ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – 09 06 1 Call Identifier : FP6-2004-TREN-3 Thematic Priority 1.4 Aeronautics and Space ERASMUS project Project overview September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Advertisements

1 PHARE Achievements Dr. H. Schröter PHARE Programme Manager EUROCONTROL version 1.1,
1 PHARE Operational Scenarios J-P. Nicolaon, Operational Task Force Chairman EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
1 The PHARE Concept and Scenarios by Job Brüggen Head Air Transport Division National Aerospace Laboratory, NLR.
Introduction ATMCP and Performance Dominique Colin de Verdière (CENA) Bernard Miaillier (Eurocontrol) TIM9 - ATMCP-RTSP May 2002.
European ATFM From current operation towards the future Patrick Ky
FAA/Eurocontrol TIM 9 on Performance Metrics – INTEGRA Rod Gingell 16 May 2002.
The EMERALD RTD Plan and the ASAS Validation Framework R P (Bill) Booth 10 October 2002.
Presented by United Arab Emirates MID ATM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (MAEP) TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.
PETAL A major step Towards Cooperative Air Traffic Services Patrice BEHIER Manager of the Air/ground Co operative ATS Programme Directorate Infrastructure,
19/09/2007 Belfast, AIAA Conference SWIM-SUIT Giuliano dAuria SELEX Sistemi Integrati.
Mission Trajectory Step 1 From planning to deployment.
ENAV S.p.A. ASAS TN I Workshop, April 20031/13 Airborne Spacing and Safety Alberto Pasquini - Deep Blue (ENAV)
Episode 3 1 Episode 3 EX-COM D Final Report and Recommendations Operational and Processes Feasibility Pablo Sánchez-Escalonilla CNS/ATM Simulation.
GAMMA Overview. Key Data Grant Agreement n° Starting date: 1 st September 2013 Duration: 48 months (end date 31 st August 2017) Total Budget:
1 Data Link Roadmap Overview Mike Shorthose, Helios Technology Jorge Grazina, European Commission 25 September 2002.
Advanced Safe Separation Technologies and Algorithms (ASSTAR) Project ASAS-TN2 Workshop #1 Malmö 26 th -28 th September 2005 ASSTAR is a Specific Targeted.
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
Study Continuous Climb Operations
SESAR Single European Sky Air traffic management Research
Federal Aviation Administration ASAS issues identified in the AP23 work ASAS-TN2.5 workshop 13 Nov 08, Rome By Jean-Marc Loscos, DSNA.
Enav.it Channelling Finance and Innovation to Industry Steps towards the Air Traffic Management system modernisation.
Page Lufthansa ASAS It's Time for a paradigm change... Workshop May 2003, Rome
CRISTAL ATSAW Project Sep 2007 ASAS TN Christelle Pianetti, DSNA Simona Canu-Chiesa, Airbus.
CRISTAL ITP European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation CRISTAL ITP ASAS-TN, Paris Johan Martensson CASCADE CRISTAL ITPJohan Martensson ASAS-TN.
Episode 3 EP3 WP6 - Excom - December 15th, Brussels 1 WP6 - Technology EP3 Final Report Technology results December 2009.
CARE/ASAS Validation Framework Guidelines & Case Studies Mark Watson NATS.
ASAS FRA OB/T ATM Projects Lufthansa point of view.
Draft High Level Operational Concept V0.4 Mode of Operation for the Single European Sky Deployable from /11/04.
1 Call Identifier : FP TREN-3 Thematic Priority 1.4 Aeronautics and Space ERASMUS project Project overview Aeronautical Days - Vienna June 2006 En.
- Session 4: Interoperation José M. Roca Air/Ground Cooperative ATS Programme Eurocontrol.
IFly project: Airborne Self Separation as basis for advanced en route ATM Henk A.P. Blom iFly coordinator National Aerospace Laboratory NLR
The CASCADE Programme From Concept to Operations ASAS-TN Malmö September 2005 Alex Wandels CASCADE Programme Manager, EUROCONTROL European Organisation.
