The NSCL is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and Michigan State University. 55 Co S800 PID - 56 Ni(d, 3 He) 55 Co Target (p / d) 56 Ni.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2/June/2014 Advances in Radioactive Isotope Science (ARIS2014) the University of Tokyo S. Watanabe A K. Minomo, M. Shimada, S. Tagami, B M. Kimura, C M.
Advertisements

Γ spectroscopy of neutron-rich 95,96 Rb nuclei by the incomplete fusion reaction of 94 Kr on 7 Li Simone Bottoni University of Milan Mini Workshop 1°-
Proton Inelastic Scattering on Island-of-Inversion Nuclei Shin’ichiro Michimasa (CNS, Univ. of Tokyo) Phy. Rev. C 89, (2014)
DNP, Hawaii 2014 Non-local potentials in nuclear reactions Luke Titus and Filomena Nunes Michigan State University.
The Shell Model of the Nucleus 4. Applications – nuclear spin [Sec. 6.1 and 6.3 Dunlap]
Spectroscopic factors and Asymptotic normalization coefficients Oak Ridge, Oct 2006 F.M. Nunes NSCL, Michigan State University in collaboration with D.
GAMMA-PARTICLE ARRAY FOR DIRECT REACTION STUDIES SIMULATIONS.
Su Shi Chun. From experiments, we found that nuclei are more tightly bounded  number of protons or neutrons is 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126 (Magic numbers).
Nuclear models. Models we will consider… Independent particle shell model Look at data that motivates the model Construct a model Make and test predictions.
Higher Order Multipole Transition Effects in the Coulomb Dissociation Reactions of Halo Nuclei Dr. Rajesh Kharab Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University,
1107 Series of related experiments; first for transfer with TIGRESS Nuclear structure motivation for 25,27 Na beams Nuclear astrophysics motivation for.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Reactions Categorization of Nuclear Reactions According to: bombarding.
The National Superconducting Cyclotron State University Betty Tsang, 2/24-26/2005 INFN Workshop on Reactions and Structure with Exotic.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Calculations for 56 Ni transfer cross sections (p,d)  Zero-range and finite-range options give similar results  Codes mostly consistent with increasing.
GRETINA experiments with fast beams at NSCL Dirk Weisshaar,  GRETINA and fast-beam experiments  Some details on implementation at NSCL  Performance.
Nuclear Level Densities of Residual Nuclei from evaporation of 64 Cu Moses B. Oginni Ohio University SNP2008 July 9, 2008.
Zbigniew Chajęcki National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory Michigan State University Probing reaction dynamics with two-particle correlations.
LIVING WITH TRANSFER AS AN EXPERIMENTAL SPECTROSCOPIST WILTON CATFORD TRENTO WORKSHOP 4-8 Nov 13 FROM NUCLEAR STRUCTURE TO PARTICLE-TRANSFER REACTIONS.
Spectroscopic factors and Asymptotic Normalization Coefficients from the Source Term Approach and from (d,p) reactions N.K. Timofeyuk University of Surrey.
Noyaux CERN- ISOLDE Yorick Blumenfeld.
One-proton Breakup of 24 Si and the 23 Al( p, γ ) 24 Si Reaction in Type I X-ray Bursts How can we measure capture cross-sections for 23 Al(p,γ) 24 Si.
1 10/15/2015 Cuie Wu School of Physics, Peking University Neutron removal reactions of 17 C Cuie Wu et al., JPG31(2005)39.
The NSCL is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and Michigan State University. Determining the Impact Parameter and Cross-Section in Heavy.
Hypernuclear Production with Hadronic and Electromagnetic Probes Radhey Shyam Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata, India Z.Zt. Institut f. Theo.
Single-neutron structure of neutron-rich nuclei near 132 Sn Jolie A. Cizewski Department of Physics & Astronomy Rutgers University.
The High Resolution Array The High Resolution Array is a detector designed to detect and identify light charged particles like protons, deuterium, triton,
Evolution of Nuclear Structure with the Increase of Neutron Richness – Orbital Crossing in Potassium Isotopes W. Królas, R. Broda, B. Fornal, T. Pawłat,
Measurements of Ay for the pd breakup reaction at 250MeV Yukie Maeda (CNS, Univ. of Tokyo) T. Uesaka, T. Kawabata, K. Suda, S. Sakaguchi, Y. Sasamoto (CNS,
Spin-orbit potential in 6 He studied with polarized proton target 2007/6/5, INPC2007 Satoshi Sakaguchi Center for Nuclear Study, Univ. of Tokyo.
