Axial resistance of micropiles : from French to Eurocode design Roger Frank CERMES (ENPC-LCPC), Paris, France.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr Colin Smith University of Sheffield, UK Director, LimitState Ltd UK
Advertisements

Ing. Miloš Rieger Reliability assessment of composite steel concrete cross section of roadway bridge VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of.
1 LESSLOSS Sub Project 7 Techniques and Methods for Vulnerability Reduction Barcelona 18 th May 07 – Lisbon 24 th May 07 LESSLOSS Dissemination Meeting.
20/05/2008 LimitState:GEO launch & technology briefing - ICE London 12/01/2015geo1.0 LimitState:GEO Eurocode 7 Colin Smith MA(Cantab) PhD Director & LimitState:GEO.
Prof. Roger FRANK CERMES (ENPC-LCPC) Tokyo IWM August 2004 PRESENT ISSUES IN DESIGN AND CONSTRUTION OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS.
September 20081Department of structural engineering The effect of Eurocode 5 on timber structure design in Norway Kolbein Bell and Kjell Arne Malo NTNU,
Chp12- Footings.
Lecture 9 - Flexure June 20, 2003 CVEN 444.
Cracking, Deflections and Ductility Code Provisions and Recent Research October 2006 Serviceability and Ductility The Other Limit States.
Investigation of Consolidation Promoting Effect by Field and Model Test for Vacuum Consolidation Method Nagasaki University H.Mihara Y.Tanabasi Y.Jiang.
Imperial College London First-Order Robustness, Higher-Order Mechanics Bassam A. Izzuddin Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering.
THE ENGINEERING OF FOUNDATIONS A BOOK BY RODRIGO SALGADO POWERPOINT RESOURCES FOR CHAPTER 2 Contains copyrighted material.
AASHTO LRFD Section and 10
DESIGN OF GROUND ANCHORS – USE OF NEW SECTION 8 Eric R Farrell AGL Consulting.
Safety assesment of a steel frame using current code and SBRA method Petr Konečný, M.S. Structural Mechanics Division Department of Civil Engineering.
Task 3.4. Validation of horizontal solutions Fire and mechanical characterization.
A new assessment method for masonry arch bridges (SMART) Clive Melbourne, Adrienn Tomor School of Computing, Science and Engineering, University of.
Horizontal Loading Tests on Model Foundations Retrofitted by Micropiles Masahiro NISHITANI Jiro FUKUI Takeshi UMEBARA IAI, PWRI Structures Research Group.
Jerry G. Rose, PE University of Kentucky Department of Civil Engineering REES 3: Module 3-D REES 2014.
TOPIC 2: TYPES OF FOUNDATION
Rehabilitation and maintenance of buildings - 02 Karel Mikeš.
Joint Research of Seismic Retrofitting Technology for Existing Foundations Masahiro Ishida Public Works Research Institute JAPAN “Design and Execution.
Providing Design Standards for Frictional Compression Ground Anchors Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Lab., Seoul Natl. Univ. Master Course Student Joo,
University of Palestine
FAILURE INVESTIGATION OF UNDERGROUND DISTANT HEATING PIPELINE
R Frank- General presentation of Eurocode 7, TAIEX & Moscow State Constr U Workshop, 9-10 Dec General presentation of Eurocode 7 ‘Geotechnical design’
I. Truss Bridge Gussets Background
Reinforced Concrete Design
MAE CENTER RESEARCH SUCCESS WITH DOTs Past and Future Neil M. Hawkins - Professor Emeritus University of Illinois MAE Center Annual Meeting With.
1 Presentation by: Jesse Conklin Group Members: J.P. Telemaque & Mike Milano First National Educational Competition on Predicting Progressive Collapse.
6 th International Workshop on Micropiles Tokyo, Japan, August 24-27, 2004 Development of ADSC-FHWA Micropile Teaching Module into NHI Course Dr. Donald.
16 Material properties for ultimate analysis Minute Exercise Open Democolumn.ads Run ULS STRENGTH for analysis cases 1 2& 3 Find out where in the.
FORUM FOR PROMOTION OF SOIL DYNAMICS IN INDIA Vijay K Puri Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, ILLINOIS,
Petr Konečný, M.S. Parametric study of the Safety of a Steel Bar using SBRA Method Structural Mechanics Division Department of Civil Engineering VŠB –
AFT STATNAMIC Load Testing of High Capacity Marine Foundations
Reliability-Based Design Methods of Structures
Moscow, 9-10 December 2010 – Workshop on Eurocodes N. Malakatas Chairman CEN/TC250/SC1 Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-6: General actions –
PRACTICE AND RESEARCH ON MICROPILE GROUPS AND NETWORKS Prof. François SCHLOSSER ENPC - CERMES 2 nd LIZZI lecture Tokyo IWM August 2004.
1 MICROFOR Micropile Interstate Cooperative Research on Foundations and slOpe Reinforcement Micropile Interstate Cooperative Research on Foundations and.
Research at Northwestern University: End-bearing Micropiles in Dolomite.
1 EUROCODES A tool for building safety and reliability enhancement Workshop on Eurocodes: Training the trainers Moscow - 09 December - 10 December, 2010.
The French National Research Project Soil Reinforcement by Micropile Systems François SCHLOSSER - Roger FRANK Ilan JURAN - Roger ESTEPHAN FOREVER.
Ohayo Gozaimas Good Morning!. Performance and Instrumentation of Micropiles for a Paper Mill Expansion Nadir Ansari, Matthew Janes, Daniela Ramirez.
Limit state design method
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
Pile Foundation Reason for Piles Types of Piles
23/10/02TIS/TE-MC Gonzalo Micó Montava2 Structural Analysis of the Gantry Static Analysis (EuroCode 3) Seismic Analysis (EuroCode 3, PS 92) –Contents.
1 ROAD & BRIDGE RESEARCH INSTITUTE WARSAW Juliusz Cieśla ASSESSSMENT OF PRESTRESSING FORCE IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BRIDGE SPANS.
1 EUROCODES A tool for building safety and reliability enhancement Introduction to EN 1990 – Section 6 Workshop on Eurocodes: Training the trainers Moscow.
Design Factors The axial load on the casing can be either tensile or compressive, depending on the operating conditions.
Development of ADSC-FHWA Micropile Teaching Module into NHI Course Dr
Outline Introduction Test section details Axial load test results
PS Internal Dump - actuation system
Foundations The function of a building foundation can be summarised as follows: To transmit the combined dead, imposed and wind loads from a building to.
M. Z. Bezas, Th. N. Nikolaidis, C. C. Baniotopoulos
«Development and analysis of heat exchanger combined with fire tank with a view of its application as part of geothermal heat pump»
Ohayo Gozaimas Good Morning!
Presenter: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Kerstin Lesny
European Standard prEN 14199
Topics on Micropiles in Japan
The French National Research Project
IWM 2000 Turku, Finland Pasi Korkeakoski
Axial resistance of micropiles : from French to Eurocode design
دانشگاه شهیدرجایی تهران
تعهدات مشتری در کنوانسیون بیع بین المللی
Discussers (alphabetical order):
Preliminary design of foundation for HEPS
Draft concept to assess quality of monitoring database
Quality assessment of the monitoring database on priority substances
SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS
Presentation transcript:

Axial resistance of micropiles : from French to Eurocode design Roger Frank CERMES (ENPC-LCPC), Paris, France

ULS compressive or tensile resistance failure of a single pile ULS of the pile foundation as a whole ULS of collapse or severe damage to a supported structure by excessive displacement or differential displacements of the pile foundation SLS in supported structure by displacements of the piles Eurocode 7-1 : check of axial capacity of pile foundations

The design shall be based on : - the results of static load tests - empirical or analytical calculation methods whose validity has been demonstrated by static load tests - the results of dynamic load tests whose validity has been demonstrated by static load tests - the observed performance of a comparable pile foundation (provided that this approach is supported by the results of site investigation and ground testing). Axial resistance of piles/micropiles

Basic relations for axial resistance The basic relations of Eurocode 7-1 are : R k = R m /  (1) R d = R k /  t (orR d = R bk /  b + R sk /  s ) (2) Or R d = R k /  st On the other hand : F d =  F F (3)

The basic condition for all ULS is : F d (ULS)  R d (4) Eqs (1) to (4) lead to : F d  R m /  F.  t.  = R m /FS (5)

Eurocode 7- 1 : Characteristic resistance from static load tests R k = Min { R m,mean /  1 ; R m,min /  2 } where R m : measured resistance(s) with  =  1 on the mean, or  =  2 on minimum value function of the number of pile test(s) (n)

EC 7-1: Recommended values for the  - factors for R k from n – static load tests French practice (Fascicule 62-V) :  ≤1.2  for n =1234  5 1 2

ULS, permanent and transient situations :  F = 1.35 to 1.5 ULS, accidental situations :  F = 1.0 SLS :  F = 1.0 Factors on actions (EC 7-1 and F 62-V)

Factors for micropile side resistance : Eurocode 7-1 and Fascicule 62-V ULS persistent and transient situations  s = 1.1 and  st = 1.15 (approach 2 of EC 7-1)  s =  st = 1.4 (F 62-V) ULS accidental situations  s =  st = 1.0 (EC 7-1)  s =  st = 1.2 (F 62-V)

Factors for micropile side resistance : Eurocode 7-1 and Fascicule 62-V SLS characteristic combinations check the displacements (EC 7-1)  s =  st = 1.1 on Q creep (F 62-V) SLS quasi-permanent combinations check the displacements (EC 7-1)  s =  st = 1.4 on Q creep (F 62-V)

Conclusion The main challenge is the prediction of displacements, whether for ULS or for SLS … Which model(s) to use : t-z approach or others ? How to collect the data ? Which are the tolerance criteria ?

Thank you for your attention !