Projects EMERALD and EMERTA EMERALD WP5 The Specific case of ASAS/ADS-B.
Direction générale de l’Aviation civile centre d’Études de la navigation aérienne First ASAS thematic network workshop The user’s expectations and concerns.
MFF is a EC co-funded programme Rome, 3-5 Aprili 2006 ASAS-TN2 Rome, 3-5 April 2006 Maurizio Zacchei, ENAV (MFF PM) Mediterranean Free Flight Programme.
A Vision Based on Achievable Expectations Jack Howell Director / Air Navigation Bureau Agenda Item 1.
Air Systems Division GROUND ASAS EQUIPMENT Michel Procoudine Gorsky ASAS TN2 – Workshop 5 Toulouse 17th-20th September 2007.
Airbus Status on ADS-B In / Out Update
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
1 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Jan Van Doorn Director EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre April 2006 ASAS / ADS-B: Implementation.
Malmö 5 September. 27 th 2005 NUP ITP TT Reykjavik “NUP -- ITP”
C-ATM User Group and ASAS…….. Presented on Behalf of the C-ATM User Group Billy Josefsson, LFV Group ASAS Thematic Network 2, Malmö /28.
2 nd Workshop, April 2006 ASAS in Tomorrows Airspace Pierre Gayraud, THALES Bob Graham, EEC Tony Henley, BAe Systems Dr Anthony Smoker, IFATCA ASAS-TN2.
ENAV S.p.A. 1 AENA / ENAV / DFS / LFV ASAS Thematic Network Workshop Malmoe, ASAS /ADS-B: SAMPLE ANSPs STRATGIES & EXPECTATIONS.
SSAP The European Strategic Safety Action Plan (SSAP) The History & Rationale.
NATIONAL AVIATION UNIVERSITY Institute of Air navigation Air Navigation Systems Department Graduate work MASTER’S DEGREE THESIS «Modeling of flight using.
Guidance and Control Programs at Honeywell Sanjay Parthasarathy Honeywell Aerospace Advanced Technology October 11, 2006
ASAS Crossing and Passing Applications in Radar Airspace (operational concept and operational procedure) Jean-Marc Loscos, Bernard Hasquenoph, Claude Chamayou.
19-21 April 2004ASAS TN – 3 rd workshop AIRLINES/IATA OVERVIEW Needs and Considerations Anthony van der Veldt/IATA Assistant Director Safety Operations.
A consolidated starting point from DFS / AENA / LFV ASAS Thematic Network Workshop Toulouse, Is ASAS /ADS-B needed for ANSP strategy?
ASAS in ATC Domain plans ADAS Initiative Dragos TONEA Eurocontrol Glasgow,13 th of September 2006 European Organisation for.
4 th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 rd -25 th April 2007 ASAS-SEP Applications Airborne Implementation Overall Architectural Considerations.
Programme Status ECTL AAB February FACTS  A mature approach: 2500 contributors Release process organises the delivery cycle ATM Engineering:
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT Information Day 6th Framework Programme 1st Call for Proposals, 5 Feb. 2003, Brussels ASAS operational improvements:
Toward a New ATM Software Safety Assessment Methodology dott. Francesca Matarese.
1 EUROCONTROL S TRATEGIES FOR The ATM Strategy for the Years As from MATSE/6 decision (Jan. 2000): To cater for forecast increase in demand.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
COmbining Probable TRAjectories — COPTRA
FF-ICE A CONCEPT TO SUPPORT THE ATM SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Presented by United Arab Emirates
Analysis Capabilities Developed in Support of WTIC Research
OPTIFRAME : Project Overview
Blocks 2 & 3 Overview Samuli Vuokila Air Navigation Commissioner
Ground System implication for ASAS implementation
Karim Zeghal EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
OptiFrame WP1: Project Management
ASSTAR Project Overview & User Forum Objectives
Trajectory-Based Operations(TBO) Saulo Da Silva
Presentation transcript:

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – Call Identifier : FP TREN-3 Thematic Priority 1.4 Aeronautics and Space ERASMUS project Project overview September 2006 En Route Air Traffic Soft Management Ultimate System This project has been carried out under a contract awarded by the European Commission No part of this report may be used, reproduced and/or disclosed in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the ERASMUS project partners. © 2006 – All rights reserved

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – Objectives Rational Potential impacts Potential impacts Project plan & Resources Project plan & Resources Consortium ERASMUS

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – The ACARE Strategic Research Agenda (SRA II) and its Vision 2020 foresees a doubling, if not a tripling of traffic in the 15 years to come. There is clear need for:  more capacity ;  more efficiency ;  more safety. This group stresses that ATM system will not be able to cope with this increase if no radical changes are performed. Several fields of improvement require urgent investigations:  more automation for the ATM;  shifting responsibilities from ground to the air. ERASMUS Rational I

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – Automation for ATM is reaching a strong barrier for many reasons:  existing legacy system and difficulties for change ;  uncertainty and poor accuracy of data;  ATCo cognitive process badly known;  so far aiming at replacing the human being by the machine;  poor common use of proven technologies such as Precision Area Navigation (P-RNAV), air/ground communication facilities, airborne flight management system (FMS) already widely used by airlines. We could imagine automation in a way of:  improving air ground cooperation;  reducing uncertainty (and not removing it);  seeking for human being and machine cooperation. ERASMUS Rational II

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – ERASMUS project proposes an air-ground cooperative work aiming at defining and validating innovative automation and concepts of operations for the En-route phase. The goal is to propose an advanced automation while maintaining the controllers in the decision loop. Three majors applications are proposed to be investigated:  Enhanced Medium Term Conflict Detection (MTCD);  “ATC autopilot”;  subliminal control; ERASMUS Objectives

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – Foundations of the three proposed applications:  Slight variation in aircraft speed or rate of climb can be sufficient to prevent a latent conflict (15’ in advance a difference of some 2%, less than 10 knots, in speeds could change a “conflict” into a “non conflict”).  Such accuracies are far out of reach of the controller (perception) sensorial picking and mental computing.  Derived current cockpit autopilot enabling aircraft attitude, trajectory and level control to be delegated to the FMS (minor automatic trajectory adjustment not always perceivable by the pilot), in the ATC domain.  Derived from ERATO, in addition with the integration of more accurate data (FMS based), ATCo cognitive processes to be considered for providing better and more accurate aircraft conflict/problem information. ERASMUS Concept foundations

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – !!!?? Ask to the machine I fix it I inform ERASMUS The 3 applications Enhanced MTCD ATC Auto-pilot control Subliminal control

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – The innovation is:  to enrich MTCD information with ATCo cognitive logic and more accurate trajectory prediction;  to use existing and proven air/ground data-link facilities. To provide aircraft conflicts/problems information taking into account the most accurate data, and the controller cognitive processes. ERASMUS Enhanced MTCD

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – The innovation is:  to use the machine to solve conflict;  to be able to overwrite any subliminal changes at any time: keep ultimate control;  not to conflict with ATCo and pilot own actions and responsibilities;  to use existing and proven air/ground data-link facilities and to transform the current “open loop” into a “closed loop” ATC - computer-to-computer clearances delivery. To delegate “subliminal” problem resolution actions to the machine on case by case basis (under the control of the human being) ERASMUS ATC Autopilot

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – The innovation is:  to use the machine not to solve conflict but to de-conflict the air situation (advanced MSP function with automatic and minor adjustments);  to apply changes not directly perceivable by the human being;  to be able to overwrite any subliminal changes at any time: keep ultimate control;  not to conflict with ATCo and pilot own actions and responsibilities;  to use existing and proven air/ground data-link facilities and to transform the current “open loop” into a “closed loop” ATC - computer-to-computer clearances delivery. The subliminal control could automatically “remove” conflict by minor alterations of the speeds or rate of climb with no human being intervention ERASMUS Subliminal control

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – Human decision (ultimate control in any cases) Machine decision High Low High Full automation path Low Auto ATC ERASMUS Automation path Enhanced MTCD Subliminal control