Experimental studies around N=28… What’s next? ESNT – 4-6/02/2008 Saclay 1)Various experimental approaches for one physics case 2) From data to theoretical.
Probing the isospin dependence of nucleon effective mass with heavy-ion reactions Momentum dependence of mean field/ –Origins and expectations for the.
Wolfram KORTEN 1 Euroschool Leuven – September 2009 Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams Motivation and introduction Theoretical aspects of Coulomb.
-NUCLEUS INTERACTIONS OPEN QUESTIONS and FUTURE PROJECTS Cristina VOLPE Institut de Physique Nucléaire Orsay, France.
Nuclear Models Nuclear force is not yet fully understood.
1 Beta Counting System Li XiangQing, Jiang DongXing, Hua Hui, Wang EnHong Peking University
Where next (with HDU)? Q-value mass. excitation energies. Angular distributions of recoils l -value spectroscopic information.
ESF Workshop on The future of stable beams in Nuclear Astrophysics, Athens, Dec , 2007 Stable ion beams for nuclear astrophysics: Where do we stand.
Caroline D. Nesaraja, Michael S. Smith NUCLEAR DATA ACTIVITIES AT OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY.
Spectroscopic factors from direct reactions A unique information to study nuclear shell structure ESNT, february 2008 A. Obertelli, CEA-IRFU/SPhN To which.
Study of unbound 19 Ne states via the proton transfer reaction 2 H( 18 F,  + 15 O)n HRIBF Workshop – Nuclear Measurements for Astrophysics C.R. Brune,
H.Sakurai Univ. of Tokyo Spectroscopy on light exotic nuclei.
Nucleosynthesis in AGB Stars: the Role of the 18 O(p,  ) 15 N Reaction Marco La Cognata.
Shell Model with residual interactions – mostly 2-particle systems Simple forces, simple physical interpretation Lecture 2.
The concept of compound nuclear reaction: a+B  C  d+F The particle transmission coefficients T are usually known from cross sections of inverse reactions.
1 CNS summer school 2002 The RI-Beam Factory and Recent Development in Superheavy Elements Search at RIKEN ◆ Brief introduction to the RI Beam Factory.
Shape evolution of highly deformed 75 Kr and projected shell model description Yang Yingchun Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai, August 24, 2009.
Reaction cross sections of carbon isotopes incident on proton and 12 C International Nuclear Physics Conference, Tokyo, Japan June 3-8, 2007 W. Horiuchi.
23.1 Atomic structure The Rutherford scattering experiment  In 1911, Ernest Rutherford carried out the famous Rutherford scattering experiment to explore.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 The Deuteron Deuterium (atom). The only bound state of two nucleons  simplest.
J-PARC でのシグマ陽子 散乱実験の提案 Koji Miwa Tohoku Univ.. Contents Physics Motivation of YN scattering Understanding Baryon-Baryon interaction SU(3) framework Nature.
Shifts in neutron single- particle states outside N=82 S.J.Freeman, B.P.Kay, J.P.Schiffer, J.A.Clark, C.Deibel, A.Heinz, A.Parikh, P.D.Parker, K.E.Rehm.
Search for direct evidence of tensor interaction in nuclei = high momentum component in nuclei = TERASHIMA Satoru 寺嶋 知 Depart. of Nuclear Science and Technology,
Lecture 4 1.The role of orientation angles of the colliding nuclei relative to the beam energy in fusion-fission and quasifission reactions. 2.The effect.
Pairing Evidence for pairing, what is pairing, why pairing exists, consequences of pairing – pairing gap, quasi-particles, etc. For now, until we see what.
KS group meeting April 2007Transfer reactions at REX-ISOLDE: Status and a physical case to be studied K. U. Leuven One Nucleon Transfer Reactions Around.
Determining Reduced Transition Probabilities for 152 ≤ A ≤ 248 Nuclei using Interacting Boson Approximation (IBA-1) Model By Dr. Sardool Singh Ghumman.
Shell model calculation on even-even Germanium isotopes
György Gyürky Institute for Nuclear Research (Atomki)
N. K. Timofeyuk University of Surrey
The neutron capture cross section of the s-process branch point 63Ni
Nuclear excitations in nucleon removal processes
gamma-transmission coefficients are most uncertain values !!!
Probing core polarization around 78Ni:
Satoshi Adachi Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP),
Isospin Symmetry test on the semimagic 44Cr
Geometry of experimental setup for studies of inverse kinematics reactions with ROOT Students*: Dumitru Irina, Giubega Lavinia-Elena, Lica Razvan, Olacel.
