Polling the Leadership Debates The role of the instant polls Andrew Hawkins & Caroline Lawes 22 nd November 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Client logo Telephone Polls: Opportunities and Pitfalls Martin Boon, ICM Research.
Advertisements

Methodology Conducted from March 16 – 22, 2006
THE IMPACT ON UK/US RELATIONS The British Election of 2010.
2010: Did online polling come of age? Anthony Wells – Associate Director Joe Twyman - Director of Political Research, YouGov.
The impact of weightings and adjustments on the accuracy of the final polls in 2010.
 Friends of the earth drafted a Bill which says the Government has to cut the amounts of carbon dioxide being released by us by 3% year on year, an example.
The images of the main party leaders are important in influencing voters. Trust in the party leader and their perceived ability to become prime minister.
Consumers & Online Privacy: Agenda Background and objectives General attitudes to the internet Attitudes to online data and privacy Attitudes to.
History Knowledge and Trust In Sources December, 2011 Jack Jedwab Executive Director Association for Canadian Studies.
What is happening on May 7 th 2015?. The General Election.
Internet Political Surveys: History & State of Play in the UK Joe Twyman Special Projects Director YouGov.
5. The Structuring of Beliefs. Are Many Opinions Random? (re Converse) GV917.
“There is one, single, overriding message when it comes to contacting leads generated from online lead sources. Every second counts.” Internet Lead Response.
Live. Interactive. Timely. Be a provider of ideas and solutions…
Voting Behaviour at the 2010 General Election Dr Justin Greaves University of Warwick.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Exhibit 1. Health Reform Proposal’s Projected Success in Meeting Goals “How successful do you think the comprehensive health reform.
For the British Polling Council / Market Research Society 19 June 2015 Voting Intention polling.
Television and Voting Lesson Objectives I will get the opportunity to develop my understanding of the influence television has over voters.
BY TERESA CHATEL ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS 3.1 AND 3.2.
Surveys and Social Research Young Persons’ Attitudes Survey 2008.
Prepared by Poker Players Research Ltd. Methodology for Spring 2010 Wave Poker Players Research Limited.
TV Debate 1 Contrast 2010 with the 2015 proposals Why are they different?
How important is the media in voting behaviour?. Influence of the media Newspapers, especially tabloids, attempt to influence the result of elections.
Active Citizens: How are governments formed? 1.There are currently 650 Members of Parliament (MPs). 2.A government needs the support of half of all the.
Understanding the polls: Ipsos MORI’s election BPC ENQUIRY 19 JUNE.
1 School of Health in Social Science 2011 UG Entrants’ Survey Analysis.
Ms. Juana LAHOUSSE-JUAREZ Director-General for Communication European Parliament LOOKING BACK AT THE EUROPEAN ELECTIONS 2014 Civil Society Media Seminar.
National Government I will: Discuss the benefits of living in a democratic society and the importance of voting. Know how a government is elected and run.
Reporting the 2010 British General Election Professor Sir Robert Worcester Founder, MORI Chancellor, University of Kent Medway Campus 24 May 2010.
The Mathematics of the General Election Dr Justin Greaves Department of Politics University of Warwick.
The Media’s Influence on Voting Behaviour – Television Learning Intentions: 1.Explain the importance of television as a factor affecting voting behaviour.
British Elections 2015 By Safa Javed and Haaniya Mahmood.
The British parliament is based on Democracy. Democracy is when ordinary people have a say in what the government do. It allows voters to decide how their.
Voting behaviour Joan Garrod FOTOLIA. Voting behaviour Falling turnout Politicians from all parties are increasingly concerned by the falling turnout.
A Study into the Behaviour and Attitudes of Active Job Seekers and Browsers The job market and the influence of communication channels in North West England.
TNS Independence Referendum Survey © TNS January ScotlandSeptember18.com Independence Referendum Survey January 2014 Phase 1 and 2 results.
PowerPoint 7: Opinion Polling in Elections. Opening Discussion Have you ever taken part in a poll or survey? Were the results published or shared afterwards?
C1, L2, S1 Political Polls in New Zealand Dru Rose.
What is happening on May 7 th 2015?. The General Election.
Key Stakeholder Interviews Assessing Effectiveness of Washington State Board of Education Communications with Key Stakeholders.
120 Exchange Street Portland Maine 1 October 2010 Maine Voter Preference Study – Wave III Prepared for: Maine Today Media October.
Active Citizens: How are governments formed? 1.There are currently 650 Members of Parliament (MPs). 2.A government needs the support of half of all the.
Why do people vote the way they do? DO NOW Make a list of factors that can influence voting behaviour. Start by making your own list, then compare it with.
American Views of Pope Election Survey of 1,060 American Adults.
Political Parties 21 st September 2009 Use a double page.
Resources Print slide 6 as handout for activity 1.
(Title Slide) Upwardly Mobile Usage, trends and brand perceptions Conducted by: Essential Research August 2011.
E-Campaigning in the new political landscape. What is the new landscape? What is the new coalition government? How long will the coalition last? A third.
Grass roots strategies for a hung parliament. What is the new landscape? What is the coalition government? How long will the coalition last? A third of.
Election Special What on earth happened?! Up to date examples for Health and Wealth How to incorporate the results into an essay on voting behaviour or.
Federal Election Poll Results Oct. 10, Éric Grenier's Poll Tracker (338 seats) Source: tracker/2015/index.html#pollshttp://
20 January 2010 Internet polling: a more hesitant approach Andrew Cooper, Founder, Populus.
2012 UK Gov’t 55 th United Kingdom Parliament The Coalition Gov’t Conservatives & Lib Dems.
4SSIE001 – Challenges and Transformations: British Political History Since 1945.
The Phone/Internet Divergence John Curtice Senior Research Fellow NatCen Social Research and ‘The UK in a Changing Europe’ initiative.
Laurence Janta-Lipinski Associate Director, Political and Social YouGov / University of Cambridge Results.
Britain Says NO: Voting in the 2011 AV Ballot Referendum Paul Whiteley Harold Clarke David Sanders Marianne Stewart.
The British Election Study Harold D. Clarke (Essex and UT Dallas) David Sanders (Essex) Marianne Stewart (Essex and UT Dallas) Paul.
Public Opinion and Political Socialization
Introduction.
Did people do what they said
Can we trust the opinion polls – a panel discussion
Lesson 3- The Media’s Influence on Voting Behaviour – Television
How Have The Polls Changed Since 2015?
Lesson 3- The Media’s Influence on Voting Behaviour – Television
MINI-SPEC REFERENDUM April 2010 Report
The Polls in 2010: Questions and Queries
How media cover election polls in the U.S.
PUBLIC OPINION POLL ON DRAFT CONSTITUTION
YouGov polling on public priorities for Council spending
Presentation transcript:

Polling the Leadership Debates The role of the instant polls Andrew Hawkins & Caroline Lawes 22 nd November 2010

Overview The players Methodology & sampling Challenges Results Impact Lessons learnt

The players Angus Reid ComRes/ ITV News ICM/ Guardian Populus/ The Times YouGov/ The Sun

The methodologies Across the different companies, three methodologies were used and three types of weightings. Automated telephone Online Telephone Nationally representative weighting Viewer profile weighting No weighting

Telephone ComRes: Automated Telephone Pre-recruited panel of 10,000 people, demographics collected in advance Programmed key touch survey using James Mates’s voice Quotaed sample to send out Automatic sample weighting – nationally representative Sample size of 4032, 2691, 2372 Six minutes fieldwork time ICM: CATI methodology Random sample of omnibus for recruitment. Recontacted sample of people who said they would be watching. Sample of 500 on the evening after the debate. Weighted to the profile of all people selected at random who previously stated they would be watching the debate.

Online Populus: Online Recruited through a nat rep online panel. Reminders the day before and again on the morning of the debate. Data were not weighted, but was sub sample of nat rep base. Sample of 1000 YouGov: Online Sample of people who said they would definitely or probably watch the debate, from large screener Weighted to be representative of debate viewers. Reminder s before the debates Sample of 1000 Angus Reid: Online Sample: panelists from Springboard UK panel who watched debate Fieldwork on evening and next day Weighted to be nationally representative Sample of

Audience profile Audience numbers% Share ITV Debate9,679, % Sky Debate2,212,0008.5% BBC Debate7,428, % As a UK first, a key question was who will watch the debates? Actual viewing figures: Profile % GenderSocial GroupAge MaleFemaleABC1C2DE ITV Sky BBC

