Axial resistance of micropiles : from French to Eurocode design Roger Frank CERMES (ENPC-LCPC), Paris, France
ULS compressive or tensile resistance failure of a single pile ULS of the pile foundation as a whole ULS of collapse or severe damage to a supported structure by excessive displacement or differential displacements of the pile foundation SLS in supported structure by displacements of the piles Eurocode 7-1 : check of axial capacity of pile foundations
The design shall be based on : - the results of static load tests - empirical or analytical calculation methods whose validity has been demonstrated by static load tests - the results of dynamic load tests whose validity has been demonstrated by static load tests - the observed performance of a comparable pile foundation (provided that this approach is supported by the results of site investigation and ground testing). Axial resistance of piles/micropiles
Basic relations for axial resistance The basic relations of Eurocode 7-1 are : R k = R m / (1) R d = R k / t (orR d = R bk / b + R sk / s ) (2) Or R d = R k / st On the other hand : F d = F F (3)
The basic condition for all ULS is : F d (ULS) R d (4) Eqs (1) to (4) lead to : F d R m / F. t. = R m /FS (5)
Eurocode 7- 1 : Characteristic resistance from static load tests R k = Min { R m,mean / 1 ; R m,min / 2 } where R m : measured resistance(s) with = 1 on the mean, or = 2 on minimum value function of the number of pile test(s) (n)
EC 7-1: Recommended values for the - factors for R k from n – static load tests French practice (Fascicule 62-V) : ≤1.2 for n =1234 5 1 2
ULS, permanent and transient situations : F = 1.35 to 1.5 ULS, accidental situations : F = 1.0 SLS : F = 1.0 Factors on actions (EC 7-1 and F 62-V)
Factors for micropile side resistance : Eurocode 7-1 and Fascicule 62-V ULS persistent and transient situations s = 1.1 and st = 1.15 (approach 2 of EC 7-1) s = st = 1.4 (F 62-V) ULS accidental situations s = st = 1.0 (EC 7-1) s = st = 1.2 (F 62-V)
Factors for micropile side resistance : Eurocode 7-1 and Fascicule 62-V SLS characteristic combinations check the displacements (EC 7-1) s = st = 1.1 on Q creep (F 62-V) SLS quasi-permanent combinations check the displacements (EC 7-1) s = st = 1.4 on Q creep (F 62-V)
Conclusion The main challenge is the prediction of displacements, whether for ULS or for SLS … Which model(s) to use : t-z approach or others ? How to collect the data ? Which are the tolerance criteria ?
Thank you for your attention !