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – Project objectives will be materialised by:  Definition of concepts of operations for the air and ground sides;  Definition of the operational scenarios (advanced tools, working methods);  Detailed specification and design of the prototype (advanced tools, working methods);  Definition of the validation plan and experimental plan (E-OCVM applied);  Assessment and refinement of the hypothesis and proof of concept in term of safety, efficiency, capacity, security and economy;  Clearly identified quantified benefits in safety, efficiency, capacity, security, economy;  Identification of the transition issues and implementation plan. ERASMUS Deliverables

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – A better knowledge of the air and ground trajectory prediction : assessing if the spectacular accuracy of GPS and CNS capabilities would increase the accuracy of the knowledge of the past/present positions and speeds of an aircraft; knowing the statistical distribution of the position forecasts and defining the required accuracy and integrity of the positions prediction. An ATC Modelling assessment : using the air and ground data accuracy results, an ATC mathematical model should evaluate the ability to a priori estimate for each case the probability of success of the trajectory prediction and the proportion of successful subliminal action. Safety : assessing the “safety” of the automated processes themselves and of any subset, since it would be impossible to rely on any real time return back to the controller of any such transferred responsibility. Working methods and modus operandi (for subliminal control, ATC autopilot, and enhanced MTCD): considering cognitive needs and data accuracy capabilities, defining working methods and tools specifications. ERASMUS Potential Impacts I

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – What are the meteorological prediction capabilities? What are the aircraft speed margins of manoeuvre and constraints? What are the trajectory performance between the air and the ground? How to use a better FMS trajectory prediction capabilities in order to decrease the number of real conflicts and at which time horizon? How to use the controller cognitive model and technology capabilities to support different applications? How to present the relevant traffic situation information (conflict detection) in accordance with the controller cognitive model? How these new capabilities will allow to increase the ATC sector capacity? What is the safety impact of such applications in order to define nominal and degraded mode ? Which mode are acceptable to a controller and a pilot ? What are the other impacts (efficiency, cost-benefits)? ERASMUS Potential Impacts II

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – EUROCONTROL - Paris - Consortium leader - 2 DSNA - Toulouse (former DNA) 3 HONEYWELL - Brno 4 University of Linköping 5 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology - Zurich 6 SICTA - Napoli 3 HONEYWELL - US ERASMUS The consortium

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – man.month allocated to the project EURDSNAHONLIUETHSICTotaltotal WP % WP % WP % WP % WP % ERASMUS Resources

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – ERASMUS Key expertises EURDSNAHONLIUETHSIC FMS Human Factors Human cognition Math modeling FT simulation RT-HIL simulation ATM operational Safety Security Validation ATM automation

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – WP1 Air & Ground Trajectory Prediction WP2 Definition of Concept of Operation WP0 Project Management & Dissemination WP4 Validation WP3 Prototype Development Subliminal control application AC auto-pilot application Enhanced MTCD application ERASMUS WBS Air and Ground Trajectory Prediction (WP1): better knowing the aircraft position forecast in order to assess the feasibility and efficiency of any future automation project; and evaluating the ability to estimate “ a piori ” the probability of success of the trajectory prediction and the proportion of successful subliminal action as well as minor adjustments Prototype developments (WP3): producing detailed specifications of the selected operational scenarios and developing the prototype (both controller and the pilot sides). Project management & dissemination (WP0): managing the consortium, reporting to the Commission, technical coordination with the partners. and also ensuring dissemination Validation & Conclusion (WP4) conducting validation processes in term of “proof of concept” assessment aiming at providing quantifiable benefit statements for the safety, efficiency, capacity, security and economy (validation process based on E-OCVM, ESARR4 as reference for safety requirement). Concept of Operation (WP2): elaborating the concept of operations (with the objective of meeting capacity, safety and efficiency in the time frame 2011 – 2020).

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – ERASMUS Project Gantt Started on the 11 th of May 2006

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – ERASMUS Milestones September 2007 November 2008

ERASMUS – gen – V 1.1 – Thank you Any question? ERASMUS … a new path towards automation … This project has been carried out under a contract awarded by the European Commission No part of this report may be used, reproduced and/or disclosed in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the ERASMUS project partners. © 2006 – All rights reserved