Weighting In hindsight we know what the audience looked like, but each instant poll had to make a choice of whether to and how to weight. Debate 1 MaleFemale ABC1C2DE Viewing Figures45.7%54.3%19.6%16.6%16.1%16.3%31.3%60.5%39.5% ICM Viewer weighting48.9%51.1%20.2%54.6%25.2%60.0%40.0% Nationally Representative48.0%52.0%27.7%19.8%16.8%14.9%20.8%55.0%45.0% Debate 2 MaleFemale ABC1C2DE Viewing Figures51.9%48.1%29.6%18.6%19.8%15.3%16.8%73.9%26.1% ICM Viewer weighting49.0%51.0%20.2%54.6%25.2%60.0%40.0% Nationally Representative48.0%52.0%27.7%19.8%16.8%14.9%20.8%55.0%45.0% Debate 3 MaleFemale ABC1C2DE Viewing Figures47.5%52.5%24.2%15.3%16.5%15.3%28.8%65.5%35.5% ICM Viewer weighting49.0%51.0%20.2%54.6%25.2%60.0%40.0% Nationally Representative48.0%52.0%27.7%19.8%16.8%14.9%20.8%55.0%45.0%

Impact of weights Following the release of the viewing figures we reweighted the data to the actual viewer profile and the differences are given below. Who do you think won tonight’s debate? Debate 1 Nat rep weightingViewer profile weighting Cameron26%27% Clegg43% Brown20%19% Debate 2 Nat rep weightingViewer profile weighting Cameron30%32% Clegg33%32% Brown30% Debate 3 Nat rep weightingViewer profile weighting Cameron35%38% Clegg33%30% Brown26%27%

The Worm 20 participants across the two marginal constituencies of Bolton West and Bolton North East Respondents were definitely going to vote, but were undecided who for. There was a good spread of men and women, different ages and ethnic groups and different past voting intentions. Participants use an electronic keypad where they could let us know when they liked something, when they didn’t like something, or when they were neutral to what was being said.

Challenges Sampling: What is the best way to recruit, how can we be sure people are planning to watch debates, how should invitations be quotaed? Target weights: The viewer profile before the debates was unknown so how is the decision made to weight the results, or is the sample self selecting? Speed: Allowing for the over-run of the programme, yet not wanting viewers to be influenced by commentary

Results Debate 1 Angus ReidComResICMPopulusYouGov Cameron20%26%20%23%29% Clegg49%43%51%61%51% Brown19%20%19%17%19% None/ DK13%11% -2% Debate 2 Angus ReidComResICMPopulusYouGov Cameron32%30%29%37%36% Clegg33% 36%32% Brown23%30%29%27%29% None/ DK12%7%8%-3% Debate 3 Angus ReidComResICMPopulusYouGov Cameron36%35% 38%41% Clegg30%33%27%38%32% Brown23%26%29%25% None/ DK11%6%9%-2%

Additional questions After first debate, Conservatives, closely followed by Lib Dems, had best policies on immigration and this topic became increasingly important during the campaign. In debate two, expectations had been set. Indeed 47% of viewers thought that Brown performed better than expected in this debate, compared to just 21% of people for Clegg. 43% of viewers thought Clegg gave the most honest answers – compared to 29% for Cameron and 23% for Brown. After debate three, viewers were still split on who would be best to make spending cuts with about a third of people choosing each party. Source: ComRes

Changing opinion Pre debates Post first debate Post second Debate Post third debate David Cameron47%35%37% Gordon Brown30%22%26%25% Nick Clegg23%43%37%38% Source: YouGov Debate 1Debate 2Debate 3 Gordon Brown48%30%29% David Cameron44%45%49% Nick Clegg4%21%19% Don’t know4% 3% Source: Populus Most evasive and least willing to give straight answers Most like to see as PM

The impact Debates became the defining feature of the campaign Liberal Democrat surge Financial markets quivering at prospect of hung parliament

Impact on the polls Average daily voting intention figures from all polls released

Financial markets The prospect of a hung parliament caused the value of the pound to drop. 16 th April intra-day figures show the impact of the instant polls from debate one. GB Pound v. US Dollar on 16 th April 2010

Lessons Learnt Sampling: Measuring what viewer profile may look like before the event. Weighting: What is the most accurate weighting and how can the national impact be modelled? Timing: Impact of polling too early or too late Interpretation: Ensuring the results are not misinterpreted when published in the heat of an election campaign The leadership debates are likely to be a feature of all future General Elections and the polls have a vital role to play

For further information please contact: Caroline Lawes ComRes, Four Millbank, London SW1P 3JA