedial Objectives: * To Determine Metals Loading Sources and Pathways * To Reduce Metal Loadings to Chalk Creek Partners: * USGS, USFS, University of Colorado & CDMG

Mary Murphy Gold Mine—Applied Research Site Mining History Placer Mined in 1860’s-1870: Vein Deposits Located : Period of Greatest Mining Activity Mary Murphy Mine: 1870—1951 * 75% Gold, Silver, Lead, Zinc, Copper * 5 Main Veins * 14 Main Levels * 2200 Vertical Feet * Golf Adit—Drain / Haul Adit * Connected to Iron Chest Mine Remedial Work: * 1991—3 Piles Consolidated 69,000 cu. yds., Golf Tunnel Unplugged, Lined Settling Pond * 1992—Golf Adit Water Rerouted * 1998—1400 Level Opened / Stabilized * 1999—700 Level Partially Opened * 2003—Lady Murphy Adit Opened

Mary Murphy Mine Site Environmental Characterization History > Flow Measurements > Steam Tracing 14 Times –1990—2003 > GW Tracing > Metal Loading > Geochemical 5 Times- 1990—1994 Modeling > Sediment Sampling > Hydrometrics / Sept. ’93 & June ’99 Isotopic Research > Water Chemistry > Surficial 17 Times- 1990—2003 Geophysical Work > Toxicity Testing / Fish Data 11 Times- 1991—2003

Focus Of This Talk > Metals Loading > Stream & Ground-Water Tracing > Hydrometrics / Isotopic Results

Chalk Creek Mining District-Collegiate Range, CO

Geology and Mine Features Mary Murphy Mine & Vicinity

Elements of Conceptual Model Strong GW / SW Interaction > Gaining Streams > Strong Upward Gradient in Valley Bottom Fracture Dominated Flow Paths Multiple GW Flow Systems Many Seeps / Springs Significant Seasonal Variation in Flow and Water Quality ( GW & SW) Several Water Types Chemistry of GW & SW is Strongly Impacted by Geology and Mineralogy of Ore Body, and Mine Features.

Mary Murphy Gold Mine—Chafee County, CO DISSOLVED ZINC CONCENTRATIONS Location Date Conc. (ug/l) Chalk Creek CC-9 9/90 < 100 CC-9 7/ CC-9 7/02 24 CC-9 5/03 Upstream of Pomeroy 35.2 CC-7D 9/ CC-7D 7/02 44 CC-7D 5/03 Upstream of Golf 53.2 CC-7 9/90 18,000 CC-7 7/00 27,710 CC-7 7/02 24,300 CC-7 Golf Adit 3,620 CC-6 9/ CC-6 2/ CC-6 5/03 Upstream of Iron Chest 534 CC-0 9/90 < 100 CC-0 7/02 At Arkansas 08

Mary Murphy Gold Mine—Chafee County, CO DISSOLVED ZINC CONCENTRATIONS Location Date Conc. (ug/l) GW Wells MM-15 9/93 45 MM-15 Bedrock 7/02 08 MM-11 9/ MM-11 7/ MM-11 7/ MM-11 Allurial 5/ MM-3 9/93 17,131 MM-3 7/00 15,830 MM-3 2/02 21,500 MM-3 Bedrock 5/03 5,570 MM-6 9/ MM-6 7/02 13,700 MM-6 Allurial 122,000

Scope of Ground-Water Tracing Mary Murphy Mine—Applied Research Site

Results of Ground Water Tracing Mary Murphy Mine

Inverse Geochemical Modeling

Variation of Discharge Components Versus Time in 1400 Level. Mary Murphy Gold Mine

Delta O-18 in Selected Tributary Inflows, 1400 Level Mary Murphy Gold Mine

Pre-event Water and Event Water in Total Discharge From 1400 Portal Mary Murphy Gold Mine

HELIUM DATA Mary Murphy Mine site  ESTIMATED AGES OF GROUND WATER Using tritium data from different date t = 12.43/ln2. ln ( 1 + [3Het] / [3Ht] ) Clark & Fritz p188  BEDROCK WELLS MM YRSMM YRS MM YRSMM YRS MM 15 - ABOUT 8 YEARS OLDMM 15 - ABOUT 8 YEARS OLD  ALLUVIAL WELLS MM YRSMM YRS  Source – A. Manning -USGS