Study of the resonance states in 27P by using
Study of the resonance states in 27P by using
Differential cross section [arb units]
Presentation transcript:

The NSCL is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and Michigan State University. 55 Co S800 PID - 56 Ni(d, 3 He) 55 Co Target (p / d) 56 Ni Beam Φ To S800 Spectrograph 55 Ni / 55 Co (measure P,E,Φ) MCP's θ d / 3 He HiRA Results Experimental Setup Inverse kinematics at 37MeV/A, 80MeV/A R. Shane 1*, T. K. Ghosh 2, A. Sanetullaev 1 and M. B. Tsang 1 For the HiRA Collaboration 1 National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 2 Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, 1/AF, Bidhannagar, Kolkata , India * The global OM potentials obtained from systematic analysis of (p,d) and (d,p) transfer reactions at low-energy do not seem to work at higher energy. Work on extraction of the neutron and proton SF from the higher-energy data, as well as a consistent framework for comparison to the low-energy results, is in progress. HiRA + High Resolution Array (HiRA) 56 Ni: An alluring nucleus 56 Ni is outside the valley of stability and is doubly magic according to the Independent Particle Model (IPM) In the shell model, the magic number 28 is the first shell that requires the introduction of a strong spin-orbit interaction 56 Fe is the most abundant heavy element in the universe, yet 56 Ni is the first doubly-magic nucleus that is not stable 56 Ni is a “waiting point” nucleus in the astrophysical rapid proton (rp) capture process Understanding the shell structure of this doubly-magic, N=Z=28 nickel nucleus is therefore of considerable interest for both nuclear structure and astrophysics Study nucleon transfer reactions in inverse kinematics: 56 Ni(p,d) 55 Ni 56 Ni(p,d) 55 Ni at 37 MeV/A and 80 MeV/A to extract the neutron spectroscopic factor of 56 Ni and also its energy dependence 56 Ni(d, 3 He) 55 Co 56 Ni(d, 3 He) 55 Co at 80 MeV/A to extract the proton spectroscopic factor of 56 Ni These two reactions allow us to compare the neutron and proton SF in the f 7/2 shell Extracted spectroscopic factors are important benchmarks in evaluating different pf-shell model interactions that may be used to predict the structure of 78 Ni, a major waiting point in the path of the r-process. Goal of experimental study Ground-state neutron SF of Ni isotopes Measurement of the SF is essential in calibrating the theoretical shell model of the nucleus. Two possible shell structures of 56 Ni: Inert core of 56 Ni with 28 protons and 28 neutrons inside Inert core of 40 Ca with 8 protons and 8 neutrons outside IPM S800 Spectrograph Spectroscopic Factors from Transfer Reactions with Radioactive Beams 1.5mm Si 65μm Si CsI(Tl) HiRA PID - 56 Ni(d, 3 He) 55 Co 3 He Summary Implications: 56 Ni is not a good core Accurate description of Ni isotopes requires full model space with 40 Ca core. GXPF1A describes the data better than K3B interactions Reaction Model: (d  /d  ) RM calculated from 3-body model with global optical potentials and standard geometry of n-wave functions. The probe: Spectroscopic Factor N=2 N=8 N=20 N=28 Single-nucleon transfer reactions are a powerful tool to study single particle states. Spectroscopic Factor (SF) quantifies the nature and occupancy of the single particle orbits in a nucleus. SF provides information on nuclear structure and is a key input for astrophysics calculations. Lab Angle [degrees] Differential Cross section [arb. units] (d, MeV/A Shape of calculation section depends on potentials. Best match to data is for CH89 (p), Perey-Perey (d), and Bechetti-Greenlees ( 3 He). Deuteron Potentials: pp = Perey-Perey ADNTD 17 (1976) 3 He Potentials: gdp = GDP08 PRC 79 (2009) and ch=Chapel Hill 89 bg = Bechetti-Greenlees ADNTD 17 (1976) 80.7 MeV/A Differential Cross section [arb. units] Deuteron Potentials: pp = Perey-Perey ADNTD 17 (1976) js = Johnson-Soper PRC 1 (1970) 976 Proton Potential: ch = Chapel Hill 89 Phys. Rep. 201 (1991) 57 Lab Angle [degrees] 37 MeV/A SF is extracted by matching the magnitude of the calculated cross section to the data The value SF exp = 7 was determined for the f 7/2 neutron from data at 37 MeV/A js = Johnson-Soper PRC 1 (1970) 976 *Note: there seems to be a shift in angle between the data and calculations which is not yet understood